Response to Intervention in Illinois November 22, 2008 Presented by: Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Todays presentation slides will be available at under the Resources Section Thanks for supporting ISBEs quest to Go Green.
Advertisements

Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan September 4, 2008 Presented by:Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Data Collection Benchmark (CBM Family) Progress Monitoring Interventions Tiers Training/Materials Problem Solving Model Allocation of Resources.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
The RtI Plan Special Education Directors Conference August 1, 2008 Elizabeth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
Thank you for joining us for Implementing an RTI Model The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Response to Intervention
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
D62 Response to Intervention
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Response.
What is Response to Intervention (RTI)? Response to Intervention is the practice of providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Today’s presentation slides will be available at www. isbe
Handouts Please support ISBE’s efforts to Go Green!
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Handouts Please support ISBE’s efforts to Go Green!
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Response to Intervention in Illinois November 22, 2008 Presented by: Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education

As of January 1, 2009, all school districts will be required to have a district RtI plan. This presentation is intended to assist school districts to fully understand the background and guiding principles of the state plan and provide a basic understanding of district plan writing requirements.

Defining Response to Intervention (RtI)

Response to Instruction = RtI Approach for redesigning and establishing teaching and learning environments that are effective, efficient, relevant and durable for all students, families and educators NOT a program, curriculum, strategy, intervention NOT limited to special education NOT new

Essential Components Response to Intervention (RtI) consists of Three Essential Components: High quality, research-based instruction/ intervention matched to student needs Frequent use of data to determine learning rate and student performance level Educational decisions based upon the students response to instruction/intervention

Quality Education for All Students In an RtI Model educators will: Use assessments for screening, diagnostics and progress monitoring Use data from those assessments to inform instructional decisions Use a multi-tier model of instruction to respond to student needs Collaborate among teachers, school support personnel, administrators and parents

In an RtI Model educators will Use scientific, research-based instructional interventions when data show students are not successful Intervene early rather than adopt a wait to fail approach to education Effectively teach all children Quality Education for All Students

RtI is the Foundation of Instructional Improvement

Meeting the Needs of ALL Students One Educational System Educational Reform Education Initiatives Response to Intervention RtI IS School Improvement An EVERY EDUCATION Initiative Three Tier Model of School Supports Problem Solving Method of Decision-Making Integrated Data Collection that Informs Instruction

The Illinois Model

Multi-Tier Model Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Tier 3 Individual Students/Very Small Group Assessment-based High Intensity Tier 3 Individual Students/ Very Small Group Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Tier 2 Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Tier 2 Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Tier 1 All students Preventive, proactive Tier 1 All settings, all students Preventive, proactive

Defining the Tiers Tier 1: Core curriculum meets the needs of 80%* or more of the students Tier 2: 20%* of the students may be identified as at-risk and require supplemental instruction/intervention in addition to the core curriculum Tier 3: 5%* of those students may be identified as needing more intensive, small group or individual interventions to supplement the core curriculum *Percentages will vary by district/school

Legislation, Rules and State Plans

Why RtI Planning is Required By the school year, documentation of the RtI process shall be a part of the evaluation process for students when a specific learning disability (SLD) is suspected. After implementing an RtI process, a district may use a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement as part of the evaluation process for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability. It is important to note that RtI within a three-tier intervention model is also a part of special education eligibility decision-making required by 34 CFR and 23 IAC Reiterates the parent request for an evaluation already in Section … does not imply that it would prevent or abbreviate the use of RtI.

IDEA Regulations - October 2006 The State must not require the use of a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability must permit the use of a process based on the childs response to scientific, research-based intervention

IDEA Regulations - October 2006 The Team must document how the child responds to scientific, research-based interventions must document that the child does not achieve adequately or make sufficient progress in state- approved grade-level standards must consider data that demonstrates appropriate instruction delivered by qualified personnel and documentation of repeated assessments of achievement at reasonable intervals

Illinois Part Rule (SLD Eligibility) Requires: Use of a process that determines how the child responds to scientific, research-based interventions as part of the evaluation procedure described in 34 CFR Development and distribution of a State RtI Plan by January 1, 2008 by the State Superintendent in collaboration with professional organizations outlining the professional development that is necessary and other activities and resources that are essential for implementation

Illinois Part Rule Requires: Illinois districts to complete a plan for transition to the use of a process that determines how the child responds to scientific, research-based intervention as part of the evaluation procedure by January 1, 2009 Illinois districts to implement RtI as part of their evaluation procedure for making SLD determinations by the academic year

The Link Between RtI, Problem- Solving and SLD RtI is the problem-solving method for identifying a students strengths and weaknesses both academically and behaviorally. RtI matches instructional resources to educational needs RtI provides the historical data needed to determine what the school needs to do to ensure a students success in the general education curriculum.

Illinois Part Rule Important Illinois Rule does not prevent the parent request for an evaluation already in Rule

State RtI Plan

Participating Stakeholder Groups Illinois Education Association Illinois Federation of Teachers Illinois State Advisory Council on the Education of Children with Disabilities Illinois Alliance of Administrators of Special Education Illinois Association of School Administrators Regional Offices of Education Parent Initiative Centers Higher Education Illinois State Board of Education (Bilingual, Professional Certification, Accountability, Curriculum and Instruction, Special Education, Federal Grants and Programs)

State RtI Plan Components Introduction/Belief Statements for RtI Definition of RtI and Problem Solving Link between RtI and SLD Eligibility Determination Process for Implementation Implementation Timelines Funding Considerations ISBE Evaluation Plan Supporting Resources

District RtI Plan

Access the District Improvement Plan

Goal for 2010 – Integrated Planning From this... To this...

District AYP Status District is in StatusDistrict is not in Status Must Complete All DIP Sections Must Complete RtI Components

Required Plan Components

District Improvement Plan – Section I Section I-B – Local Assessment Data Section I-C – Item 1 Other Data Attributes and Challenges Section I-C – Item 3 Other Data Parent Involvement Section I-D – Key Factors

District Improvement Plan – Section II Section II-A – Action Plan RtI Objective Section II-B – Student Strategies and Activities for RtI Section II-C – Professional Development Strategies and Activities for RtI Section II-D – Parent Involvement Strategies and Activities for RtI Section II-E – Monitoring Process for RtI

District Improvement Plan – Section III Section III-A – Development, Review and Implementation Stakeholder Involvement

Starting the Writing Process

District Self-Assessment Template Contains seven areas of implementation: Consensus Building and Collaboration Standards-Based Curriculum and Research- Based Instruction Research-Based Assessment Practices Student Intervention/Problem Solving Team Process Intervention Strategy Identification Resources Allocation Ongoing Professional Development for Effective RtI

District Self-Assessment Template Each of the seven sections contains multiple indicators Use each template section with stakeholders to assess the districts current state of RtI implementation Each set of indicators can also be used to generate discussion and to assist stakeholders in developing a greater understanding of RtI

Crosswalk of Self-Assessment Template and RtI Plan Components Self Assessment Section District Improvement Plan Sections I-VIISection II-A Action Plan – RtI Objective

Crosswalk of Self-Assessment Template and RtI Plan Components Self Assessment Section District Improvement Plan I.Consensus Building and Collaboration Section III-A Stakeholder Involvement Section I-C, Item 3 Parent Involvement

Crosswalk of Self-Assessment Template and RtI Plan Components Self Assessment Section District Improvement Plan II.Curriculum and Instruction Section I-C, Item 1 Attributes and Challenges Section I-D Data and Analysis Key Factors

Crosswalk of Self-Assessment Template and RtI Plan Components Self Assessment Section District Improvement Plan III.Assessment Practices Section I-B Local Assessment

Crosswalk of Self-Assessment Template and RtI Plan Components Self Assessment Section District Improvement Plan IV.Intervention/ Problem-Solving Team Section I-B Local Assessment Section I-C, Item 3 Parent Involvement

Crosswalk of Self-Assessment Template and RtI Plan Components Self Assessment Section District Improvement Plan V.Intervention Strategy Identification Section I-B Local Assessment Section I-C Parent Involvement Section II-B Student Strategies and Activities Section II-D Parent Involvement Strategies and Activities Section II-E Monitoring

Crosswalk of Self-Assessment Template and RtI Plan Components Self Assessment Section District Improvement Plan VI.Resources Allocation Section II-B Student Strategies and Activities Section II-C Professional Development Strategies and Activities Section II-D Parent Involvement Strategies and Activities Section II-E Monitoring

Crosswalk of Self-Assessment Template and RtI Plan Components Self Assessment Section District Improvement Plan VII.Professional Development Section II-C Professional Development Strategies and Activities

Additional Resources

E-Plan Writing Web Resources E-Plan writing guides and other resources are available at process.htm

Accessing the IIRC Each District Superintendent has a User Name and Password to Access the IIRC A Word document template is available at districts.doc

Writing the Plan The E-Plans Resource guide found at process.htm has been updated to include RtI process.htm The RtI Self-Assessment Template found at provides a useful tool for writing teams

Plan Submission and Review

Submitting the Plan The RtI Plan is submitted by each district through the IIRC website ( when it is completehttp://iirc.niu.edu/ Local Board Approval is still required for Districts submitting a full District Improvement Plan

Reviewing the Plan Staff teams at the Illinois State Board of Education will review RtI plans using the IIRC monitoring forms

Response to Intervention Web Resources Information on Illinois RtI is available at