This file is part of the FS Resources section at:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
Advertisements

Note to presenters - This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should.
National Park Service Mission To preserve unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education,
Note to presenters - This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Managing Development in the Coastal Zone, Federal Policy II: Coastal Zone Management Act; Slide 29.1 Session Name: Managing Development in the Coastal.
Need for Revision to the New York State Endangered Species Regulations
1 This document is contained within the Traditional Tools and Skills Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may.
This document is contained within the Fish and Wildlife Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Amendments to Part 182: Endangered Species Regulations.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Fermilab Environmental Management System (EMS)
Endangered Species Act
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Cooperative Agreements “Suppression”
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Six Transportation System Development.
Defining Responsible Forest Management FSC Forest Certification Standards Defining Responsible Forest Management Version:
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Wilderness Characteristics Policy & Guidance for the BLM Two manuals completed in March 2012: 6310 – Conducting Wilderness Characteristics Inventory 6320.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Manual Direction Cave & Karst Resources Management James Goodbar Senior Cave /Karst Specialist Bureau of Land Management May 12-16, 2014 Cody, Wyoming.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
Wilderness Considerations for Fire Resource Advisors Wilderness Fire Resource Advisor Training Southern Region
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Endangered Species Act Counterpart Regulations for National Fire Plan Projects Bureau of Land Management Forest Service June 9, 2004.
ASSESSING AND MANAGING WILDLAND RECREATIONAL DISTURBANCE Stephen J. DeMaso, Fidel Hernández, and Leonard A. Brennan Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute,
Species At Risk Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Legislation - Update on Status Bill C-5 currently before the Senate Has been given 1st and 2nd readings Bill.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Endangered Species Act 2005 Legislative Action. House of Representatives  On Sept. 29, 2005 the House passed H.R. 3824: Threatened and Endangered Species.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
PROVISIONS OF H.R SECTION 3: SCIENCE BASED IMPROVEMENTS TO MANAGEMENT [303(a )] Page 3, lines 22-25, Page 4, Page 5, lines 1-9 Paragraph 15 is.
Cave and Karst Management Through Land Use Planning James Goodbar Sr. Cave Specialist Bureau of Land Management Cody, Wyoming May 12-16, 2014 Aaron Stockton.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
RESOURCE ADVISING IN SPECIAL MGMT. AREAS. TYPES OF SMA’S Designated Wilderness WSA - Wilderness Study Area National Monuments and similar areas Wild and.
Managing 6(f) Conversions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Greenville, SC September 8-11, 2015.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
Why preserve it? What is it? How to monitor it? Citizen stewardship WILDERNESS CHARACTER.
USING STEWARDSHIP AUTHORITY TO ADVANCE RESTORATION Mae Lee Hafer Regional Stewardship Coordinator Collaborative Restoration.
PETER A. APPEL ALEX W. SMITH PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY. OF GEORGIA SCHOOL OF LAW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRESENTED AT LEWIS AND CLARK LAW SCHOOL APRIL 11,
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
Wilderness Fires Law, Policy, Mgt Approach Steve Kimball, R1 Prog. Mgr. Wilderness, WSR’s, O/G’s Law, Policy, Mgt Approach Steve Kimball, R1 Prog. Mgr.
Wilderness Fires Law, Policy, Mgt Approach
Endangered Species Act
Executive Order – The Basics
The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988
PROVISIONS OF H.R
Research in Wilderness: How much is enough?
What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.
Presentation transcript:

This file is part of the FS Resources section at:

Fish and Wildlife Management in Wilderness AFWA Policies and Guidelines LONG version The materials in this presentation are derived from the Wilderness Act, Forest Service Policy, and the AFWA Policies and Guidelines. This presentation contains readily available information only and it is not offered as official FS or AFWA training A SHORT version of this presentation without the information on specific types of projects from the AFWA P and Gs is also available. The AFWA P and Gs and additional information is found in the Fish and Wildlife Management Toolbox found at:

Management of Fish and Wildlife in National Forest Wilderness Areas

Who has authority over management of fish and wildlife wilderness? a. habitat? b. populations? In addition to direction from law and FS policy what guidelines are used to manage fish and wildlife in wilderness? Questions Fish and Wildlife Management in Wilderness

The Wilderness Act Section 4 (d) (8): Nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting the jurisdiction or responsibilities of the several States with respect to wildlife and fish in the national forests. The Wilderness Act did not change any authorities previously granted to the states or reserved to the federal government.

The Wilderness Act Section 4 (b): Except as otherwise provided in this Act, each agency administering any area designated as wilderness shall be responsible for preserving the wilderness character of the area and shall so administer such area for such other purposes for which it may have been established as also to preserve its wilderness character. The Wilderness Act did prescribe that the federal agencies are responsible for preserving wilderness character.

Forest Service Wilderness Management Policy Management of Wildlife and Fish 1. Recognize that States have jurisdiction and responsibilities for the protection and management of wildlife and fish populations in wilderness. Cooperate and work closely with State wildlife and fish authorities in all aspects of wildlife and fish management. 2. Wildlife and fish management programs shall be consistent with wilderness values.

Forest Service Wilderness Management Policy (5) - Management of Wildlife and Fish Apply the "Policies and Guidelines for Fish and Wildlife Management in Wilderness and Primitive Areas," developed jointly by the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies [AFWA] Note – AFWA Policies and Guidelines Revised - June, 2006

Policies and Guidelines for Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness, AFWA 2006 POLICIES AND GUIDELINES FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IN NATIONAL FOREST AND BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WILDERNESS (as amended June, 2006) Fish and Wildlife Management Toolbox:

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness What is the purpose of the AFWA Policies and Guidelines ? “The purpose of these guidelines is to develop and expand a framework of cooperation upon which projects and activities may be planned and accomplished while working cooperatively at the national, regional, and local levels.” AFWA A. page 3

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Who manages fish and wildlife populations and who manages habitat? “ This statement of policy and the following are guidelines are intended to provide guidance to State fish and wildlife agencies, Forest Service (FS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) personnel for the management of fish and wildlife populations in wilderness in accordance with the Wilderness Act of 1964 (16 USC ).” AFWA A. and B. page 3

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Who manages fish and wildlife populations and who manages habitat? ”…consistent with applicable Federal and State laws, the States and the Federal government each have management responsibilities affecting fish and wildlife, and will endeavor to work cooperatively in the fulfillment of these responsibilities.” AFWA A. and B. page 3

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness What do the AFWA Policies and Guidelines say about the responsibility to preserve wilderness character? “The FS and BLM are required to preserve wilderness character as directed by the Wilderness Act, while supporting the States’ fish and wildlife objectives, to the extent such objectives are consistent with the Act.” AFWA B. page 3

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness What do the FS and the states need to do to implement the AFWA Policies and Guidelines ? “Participate with the States in annual coordination meetings and encourage communication, coordination and identification of State-originated fish and wildlife projects satisfying mutually beneficial objectives.” AFWA B. page 3-4

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness What do the FS and the states need to do to implement the AFWA Policies and Guidelines ? “Enter into individual agreements … in order to make these guidelines as relevant to individual States as they are to the FS and BLM. The FS and BLM will jointly encourage individual States to incorporate these guidelines into statewide agreements or encourage states to adopt a resolution endorsing these guidelines. Work with AFWA and States to identify opportunities and jointly pursue projects that meet fish and wildlife objectives for wilderness subject to compliance with applicable Federal law. “ AFWA B. page 3-4

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Who approves the use of motorized equipment, landing of aircraft, and structures for fish and wildlife management in wilderness? “ Proposed State fish and wildlife management activities that would involve uses generally prohibited under Section 4(c) of the Wilderness Act will be considered and may be authorized by the Federal administering agency.” AFWA E. page 5

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness What process is used to assess the need for and approve any of the ‘prohibited uses’ ? “Any such use should be rare and temporary; no roads can be built; and proposals for use of motorized equipment will be considered and may be authorized by the Federal land management agency, in cooperation with the State, through application of the Minimum Requirement Decision Process (MRDP) as outlined in Section E., General Policy.” AFWA F. 1. page 6

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness How is management of threatened and endangered species to be conducted? “For purposes of this document, threatened and endangered species means Federally listed species applicable to the geographic area. Actions necessary to conserve or recover threatened or endangered species, including habitat manipulation and special conservation measures, that involve uses generally prohibited under Section 4 (c) of the Wilderness Act, will be considered and may be authorized by the Federal administering agency” AFWA F. 5. page 8

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness How is management of threatened and endangered species to be conducted? “Guidelines for Threatened and Endangered Species a. When alternative areas outside of wilderness offer equal or better opportunities for habitat improvement or species conservation, actions to recover threatened or endangered species outside of wilderness should be considered first, but this does not preclude analyzing or implementing projects in wilderness. b. Threatened and endangered species may be transplanted into previously occupied habitat within wilderness. Proposals that would involve uses generally prohibited under Section 4 (c) of the Wilderness Act will be considered and may be authorized by the Federal administering agency….” AFWA F. 5. page 8 -9

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness How is management of threatened and endangered species to be conducted? “Guidelines for Threatened and Endangered Species c. Proposals for transplants of indigenous species and proposals for habitat improvement projects require close coordination and cooperation between the State and Federal administering agencies. d.To prevent Federal listing, manage and conserve indigenous species that could become threatened or endangered.“ AFWA F. 5. page 8

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Can fish and wildlife research and management surveys be conducted in wilderness ? “Provide opportunities for studies that are dependent on a wilderness environment.” FSM page 20 of 24 “ Research and evaluation related to fish and wildlife, their habitats and the recreational users of these resources are legitimate activities in wilderness when conducted in a manner compatible with the area as wilderness.“ “Coordination of all research and survey activities is essential between State and Federal agencies. “ AFWA F. 3. page 6

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Can fish and wildlife research and management surveys be conducted in wilderness ? “Methods that temporarily infringe on the wilderness environment may be authorized by the Federal administering agency if alternative methods or other locations are not reasonably available. Research or management survey activities that would involve uses generally prohibited under Section 4 (c) of the Wilderness Act will be considered and may be authorized by the Federal administering agency through application of the MRDP as outlined in Section E., General Policy.” AFWA F. 3. page 6

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Can fish and wildlife research and management surveys be conducted in wilderness ? “Helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft over flights may be used to conduct fish and wildlife research and management activities. Use of aircraft for these activities will be coordinated among the State and Federal agencies to minimize conflicts with other wilderness uses. To the greatest extent possible, aircraft must be used in a manner that minimizes disturbance to wilderness character and to human and wildlife use of the wilderness.” AFWA F. 3. page 6-7

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Can fish and wildlife research and management surveys be conducted in wilderness ? “Aerial counts and observations (i.e. surveys) of wildlife are allowed in the management of fish and wildlife resources in wilderness. will be considered and may be authorized Capturing and marking of animals, radio telemetry, and occasional installations (such as shelters for cameras and scientific apparatus and enclosures essential for wildlife research or management surveys) that would involve uses generally prohibited under Section 4 (c) of the Wilderness Act will be considered and may be authorized by the Federal administering agency… “ AFWA F. 3. page 7

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Can fish and wildlife research and management surveys be conducted in wilderness ? A. Obtain specific written approval or permits from the Federal administering agency before erecting any structure, enclosure, or exclosure.” AFWA F. 3. page 6-7

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Who approves the application of pesticides and/or chemical treatment in wilderness? “The use of pesticides may be necessary in management of fish and wildlife resources, and their use must be approved by the Federal administering agency.” AFWA F. 2. page 6 Note: The Regional Forester must approve any pesticide use in wilderness. FSM c

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Who approves population sampling projects? “Methods that temporarily infringe on the wilderness environment may be authorized by the Federal administering agency if alternative methods or other locations are not reasonably available. AFWA F. 3. page 6-7 and F. 7. page 9

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Who approves population sampling projects? “Gill netting, battery-operated electrofishing, and other standard techniques of population sampling that would involve uses generally prohibited under Section 4 (c) of the Wilderness Act will be considered and may be authorized by the Federal administering agency through application of the MRDP…” AFWA F. 3. page 6-7 and F. 7. page 9

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Can fish-less lakes be stocked? “It is generally undesirable to stock previously unstocked waters. Because these areas generally reflect natural ecosystem processes, they may possess high scientific values.” AFWA F. 10. page Who has to agree to this activity? “Lakes and streams currently without fish may be considered for stocking, if there is mutual agreement that no appreciable loss of scientific values or adverse effects on wilderness resources will occur. “ AFWA F. 10. page 10-11

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness What is the criteria for approving aerial fish stocking? “Aerial stocking of fish shall be permitted for those waters in wilderness where this was an established practice before wilderness designation or where other practical means are not available.” AFWA F. 11. page 11 Note – FS Policy at FSM b States: “Regional Foresters may permit dropping of fish from aircraft…”

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness What is the criteria for approving aerial fish stocking? “To stock waters that had not been aerially stocked before wilderness designation, the State agency will demonstrate to the Federal administering agency the need for using aircraft.” AFWA F. 11. page 11

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Who approves wildlife transplant projects? Transplants shall be made in a manner compatible with the wilderness character of the area. Transplant projects require advance written approval by the Federal administering agency. AFWA F. 12. page 11

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Can non-native or non-indigenous wildlife species be introduced in wilderness ? “…indigenous wildlife and fish species are those that naturally occur within a wilderness area and that were not introduced by humans.” “Additionally, fish species introduced for management purposes prior to wilderness designation may be managed as indigenous fish species if the species is likely to survive.” AFWA E. page 5

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Can non-native or non-indigenous wildlife species be introduced in wilderness ? “The State has the responsibility to make the determination as to which wildlife and fish species are indigenous.” AFWA E. page 5 “Transplants shall be made in a manner compatible with the wilderness character of the area.” AFWA F. 12. page 11

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Federal agency approval is needed for projects, regardless of method or equipment used, such as: Application of pesticides (herbicides and piscicides included) Research and surveys – “methods that infringe on the wilderness environment” Habitat alteration Wildlife transplants Wildlife (predator) damage control Visitor use management Fire Management AFWA F. pages 5-15

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Federal agency approval is needed for projects if they require : : Use of motorized equipment, mechanical transport, landing of aircraft, motor boats, motor vehicles, structures, installations, temporary roads for any activity including: –Research and surveys –Facility development (i.e. water and fish developments and maintenance of existing) –Threatened and Endangered species –Population sampling –Spawn taking –Fish stocking AFWA F. pages 5-15

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Use of the Minimum Requirements Decision Process (MRDP) Outline (Attachment A) to determine the Minimum Requirements “…the State agency will conduct the Minimum Requirements Decisions Process, in close coordination and cooperation with the Federal administering agency,…” “The Federal administering agency will make the final determination of the minimum requirements.” AFWA Attachment A pages 14-17

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness Use of the Minimum Requirements Decision Process (MRDP) Outline (Attachment A) to determine the Minimum Requirements “For project proposals where a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis is required, the MRDP prepared by the State agency will be included in the NEPA process. ” AFWA Attachment A pages 14-17

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness The Minimum Requirements Decision Process (MRDP) Outline The MRDP Outline is similar to the Minimum Requirements Decision Guide (MRDG) process recommended by the FS Chief for determining the minimum requirements. Both the MRDP and the MRDG use a two-step process to first determine if an action is necessary and then determine the minimum tool. AFWA Attachment A pages 14-17

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness MRDP Outline vs. MRDG Comparison MRDP Step 1, #4: Requires consideration of other state guidance MRDG Step 1, D: Requires consideration of federal, state. tribal, and other guidance Analysis: Limiting consideration to only state guidance could inadvertently ignore other requirements such as a federal species conservation plan or tribal management agreement. AFWA Attachment A pages 14-17

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness MRDP Outline vs. MRDG Comparison MRDP Step 2a, 2: Analysis of effects to wilderness characteristics and 2 qualities of wilderness character –naturalness –opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation MRDG Step 2, B: Comparison of effects to wilderness character and all 4 qualities –naturalness –opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation –undeveloped –untrammeled AFWA Attachment A pages 14-17

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness MRDP Outline vs. MRDG Comparison MRDP Wilderness characteristics and 2 qualities of wilderness character –naturalness –opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation MRDG Wilderness character and all 4 qualities –naturalness –opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation –undeveloped –untrammeled Analysis: Wilderness character is the term used in the Wilderness Act Wilderness characteristics is a specific term used by the FS to determine if lands should be evaluated and proposed for designation as wilderness.

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness MRDP Outline vs. MRDG Comparison MRDP Wilderness characteristics and 2 qualities of wilderness character –naturalness –opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation MRDG Wilderness character and all 4 qualities –naturalness –opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation –undeveloped –untrammeled Analysis: The FS has defined wilderness character to include 4 qualities (Monitoring Selected Conditions Related to Wilderness Character: A National Framework, 4/05) Both the ‘undeveloped’ and ‘untrammeled’ qualities are often relevant to analysis of fish and wildlife management projects.

Management of Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness The objective is to cooperate and coordinate and implement necessary projects that meet both wilderness and fish and wildlife management objectives. : For more information visit the Fish and Wildlife Management Toolbox at: