High School Mathematics: Where Are We Headed? W. Gary Martin Auburn University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Advertisements

MARCH 2012 Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Implications for Grades K-12.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Adoption and Implementation Workbook Alissa Peltzman, Achieve, Vice President of State Policy & Implementation.
CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Multnomah County Student Achievement Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick.
District Teacher Leaders and School Teacher Leaders Workshop April 29, 2004 Tallassee High School.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Agenda PWCS Balanced Math Program Grades
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume VII System-Wide Standards-Based Mathematics Model.
 State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by the Council of Chief State School.
Common Core State Standards CCSS What Parents & Board Members Need to Know.
The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics Dr. Robinson, EEX 4251, Spring 2008.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Preparing America’s Future Future. No Child Left Behind Key Principles Increase accountability for student performanceIncrease accountability for student.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Mathematics The Bigger Picture. Mathematics is not arithmetic… Arithmetic is about –math facts –computation –algorithms –word problems Mathematics is.
Ohio HSTW/MMGW: The Positive Impact!. What is High Schools That Work?  An initiative of the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)  The nation’s largest.
Achieve’s American Diploma Project (ADP): A Preview Urban Mathematics Leadership Network Meeting April 20-22, 2006.
Out with the Old, In with the New: NYS Assessments “Primer” Basics to Keep in Mind & Strategies to Enhance Student Achievement Maria Fallacaro, MORIC
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
A presentation of key findings from a national survey of 800 registered voters conducted September 10-12, 2007.
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in California.
National & International Assessments. INTERNATIONAL: Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS) The Trends in International Math and Science.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
1. 2 To have the student learn: The history of the development of the Principles and Standards; the vision of the NCTM; Principles; and the Standards.
International Assessments September 5, 2012 DAC Annual Meeting
National & International Assessments. INTERNATIONAL: Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS) The Trends in International Math and Science.
C. “Changing the conversation…” Instructional Change –  Align to standards  Set higher expectations  Rigorous coursework  Assess  Data driven intervention.
ONEONTA HIGH SCHOOL 8 TH GRADE - OCTOBER 2010 PRESENTED ON DEC. 14, 2010 ACT EXPLORE RESULTS.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Creating a High School Diploma That Counts: What Should Higher Education Do? SHEEO Annual Meeting July 21, 2006.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
West Virginia’s Adoption of the Common Core State Standards for High School Mathematics Lou Maynus, NBCT Mathematics Coordinator Office of Instruction,
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
2012 Parent Engagement Summit. Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.
Your future – Are you ready to lead?. What are some of the factors that require us to change what we are doing in public education? How will those changes.
Joint Council April 6,  Standards for Mathematical Practice  Standards for Mathematical Content  PA Standards & CCSSM.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
UAE National Agenda – A World Class Education
Common Core Mathematics Standards Curriculum Network October 7, 2011.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
1 Perspectives on the Achievements of Irish 15-Year-Olds in the OECD PISA Assessment
September 2006 September 2007 September 2008 September 2009 September 2010 First teaching of 2 tier GCSE Maths (Foundation level C-F, Higher level A*
High School Graduation Requirements
California Common Core Standards
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
UAE National Agenda – A World Class Education
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
Presentation transcript:

High School Mathematics: Where Are We Headed? W. Gary Martin Auburn University

Agenda We will address the following questions related to high school mathematics: 1. How are we doing? 2. What do students need? 3. Where should we be heading?

How Are We Doing?

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) “The Nation’s Report Card” Given in all subject areas, including mathematics. Most recently given to grade 12 students in 2005.

Sample Questions Answer the three questions. Predict what percent of grade 12 students answered it correctly.

Sample Question #3

Responses to #3

Sample Question #17

Responses to Question #17

Question # If f(x) = x 2 + x and g(x) = 2x + 7, what is an expression for f(g(x)) ?

Responses to #16

NAEP Achievement Levels Advanced(≥216) Proficient or above(≥176) Basic level or above(≥141) Below basic(<141) (see p. 21) 2% 23% 61% 39%

Briefly review the report…

Subgroups on NAEP 70% of African-American students are below basic 6% proficient or above Also, big gaps for Hispanic students, students with disabilities and ELL No major differences by gender

Impact of Course-Taking COURSEAVERAGE SCORE AVERAGE LEVEL Algebra I or less117Below basic Geometry126Below basic Algebra II141Basic Pre-calculus165Basic Calculus182Proficient

Trends The NAEP math assessment hadn’t been given to grade 12 students since This is a new framework and new scale, which makes comparisons to previous years difficult. An analysis of common items to the two assessments suggests that there is a “probable” increase, from 42% to 44% correct.

Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Measures 15-year-olds’ capabilities in reading literacy, mathematics literacy, and science literacy every 3 years. One area is focused on each cycle. Math was the focus in countries were included.

Mathematics Literacy “...an individual’s capacity to identify and understand the role that mathematics plays in the world, to make well-founded judgements and to use and engage with mathematics in ways that meet the needs of that individual’s life as a constructive, concerned, and reflective citizen.” Thus, PISA’s emphasis is on the ability to apply a range of knowledge and skills to a variety of problems with real-life contexts.

Sample Problems See pp. 8 and 9.

Results International average:501 U.S. average:476 U.S. students averaged: Better than students in 9 countries The same as students in 4 countries Worse than students in 26 countries

More Results U.S. students did best in “Uncertainty” and worst in “Space and shape”

Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Grade 12 was last tested in 1995 (released in 1998). General performance. U.S. was significantly below international average. Outperformed by 14 countries Similar to 4 countries Outperformed 2 countries Advanced students. U.S. was significantly below international average. Outperformed by 11 countries Similar to four countries Did not outperform any country

What Can We Conclude?

What Do Students Need?

An Agenda for Action (NCTM, 1980) Problem-solving should be the central focus Include estimation, geometry, measurement, data analysis, modeling, computer literacy -- not just computation Take full advantage of the power of technology Require more mathematics study and a curriculum that meets the needs of all students. 3 years of math in high school; those going on to further study should have 4 years Meet the needs of different groups of students Further study --vs.-- “Consumer math” (which should include a broader focus on quantitative literacy) However -- Problem solving for all AND Algebra for all Move away from focus on calculus

NCTM’s Standards Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000) Compare and contrast recommendations for 9-12 to An Agenda for Action

Ready or Not: Creating a HS Diploma that Counts DISCUSS: Why might they consider the high school diploma an issue? Read pp. 1-2

Two Audiences The project looked at both: Requirements for the workplace Requirements for postsecondary education DISCUSS: How do you think the requirements for these populations are the same or different? Read p. 3.

What Is the Solution? The American Diploma Project set out to define the content needed by students in order to: Succeed in postsecondary education Succeed in the workplace They concluded that this is more alike than different through Algebra II!

Summary The traditional middle class based on manufacturing is disappearing. “Good jobs” ($25,000+/year, plus benefits) increasingly require advanced preparation in mathematics. Preparation in algebra, geometry, data analysis Think creatively, solve problems Algebra II is increasingly seen as the gateway course to future success For higher education For the workforce

Competitiveness The U.S. is losing its leadership position in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. (Rising Above the Gathering Storm) By 2010, more than 90% of all scientists and engineers will be living in Asia. (Tapping America’s Potential, Business Roundtable) Decreasing numbers of students are majoring in mathematical sciences. (CUPM Report, MAA, 2004) Mathematics is a key to improving performance in science

New Demands for Mathematics The challenge of globalization and the rise of technology (The World is Flat) The need to extend beyond the traditional curriculum leading to calculus (MAA Curriculum Foundations) Statistics is increasingly important (GAISE) The business community is calling for ability to solve problems, communicate, and learn in teams (Ready or Not)

Where Should We Be Heading?

NCTM’s Next Effort “Focus on the High School Curriculum” Issues: Increasing options for success Ensuring equity Promoting reasoning Important mathematics Technology A coherent program

Project Model A core document: pages Shorter versions for particular audiences Policymakers Administrators Parents and community Additional products for teachers

Thoughts How can this effort be more effective?

State Level What are the ramifications for state high school standards? What are other implications for state policy?

Personal Connections Teacher Educators What can do differently to prepare students to teach high school? Teachers What can we do differently in classrooms?