DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Supervisor’s Core: Fiscal Essentials Version 2.0 July 2009.
Working Across Systems to Improve Outcomes for Young Children Sheryl Dicker, J.D. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Family and Social Medicine, Albert.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau September 2007.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Identifying the Underlying Factors Related to Placement Stability in Florida Penelope (Penny) L. Maza, Ph.D. Consultant National Resource Center for Child.
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Georgia: Improving Outcomes for Children through Data Sharing Presenter: Sharon L. Hill, PhD Director, Georgia Division of Family & Children Services Presentation.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
1 Contracts Training Summer Agenda Entering a Provider Entering a Contract –Enter Contract Holder Information –Enter Contract Line Item Number.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
1 A B C’s of Performance Based Contracting A Presentation for the Georgia Child Welfare Private Providers Provider Summit Held at the Wyndam Hotel September.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
1 Georgia’s Child Support Program … what you need to know.
Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July.
1 Pre-Service Training Summer Agenda Day 1 –Searching (Cases, Clients, etc…) –Client Information –Contacts/Visits Day 2 –Home Removal and Placement.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
1 G-FORCE MEETING October 23, 2008 ON THE ROAD TO GREATNESS!
Department of Human Services
1 DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING April 23, 2009.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
PEFORMANCE TRACKING & PRACTICE IMPLICATION DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING June 26, 2008.
Kenny A vs State Principles Georgia’s Child Welfare System must actively promote the opportunity for children to grow up with in a family. Family contacts.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Administration for Children and Families Children’s Bureau Fostering Connections Implementation Support & Resources CAPTA 2010 – Highlights.
1 CPA PROVIDER G-FORCE MEETING January 12, Agenda Maltreatment in Care Permanency Continuum Permanency Status Exercise for February DFCS Data.
NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.
SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.
1. DFCS Performance Update Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council September 16, 2015.
1 Provider “G” What the Heck is That?!. 2 G-Force Process  Georgia has pioneered a performance management approach which shapes practice according to.
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau March 2007.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
DHS Board Meeting DFCS Subcommittee Report Performance Highlights July 21, 2010.
OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention (CBCAP) and Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) Grantees Meeting.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Foster Care After 18 AB12 signed into law September 30, 2010 Designed to align with the Federal Fostering Connections to Success Act Extends foster care.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
Foster Care Managed Care Program
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Insert Meeting Date and Presenters
Overview of Public Facing ODJFS Child Welfare Dashboards
The Preventing Sex Trafficking & Strengthening Families Act
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009

2 AGENDA Child Welfare Trends & Outcomes Safety Resources CFSR Outcomes OFI Trends & Outcomes Analysis of Decreasing TANF Child Only Cases

3

4

5

6 REPORT DISPOSTIONS March 2008, September 2008 & March 2009 Total Reports March 2008=7,791 September 2008=8,115 March 2009=7,751

7 INVESTIGATIONS Total Investigations March 2008=2,794 September 2008=2,876 March 2009=2,371 Decrease in percentage of reports investigated in March 2009 but higher percentage substantiated. Unsubstantiated and opened have been excluded from this graph.

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS IN SAFETY RESOURCES

47

48 AVERAGE DAYS IN SAFETY RESOURCES BY REGION January & February 2009* Several regions indicated that judges are ordering safety resource placements for children. * As reflected in SHINES

49

50 Item 3: Services to Family to Protect Children in Home and Prevent Removal or Re-entry Into Foster Care May 2008 – April 2009

51 Item 3: Services to Family to Prevent Removal or Re-Entry Into FC Determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to provide services to the family to prevent children’s entry into foster care or re-entry after a reunification.

52 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 3: Services to Family to Prevent Removal or Re-Entry 739 of %304 of %

53 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May April2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 3: Services to Family to Prevent Removal or Re-Entry(FPS Only) 401 of %173 of % Item 3: Services to Family to Prevent Removal or Re-Entry(Plc/ Adopt Only) 90 of %25 of %

% PIP Goal

55 Review Findings for Item 3 Lack of follow up with identified services to prevent removal and reduce risk. When parents were non compliant with services, documentation did not support the state’s efforts to secure court intervention. Delays in initiating services to the family. Safety and risk assessments are tools and not activities or services to prevent removal. Safety plans are not being monitored.

56 Safety Resources May 2008 – April 2009

57 Rolling Twelve Months May April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 # of Cases W/SR Assessed Timely/ Appropriate Average Days in SR # of Cases W/SR Assessed Timely/ Appropriate Average Days in SR 21052% %136 Safety Resources

58 FFY 2009 To-Date: October 2008 – April 2009 Regions 13 (Fulton) and 14 (Dekalb) do not include PLC/Adopt. Cases Region # of Cases With SR Assessed Timely/ Appropriate Average Days in SR 41644% % % % % % %142 Safety Resources

59 Review Findings for Safety Resources Screenings not completed on all household members in the safety resource home. Assessments not completed in required timeframe. Lack of follow up with children in safety resources. Lack of contacts and service provision with parents to reduce risk so children can return home. This trend could have a negative impact on the IV-E eligibility of children who may later enter foster care.

60 Other Issue: Utilize safety resource tab in SHINES by entering safety resource in a timely manner. Assessments in SHINES in the contacts/summaries section would not be captured as safety resource case. Accuracy of start and end date in SHINES.

PERMANENCY FOR CHILDREN

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85 CFSR Georgia’s Program Improvement Plan

86 Georgia’s Program Improvement Plan 5 Strategies  111 Action Steps 26% of the Action steps (29) requested to be marked completed

87 Georgia’s Program Improvement Plan  Nine Statewide Items Measured for Improvement  Items 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, 17,18, 19, 20  Two Kenny A measures for Fulton and DeKalb  Outcome 24  Outcome 27  Four FORG Measures for Fulton and DeKalb  Items 17, 18, 19, 20  Two Composite scores for the state from NCANDS and AFCARS  Safety Composite 2 Abuse in Foster Homes  Permanency Composite 2 Adoptions

88 ItemPeas Baseline data Federal Improve- ment Level Current PEAS as of 03/31/09 Gap 179%81%79.04%1.96% 377%78.9%78.96% 472%73.5%72.72%.78% 744%46.42%46.45% 1074%79.95%77.55%2.40% 1757%58.94%59.38% 1849%51.09%50.64%.44% 1959%60.73%63.04% 2021%23%20.63%2.37%

89 Fulton and DeKalb Kenny A Measurements for the PIP Items Baseline Kenny A data Federal Improve -ment Level Current Kenny A performance Gap Outcome 27 for CFSR Item 7 55%58.8%3.8% Outcome 24 for CFSR Item 10 30%33.7%3.7%

90 National Standard Neg. level of Improve- ment Current State Score Safety Outcome 2: Absence of child abuse Neglect in foster care (2008 NCANDS) Permanency 2: Timeliness of adoption or higher (03/31/08 07B08A)

91 Safety 2 Safety Data: Absence of child abuse/neglect in foster care National Standard FFY 2006FFY 2007FFY 2008 Negotiated Improvement Goal Gap

92 Permanency Composite 2 Permanency Outcome 2: Timeliness of adoption National StandardFFY 2006FFY 2007FFY Negotiated Improvement Goal Gap Items considered : Of children exiting to adoption, % exiting in less than 24 months of current removal date Of children exiting to adoption, median number of months in foster care Of children in care for 17 months or more at the start of the reporting year, % who exit to adoption by the end of the year Of children in care 17months or longer and not legally free for adoption at the start of the reporting year, % who become legally free within 6 months of the start of the year. Of children who are legally free for adoption in the previous year, % adopted in less than 12months of becoming legally free.

93 National Standards/Composite Scores Due to the data clean up efforts and the subsequent re-submissions of NCANDS and AFCARS scores (mainly AFCARS) the composite scores are still likely to change as well as the required improvement level. We have re-submitted our AFCARS scores for 08AB and our negotiated levels are subject to change

94 Well-being Outcomes II and III Items 21, 22 and 23 May 2008 – April 2009

95 Item 21: Educational Needs of the Child Determine whether the agency made concerted efforts to assess children’s educational needs and whether identified needs were appropriately addressed in case planning and case management activities.

96 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 21: Educational Needs of the child 639 of %232 of %

97 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May April2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 21: Educational Needs of the child (FPS Only) 105 of %36 of % Item 21: Educational Needs of the child (Plc/ Adopt Only) 534 of %196 of %

98

99 Review Findings for Item 21 FFY 2009 – State is currently in substantial conformity for item 21 at 91.38%. Not item in PIP but Goal is 95% for the Outcome. Placement/Adoption cases rated higher than FPS cases.

100 Things to consider to improve item 21 Review all assessments and CCFAs to ensure follow up is made. Read recommendations carefully. Document education in SHINES for the children under person detail and youth detail tab. Document on case plan. External documentation.

101 Item 22: Physical Health of the Child Determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to address the physical health needs of the child, including dental health needs.

102 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 22: Physical Health of the child 781 of %279 of %

103 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May April2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 22: Physical Health of the child (FPS Only) 136 of %47 of % Item 22: Physical Health of the child (Plc/ Adopt Only) 645 of %232 of %

104

105 Review Findings for Item 22 Current, age appropriate medical or dental assessments were not documented in case files and there was a lack of follow up when needs were identified. Lack of follow up with dental needs is main issue with this item. Dental exam is required beginning at age 3. Lack of documentation of results of exams. Lack of documentation in SHINES in health detail/health log. Placement/Adoption cases rated higher than FPS cases.

106 Item 23: Mental/Behavioral Health of the Child Determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to address the mental/behavioral health needs of the child(ren).

107 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 23: Mental/ Behavioral Health of the child 632 of %227 of %

108 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May April2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 23: Mental/ Behavioral Health of the child (FPS Only) 148 of %46 of % Item 23: Mental/ Behavioral Health of the child (Plc/ Adopt Only) 484 of %181 of %

109

110 Review Findings for Item 23 Mental/behavioral health needs were not assessed or services provided to meet the identified needs. Lack of follow up when counseling was recommended. Lack of follow up/reports from providers. Lack of documentation in health tab/health log in SHINES. Placement/Adoption cases rated higher than FPS.

111

OFFICE OF FAMILY INDEPENDENCE

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

Analysis of TANF Child Only Cases

127

128

129

130

131

132 FAMILY INDEPENDENCE QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW PROCESS Reviews are conducted based on the Federal Management Review Process which is based on national trends

133 FOOD STAMP PROGRAM POLICY ISSUES Outreach Case Record Review—Initial Certifications, Denied Applications, Terminations, Recertifications (approvals and closures) Customer Service: Application Process, interviews with staff/clients/advocates Hearing Logs

134 CORRECTIVE ACTION Quality Improvement Plan/Monitoring Corrective Action Plan Quality Control Data/Central File Error Prone Cases: –Wages and Salaries –Shelter and Utilities

135 Claims Management 5667 Log for OIS Referrals Overpayments/Underpayments IPV referrals made/documented timely Disqualified Recipient Subsystem (DRS) entry Sanctions applied timely Agency Error/Inadvertent Household Error claims documented on ADDR NARR screen

136 AGENCY COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES Civil Rights/Title VI Limited English Proficiency/Sensory Impaired (LEP/SI) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA/Section 504) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

137 IRS/BEERS SECURITY REVIEW Two Barrier Security Destruction Logs Annual Training/Logs/User Agreement Forms UNAX Poster County Security Plan

138 Other Review Items TANF Participation Activities/Validation of Hours TANF Mandatory Forms

139 Three Months and Six Months Trends Comparison Chart

140 Three Months and Six Months Trends Comparison Chart

141 Three Months and Six Months Trends Comparison Chart

142 Three Months and Six Months Trend Comparison Chart