May 2007 Developing a Walk-Out Evacuation Plan for Washington, DC TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro, VHB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
Advertisements

CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Corridor planning: a quick response strategy. Background NCHRP Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques (1978) Objective: provide tools.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Cobb County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Board of Commissioners Briefing January 22, 2008.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
CE 573 Transportation Planning1 Transportation Planning Context CE 573 Transportation Planning Lecture 7.
Lec 28: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Traffic assignment Learn how to assign generated and distributed trips to the street system approaching the site.
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Opportunities & Challenges Using Passively Collected Data In Travel Demand Modeling 15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic.
Automatic loading of inputs for Real Time Evacuation Scenario Simulations: evaluation using mesoscopic models Josep M. Aymamí 15th TRB National Transportation.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Evaluating and Communicating Model Results: Guidebook for.
Talking Operations Seminar on Emergency Transportation Operations & Planned Special Events - The DDOT Perspective - Joe Kammerman Homeland Security Coordinator.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
National Transportation || || 1 Lei Zhang, Ph.D. Associate Professor Director,
PAPAL VISIT 2015 CITIZEN ADVISORY LOWER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
2007 TRB Planning Application Conference D ELDOT S TATEWIDE E VACUATION M ODEL.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Transportation leadership you can trust. 12 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference, May 2009, Houston, TX presented to 12 th TRB Transportation.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Transportation Concurrency The provision of “adequate transportation facilities” Integrating land use and transportation.
2007 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Daytona Beach, Florida Pseudo Dynamic Traffic Assignment A Duration Based Static Assignment.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
S. Erdogan 1, K. Patnam 2, X. Zhou 3, F.D. Ducca 4, S. Mahapatra 5, Z. Deng 6, J. Liu 7 1, 4, 6 University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.
July 4 th Operation Fast Forward Safarian, Kaz, PM.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
August 20, 2015 Transportation Analysis Meeting 2015 Update Tampa Bay Region Roberto O. Miquel, AICP.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Regional Transportation Data Clearinghouse Update MWCOG Technical Committee 5 November 2004 Bob Griffiths, Martha Kile, Charlene Howard Department of Transportation.
{ MEMA Massachusetts Statewide Mass Care and Shelter Coordination Plan 1.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Florida Transit Modeling Workshop presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 8,
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Local Government Roundtable Session Arlington, Virginia
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Application of a Macro Based Capacity Constraint Assignment Technique
What follows after approval of Active Transportation
Presentation transcript:

May 2007 Developing a Walk-Out Evacuation Plan for Washington, DC TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro, VHB

2 Contributors Soumya Dey, DDOT Joe Kammerman, DDOT George Branyan, DDOT David Anspacher, VHB Dalia Leven, VHB Peter Cusolito, VHB Joe Ojeda, VHB

3 Objectives Facilitate pedestrian egress due to an event that requires an undeclared evacuation of District  Terrorism  Chemical spill  Other Identify pedestrian evacuees  Volume  Travel patterns Develop systematic plan to facilitate pedestrian egress

4 Model & Planning Assumptions Initial step of continuing planning process Follow-on planning required for MOUs, SOPs, etc Plan supports evacuation of:  Entire City  Individual Sub-areas of District Includes residents, non-residents & visitors Separate plans for:  Mobility impaired  K-12 students (public and private) Start-up time for evacuee bus transportation: 3 hrs

5 Project Status Initial Analysis Completed Draft Proposal for Inclusion in Emergency Transportation Annex Stakeholder Coordination Continuing Operational Issues Under Review Standard Operating Procedures Must be Developed

6 EMP Sustainability Model

7 Project Overview Determine Evacuation Scenarios Pedestrian Volumes and Routes Emergency Transportation Annex (ETA) Operational Strategies for Implementation

8 Review Existing Information Threat Vulnerability Assessment Emergency Transportation Annex Vehicle Evacuation Plan/Routes Consequence Mgmt Center & Traffic Mgmt Center protocols, procedures, diagrams and maps Transfer Locations Census Data Travel Data Available pedestrian facilities (sidewalks, etc.)

9 Evacuation Structure Transfer Points Collection Areas Bus Routes

10 Pedestrian Evacuation Structure

11 Pedestrian Evacuation Structure (Continued)

12 Walk-Out Routes Pedestrians guided to routes that minimize interference with vehicular travel Pedestrians able to walk on all facilities Pedestrians will be supported on walk-out routes  Information  Police / traffic control  Food and water  Medical Use of sidewalks and a few designated roadways (only when sidewalks too crowded)

13 Evacuation Time Periods Daytime Incident  Most bodies at desks  Weekday - 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.  Evacuation of entire city Nighttime Incident  Most bodies in bed  Weekday - 12:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m.  Evacuation of entire city

14 Model Structure

15 Estimating Number of Evacuees (Daytime)

16 Estimating Number of Evacuees (Trip Generation)

17 Estimating Number of Evacuees (Trip Generation)

18 Estimating Number of Resident Evacuees (Trip Generation)

19 Estimating Number of Non-Resident Evacuees (Trip Generation)

20 Estimating Number of Visitor Evacuees (Trip Generation)

21 Pedestrian Volumes Evacuees at time of event  Daytime scenario – approx. 850,000  Nighttime scenario – approx. 700,000 Evacuees that are pedestrians  Daytime scenario – approx. 400,000  Nighttime scenario – approx. 300,000 Evacuees by sub-area

22 District of Columbia Sub-Areas

23 Evacuees by Sub-Areas

24 Destination/ Mode Choice

25 Destination/Mode Choice Choice of destination (transfer point, collection area) is determined by weighted total time  Walk Time (weight = 1.5)  Wait Time (weight = 1) Startup Time (assumed as 3 hrs) Queue Time  Bus Time (weight = 1) Logit model distributed evacuees across all of the available transfer points and collection areas

26 Pedestrian Evacuees by Transfer Point (Inside District)

27 Daytime Pedestrian Evacuees Number of Pedestrians Collection AreaWalking DirectlyTotal Arriving VA #13,50019,500 VA #212,50025,000 VA #31,50030,000 MD #118,00045,000 MD #29,00036,000 MD #310,50026,000 MD #440,00069,500 MD #550020,000 MD #667,00093,500 Total162,500364,500

28 Assignment Uses standard regional model with some modifications to the network:  Addition of non-vehicular facilities  Removal of vehicle-only highway facilities  Removal of all one-way restrictions  Definition of all speeds as 3 mph (4 ft/sec)

29 Walk-Out Corridors Preliminary Draft

30 Corridor Analysis

31 Corridor Volume & Capacity Comparison

32 Corridor Support

33 Research Topics How far are people willing to walk during an evacuation? Where do you direct pedestrian evacuees? Who will wait for transportation and who will walk? What support services are necessary?  Water  Medical  Other How can undeclared evacuation be supported? If sidewalk facilities are insufficient to accommodate pedestrian volumes, how do you dedicate roadways to evacuees?  Limited access facilities  At grade roadways

Questions?