The Intensive Preventive Services Program in Wyoming County involving DSS, Probation, & Youth Bureau.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ORCHARD ACADEMY Best Practices in Person-Centered Transition Planning and Programming that Deliver Positive Outcomes Presented by… Tim Bobrowski, Director.
Advertisements

Senate Criminal Justice Committee Interim Charge 1 June 21, 2006.
MISSION: To protect the public and reduce crime by and reduce crime by holding youth offenders accountable and holding youth offenders accountable and.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
A New Chance Cross Border Fostering Project Project Manager: Eric Plunkett, Eric Plunkett, Principal Social Worker. Principal Social Worker.Consultant:
Strategies for Student Engagement in Higher Education Settings Jamie Crandell, Fostering Success Coach Training and Certification Coordinator, Western.
Home and Community Based Services for Children with Autism Waiver (HCBS-CWA)
A Community Idea For A Better Future: The Pulaski County Commission on Children and Families John Bumgarner Project Associate, Institute for Policy Outreach.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
Michigan State Overview Homeless Children and Youth Foster Care Summit November, 2011 Washington, D.C.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
THE RANGE OF PLACEMENTS An Overview of the California Foster Care System.
Supporting Foster Care Students. Improving Outcomes for Foster care Students Nationally, less than half of youth in foster care complete a regular high.
Preparing Foster Youth for Today’s Workforce. Our Goal Foster Youth leave the care system equipped to function independently, able to obtain viable employment,
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Leveraging Community Partnerships to Break Barriers to College Access.
BEST-INTEREST DETERMINATIONS Implementing the Mandate of Fostering Connections Presented by: Rocky Mountain Children’s Law Center, Denver Department of.
CROSSOVER YOUTH: THE EDUCATION IN BETWEEN Amy Bishop, MSW, Senate Bill 94 Education Advocate Darcy Brown, LCSW, CAC II, Coordinator of Intensive Supervision,
CSWE Child Welfare Symposium Child Welfare Workforce Retention Research in New York State New York State Social Work Education Consortium.
Avery’s Creek Elementary School. What is Title I? United States Federal Government’s largest education program to support public schools. The Purpose:
OVERVIEW OF KATIE A. SETTLEMENT. WHO IS KATIE A?  year old Caucasian female  Placed in foster care at age 4  Mental health assessment at age.
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
Department of Children and Families Autism Services Jan Nisenbaum Deputy Commissioner Clinical and Professional Services.
The Evolution of Reunification Services at Marist Youth Care.
DCFS School Readiness Planning Initiative Insure that all young children in the system start school ready to learn –Physically –Socially –Emotionally.
By Mary Anna Ledden. Overview/Table of Contents: Mission and Vision Demographic Information Policies & Procedures Structure Governance Funding Relationship.
The Honorable Suzanna Cuneo Pima County Juvenile Court Commissioner April 12, 2011 Strategies to Support School Stability and Continuity: The Pima County.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Clackamas County Juvenile Drug Court Enhancement Evaluation (OR) NPC Research Outcome and Cost Evaluation Results.
The local authority view: current looked after children policy and outcomes Andrew Christie Director of Children’s Services London Borough of Hammersmith.
Preview of 2005 Data From North Dakota KIDS COUNT! For NDSU Extension Service Bismarck, ND May 11, 2005 Helen Danielson Coordinator, North Dakota KIDS.
Making RBS Happen in the Bay Area Establishing a Regional Child and Family Reconnection Resource.
Setting the Stage for Implementation Translating RBS Ideas into Action.
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
What is a Family Connections Program? An Overview of a New Service Approach Being Developed by the Bay Area Residentially Based Services Consortium.
Innovation in Monroe County Jody Levison-Johnson Director Child & Family Service Quality & System Development Coordinated Care Services, Inc. Technical.
2005 Becoming a Volunteer Volunteer Screening Module 6 Volunteer Development: Making the Best Better Series.
Independent Living Program/ Workforce Investment Act (ILP/WIA) Cross System Collaboration Serving Current and Former Foster Youth Fiscal Essentials for.
Workforce Solutions Texoma Child Care Assistance.
Therapeutic Under 13s Program.  In Impact had an increased number of referrals for males under 13 years of age  Presenting behaviours were.
Copyright 2007 American Bar Association ABA Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Brenda Shum Andrea Khoury Debra.
A NEW RESOURCE FOR RECONNECTING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX AND ENDURING NEEDS Residentially Based Services.
 Population: 45,578  Median Household Income: $54,871  Persons below poverty level: 8.3%  Housing Units: 27,925  Homeownership rate: 78.8%  Persons.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
Foster Youth Within Lake Elsinore Unified School District Presented by: Steve Behar, Director of Student Services.
Child Welfare, Education, and The Courts: A Collaboration to Strengthen Educational Successes of Children and Youth in Foster Care Conference November.
San Francisco Unified School District Student Support Services Department Foster Youth Services Program FYS Liaison Orientation.
KAITLIN FERRICK, JD MPHI WEBCAST SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 Head Start and Early Head Start: An Introduction 9/10/2015Michigan Public Health institute Webcast1.
ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)
Toolkit for Foster Youth Education Success
HN 299 Welcome to our second Seminar. Review Review of first week Review of first week Second week Second week Projects ahead Projects ahead Discussion.
Pennsylvania Homeless Children’s Initiative
CONTINUUM OF CARE REFORM (AB403) Alexis Barries Project Associate Youth Engagement Project Alyssum Maguire Project Coordinator Youth Engagement Project.
A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ken Berrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seneca Center for Children and Families
Foster Care After 18 AB12 signed into law September 30, 2010 Designed to align with the Federal Fostering Connections to Success Act Extends foster care.
Continuum of CARE reform (AB403 & ab1997)
2015 Annual Report February 9, 2016 Presenters:
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Board of Early Education and Care
Sheree Wheeler, State Coordinator of Foster Care Education
JUVENILE COURT 2016 Empowering Youth Strengthening Families
Behavioral Health (DBH)
Continum of Care Reform (CCR)
2016 Child & Family Annual Report
Sheree Wheeler, State Coordinator of Foster Care Education
Promoting Educational Stability, Continuity,
Pennsylvania Homeless Children’s Initiative
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Presentation transcript:

The Intensive Preventive Services Program in Wyoming County involving DSS, Probation, & Youth Bureau

  Rural 600 square miles 57% Farm Land  Located between Buffalo and Rochester in WNY  Total Population ~41,400  16 other NYS counties with similar demographics  ~70 people per square mile  ~9,600 youth - ~22% of population  Median Household Income is ~ $40,000  ~11% live below poverty level  Primarily Caucasian 92%  85% HS Graduates Wyoming County Facts

  PINS children were being recommended for placement in foster homes or residential facilities, at a Family Court proceeding, by the County Probation Department, at a high cost to the local Department of Social Services. Situation

  Incorrigible/Ungovernable  Truancy  Runaway  Possession of Marijuana PINS Youth

  Regular Foster Care  Therapeutic Foster Care (TFC) Types of Foster Care

  Diagnostic Care  Short-term residential  Residential Types of Residential Care

  “Regular” foster care is $27.36 per day  “Therapeutic” foster care is $ per day The cost of care per day

  Short term residential is $  Residential B1 is $  Residential B3 is $  Residential B5 is $  Diagnostic care is $ Per day The cost of Residential Care

  $27.36 x 30 days = $820 Regular Foster Care for one month

  $820 x 12 mo = $9,849 Regular Foster Care for one year

  $82.29 x 30 days = $ 2, Therapeutic Foster Care for one month

  $ x 12 = $29, Therapeutic Foster Care for one year

  $ x 30 days = $9, Diagnostic Foster Care for one month

  $ x 30 days = $7, per mo Short-term residential for one month

 $7, x 12 mo = $94,557 Short term residential for one year

  $ x 30 days = $ 9, per mo B1 Residential for one month

  $9, x 12 mo = $ 133, B1 Residential for one year

  $ x 30 days $10, B3 Residential for one month

  $10, x 12 mo = $124, B3 Residential for one year

  $ x 30 days = $13, B5 Residential for one month

  $13, x 12 = $ B5 Residential for one year

  As referrals increased, and costs of placements increased, both Probation & DSS were ready to consider alternatives to placement. Readiness for change

 Could casework with the child and family prevent or defer placement? Options

  Probation does not employ Caseworkers, but they did have a Family Court position, and DSS was funding that position.  DSS could not re-assign a Caseworker for this task. Staffing challenge

  The normal Casework method of monthly contact was deemed inadequate by both Probation & DSS.  These kids & families needed more contact time; more Intensive Casework to attempt to avoid or defer placement. Caseworker needs

  In the course of solving this problem, the County Youth Bureau, was invited to join the discussion. Agency Directors identify a 3 rd party

  Youth Bureau identified a staff member who could add this new responsibility of Intensive Casework to her existing duties.  Administrators of the 3 agencies came to agreement on cost sharing for this role.  The Probation Department transferred $5,000 from the Family Court staff position, funded by DSS, to the Youth Bureau to support the Intensive Caseworker position. Resulting Action

  Probation Department transferred $5,000 from their Family Court position to the Youth Bureau to support the Intensive Caseworker position. A MOU was written & signed.  Referrals were made by Probation to the Intensive Casework Program.  All parties agreed to limit the referrals to 5 cases.  Weekly contacts with families commenced.  6 Kids avoided placement year 1. Year One

  Two needs were identified:  1. Intensive Caseworker needed a method of entering case notes into the DSS system.  2. As a result of her weekly contacts, the Intensive Caseworker identified the need for some specialized services for the child. Year Two

  We decided to “certify” the Intensive Caseworker by enrolling her in NYS Common Core Training- like all NYS full-time Caseworkers. Satisfying Needs

  The Intensive Caseworker could now enter case notes and Service Plans in the NYS Connections System …. As Caseworkers do across NYS. Case manager could log on & review progress notes at any time. What was accomplished?

  The Intensive Caseworker could now request, through DSS, a customized contract with a specialized provider for the additional high-skill requirements needed. DSS has been “purchasing” these types of specialized services like Socio therapy or Skill building from Hillside Children’s Center, through formal contract. The 2 nd Accomplishment

  21 kids did not go into foster or residential placement.  Youth Bureau enhanced their community value in the Human Service field and identified a funding stream for the Intensive Caseworker position (DSS)  Probation has a viable alternative to foster or residential placement. Current Results

 Case Study

 Final Thoughts What this means for:  DSS  Probation  Youth Bureau

 This worked for us, can it work for you?

  Andrea Aldinger Director Wyoming County Youth Bureau (585)  Gordon Lew, Case Supervisor Wyoming County DSS (585)  Tonya Clester, Probation Supervisor Wyoming County Probation (585)  Jamie Hudson, Caseworker/ Program Coordinator (585) Contact Information