GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP September 4, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
Clover Park School District Board of Directors 1.
Ohio Valley Educational Service Center CIP expanded for Agency Improvement Planning September 8-9, 2011 CIP expanded for Agency Improvement Planning September.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Every child in Davidson County Schools is given the same deal… a guaranteed and viable curriculum. Professional Learning Communities October 2013.
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
Leadership in the Baldrige Criteria
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
School Climate Control Does it Matter?. Key Messages Student achievement and behavior are impacted by school climate. School climate can be influenced.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Overdale Primary School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: November 1999 Revised: May 2003 Revised: September 2004.
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Student-Focused System Leadership: Transformation Through Strategic Coherence BCSSA & BCASBO Fall Conference November 13th, 2014.
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Outline of Presentation 1.Mission, Vision and Values for Task Force 2.Definition of Engagement 3.Explanation of Research-Informed Framework 4.Characteristics.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
The Method to My Madness Rapid City Area Schools Administrative Retreat August 9, 2010.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
SAS: Resiliency December 8, Build: SAS Resiliency Clear Standards and Curriculum Frameworks –Update –Student / School Resiliency and School Climate.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
2012 Summer Institute THE PIVOT FROM RECRUITMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION.
Dunbar Primary School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: May 2003 Revised: April 22, 2004 Revised: September 30,
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Mission of Restoration
Nancy Steele Kelly Vanderbosch The Power of Teams in RtI as a Multi-Tiered System of Support.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Blueprints for RtI Implementation Coaches/Principals 10/8/09.
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Stakeholder Meeting February Expectations  Interview:  Date and time: Tuesday, March 5 th at  Duration: 45 minutes  Setting  Business casual.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
School Counseling Advisory Council Meeting
Ferguson Elementary School ASCA “RAMP” Award Application
Family Engagement Policy
Fallsmead Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP September 4, 2012

Let’s Review and Renew Review following: Group Norms Decision Making Method DLT Responsibilities DLT Core Beliefs BLT Membership

DLT Norms Begin and end each meeting on time. Be respectful of other’s opinions. Everyone’s voice is important and should be heard. Ensure confidentiality within the group. Stick to the agenda. Have student’s best interests in mind. Disengage in sidebar discussions. Guarantee that no decisions are made about a program/level unless that group is represented.

DLT Decision Making Method 1. Majority rule: 80% is the decision point for majority. 2. When majority can’t be reached, the ruling will be Dr. Atha’s decision. 3. Any decision made will be supported by all members of the District Leadership Team.

DLT Responsibilities Create the rationale for implementing MTSS. Ensure the rationale for MTSS is reflected in district and building vision, core beliefs, mission, policies, procedures, and practices. Ensure staff has support necessary to successfully achieve what they’re being asked to accomplish. Create a culture that allows staff to be actively involved in data- driven decision making. Ensure regular bi-directional communication with all stakeholders. Monitor and provide checks and balances for district expectations. Support building and overall systemic changes. Provide clarity to building and collaborative teams. Hold high standards for the implementation of MTSS systemically.

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 1. Students will learn in a safe environment where everyone will be treated with dignity and respect. Students, staff, and patrons will model and implement the school culture in which relationships are built upon trust and respect and every child makes a connection with at least one adult. Culture and environment are determined by individual staff.

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 2. Every child will learn and achieve at high standards. No excuses. Based on data, all students will continually show growth and have skills for post-school success. All students will reach the same benchmarks at the same time in the same way.

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 3. Learning includes academic and social competencies through high quality instruction. Curriculum is aligned with standards. Student learning is measured both in academics and behavior. The focus is not only on AYP and discipline referrals.

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 4. Every member of the learning community will continue to grow, learn and reflect. Requires commitment to professionalism (e.g., participating in continuing professional development) and using/sharing new learning to improve student learning. This is not just about earning release time or attending workshops.

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 5. All building staff will be responsible for the learning of all students. Certified and classified staff contributes to student learning. There is collaboration among staff. Learning is student centered and not subject centered. Isolation One person’s role is better than another. Student label/placement does not remove responsibility for student learning.

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 6. Effective change is intentional, coherent, and dynamic. Change is based upon student needs and is communicated to and implemented by staff. This is not based on adult desires.

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 7. Families have an important role in the education of children. This means we create meaningful opportunities for families to be involved in their child’s learning. This does not mean one way communication (i.e., newsletters, parent-teacher conferences)

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 8. Effective communication is essential with all stakeholders in the school community. This means consistent ongoing two-way communication with all staff, students, and patrons. This does not mean one way communication and not listening to students, staff, and patrons.

DLT Core Beliefs We believe…This means…This does not mean… 9. All decisions will be data-based. This means data will drive instruction with consistent and frequent analysis. This does not mead decisions are based on personal views or perceptions.

BLT Responsibilities Establishing bi-directional communication Bringing staff to consensus Fostering collaboration Ensuring supportive schedule Ensuring fidelity of MTSS Establishing and protecting time for collaborative teams

Considerations for Your BLT Primary responsibilities of the BLT as a whole Appropriate departments/groups represented Groups/people affected by the changes Authority to make decisions at building level Ability to allocate resources including time at building level Ability to manipulate and explain data Ability to present/train peers Direct link to all collaborative teams

Providing Communication Purpose Consistent message Information sharing Bi-directional communication Stakeholder input

Do We Need to Communicate Today?

Long Term Plan WHEN beyond WHAT for WHO MTSS Reading Implementation for all buildings MTSS Math Structuring for all buildings; MTSS Reading Refinement and Sustainability for all buildings MTSS Math Implementation for all buildings; MTSS Reading Refinement and Sustainability for all buildings Ongoing MTSS Refinement and Sustainability district wide

Next Steps On the following dates the DLT will meet with MTSS Core Team Support September 25, 2012 Discuss and finalize the district’s curriculum protocol and update intervention plan October 23, 2012 Analyze Fall AIMSweb data and proceed through the MTSS Reading grouping for intervention process November 6, 2012 Proceed through MTSS Reading progress monitoring process February 26, 2013 Analyze Winter AIMSweb data and proceed through the MTSS Reading grouping for intervention process

Next Steps March 12, 2013 Proceed through MTSS Reading progress monitoring process May 7, 2013 General support through entire MTSS Reading process