AASA 2011 Legislative Agenda Presented by Bruce Hunter & Sasha Bartolf National Conference on Education, Denver CO February 17, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
PORTFOLIO.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Consensus Questions.  The Education Study scope is broad and includes the following areas under the role of the federal government in public education.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Introduction to Title I October 23, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) January 2001 Re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Understanding the Requirements of Title I, Part A November 15, 2012 Caribe Royale LaTrell Edwards, Florida Department of Education Anna Moore, Florida.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS EQUITY IN EDUCATION COALITION CLOSING THE OPPORTUNITY/ACHIEVEMENT GAP.
IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities | May 20, 2009.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE AND THE 7 SCHOOL TURNAROUND PRINCIPLES Dale Gasparovic, MSed., Administrator Student Assistance Center at Prevention First
1 State Aid to School Districts in New York State: An Overview Based on the Laws of 2007 State Aid Work Group New York State Education Department April.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
ALL CHILDREN WILL LEARN AASA’s Proposal for Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Developed January 2009, by the AASA Executive.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
The Early Learning Challenge Fund: Metrics and Data Danielle Ewen February 22, 2010.
AASA Federal Advocacy Update Bruce Hunter & Sasha Bartolf National Conference on Education Denver, CO February 17, 2011.
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Parent Summit 02/21/2014 SAISD Federal Programs Dept. Barbara.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Title I Annual Meeting A Collaborative Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs and Title I Schools.
Title 1, Part A Local Consolidated Plan (LCP) Application May 2009.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
1.  Biennial Budget was first step 2  Lessons learned ◦ Good start ◦ Too detailed ◦ Lacked overarching structure ◦ Need to refine  AB 248.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Closing Using Federal Stimulus Funds To Purchase the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program Sue Thomas, Manager, Business Development, Hazelden Publishing.
Homeless Students and the Expenditure of Title I Part A Funds Rebecca Derenge, N&D Coordinator.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Federal Education Update Mary Kusler Asst. Director, Advocacy & Policy American Association of School Administrators April 22, 2009.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Federal Policy Discussion How do Policy Issues play out? ESEA–Budget-Appropriations Federal Policy Discussion How do Policy Issues play out? ESEA–Budget-Appropriations.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and America’s Public Schools The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and America’s Public Schools AASA Advocacy.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
WELCOME Title I School-wide Open House EWING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2012 AASA Legislative Agenda NCE 2012 Bruce Hunter Houston, TX February 17, 2012 Associate Executive Director Advocacy and Communication.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
FUNDING LEGISLATION FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL. CONTRIBUTIONS TO EDUCATION- 07/08 vs. 08/09  8%- Federal funds  State funds07/08  43%- State funds07/08.
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
Federal Grant Programs September 13, Grants-in-aid Federal grants are funds from the national government to state and local governments to help.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Why Rural Matters for North Carolina
Federal Grant Programs
Division of Student Support Services
Introduction to Title I
Introduction to Title I
Federal Grant Programs
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Overview of the Title I Program at Bayview Elementary
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Berkshire Hills Regional
Presentation transcript:

AASA 2011 Legislative Agenda Presented by Bruce Hunter & Sasha Bartolf National Conference on Education, Denver CO February 17, 2011

Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Guiding Principles include: Significant regulatory relief if ESEA is not reauthorized this year; Allocation of funds via formulas based on the percentage of poverty; Federal policy should supplement, not dictate the local policies; Reduction of federal funds be accompanied by reduction in federal mandates; Connection with health, personal and social development programs; Direct allocation of funds to the local level; School districts should not be required to spend state and local funds for federal mandates. Limitation on regulations to ESEA programs;

Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Improving Standards and Accountability for Students Served with Federal Dollars Support for the Common Core of Standards Separation of accountability and instructional measures -One test cannot serve both purposes Clear and accurate accountability measures. Less intrusive and costly testing for accountability. Measure student of growth for both accountability and instruction. Multiple sources of information for both accountability and instruction.

Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Improving Standards and Accountability for Students Served with Federal Dollars Measure special education consistent with the Individualized Education Program. Assess ELL students in a language they understand. Emphasize rewards not punishment – build capacity. Disaggregate student outcomes - adjust for new student categories. Eliminate mandatory set-asides especially for SES & choice. Three- to six-year graduation rates, without penalty. Recognize alternative pathways to graduation including GED

Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Improving Struggling Schools Select lowest-achieving schools on a rolling three year averages. Focus state interventions on building capacity. Special consideration for alternative schools. Plan and implement state intervention in conjunction with school districts. Support a broad range of turn-around models.

Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Improving the Effectiveness of Teachers and Administrators Accountability for the effectiveness is a state and local responsibility. Compensation decisions are a state and local matter. Evaluations must be created at the local school district. Permit use of ESEA funds to encourage teachers to work in hard-to-staff schools. Provide ESEA funds for hard-to-staff schools. Distribute professional development funds by percentage of poverty. Local flexibility in professional development programs.

Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Improving the Effective Use of Data Fund school districts to implement and maintain data systems. Open data systems funded by ESEA to local administrators and teachers. Ensure federal funds cover the costs imposed by federal requests for data. Federal data requests must be appropriate and useful.

Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Services for Special Populations Fully fund the Rural Education Achievement Program Reauthorization Act. Distribute funds via formulas. Authorize and fund a dual-language pilot program for schools serving concentrations of low-income and minority students. Increase funding for the extended day and year programs under 21 st Century Community Learning Centers. Expand programs for Indian/Native American, Native Hawaiian and Native Alaskan students. Full funding for Impact Aid.

AASA on ESEA Our Heaviest Lifts 1.Limit the federal oversight to children served with federal funds – in the case of school wide programs – schools served by Title I funds 2.Separate Accountability and Assessment for learning – Accountability assessments focus on growth (value added if desired) by sampling & including multiple measures – Instructional assessment includes a variety of methods of measuring growth, formative, adaptive, embedded teacher developed, etc., that provide immediate feedback to teachers and administrators

Hottest Issues Teachers – Compensation – Seniority – Evaluation – Termination Testing – Accuracy – Policy v. instruction – Measuring growth

Hot Issues Foundations, think tanks, Congress & USDOE want federal control over critical decisions, e.g., – Per pupil expenditures/Comparability – Teacher contracts – Standards/curriculum – Personnel decisions – Instructional strategies – Instructional methods

IDEA Mandatory funding for IDEA at 40 percent of the national average per-pupil expenditure. Permit school districts to reduce local effort by up to 100 percent of federal funding increases. Eliminate the requirement for parental consent for Medicaid reimbursement.

Early Childhood Education Federal funding to address non school barriers to student achievement. Improve access to high-quality federal child care programs for poor families. Tax incentives for employers to provide support for child care and after-school care. Make early childhood education available to all children. Coordinate early childhood programs regardless of funding source.

School Food Service Programs Objective: Avoid federal overreach into nutrition policies

Health Care Permit schools to claim reimbursement from Medicaid. Uniform methodology for claiming reimbursement from Medicaid. Increase Medicaid reimbursements for low-income students. Ensure school districts have access to mental health services funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Continue the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

E-Rate and Instructional Technology Raise the funding cap for E-Rate to meet demand. Continue to include the E-Rate program in the Universal Service Fund. Reduce the paperwork requirements for E-Rate. Create a robust R & D arm in the U.S. Department of Education to address instructional technology in schools. Expand broadband to all parts of the country. Permanent exemption from the Anti-Deficiency Act.

Vouchers Oppose federal funding to non-public schools. Oppose special education vouchers. Permit the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program to expire.

School Construction Make Qualified Zone Academy Bonds and Qualified School Construction Bonds more marketable. Provide direct-to-district federal grants and stimulus funds for school modernization, renovation, greening and new construction.

Seclusion and Restraint Fund professional development regarding seclusion and restraint. Permit engagement of parents regarding safe and appropriate seclusion and restraint in Individualized Education Plans and Behavioral Intervention Plans. Allow monitored seclusion and restraint as an option of last resort.

Foster Care Ensure transportation costs for foster children is the responsibility of the state Ensure school districts have access to all relevant data pertaining to student academic, social, emotion, criminal, and behavioral records upon student enrollment.

Criminal Background Checks Support coordination of, and communication between, existing federal and state criminal background databases. Support the development of a national database of sexual offenders and child predators that school districts can access for criminal background checks.

Stimulus and Fiscal Support for State and Local Revenue Shortfalls Ensure that states receiving State Fiscal Stabilization Fund or Education Jobs Fund dollars are not able to disproportionately reduce the amount of education state. Ensure that federal funding is in addition to state or local effort.

Questions? Concerns? Bruce Hunter Sasha Bartolf