Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Advertisements

Improving The Lives of Maryland’s Dually Involved Girls June 11, 2014 A project generously funded by the Abell Foundation & the Jewish Women’s Giving.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Criminal Justice, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Reinvestment Grant
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Youth Mental Health April 9, Overview History Current Youth Mental Health Resources – Wraparound Orange Youth Mental Health Proposal Action item.
NAMI MASSACHUSETTS Crisis Intervention and Diversion Project: A Work in Progress Laurie A. Martinelli, J.D., MPH Executive Director.
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Introductions Agenda 10:00- 10:20am Introductions and Today’s Agenda 10:20- 10:40am Project Overview (large group) 10:40- 11:30am Definitions 11:30-
West Virginia’s Drug Courts: An Overview Division of Probation Services,
The Juvenile Justice System
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Risk Assessment Instrument And the Development of Detention Alternatives Primary.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
ANGELA BELL, ESQUIRE RJIP TASK FORCE FACILITATOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT COORDINATOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY.
The Analysis and Synthesis of Research Studies on Children and Youths entering the Justice System in Thailand. Researcher : Asst. Professor Dr. Sunee Kanyajit,
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Dennis Mondoro Strategic Community Development Officer Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Community & Family Resource Center. (CFRC) CFRC is dedicated to strengthening families and communities by providing information, education and support.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency An Overview.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
Nassau County Juvenile Treatment Court / Reclaiming Futures Initiative Goals, Objectives, and Activities.
1 Worcester Public Schools A Collaborative-Proactive Approach to provide a Safe Teaching and Learning Environment.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
Policy Academy-Action Network Initiative: Overview of State Proposal and Goals April 17, 2015 Tom Andriola: Chief of Policy and Implementation, DCJS.
Expanding Opportunities Awards Technical Assistance Webinar 1.
THINK. LEARN. DECIDE. ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA SECOND CHANCE PROGRAM Presenters Mary Hynes | Arlington County Board Abby Raphael | Arlington School.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
1 The New Jersey Experience: The Stationhouse Adjustment Program Part II Presented by: Raymond Massi, Jr., Law Enforcement Coordinator, US Attorney’s Office.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice (FACJJ) 2008 Annual Request for Information (ARI) Presented by CSR, Incorporated August 2008.
Changing the Status Quo for Status Offenders: New York State’s Efforts to Help Troubled Teens Michael Lens, Vera Institute of Justice Annie Salsich, Vera.
Combating Truancy Knox County Truancy Initiative and the
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
TASK FORCE REPORT REDUCING JUVENILE RECIDIVISM IN ALABAMA.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice (FACJJ) 2009 Annual Request for Information (ARI) Presented by CSR, Incorporated August 2009.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Neville Cooney ABS November 2005 WA Justice Research Conference ABS Initiatives in Crime and Justice - from NIDP to RADLs.
Weaving Good Relations Humboldt County Probation Efforts Working With Local Tribes.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District 2 Juvenile Justice Council 2014 Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives October 29-30,
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Presentation to the California State Association of Counties (CSAC) February 24, 2016.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Department of Juvenile Justice
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
Dependency Court Flowchart
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
Reducing the School-to- Prison Pipeline A Strategy to Serve High-Risk Youth Juvenile Justice Summit, April 25, 2017 Both Introduce Ourselves LINDA BARTON,
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Presentation transcript:

Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through the Albany Police Department who would be under the jurisdiction of Albany County Family Court if arrested and formally processed. Why? There is currently an identified gap in transferring hard copies of juvenile delinquency paperwork between police departments and probation. An identified gap is the lack of formal information sharing between law enforcement agencies, social service agencies, school districts, and other collaborative partners regarding juvenile delinquents. Program Overview The City of Albany will utilize funding to hire a Juvenile Justice Mobile Response Team (JJMRT) to be available to assess and evaluate all individuals charged with juvenile delinquency at the point of arrest. The JJMPT will consist of professionals from community based organizations who are trained and certified in providing assessments to help determine; pre-arraignment placement in detention, appropriateness for diversion, and referral to interventions and services to reduce recidivism. Goals of the Project Through JJMRT services and cross-system collaboration, the project will aim to (1) decrease use of pre-arraignment detention, decrease formal petition requests, increase informal diversion, and increase pre-arrest diversion, (2) increase the efficiency of transferring juvenile delinquency paperwork between Albany County law enforcement agencies and Albany County Probation, and (3) increase the formal information sharing among law enforcement, social service agencies, school districts, and other collaborative partners. Strategies Juvenile Justice Mobile Response Team (JJMRT) Specially trained and certified professionals from community-based organizations will provide assessments to help determine; pre-arraignment placement in detention, appropriateness for diversion, and referral to interventions and services to reduce recidivism. Evidence Based Assessment Tools YASI Short Form Prescreen RAI Electronic File Transfer purchase hardware and software to enable paperwork to be sent electronically between agencies. Cross-Agency Data Sharing Agreements Formal MOU’s will allow for sharing of information that is considered confidential for the purposes of assessing whether a juvenile will be charged as a juvenile delinquent, assessing placement of a person charged with juvenile delinquency, assessing the utilization of informal diversion, assessing the use of pre-arrest diversion, or assessing the needs of services for the youth including, but not limited to, mental health, substance abuse, or counseling. Expected Outcomes 1. Using the RAI, the RRT will reduce the use of pre-arraignment detention by 20%. 2.Using the YASI, the RRT will increase referrals to informal diversion at Albany County Probation by 20%, thus decreasing agency requests for formal presentation to Family Court by 20%. 3.The Albany Police Department will conference 100% of juvenile delinquency cases with the RRT to identify cases best suited for pre-arrest diversion services 4.APD will refer 10% of juvenile delinquency cases to pre-arrest diversion programs without attaching sanctions for failure to comply with social services programs. 5.APD will transfer all juvenile delinquency paperwork to Albany County Probation electronically by January 1, The Albany County Juvenile Justice Steering Committee will have in place a memorandum of agreement between all partners allowing for information sharing by January 1, Reduce juvenile contacts and rearrests with APD. 04/20/12