Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASSESSMENT UPDATE Rhonda Sims, Director Division of Support and Research Office Of Assessment And Accountability
Advertisements

Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
Testing for STAAR/EOC, TAKS Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
END OF COURSE STAAR TESTING What every 9 th grade student and parent need to know Sept
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness--EOC Tim Walker Nathaniel Session.
Kentucky Association for Assessment Coordinators (KAAC) Office of Assessment and Accountability 10/23/12 1 Assessment and Accountability Update.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Education, Employment and the Economy Lexington Rotary July 19, 2012 Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner.
Moving Forward With Assessment and Accountability August 2011.
ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Create by KAAC Modified by Kenna Williams.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
February GRADES Reading: Grades 3 – 8 Math: Grades 3 – 8 Writing: Grades 4 & 7 Science: Grades 5 & 8 Social Studies: Grade 8 2 HIGH SCHOOL.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
College and Career Readiness Henry County High School.
P t G T P ersistence t o G raduation T ool A tool designed to identify students who may be off-track for graduating.
DAC Back-to-School Training Overview Presented By: Jennifer Stafford 1 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Assessment and Accountability Update Kentucky Association of School Administrators July 18, 2013 Kentucky Department of Education Office of Assessment.
SBDM COUNCILS/BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING OCTOBER 20, 2011.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting A Next Generation Accountability Model March 25, 2010.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets 2015 Workbook.
A Balanced Approach As of September 15, 2010 Proposed Accountability Model.
ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Kentucky Association for Assessment Coordinators Ken Draut, Associate Commissioner Rhonda L.. Sims, Director Office.
Moving Forward With Assessment and Accountability August 2011 High School.
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Monthly DAC Webcast February 11, 2016 KDE:OAA:DSR:
 Achievement – 30% ◦ Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies, Writing, & Language Mechanics  Gap – 30% ◦ Free & Reduced Lunch ◦ Special Education ◦ ESL.
South Carolina Succeeds
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
Kentucky Board of Education OAA 10/9/12 1 Assessment and Accountability Update.
Academic Year – Dawson Springs Independent.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Operationalizing the General Assembly’s School Performance Grades (Senate Bill 795, Excellent Public Schools Act) October 2012 Superintendents’ Feedback.
2015 Assessment and Accountability Update Scott Trimble Workshop October 20, Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Kentucky.
Next Generation Learners Session 1: Introduction of Next Generation Learners.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
Communication Webinar:
UNBRIDLED LEARNING: College/Career Ready for All
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
College/Career Ready for All
Kentucky’s New Accountability Model
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Next Generation Learners
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
College/Career Ready for All
College/Career Ready for All
Unbridled Learning: College/Career for All Accountability System
Spencer County Public Schools
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
English Learner Accountability Component
Presentation transcript:

Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011

 Participants will understand Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model.

 The Kentucky Board of Education approved regulation 703 KAR 5:200 on April 13, 2011  The regulation is still under review and has not been finalized yet.  Minor changes could occur between now and then based on recommendations from these groups

Next-Generation Learners Next-Generation Instructional Programs and Support Next-Generation Professionals Next-Generation Schools/Districts (reporting mechanism) Achievement (Proficiency) Gap Growth Readiness for College/Career Graduation Rate Program Reviews Working Conditions Survey Percent Effective Teachers Percent Effective Leaders Revised Report Card New Accountability System

 Next-Generation Learners is the first column to be finalized and will be in effect for  Next-Generation Instructional Programs and Support is in the works, with portions possibly going into effect in  Next-Generation Professionals and Next-Generation Schools/Districts are forthcoming

Elementary and Middle Schools  Reading, writing and math based on new Kentucky Core Standards  Grade 3 will have multiple choice and short answer only (new)  Grades 4-8 will have MC, short answer, and open/extended response  Science and social studies continue with existing Kentucky Core Content until new standards are released  Nationally norm-referenced section embedded in the test for reading, math, science and social studies  Nationally norm-referenced portion is Stanford  On-Demand format will use prompts  Editing and mechanics may have MC and short answer  Vendor is Pearson

High School End-of-course – English II, Algebra II, Biology, and US History Not grade-specific; to be taken when a student completes a course May be used for a percentage of a student’s final grade in that course (20% is KDE recommendation) Test will be linked to enrollment in a course procedures about withdrawal dates are currently being developed Vendor is ACT Quality Core On-Demand format will use prompts Editing and mechanics will come from PLAN (multiple choice)

Beginning in  Last 14 instructional days of the district’s calendar  Maximum of 5 days testing, with the other days to be used for make-up testing NOTE: EOCs will occur at various times throughout the school year

 Stop and review your notes, jot down more thoughts, and ask questions

 Next- Generation Learners

Achievement = proficiency  Achievement for elementary and middle schools is based on performance on the reading, math, science, social studies and on- demand writing tests  Achievement for high school is based on performance on the end-of-course exams and the on-demand writing test

For each content area... 1 point awarded for each % scoring proficient or distinguished 0.5 points awarded for each % scoring apprentice 0 points awarded for novice Bonus Additional 0.5 awarded for each % distinguished combined with -0.5 for each % novice Bonus points awarded in the amount that distinguished offsets novice (NOTE: No points will be taken away if novice offsets distinguished).

Gap = distance of the gap group from the goal of 100% proficiency  Gap calculation for elementary and middle schools is based on performance on the reading, math, science, social studies and on- demand writing tests  Gap calculation for high school is based on performance on the end-of-course exams and the on-demand writing test

The Student Gap Group is an aggregate count of the following student groups:  Ethnicity/race (Af. Am., Hisp., Nat. Am.)  Special education  Poverty (free/reduced lunch)  Limited English Proficiency

 Non-duplicated counts of students in the gap student groups who score proficient or higher are summed.  This yields a single gap number of proficient or higher students with no student counting more than one time.  For each subject area, the % of students scoring proficient or distinguished in the Non- duplicated Gap Group is reported.

 Student 1: Donatello – AA, FR, (proficient)  Student 2: Ricky – W, FR, and Spec. Ed.  Student 3: Enrique – LEP, FR  Student 4: Michelle – FR  Student 5: Marco – LEP, FR, and Spec. Ed

 The achievement of all individual groups will still be disaggregated and reported as they always have been, however...  Gap reporting for accountability purposes will include only the % of student in the combined non-duplicated Gap Group scoring at proficient and distinguished level.

 Stop and review your notes, jot down more thoughts, and ask questions

Growth = comparison of an individual student’s score from one year to the next; uses a Student Growth Percentile based on actual growth of student’s similar academic peers Growth for elementary and middle schools is based on performance on the reading and math tests Growth for high schools is based on PLAN to ACT in reading and math

 Growth comparisons are made to similar performing “academic peers.”  Low, typical and high growth scales will be determined based on actual student performance state-wide.  These are equal-interval, percentile-based scales.  Based on model currently used by Massachusetts Department of Education

For reading and math...  1 point for each % of students showing typical or high growth  0 points for low growth

College/Career Readiness = number of graduates successfully meeting an indicator of readiness  Readiness for middle schools is based on performance on EXPLORE test  Readiness for high schools is based on ACT, college placement tests and career measures

 Stop and review your notes, jot down more thoughts, and ask questions

Middle Schools % of students meeting the ACT-established benchmarks for EXPLORE in reading, English and math is averaged to generate an overall readiness percentage EXPLORE Benchmarks Reading – 15 English – 13 Math – 17

High Schools % of graduating seniors who meet at least one of the following readiness indicators: 1. Meets all of the ACT benchmarks (Reading: 20, English: 18, Math: 19), OR 2. Passes a college placement test (COMPASS, KYOTE), OR 3. Receives an industry-recognized career certificate (other possible measures forthcoming)

Graduation Rate = % of students graduating  Average Freshman Graduation Rate (AFGR) is current transitional reporting model  Federally-mandated Graduation Cohort Model goes into effect in three years

Grade Range Achievement (Proficiency) GapGrowthCollege/ Career Readiness Graduation Rate Total Elementary30 40N/A 100 Middle28 16N/A100 High20 100

 Next-Generation Learners System to classify schools and districts

 Stop and review your notes, jot down more thoughts, and ask questions

There are 100 points total for each school. Each school will be classified according to the total number of points earned (cut scores yet to be determined...) Classification Categories Distinguished Proficient Needs Improvement Persistently Low Achieving (bottom 5%)