© 2008, Johns Hopkins University. All rights reserved. Documenting the Quick Win The Quick Win Step 1: Formative Step Step 2: Process Activities Step 3:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Designing and Building a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Tool for Public Sector Management.

Advertisements

1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)

WMO Monitoring & Evaluation System (Measuring our Performance/Success)

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.

Margaret Geary Crime Reduction & Social Inclusion Director Government Office for the West Midlands.

Introduction to Impact Assessment

Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.

European Clearing-House Mechanism Portal Toolkit Expert Group Meeting

Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.

Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2006 ACTION RESEARCH Eileen Ferrance Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories Brown University.

Impact Measurement and You Understanding Impact Measurement, Practical Tools, Key Questions.

Higher Physical Education

Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)

Indicator Baseline Target Milestones PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS.

Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.

Action Research / Intervention Project Module I Notre Dame of Maryland University.

A Tool to Monitor Local Level SPF SIG Activities

USAID’s Experience and Lessons Learned in Approaches used in Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity Building Activities Duane Muller, USAID November 7, 2008.

Impact assessment framework

Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!

UNCTAD ICT and E-Business Branch 9/17/2015 / 1 Joint UNCTAD-ITU-UNESCAP Workshop Information Society Measurements in Asia-Pacific Bangkok, July 2006.

National Malaria Program Scale-up for Advocacy Based on Impact 23 January 2006.

Impact Measurement and You Understanding Impact Measurement, Practical Tools, Key Questions.

Balanced Scorecard: linking strategic planning to measurement and communication Gulcin Cribb and Chris Hogan Bond University, Australia.

Localizing the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) UN-HABITAT Nairobi.

Introduction to Evaluation. Objectives Introduce the five categories of evaluation that can be used to plan and assess ACSM activities. Demonstrate how.

Tony Karbo, Ph.D. AHSI/UPEACE Africa Program.  Action or inaction taken by interested entities such as NGOs, Think Tanks, government departments, ministries,

Project Communication Kirsti Mijnhijmer & Christopher Parker 23 February 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.

M&E Monitoring & Evaluation Outcomes Measurement – Monitoring & Evaluation Creating Opportunities for Rural Youth (CORY)

ClearView Value-adding Services for Non-Profit Operations Management Transparency for Understanding, Visibility for Decisions N OT F OR P ROFIT S ERVICES.

OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.

Impact MSQ FOLIO course. What is impact? ‘ Impact’ is the difference that is made to individuals, organisations or communities by library services (1)

Health Quality Ontario: Health System Performance New Zealand Master Class March 25, 2014.

Food Security Response Analysis: Definitions, Tools and Potentials Overview FSNWG workshop Nairobi 29 April – May

Evaluation of the Quebec Community Learning Centres: An English minority language initiative Learning Innovations at WestEd May 21, 2008.

Evolution to date: where the clusters have come from, where have we reached and where should we be heading? GNC Annual Meeting 13 th -15 th October, Nairobi,

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

1 Sequenced Information Strategy –incorporating short-term programme proposal Paris21 Consortium meeting : June 2000 Tony Williams UK Department.

Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center

Food Security Cluster Inception Meeting, Rome May 2011 Food Security Cluster Inception Meeting Rome May 2011.

Student Achievement in the Expanded Core Curriculum: A Supported Discussion IESBVI Staff Conference October 2012 Carla Morrow & Cynthia White-Botello.

Community Planning: Monitoring & Evaluation Geddes Institute Research The Geddes Institute Emma Coles.

Advocacy and Partnerships for the MDGs. Context and Rationale The MDGs were created in 2000 as a concrete means to help improve the lives of poor people.

IFLA: International Advocacy Programme. Address the information gap of library workers at community, national and regional levels Build capacity among.

Advocating at Every Level An Introduction to Advance Family Planning Duff Gillespie January 21,

AFP Advocacy Communication Strategy Sarah Whitmarsh May 24, 2016.

How to Talk about Advance Family Planning Sarah Whitmarsh Communication Manager May 24, 2016.

UHC 2030 CSO engagement mechanism Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.

What are the connections between feedback and self- regulation? How can I apply those connections to my own instruction? Create a plan for improving classroom.

SCOA for Municipalities:

Partnership with AFP in Latin America

Capacity Development for Gender Subgroups of National Platforms in Armenia, Georgia, Belarus and Ukraine.

SCOA for Municipalities:

Country presentation: xxxxxx 2nd Executive Project Steering Committee meeting 1-2 November, 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Reproductive Health Uganda

Advance Family Planning (AFP)

Advance Family Planning in Uganda

Follow us: June 15-16, 2017 Steering Committee Meeting Summary of Conclusions and Action Items Follow.

MANAGEMENT, STAFF, NATIONAL COALITION, FINANCIAL RESOURCES,

Format for an Action Plan

ACSM in 2010: Overview of SG Achievements

Civil Society and the Heath Data Collaborative

Advocacy Plan Introduction

OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010

Field monitoring Project (number and title)

Policy Advocacy What is Policy Advocacy?

Format for Developing Action Plans

RCA Workshop on RCARO Future Strategies July 2007

Presentation transcript:

© 2008, Johns Hopkins University. All rights reserved. Documenting the Quick Win The Quick Win Step 1: Formative Step Step 2: Process Activities Step 3: Essential Step Step 4: Quick Win 1

© 2008, Johns Hopkins University. All rights reserved. Initial step to identify the advocacy target Process activities with outcomes Quick Win: The quantitative result which can then be followed through using the Results Cascade Process activities with outcomes Quick Win Main, crucial outcome from the above activities that will lead to the advocacy Quick Win Process activities with outcomes Quick Win Formative Activity Process Activities Essential Step

Decision Tree YesNo YesNo The Quick Win – Initiate Advocacy Initiate Advocacy Initiate Advocacy Initiate Advocacy No YesNo Yes Increased reliance on partnerships to monitor implementation closer to Impact AFP contributes by linking regional and country initiatives to expand visibility and accountability Increased reliance on partnerships to monitor implementation closer to Impact AFP contributes by linking regional and country initiatives to expand visibility and accountability

© 2008, Johns Hopkins University. All rights reserved. Documenting the Result Results Cascade Step 1: What is the result you planned to achieve Step 2: What was the Quick Win and when was it achieved Step 3: What other outcomes or Quick Wins were achieved that are critical to the result Step 4: What are your sources of data, and which partners were involved in the result? 4

© 2008, Johns Hopkins University. All rights reserved. QUICK WIN: (Date achieved) Results Cascade9/13/ (1) (2) (3) Data will be collected to measure Impact (describe what and source)

© 2008, Johns Hopkins University. All rights reserved. QUICK WIN: Results Cascade Data will be collected to measure Impact (describe what and source)