COMPARABILITY Monday, November 19, 2012 Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education 624-6705 This webinar will be recorded. Mute your.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Title I Comparability Paul Williams Principal Consultant ISBE September 2011.
Advertisements

Title IA Comparability Monday, November_____, 2010 Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education
COMPARABILITY Monday, January 29, 2012 Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education
Title I Site Eligibility Ranking & Serving Schools NCLB Technical Assistance Audio March 28, :30 PM March 29, :30 AM Alaska Department of.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Do Now: Decide if the following activities are allowable with TIIA funds Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 Activity Revising.
1 Title I Comparability Requirement Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
NCLB Monitoring NCLB/ESEA Cycle Legal Requirement: EDGAR Part 80.40(a)—monitor subgrant activities to assure compliance with applicable.
1 TITLE I COMPARABILITY – Determinations & Reporting Thomas Chin October 5, 2010.
Nonpublic School Service Updates April 3, Presenters Regina Lukich, Consultant Karl Koenig, Consultant Office of Federal Programs.
COMPARABILITY November 5, :00 p.m. Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education This webinar will be recorded. Enter your.
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
Initial Compliance Reviews (ICRs) Didi Garcia Texas Education Agency Division of Federal and State Education Policy.
Budget Planning Fiscal year December 10 th, 2003.
SALARY BASED APPORTIONMENT AND BENEFIT APPORTIONMENT
Introductions Title I KDE Team Audit and Compliance Branch David Millanti – Branch Mgr. Dan Davison – Program Consultant Mary Marshall– Program Consultant.
Programs & Services Integrated with Tax Policy Proposals Programs & Services Integrated with Tax Policy Proposals Essential Applying The Math to the Concept.
Equitable Services to Private Schools Webinar Series Introduction to the Series – Webinar 1 of 4 September 2013.
 The Ranking Report template and all supporting material can be found on the Kentucky Department Education’s Title I web page.Title I web page.
Online Grants Management System: Budgeting, Coding and Management Title IIa.
Online Grants Management System: Budgeting, Coding and Management.
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
FY 16 BUDGET SCHOOL COMMITTEE MARCH 9, 2015 Natick Public Schools.
Tell your story using numbers and words Susan Andre, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Determining Comparability Georgia Compensatory Educational Leaders Conference Savannah, Georgia February 24-26, 2014.
Tell your story using numbers and words Susan Andre, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System.
FALL ADJUSTMENTS What you need to know.. Goals and Objectives  What is Fall Adjustments?  What gets adjusted?  What can you do to prepare?  Completing.
Schoolwide Fiscal Consolidation Jackie Godbout Maine Dept. of Education Title I Program Consultant February/March
March 7,  Roland Park, an urban elementary/middle school, empowers our diverse community of learners to achieve academic excellence. Teaching and.
Federal Financial Participation (FFP) Overview Office of Family Planning Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Household Applications and Verification School Year Revised July 2014.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
NCLB Monitoring September 19, 2012 Webinar.
The Big Picture How are Public Schools Funded? ~Tim Hill will discuss later this afternoon.
Title I, Part A COMPARABILITY. What is the purpose of Comparability? To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from.
Online Grants Management System: Budgeting, Coding and Management.
SES Training on Screens 11, 12, and Part of 8. By Steve Crew September 12, 2007.
Title II, Part A: Highly Qualified Teachers and Overview of the Instructional Personnel and Licensure Report Virginia Department of Education Title II,
College Community School District 4 Budget Calculations for General Fund Budget Year.
ABCs and 123s of the Campus Improvement Plan in Plan 4 Learning April 11, 2012.
Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Department of Education Title II, Part A, University May 2, 2016.
Online Grants Management System: Budgeting, Coding and Management.
QEIA Monitoring Regular Application Schools April 29, 2010 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association QEIA Northern and.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Budgeting Basics And Fiscal Principles
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Title IIA: Essentials Plus
Changes in time and effort reporting
Title I A Comparability Report
CEDARS Statewide Webinar – High Poverty/LAP/National Board Bonus
( Annual Financial Report) Updated
Teacher Student Data Link (TSDL)
Dr. Jacqueline C. Ellis, NBCT November 7, 2017
Title I, Part A Supplement not Supplant (SNS) Under ESSA
Supplement, Not Supplant Demonstration Under Title I, Part A
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
Comparability Reporting through CDE’s Online Data System
Public School Finance An Introduction
Reporting and documenting the data for:
April 25th Town Hall Purpose
Title I Participation Data Collection
Presentation transcript:

COMPARABILITY Monday, November 19, 2012 Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education This webinar will be recorded. Mute your line with *6; unmute with #6. Enter your name in the chat box at the lower right hand corner so we can have a participant list. Thank you, Jackie.

DUE DATE Use October 2012 student enrollment and teacher data. The report is due December 18, NCLB Clearinghouse Maine Department of Education 23 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333

REQUIREMENTS Section 1120A(c) of NCLB Act Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement for Single Audit—Auditors do ask to see the district’s Comparability Report

SECTION 1120A(c)… requires that a SAU uses its state and local resources in an equitable way to provide educational services in a Title IA school that is comparable to non-Title IA schools. If all schools are Title IA, then educational resources must be comparable among the Title IA schools.

SECTION 1120A(c)… Comparability must be met in order to receive Title I funds. If comparability is not met when calculations are performed, redistribution of resources must occur in order to continue to receive Title I funds.

COMPARABILITY REPORT Located at: parability/index.htm parability/index.htm – RTF/Word format – New last year, EXCEL document which does the calculations and comparability determination for Part II-IV Worksheets

DEFINITIONS Comparable Grade Span Group Size—Smaller, Larger, Exempt – Apply definitions to Part I Worksheet Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Instructional Staff – Apply definitions to Part II & III Worksheets Review Source Documentation Requirements

GRADE SPAN Part I Worksheet – Section A Refers to actual Grade Span of the school Part I Worksheet – Section B Looks to create comparable Grade Span groupings based on the grade span of the schools from Section A. Ex. K-3, K-5, K-2, 3-5, K-2, 6-8, 6-8, 9-12 Grade Span Groups = K-2 (3 schs), 3-5 (1 sch), K-5 (1 sch), 6-8 (2 schs), 9-12 (1 sch)

GROUP SIZE: SMALLER-LARGER- EXEMPT GROUPS A school is Exempt in this process if it has less than 100 students. A single school in a grade span is always classified as Smaller. Look at a specific grade span with multiple schools after eliminating any exempt schools. If the highest enrollment at one of the schools is twice the amount of the lowest enrollment, then you may designate one school as a Larger school and the other school as a Smaller school. If other schools exist in that grade span, you place them in the most appropriate group size. If the highest enrollment is not twice the lowest enrollment of the schools in a specific grade span, then the schools are classified as Smaller.

PART 1 WORKSHEET SECTION A List All Schools in the SAU NAME OF SCHOOLGRADE SPAN ENROLLMENTTITLE I PARTICIPATION Yes/No GROUP SIZE Larger, Smaller or Excluded Pink Elem SchoolK-2175YS Yellow Elem SchoolK-3132YS River Elem SchoolK-291YE Red Elem SchoolK-5485YS Green Elem School3-5404YS JB Adams Middle School YS TB Howard Middle School NL All Around High School NS

PART 1 WORKSHEET SECTION B Two Title IA schools in same Size Group and Grade Span -- Part IV Worksheet Number of Schools with More Than 100 Students Number of Schools with 100 or Fewer Students SmallerLarger Omit from Comparability Grade SpansTitle INon-Title ITitle INon-Title I A=Gr _K_ to Gr_2__ 2* 1 Gr K to 5 Gr 3 to B=Gr_6_ to Gr_8__ 1 1 C=Gr _9_ to Gr _12__ 1

PART 1 WORKSHEET SECTION B Part V Worksheet for K-2 GS Part II and III Worksheets for 6-8 GS Number of Schools with More Than 100 Students Number of Schools with 100 or Fewer Students SmallerLarger Omit from Comparability Grade Spans (GS)Title INon-Title ITitle INon-Title I A=Gr _K_ to Gr_2__ 2* 1 Gr K to 5 Gr 3 to B=Gr_6_ to Gr_8__ 11 C=Gr _9_ to Gr _12__ 1

Full Time Equivalent Determine the number of full-time instructional staff paid with state/local resources for each school. Prorate each part-time staff person for each school to the nearest tenth and add to full-time staff to determine the total FTE for all instructional staff for that school. You must use the same standard and definition of instructional staff and FTE across all schools. Time for stipend activities is not included in this FTE count.

INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF STAFF TO BE INCLUDED: Staff members who render direct and personal services that are in the nature of the teaching or the improvement of the teaching/learning situation in a school. The term includes principals, librarians, guidance, teachers including art, music, physical education, foreign language, etc. for a school. The term also includes educational technicians or other paraprofessional personnel including clerical personnel employed to assist instructional staff members in providing these services.

INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF STAFF EXCLUDED: DO NOT INCLUDE staff positions paid from federal funds such as Title IA or Class Size Reduction. Special education and ESL staff regardless of funding are not included. In addition, any staff person paid with local funding who is providing Title IA supplemental services to Title I identified students is not included in the instructional staff count.

PART 1 WORKSHEET SECTION B Part V Worksheet for K-2 GS Part II and III Worksheets for 6-8 GS Number of Schools with More Than 100 Students Number of Schools with 100 or Fewer Students SmallerLarger Omit from Comparability Grade Spans (GS)Title INon-Title ITitle INon-Title I A=Gr _K_ to Gr_2__ 2* 1 Gr K to 5 Gr 3 to B=Gr_6_ to Gr_8__ 11 C=Gr _9_ to Gr _12__ 1

Part II Worksheet—Non-Title I School Part II Worksheet: Non-Title I Participating School Data: (Use when a grade span has BOTH Title IA and Non-Title IA schools in the same grade span and size group). Grade Span:__6-8__ Size Group: (Check One) __X__Smaller Schools ____Larger Schools Name of Non- Title IA Schools Actual Grade Span Pupils Enrolled Oct. 1 FTE Staff Oct. 1 SalariesStaff/ Student Ratio [Col. (3) ÷ Col. (4)] Per Pupil Cost [Col. (5) ÷ Col. (3)] Col. 1Col. 2Col. 3Col. 4Col. 5Col. 6Col. 7 JB Adams MS $1,438, $2, Totals for Non-Title I Schools in this Grade Span and Size Group TOTALS $1,438,335 (6A)(7A) (6B)(7B) For (6B), multiply (6A) by 110% For (7B), multiply (7B) by 90%

Part III Worksheet – Title IA School Part III Worksheet: Title I Participating Schools: (Use when a grade span has BOTH Title IA and Non-Title IA schools in the same grade span and size group). Grade Span:__6-8_________ Size Group: (Check One) ___X_____Smaller Schools ________Larger Schools Name of Title IA Schools Actual Grade Span Pupils Enrolled Oct. 1 FTE Staff Oct. 1 SalariesStaff/ Student Ratio [Col. (3) ÷ Col. (4)] Per Pupil Cost [Col. (5) ÷ Col. (3)] Is The School Comparable? YES if [Col. 6 is less than (6B) or Col. 7 is more than (7B) ; NO if [ Col. 6 is more than (6B) or Col. 7 is less than (7B) Col. 1Col. 2Col. 3Col. 4Col. 5Col. 6Col. 7Col. 8 JB Adams Yes Copy results of (6B) and (7B) from Part II to (6B) and (7B) in Part III..  (6B)(7B) 18.17$2,669.08

SOURCE DOCUMENTATION STUDENT ENROLLMENT DOCUMENTION: Needed for all schools in Part I Worksheet Student enrollment summary count from a day in October 2012 from a school information system (SIS) would be sufficient; or Copy of district listing from the Oct. 30, 2012 EF-U- 534 Free & Reduce Lunch Report; or Copy of other student enrollment report/data from an official website.

SOURCE DOCUMENTATION STAFF LISTING DOCUMENTATION Needed only for those schools requiring calculations on a Part II-IV Worksheet If the staff listing shows all staff, cross out those allowable EXCLUDED staff, but identify them as Title I, Special Ed, ESL, etc. Ensure that counts and pertinent information are clearly identifiable. Each staff should be considered 1 FTE if not coded with a different FTE count. Don’t forget allowable Ed Tech and other instructional support staff.

FREQUENT ERRORS It is important to remember that the calculated result in block 6(B) on the Part II Worksheet needs to be carried forward to block 6(B) on the Part III Worksheet. Each Title I school’s staff/student ratio in column 6 on the Part III Worksheet is then compared to the number in block 6(B) to determine if comparability is met. Salaries in column(5) are necessary only if a school does not meet Comparability using Student/Staff Ratios. Missing Source Documentation from those SAUs with an * on the FY13 Comparability List.

Questions???? Opening for questions. Type question in the chat area or ask a verbal question by pressing #6 to unmute your line. If questions arise later, contact Jackie Godbout at