1 Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement: General Introduction, Framework and Benefits Presented by Andrew Kwan ITU Consultant Conformity and Interoperability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC)
Advertisements

WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Mutual recognition arrangement on conformity assessment of electrical and electronic equipment: its implications in reducing Technical Barriers to Trade.
WTO Workshop on the different Approaches to Conformity Assessment March 2006 Geneva, Switzerland.
Nairobi, Kenya, 26 – 27July 2010 Maintaining Equipment Standards to ensure good QoS Mwende Njiraini Engineer I/NT/LCS Communications Commission of Kenya.
INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION FORUM, INC.
Facilitating Global Trade
Latest developments Merih Malmqvist Nilsson, ILAC Vice Chair
INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION FORUM “Certified Once, Accepted Everywhere” Last Updated Dec 2014.
International Recognition System for Accreditation
The New TNI Laboratory Accreditation Standards Requirements for an Accreditation Body.
Accreditation 1. Purpose of the Module - To create knowledge and understanding on accreditation system - To build capacity of National Governments/ focal.
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) & International Accreditation Forum (IAF) 13 th International Legal Metrology Conference Sydney,
Industry Canada /strategis.ic.gc.ca Industrie Canada /strategis.ic.gc.ca 1 September 26, 2003, PCC.1 MRA Workshop Inter-American Mutual Recognition.
1 Conformity Assessment Activities Presented by Andrew Kwan ITU Consultant Conformity and Interoperability Training for ARB Region on Type Approval Testing.
INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION FORUM, INC. “Certified Once, Accepted Everywhere” Last Updated January 2013.
International Organization
1 Regulatory Framework for C&I Regimes Presented by Andrew Kwan ITU Consultant Conformity and Interoperability Training for ARB Region on Type Approval.
An ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangement for Tourism Services Professor Chris Cooper Bangkok December 2006 Professor Chris Cooper Bangkok December 2006.
1 Conformity Assessment Schemes Presented by Andrew Kwan ITU Consultant Conformity and Interoperability Training for ARB Region on Type Approval Testing.
Examples of Conformity Assessment Workflow
1Having confidence in certification CASCO Comms/ International Organization for Standardization.
NOTIFIED BODIES EC MARKING. index  Notified Bodies. Activities  Notification procedure  Role of accreditation  Notified Bodies cooperation  Notified.
Best Practices in Wine Regulation Introduction to the World Wine Trade Group Robert G. Kalik World Wine Trade Group, USA.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
Conformity Assessment and Accreditation Mike Peet Chief Executive Officer South African National Accreditation System.
Overview of the Rotterdam Convention. Sub-regional Consultation for DNAs 2 Overview of the Rotterdam Convention Structure of the presentation Part 1 -Introduction.
February 19-21, 2008 Hazim Dawood Telecommunications Engineering and Certification Canadian Update on MRA Implementation.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
1 ACCREDITATION – BG situation April 2014, Prague STATE AGENCY STATE AGENCY FOR METROLOGICAL AND TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE 1.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced or distributed without authorization. ASSET Safety Management.
Сближение систем технического регулирования, стандартизации и сертификации ЕС и РФ Проект финансируется Европейским Союзом 1 Marking of products and certificates.
The Value of Joining and Participating in Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRA) Mick Owens International Standardisation Section International Training.
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE GENERAL European Commission 1 PECAs David Eardley DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission Tel: 032 (2)
5/17/02month ##, 2002 Page 1 CA 101 Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity David Ling Regulatory Policy Manager Hewlett Packard Company October 15, 2002.
European Commission Rita L’ABBATE Legal aspects linked to internal market DG Enterprise and Industry MARKET SURVEILLANCE COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK UNECE “MARS”
International Standards and the TBT Agreement Ludivine Tamiotti WTO, Trade and Environment Division Legal Affairs Officer
1 BETTER WORK AND STANDARDS PROGRAMME (BEST) A Programme of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh BETTER QUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE (BQI) COMPONENT.
“The Quality Infrastructure in Lebanon” Export Norms, Quality Control and Competitiveness FUTURE PROGRAMME Prepared By Ali Berro Director of Quality Programme.
UNECE – SIDA “ SOUTH EAST EUROPE REGULATORY PROJECT” FIRST MEETING OF REGULATORS FROM SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES PRESENTATIONFROM THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
ISO Accreditation and Certification Requirements In the 21st Century The New Imperative: “Laboratory Accreditation Is Now Required for World Trade” Gordon.
PAC AND ITS ACTIVITIES ITU-UNIDO Regional Forum on Sustainable Conformity Assessment Yangon, Myanmar, November 2013 Venkat Balakrishnan PAC Vice.
The New EU Legislative Framework for Harmonisation Legislation for products Richard Lawson Deputy Director, Technical Regulations Sustainable Development.
International Organization
1 Mutual Acceptance of Conformity Assessment Results - Japan ’ s Experience and Observation - 16 March 2006 Shinji FUJINO Director International Standards.
1 Accreditor’s View of the Value of MRAs: the APLAC View Helen Liddy APLAC Secretary.
Deputy Head of Federal Accreditation Service Sergey V. Migin Approximation of accreditation systems of European Union and Russia.
ACCREDITATION PROCESS AND THE BENEFITS OF ACCREDITATION dr. Tina Pirš, dr. vet. med. Quality Manager, Veterinary Faculty, Slovenia.
© A2LA Understanding the Accreditation Hierarchy - Who’s Who and What’s What ? NCSL International Conference Orlando, FL August 7, 2008 by Roxanne.
Confidence with competence The Development of European Accreditation Daniel PIERRE EA Vice-Chairman.
Mutual Recognition Signatories – An Obligation Promote the acceptance of accredited test and inspection reports in their economies (regulators, industry.
National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia NATA accreditation and criteria for validation and verification Mark Worrell – RACI.
Metrology & Accreditation – Their Role in the Global Market Presented at the 2009 NCSLI Conference San Antonio, Texas 30 July 2009 by Roxanne Robinson.
Workshop on “EU Enlargement: Regulatory Convergence in Non-acceding Countries” Athens 7 – 8 November 2003 Regulatory Convergence and Technical Standards.
IEEE Required – End-of-life processing requirements For all end of life equipment collected by manufacturer under :  The manufacturer.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
High Level Symposium to Enhance Regulator Expertise on Good Regulatory Practices and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION «Harmonization of the national accreditation system of Eurasian countries» 23 December 2013 Moscow World Trade.
1Johannesburg South Africa SMA May International Organization for Standardization.
the Republic of Kazakhstan
INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION FORUM
INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION SERVICE (IAS)
International Organization
Emanuele Riva – IAF Vice-Chair
Conformity and Interoperability Training for ARB Region on Type Approval testing for Mobile Terminals, Homologation Procedures and Market Surveillance.
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
OIML Certification System (OIML-CS)
The Value of Accreditation
Conformity and Interoperability Training for ARB Region on Type Approval testing for Mobile Terminals, Homologation Procedures and Market Surveillance.
Malcolm Johnson, Director, Telecommunication Standardization Bureau
Presentation transcript:

1 Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement: General Introduction, Framework and Benefits Presented by Andrew Kwan ITU Consultant Conformity and Interoperability Training for ARB Region on Type Approval testing for Mobile Terminals, Homologation Procedures and Market Surveillance Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW  Conformity Assessment  General  Aim of MRAs  Benefits of MRAs  Types of MRAs  Framework MRA for conformity assessment of telecommunications equipment 2 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Conformity Assessment  Regulators mandate and service providers specify technical regulations and specifications for IT equipment  Conformity assessment such as testing and certification are conducted to demonstrate the equipment meets the technical regulations and specifications 3 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Conformity Assessment(cont’d)  Regulators do not usually recognize conformity assessments not performed in their territories  Equipment suppliers have to conduct multiple (duplicated) conformity assessments to meet requirements of different regulators  WTO considers these conformity assessments are technical barriers to trade  MRA has been proven to be an useful and successful tool and process to address this problem 4 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

General 5 M utual R ecognition A greement A rrangement Reciprocated; Bilateral; Multilateral e.g. -Conformity assessment results; -Conformity assessment bodies; -Technical requirements Regulatory sector; Voluntary sector Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Aim of MRAs  One Test, One Report, Accepted Everywhere  One Audit, One Certificate, Accepted Everywhere  Elimination of redundant and costly activities  Avoidance of duplication of work in testing and Certification  Promotion of transparency in market access  Elimination of predatory practices and roadblocks to market access 6 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Attributes of MRAs  Mutual recognition of testing laboratories  Mutual acceptance of test reports  Mutual recognition of certification bodies  Mutual acceptance of certification 7 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Benefits of MRAs  Products may be shipped directly to foreign markets without any further requirements for testing and/or certification, thereby reducing costs and time to market  Facilitates trade by promoting transparency in market access and competition  Reduces and minimizes non-tariff trade barriers  Shortens the time for manufacturers to introduce their products into the importing countries 8 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Benefits of MRAs For Regulators  Reduction of regulatory resources required to certify terminal attachment and radio equipment;  An opportunity to reallocate a portion of these former certification costs to other areas;  A potential stepping stone towards further harmonizing of technical requirements and of regional and national conformity assessment systems; and  Access to a pool of knowledge about the latest global trends and experiences regarding conformity assessment and regulatory systems. 9 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Benefits of MRAs For Manufacturers  An opportunity to test and certify products one time to the requirements of multiple markets and ship products without further conformity assessment;  Increase certification efficiency for products exported to foreign markets, thus increasing export opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); and  Decreasing time-to-market for companies manufacturing telecommunications equipment with shorter and shorter product life cycles, thus maximizing export opportunities and allowing for rapid reinvestment in research and development for next-generation technologies. 10 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Benefits of MRAs For Conformity Assessment Bodies  Allowing conformity assessment bodies (CABs) to increase the value of their service by offering their clients a substantially wider portfolio, including testing and certifying products for multiple markets. 11 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Benefits of MRAs For Consumers  Increasing consumer access to the widest variety of available technology;  Faster access to equipment at a lower cost; and  Speeding the development of telecommunications and Internet infrastructure. 12 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs  Voluntary sector  MRA between individual conformity assessment bodies  MRA between accreditation bodies  International Laboratories Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC MRA)  International Accreditation Forum (IAF), Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (IAF MLA)  Regulatory sector  MRA between governments 13 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between accreditation bodies  The International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC)  promotes the acceptance of accredited test and calibration results by establishing a network of mutual recognition agreements among accreditation bodies 14 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between accreditation bodies  The International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC)  The accreditation bodies which are signatories to the ILAC MRA have been peer-reviewed and shown to meet ILAC's criteria for competence. 15 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between accreditation bodies  The International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC)  Tests results prepared by testing laboratories of one signatory are accepted by testing laboratories of all other signatories 16 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between accreditation bodies  The International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC)  ILAC recognizes the following Regional Cooperation Bodies which have their own MRAs:  The European cooperation for Accreditation (EA)  The Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (APLAC)  The Inter-American Accreditation Cooperation (IAAC) 17 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between accreditation bodies  International Accreditation Forum (IAF)  The primary purposes of IAF are:  to ensure that its accreditation body members only accredit bodies that are competent to do the work they undertake  to establish mutual recognition arrangements, known as Multilateral Recognition Arrangements (MLA), between its accreditation body members 18 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between accreditation bodies  International Accreditation Forum (IAF)  Accreditation body members of IAF are admitted to the IAF MLA only after a evaluation of their operations by a peer evaluation team which is charged to ensure that the applicant member complies fully with both the international standards and IAF requirements 19 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between accreditation bodies  International Accreditation Forum (IAF)  Once an accreditation body is a signatory of the IAF MLA it is required to recognize the certificates issued by conformity assessment bodies accredited by all other signatories of the IAF MLA, with the appropriate scope. 20 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between accreditation bodies  International Accreditation Forum (IAF)  IAF MLA recognizes the MRAs of 3 Regional Accreditation Groups:  The European co-operation for Accreditation (EA)  The Pacific Accreditation Cooperation (PAC)  The InterAmerican Accreditation Cooperation (IAAC) 21 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between governments MRA Types:  Single Sector / Multi-Sector  Bilateral / Framework 22 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between governments MRA Types, examples:  Single Sector :  Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) MRA; telecommunications  Multi-Sector:  Canada/European Union MRA; six sectors including EMC and telecommunications 23 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Types of MRAs MRA between governments MRA Types,  Bilateral :  Between two countries  Example: Canada/European MRA  Framework:  Framework MRA for a region  Example: Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) MRA; Inter-American (CITEL) MRA  Countries within the region develop bilateral MRAs based on the Framework MRA for the region 24 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

MRA Pre-Implementation Activities  Review legislation, regulations and admin procedures to determine if:  They permit recognition of MRA partners conformity assessment bodies (CABs)  They accept conformity assessment results prepared by MRA partners’ CABs  Market surveillance procedures are in place 25 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

MRA Pre-Implementation Activities (cont’d)  Update or develop legislation and regulations to enable the implementation of MRA  Develop MRA procedures such as Designation procedure and Recognition procedure  Update or develop market surveillance procedures 26 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment MRA between governments An Example of a Framework MRA 27 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Attributes  Scope: Equipment subject to mandatory telecommunication requirements  Coverage: Telecom, EMC and Electrical Safety  Phases: Phase I - acceptance of test results Phase II - acceptance of equipment certification 28 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Attributes (cont’d)  Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs): Testing laboratories Certification bodies  Competence of CABs: Determined using ISO/IEC Standards 17011, 17025, plus appropriate technical regulations 29 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents  Preamble  Purpose of the agreement  General Provisions  Definitions and Interpretations  Scope  Designating Authorities  Designation of CABs and Appointment of Accreditation Bodies (ABs)  Recognition of CABs and Mutual Acceptance of the Results of Conformity Assessment (CA) Procedures 30 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (cont ’ d)  Verification of CABs  Commencing the Agreement and Initiating Participation in Phase I or Phase II Procedures  Information Exchange  Joint Committee  Additional Provisions  Confidentiality  Preservation of Regulatory Authority  Fees  Amendment and Termination of Agreement  Final Provisions 31 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (cont ’ d) I.Appendix A A.Common Requirements B.Designation of Testing Laboratories C.Designation of Certification Bodies II.Appendix B – Phase I procedures for mutual recognition of testing laboratories as CABs and mutual acceptance of test results A.Scope B.Designation and Recognition of CABs C.Participation in Phase I Procedures D.Transition Periods E.Mutual Acceptance of Test Reports F.Processing of Applications G.Suspension of Mutual Recognition and Acceptance Obligations 32 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (cont ’ d) III.Appendix C – Phase II procedures for mutual recognition of certification bodies as CABs and mutual acceptance of equipment certifications A.A-G Same as above, except change Phase I to Phase II and testing to certification IV.Annexes I – Annexes IV Annex I – List of the Technical Regulations for Each Participating Country Annex II – List of Name and Address of Each Designating Authority and Accreditation Body for Each Participating Country Annex III – List of Name and Address of Each CAB Designated by Each Participating Country Annex IV – List of Name and Address of Each CAB or MRAs by AB Recognized by Each Participating Economy 33 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Preamble Trade facilitation measure in support of the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) obligations. The agreement is not legally binding; however, it does infer certain rights and responsibilities for participating countries. Parties may exchange letters if useful. 1.Purpose of Agreement To provide for the mutual acceptance of other parties’ CA results for a wide range of telecommunications equipment subject to mandatory requirements 2. General Provisions Introduces and brings into the agreement the designating and monitoring procedures in Appendices A, B and C 34 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) 3.Definitions and Interpretations Introduces ISO/IEC Guide definitions and key definitions Technical regulations - means mandatory requirements 4. Scope agreement applies to the Technical Regulations listed by each participating party in ANNEX I – applies to network terminal attachment and other telecommunication equipment. Coverage includes Telecom equipment, EMC and Electrical Safety. 35 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) 5.Designating Authority (DA) A government entity that designates, lists, verifies competence of, limits and withdraws designation of Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs) within its jurisdiction. An independent accreditation body may be appointed to determine competence of CABs. The DAs and ABs will be listed in ANNEX II by each party. 6. Designation of CABs and Appointment of ABs Each DA (listed in ANNEX II) may designate CABs to perform conformity assessment activities to the other party’s requirements. Designations must follow the procedures in Appendix A Mutual recognition agreements between accrediting bodies may be used, provided they follow Appendix A 36 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) 7.Recognition of CABs and Mutual Acceptance of the Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures Under the procedures specified for Phase I and Phase II, a party (Regulatory Authority) will recognize CABs and accept the results performed by those CABs. 8. Verification of CABs Parties have the right to contest a CABs technical competence following due process procedures. The Joint Committee may become involved to assist in resolving the differences. 37 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) 9.Commencing the Agreement and Initiating Participation in Phase I or Phase II Procedures Commencement date Each party must provide the other parties with certain information (Some countries may accomplishing this through an exchange of letters.) 10. Information Exchange Technical regulations are listed in Annex I for each party. Changes to regulations must be publicly available. DA and AB (Annex II), designated CABs (Annex III), recognized CABs (Annex IV) must be kept current 38 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) 11.Joint Committee Joint party established consisting of representatives from each party 12. Additional Provisions Each party will endeavor to use international standards as a basis for its technical regulations 13. Confidentiality A party, in accordance with applicable laws, will protect proprietary information. 14. Preservation of Regulatory Authority Each party retains all authority under its laws to interpret and enforce its technical regulations governing equipment covered by this Agreement. 39 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) 15.Fees The parties will ensure that any fees charged will be non-discriminatory, transparent, and reasonable 16. Amendment and Termination of Agreement May be amended by mutual written consent of the participating parties A party may terminate its participation by giving 6 months notice 17. Final Provisions Agreement is inclusion of Appendices A-C and Annexes I-IV, with appendices taking precedence in cases of inconsistencies 40 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix A - Designation and Monitoring Requirements for CABs Specifies designation and monitoring rules for testing labs and certification bodies A.Common Requirements DA may appoint Accreditation Bodies (AB) provided certain conditions are met, which includes the use of the relevant international standards/guides; i.e. ISO/IEC 17011, & DAs encouraged to harmonize designation procedures ABs encouraged to participate in agreements between accreditation bodies 41 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix A - (continued) B.Designation of Testing Laboratories (TL) A party may use one or more Designating Authorities or Accrediting Bodies to determine the competence of a laboratory to test equipment to the other party’s technical regulations The DA or AB must be capable of meeting of ISO/IEC The TL must be accredited to ISO/IEC to the appropriate scope and technical regulations The DA may require the TL to demonstrate competence through: Regional AB MRA, peer evaluations, proficiency testing or comparison between testing laboratories Each TL will have a 6 character identifier 42 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix A - (continued) C.Designation of Certification Bodies (CB) A party may use one or more Designating Authorities or Accrediting Bodies to determine the competence of a body to certify equipment to the other party’s technical regulations The DA or AB must be capable of meeting of ISO/IEC The CB must be accredited to ISO/IEC to the appropriate scope and technical regulations using a team of technical experts to determine competence for each type of equipment and discipline. The CB must also be accredited to ISO/IEC and be capable of testing equipment for which it approves Sub-contracting per ISO/IEC permitted CB must establish an acceptable market surveillance program in accordance with ISO/IEC Each CB will have a 6 character identifier established by the DA 43 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix B - Phase I Procedures for Mutual Recognition of Test Labs and Mutual Acceptance of Test Reports 1.Scope Specifies the procedure for mutual recognition of TLs and the acceptance of test reports relating to the technical regulations identified in ANNEX I for Phase I for each party 2.Designation and Recognition of CAB The DA of the exporting party accredits and designates CABs as being competent to test equipment subject to the technical requirements of the importing party listed in ANNEX I. The importing party (RA) upon receipt of the exporting parties designation will evaluate and recognize CABs in a fair and transparent manner. The Joint Committee may be used for the review process in cases of dispute. 44 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix B - (continued) 3.Participation in Phase I Procedures Details the appropriate ANNEXES that each party needs to complete 4.Transition Periods Establishes a procedure to build confidence with the aid of familiarization and training among participating parties 45 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix B - (continued) 5.Mutual Acceptance of Test Reports Establishes a procedure for the fair and transparent handling of test reports by recognized CABs. 6.Processing of Applications Establishes timetable for processing applications 7.Suspension of Mutual Recognition and Acceptance Obligations Establishes procedure for suspension of MRA 46 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix C - Phase II Procedures for Mutual Recognition of CBs and Mutual Acceptance of Equipment Certifications 1.Scope Specifies the procedure for mutual recognition of CBs and the acceptance of approval of equipment meeting the technical regulations identified in ANNEX I for Phase I for each party 2.Designation and Recognition of CABs The DA of the exporting party accredits and designates CBs as being competent to approve equipment subject to the technical requirements of the importing party listed in ANNEX I. The DA may appoint an AB to accredit the CB for the procedures in Appendix A. 47 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix C - Phase II Procedures for Mutual Recognition of CBs and Mutual Acceptance of Equipment Certifications 2.Designation and Recognition of CABs(cont’d) The importing party (RA) upon receipt of the exporting parties designation will evaluate and recognize the CB in a fair and transparent manner. The Joint Committee may be used for the review process in cases of dispute. 3.Participation in Phase II procedures Details the appropriate ANNEXES that each party needs to complete 4.Transition Periods Establishes a procedure to build confidence with the aid of familiarization and training among participating parties 48 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Framework MRA for Conformity Assessment of Telecommunications Equipment Contents (by paragraph) Appendix C - (continued) 5. Mutual Acceptance of Equipment Certifications Establishes a procedure for the fair and transparent handling of equipment certification produced by a recognized CBs. 6. Suspension of Mutual Recognition and Acceptance Obligations Establishes procedure for suspension of MRA 49 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015

Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement: General Introduction, Framework and Benefits Thank you Andrew Kwan 50 Tunis-Tunisia, April 2015