Superintendent Program Review Committee February 26, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group July 28, 2010.
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
SCHOOL LEADER PREPARATION: A BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE Submitted to the Illinois Board of Higher Education by the Commission on School Leader Preparation in.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Leading for High Performance. PKR, Inc., for Cedar Rapids 10/04 2 Everythings Up-to-Date in Cedar Rapids! Working at classroom, building, and district.
1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION OF THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INITIATIVE 1 Transforming Education in Kentucky Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner Michael.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
GEAR UP Alliance 2011 Institute for a College-Going Culture: Drive the dream Kentucky’s Unified Strategy for College and Career Readiness Aaron Thompson,
CIP Overview 1. Purposes of the CIP What Does CIP Success Look Like? Identifying the Team Roles of LEA, Principal, and CIP Team CIP Timeline 2.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
REL Appalachia and the Virginia Middle School Research Alliance Justin Baer, Director, REL Appalachia Virginia School-University Partnership Steering Committee.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Overview of the Vanguard Project May Vanguard Project Goal: Transform the system of education in Kentucky to a level whereby schools/students will.
Oklahoma’s Teacher and Leader Evaluation System and Great Expectations: Putting the Pieces Together Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Evaluating Educator Impact on Student Learning M.A.S.S. Midwinter Meeting March 17, 2015 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES.
Priority School (SIG) TA Session Cohort IV
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
WHAT’s A STATE TO DO? TO BUILD SCHOOL/EDUCATION LEADERSHIP CAPACITY Betty Hale.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
The Educational system Principles of Teaching Ag Ed.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Effective School Leaders and Student Achievement EPLC Conference Presentation March 13, 2006.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
CASE STUDY Managing Human and Material Resources EDD 7201 Dr. Michael Owens James Bell, Lisa Marvel, Stephanie Smith, Krystal Wright.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
College of Education and Behavioral Sciences Empowering Individuals to Lead and Serve Our Dynamic World Overview Video Welcome – Dr. Evans New Literacy.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
EMPOWERMENT THROUGH EDUCATION Business Retention and Expansion Task Force Workshop Joe Lucente Assistant Professor and Extension Educator OSU Extension.
A Comprehensive Principal Development Program for Minnesota Presentation to the BOSA Advisory Committee Friday, September 13, 2013.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Alternative Education Programs
Division of Talent and Performance
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dolores Esposito, Executive Superintendent of Leadership Developing Social and Emotional Skills in our Schools.
Schools of Excellence Recognition Program For Century Learning
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Superintendent Program Review Committee February 26, 2010

Agenda Welcome and Introductions Overview and Purpose of Group Charter approved by EPSB Review of Literature Discussion Work Teams based on charter objectives Discussion Topics

Purpose Review the current state of superintendent preparation in Kentucky. Ensure the inclusion of high quality clinical experiences for both traditional superintendent candidates and those seeking certification through an alternative route. Align the superintendent preparation with the teacher leader masters programs, redesigned principal programs, and the General Assembly mandated assessment center provided by the Kentucky Department of Education. Review programs that prepare supervisor of instruction and directors of pupil personnel.

Scope of Operation The committee shall remain within statutory boundaries, but it may recommend regulatory, statutory, and policy changes to the EPSB. All committee members are expected to make a time commitment to the work. EPSB staff will provide support to the committee and provide the necessary resources for the committee to complete its work.

Objectives Following a review of related research and current practice by institutions (both in and outside of KY) the committee shall bring forth recommendations in the following areas: Establishing a set of standards and critical performance indicators for superintendents. Determining, prior to admission to a superintendent program, that all candidates have the disposition to be leaders of a district, based on evidence of meaningful leadership experience related to improved student achievement.

Objectives Selecting superintendent candidates who exhibit the critical dispositions and attributes for guiding a district in the 21 st century. Providing throughout the program enhanced field experiences that permit superintendent candidates to put academic theory into meaningful practice.

Objectives Providing high quality mentoring for those entering the superintendent program via an alternative route. Collaborating with the Kentucky Department of Education in aligning the superintendent programs with the assessment center.

House Joint Resolution (HJR)14 Section 1: The executive direction of the EPSB, with the collaboration of the commissioner of education and the president of CPE, shall organize an interagency task force to collaborate with private and public post- secondary institutions for the redesign of programs of school and district leaders, including the preparation and certification of principals, assistant principals, superintendents, and other central office and school- based administrators.

Maxwell, 1998 Leadership is about influencing people to follow, while management focuses on maintaining systems and processes. The best way to test whether a person can lead rather than just manage is to ask him (her) to create positive change.

Binder and Literature Review 16 KAR 3:010: Certification for School Superintendent p.26 EPSB Administrator Preparation Program Review Documents p.33 Current KY Superintendent Program University Submissions p KAR 3:406: Superintendent Training Program and Assessment Center p.22 Kentucky Learning-Centered Leadership Report ISLLC Standards Kentucky Dimensions and Functions for School Leaders p. 89

Literature Review (cont.) Ohios Leadership Development Framework p.107 West Virginia Superintendent Leadership Institute p.171 Iowa Association of School Boards, New Superintendent Evaluation Process Makes the Connection p.183 Pennsylvania Department of Education, The Framework for Superintendent Preparation Program Guidelines p. 195 Waters and Marzano, School District Leadership that Works: The Effect of Superintendent Leadership on Student Achievement p.217

Work Team #1 Program Review and Development - Admission requirements - Dispositions - Field experiences - Alignment of program with teacher leader & principal programs - Standards/indicators/dimensions

Work Team #2 KDE Assessment Center -Review current topics -Address needs -Align to superintendent programs

Work Team #3 Supervisor of Instruction (SI) & Director of Pupil Personnel (DPP) – Review of current SI and DPP programs – Certification recommendations

Discussion Topic 1 What do effective superintendents need to know and be able to do?

Discussion Topic 2 What are the current practices of the superintendent programs that meet our listed expectations?

Discussion Topic 3 What past initiatives have been completed by the Commonwealth Collaborative of School Leader Program members (CCSLP)?

Discussion Topic 4 What initiatives are currently underway in KY universities to enhance training for superintendents? CURRENT INITIATIVES

Discussion Topic 5 What organizational strategies have been implemented to support our superintendents?

Discussion Topic 6 What practices/strategies need to be improved?

Discussion Topic 7 Which standards should be established for superintendents to be effective for 21st century schools?

Discussion Topic 8 What indicators/dimensions define the superintendent as an effective district leader?

Discussion Topic 9 What promising initiatives are currently underway in other states?

Discussion Topic 10 What research proven strategies need to be incorporated into the superintendent programs?

Discussion Topic 11 What alignment is needed between the superintendent programs with the redesigned teacher leader masters and principal programs? Superintendent Programs Teacher Leader Masters Programs Principal Programs

Discussion Topic 12 What alignment is needed between the superintendent programs and the superintendent training program and assessment process (704 KAR 3:406)? Superintendent Programs Superintendent Training Program Assessment Process

Discussion Topic 13 What priorities should we examine for our superintendent programs? Superintendent Program Priorities

Discussion Topic 14 What strategies should we develop to meet those priorities?

Discussion Topic 15 What tactical ideas might help achieve the strategies?

Discussion Topic 16 What model do we need to develop to ensure superintendents have skills necessary to lead a district in the 21st century?