Crack management Clemens van der Nat Bluewater Energy Services BV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Advertisements

FPSO Mooring Monitoring & In-service Inspection FPSO Research Forum Richard Leeuwenburgh College Station – May 1 st 2003.
Welcome to SMMs Presentation offering a synopsis of our Emergency Response Service on a 24 Hour basis PRESS RIGHT MOUSE CLICK IF YOU WANT TO MOVE BACK.
Condition Monitoring (CM)  Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) a joint lecture for MECH 512: Design for Structural Integrity MECH 513: Smart Materials.
Speech by Chinese Shipbuilding Industry ( CSNAME &CANSI ) Contents 1. The acceptation of IMO PSPC standard 2. Preparation done by Chinese shipbuilding.
CHAPTER 4: FRACTURE The separation or fragmentation of a solid body into two or more parts, under the action of stresses, is called fracture. Fracture.
Fracture Mechanics Overview & Basics
GBS PILOT PROJECT ROUND TABLE REVIEW TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.
Crack Management – Part II Feedback From In-Service Inspections Based upon OTC “FPSO Fatigue Assessment: Feedback From In-Service Inspections” Clemens.
FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion OTRC, College Station USA April 2003.
IR CAPIR CAP Indian Register of Shipping IR-CAP Condition Assessment Program Indian Register of Shipping.
Shipbuilders’ Feedback on IACS Harmonised Common Structural Rules (April Version) China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry (CANSI) Extract.
SHIP STRUCTURES Unique Structures (6.1) What are they optimized for?
Role of Surveyor. 2 Role of Classification Societies ► The mission of Classification Societies is to contribute to the development and implementation.
Multi Site Damage Multi-Site Damage is the multiple crack problem in the riveted structure of an aircraft skin. The reason behind Aloha Airlines Boeing.
Tripartite Meeting Beijing, 1 November 2005 IMO GBS Classification Society’s View about the Scope, Verification Process and Acceptance Criteria Roberto.
IR-CAP Condition Assessment Program Indian Register of Shipping.
1 Houston Tanker Event 2007 Houston, TX 26 March 2007 Common Structural Rules for Tankers Gary Horn, P.E. Director, Technology ABS Houston.
Energy Audit- a small introduction A presentation by Pune Power Development Pvt. Ltd.
1 High Level Panel on Double Hull Tankers Ib Matthiesen – Head of Unit INTERTANKO – Athens Tanker Event 2005.
Victaulic Solutions for “YM Mercury” Chemical & oil carrier - IMO No Owner: Chemfleet – Class: BV Built: 2010 Marmara Tersanesi, Turkey.
Pressure Vessels.
INTERTANKO UK Corrosion 2002 – Cardiff, Wales October 24, 2002
High strength materials are being increasingly used in designing critical components to save weight or meet difficult service conditions. Unfortunately.
Assignment 3 Hull structure Ran Xiao, Tomas Their, Kul
The Korea Shipbuilders’ Association Shipbuilders’ Experience & Feedback on IACS C ommon S tructural R ules.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Marine Services Condition Assessment Condition Assessment © 2003 Lloyd’s Register of Shipping.
Multipurpose Polar Icebreaking Subsea Work Vessel
Material failure analysis
New common IACS Rules for Tankers IACS Joint Tanker Rules Presentation/discussion with Intertanko Spetses September 2004.
Rogue Waves 2004 Ship design rules and regulations – an overview of major themes Gil-Yong Han Int’l Association of Classification Societies.
Hull Lifecycle Programme Intertanko Annual Meeting Dr. Pierre C. Sames, Head of Strategic Research and Development.
Tripartite meeting Beijing, 8-9 November 2008 Status and Early Experience of CSRs Gary Horn Director Rules & Standards, ABS IACS Hull Panel Chair.
FPSO Experience Database JIP FPSO Research Forum 16 October 2002 Santiago de Compostela, Spain Robert SpongABS Consulting Presented by:
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Design of offshore structures in a field development perspective ”From nothing to nothing with solid profit” $$
HCAs & Pipeline Assessment Intervals Is There a Need for Change? Richard B. Kuprewicz President, Accufacts Inc. For Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans Conference.
Steps in Foundation Engineering Understand project and site Develop design criteria Identify possible foundation alternatives Conduct soil investigation.
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
1 IACS Common Structural Rules INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Rio de Janeiro, 25 April 2006.
GOAL BASED NEW SHIP CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Dragos Rauta INTERTANKO SAFEDOR 27 January 2005 Germanischer Lloyd, Hamburg.
Life extension, upgrade and repair of welded structures – Towards the use of High Strength Steels Zuheir Barsoum KTH – Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
FAILED / ABORTED REPAIRS WHO PAYS & WHY? JOE GRASSO, ATTORNEY, WIGGIN & DANA SEAN MURPHY, NAVAL ARCHITECT & SURVEYOR ATLANTIC MARINE ASSOCIATES.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Tripartite meeting Korea, Seoul, 14 – 15 September 2006 Agenda B.10 Sharing information for ships in service (incident information sharing) Konstantin.
PASSENGER SHIPS – now and in the future
Lecture 2: Ship structural components
HULL FRAMING SYSTEMS GROUP B : SUNDEEP KULHARI PRASHANT KRISHNAN
The Korea Shipbuilders’ Association Korea Shipbuilders’ Opinion/Proposal Production Plans and Lines Plan Production Plans and Lines Plan.
OUTAGE MANAGEMENT. OUTAGE APPROACH/PHILOSOPHY A) Time based / machine operating hours based concept related to OEM recommendations - More expensive than.
1 IMO Goal-based Standards A shipbuilders ’ opinion September 20, 2007 The Shipbuilders ’ Association of Japan NISHIYAMA, goro.
Assessment of offshore wind turbines support structures within a reliability based framework 1 Dr Athanasios Kolios Research Fellow, Risk and Reliability.
Project Management Information System What?? Objective: –Record & report relevant information and status of various components of project –Highlight the.
Probability of ship fracture John Kent Contents 1What is brittle fracture 2Material fracture toughness 3Calculation overview 4Results.
Fatigue Analysis in ASME B31.3 Piping
IS:800 Section 13 FATIGUE. Introduction Mechanism of Fatigue Fracture Factors Affecting Fatigue Strength Design Strength & Cumulative Fatigue Damage IS:800.
New Aerial Lift Standards Getting Close To Completion
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE Marina Zanne, M.Sc.
Wind Composite Services Group/WindCom
Seminar On Energy Audit Submitted To: Submitted By:
5/16/2018 4:40 PM Shipbuilding industry’s perspective on the new IACS Common Structural Rules SHIBASAKI, Kohta Japan Marine United Corp. The Shipbuilders’
A study on Fatigue Strength for Tank Structures subject to
CRANE RELIABILITY STUDY
Impact of Harmonized CSR for Oil Tanker
Date of download: 12/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Hull damage experience in CSR tankers TSCF SBM, Busan October 2016
Re-Classing Existing Diving Systems
Application of New Common Structural Rules on Aframax Tankers
مادة الدرس : مقدمة في علم الإحصاء
SR 1 and 2 Hay Point Fatigue Damage Structural Risk
Presentation transcript:

Crack management Clemens van der Nat Bluewater Energy Services BV

FRF - crack management2 Content n Crack management n Existing practice in shipping n Bluewater crack management

FRF - crack management3 Crack management n Management in engineering phase –Fatigue damage prediction –Classification rules vs. direct calculations n Management in operations phase –Regular survey –When cracks are found: n Risk assessment n Corrosion –Move to condition based monitoring

FRF - crack management4 Existing practice in shipping Current practice for oil tankers n Location of cracks determined by loading condition n Involvement of classification societies –Survey period –Methods –Required action n Repair at shipyard

FRF - crack management5 Bluewater crack management Current practice for FPSOs life time extension n Tanker hull design (web spacing, details) n Old tanker requires survey of actual status and estimate of actual fatigue life n Site specific predictions for new “design life” n Critical details to be identified and improved n Surveys and repairs at site

FRF - crack management6 Enlarged brackets and backing brackets Prediction??? Expected damage after 20 years Actual damage after 6 years Backing brackets only

FRF - crack management7 Critical details Adding a backing bracket reduces the load on the crack tip Misalignment induces cracking, a backing bracket reduces the load on the hot spot

FRF - crack management8 Bluewater crack management n Repair of critical cracks during operational life –Repair is required, delay only by exemption –When is a crack critical? n Damage effects global strength of hull n Crack length exceeds critical value n More than one crack at one location n Cracks in oil separating bulkheads n Crack growth exceeds inspection interval –Reduce risk on progressive cracking

FRF - crack management9 Critical crack repair Cracks in bulkhead are not acceptable Repair by removing crack and adding backing bracket to unload the hotspot

FRF - crack management10 Critical crack repair Risk: crack might propagate into the longitudinal bulkhead Repair: adding lug plate extending to the longitudinal bulkhead plate

FRF - crack management11 Comparison of cost Note: For offshore work extra personnel for safety is required

FRF - crack management12 Discussion n “Design life”, what is basis? n “Critical” crack, criteria on case by case basis? n Accuracy of predictions, sufficient or not? n Recommendation to vessel owners: do invest during Life Time extension or not?