Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
So what is so visionary about standards? Sandra M. Alberti, Ed.D. Student Achievement Partners.
Advertisements

Greenwich Public Schools Parent Presentation Fall, 2013.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
AzMERIT Arizona’s Statewide Achievement Assessment for English Language Arts and Mathematics November 20, 2014.
October 7, 2013 Sarah Schumacher, Manager of Secondary Education COMMON CORE STANDARDS AND THE EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
The Common Core State Standards A Districtwide Dialogue for the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Putting the Core into Practice: Instructional Practice Guides
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Professional Development System Tutor Coordinator CCRS Institute 9:30 am – 4:00 pm October 29, 2014 Kim Rossman Tutors of Literacy.
PARCC Assessment Math Shifts Becky Justus Math Teacher Greene County Tech Junior High PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Common Core State Standards & SBAC Field Test April, 2, 2014 Hill Regional Career High School Intended Outcomes: To gain a general understanding of the.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
SWITCHING TO COMMON CORE. What is Common Core? Common Core is a new set of standards our country is adapting PARCC is designing- *Partnership for Assessment.
Let’s Get to the Core Presenter Info: Ron Jetty, Director, PK 16 Initiatives University of Wisconsin System.
How to Provide Professional Development to School and District Staff Reviewing Instructional Materials Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
February 3-6, 2014 Christina Orsi Parent Information Night.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Common Core State Standards – The Shifts and What they May Mean for Summer Learning Sandra Alberti, Ed.D. Student Achievement Partners
How did we get here? A Common Core-Iowa Core Introduction #CCSS.
 Common Core State Standards Or College and Career State Standards CCSS.
COMMON CORE for SCHOOL COACHES Pat Fitzsimmons and Gail Taylor representing the VT DOE Common Core Team: Marty Gephart, CC Program Manager and MS/HS ELA.
1 Investigating the Standards: K-12 English Language Arts Bruce Bufe, Ann Craig, Kathy Learn, Leigh McEwen, Nicole Peterson, Pat Upchurch, Martha Yerington.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Achievethecore.org 1 Implementing Standards and Incorporating Mathematical Practices Sandra M. Alberti AMTNJ October 24, 2013.
Common Core State Standards: The Shifts and their Implications Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Crawford Central School District Math and ELA PA Core Alignment Project Created by Cheryl Krachkowski.
Introducing the Common Core to Parents and Community Members Benson Elementary November 8, 2013.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Literacy Design Collaborative & the Common Core State Standards Implementation Plan 1.
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Student Achievement Partners – Who We Are 1 Who we are: SAP is a nonprofit organization founded by three of the contributing authors.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Raising the Bar: The Common Core and Gifted Education August 21, 2013 Sandra M. Alberti, Ed.D. Student Achievement Partners.
 Phase into the New Standards Bering Strait School District Jay Thomas, Kris Busk, Theresa Davis.
MATH/ELA ROLLOUT: INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS AND SCOPE AND SEQUENCE.
Leading and Learning in a Time of Change #CCSS.
INSTRUCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners, Inc. May 30, 2012.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards: So, What’s New?: The Shifts Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners Integrating.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Prenatal to 3 rd Grade Alignment & School Readiness PSESD EL Center Directors February 27, 2014.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Introduction to the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET): ELA
Reframing the Work – Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student #CCSS #CoreAdvocates.
Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Presentation of Professional Development Modules for Common Core State Standards Student Achievement Partners, Inc. Sandra Alberti July 11, 2012.
An Introduction. How NCCSS come about? What do we do now that we have it? What today is NOT about Venting Discussing what’s “wrong” with our kids.
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
What about Instructional Materials? Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Learning and Accountability College- and Career- Ready Standards A Balanced Assessment System A New School Accountability Model.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
State of the Standards #CCSS.
Instructional Practice Guides Reflecting on Practice
Showcase of Resources: achievethecore.org
Common Core State Standards and Disciplinary Literacy
Introducing the Common Core to Parents and Community Members
College and Career Readiness Symposium Strategies for Closing the
Empowering Practitioners to Lead the Core
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool
Introducing the Common Core to Parents and Community Members
Empowering Practitioners to Lead the Core
WLMA_CCSS_overviewoptions_6.6.13
Presentation transcript:

Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS

PAGE 2 Student Achievement Partners – Who We Are SAP is a nonprofit organization founded by three of the contributing authors of the Common Core State Standards Currently a team of approximately 30; office in NY and team members located throughout the country Funded by foundations: GE Foundation, Hewlett Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The Helmsley Charitable Trust Our mission: Student Achievement Partners is devoted to accelerating student achievement by supporting effective and innovative implementation of the CCSS.

PAGE 3 Our Principles – How we approach the work W E HOLD NO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Our goal is to create and disseminate high quality materials as widely as possible. All resources that we create are open source and available at no cost. We encourage states, districts, schools, and teachers to take our resources and make them their own. W E DO NOT COMPETE FOR STATE, DISTRICT OR FEDERAL CONTRACTS Ensuring that states and districts have excellent materials for teachers and students is a top priority. We do not compete for these contracts because we work with our partners to develop high quality RFPs that support the Core Standards. W E DO NOT ACCEPT MONEY FROM PUBLISHERS We work with states and districts to obtain the best materials for teachers and students. We are able to independently advise our partners because we have no financial interests with any publisher of education materials. Our independence is essential to our work.

PAGE 4 Getting Started: Guiding Principles for the Instructional Practice Guides The Standards require a shift in what happens in the classroom – CCSS-aligned teaching requires aligned content This work starts with a shared understanding of the expectations of the Standards and then specific descriptions of what these expectations look like in practice Professional development, coaching, feedback and professional learning community conversations must be focused and coherent to support these expectations

PAGE 5 Purpose of the Coaching Tool Designed to guide effective integration of the Common Core Shifts into instructional practice Intended to help teachers in developing their practice through: ‒ Teacher self-reflection ‒ Teacher-to-teacher learning in PLCs, grade-level meetings or other collaborative structures ‒ Feedback from instructional coaches and leaders Not designed for evaluative purposes All guides are available at achievethecore.org/instructional-practice.achievethecore.org/instructional-practice

PAGE 6 Coaching Tool: Versions The Coaching Tool exists for a single lesson and for over the course of the year Coaching Tools by subject and grade: -ELA/literacy (grades K-2; grades 3-12; History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects) -Mathematics (K-8, HS)

PAGE 7 Coaching Tool: Actions and Indicators Each Coaching Tool for a single lesson has 3 Core Actions Each Core Action has 3-7 indicators (look-fors) -Each indicator has an area to note the evidence that has been observed or gathered -Indicators include a binary (yes/no) or 4-point scale that may be used to further focus the evidence collected

PAGE 8 The Shifts are the basis of the Coaching Tool 1.Regular practice with complex text and its academic language 2.Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational 3.Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction ELA/LITERACY 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the standards focus 2.Coherence: Think across grades, and link to major topics within grades 3.Rigor: In major topics, pursue conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application MATHEMATICS

PAGE 9 Standards Aligned Instructional Practice in English Language Arts (Example Grades 3-12) 1.Focus each lesson on a high-quality text (or multiple texts). 2.Employ questions and tasks, both oral and written, that are text specific and reflect the standards. 3.Provide all students with opportunities to engage in the work of the lesson. When the Shifts in ELA/Literacy are effectively integrated into instructional practice, evidence of the following can typically be observed: EVIDENT IN EACH LESSON EVIDENT OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR 1.Students encounter an appropriate balance and sequence of texts. 2.Students are asked to practice the range of reading and writing tasks the Standards demand. 3.There is evidence of student mastery of grade level English Language Arts and Literacy Standards.

PAGE 10 Standards Aligned Instructional Practice in Mathematics (Example Grades K-8) 1.Ensure the work of the lesson reflects the Shifts required by the CCSS for Mathematics. 2.Employ instructional practices that allow all students to master the content of the lesson. 3.Provide all students with opportunities to exhibit mathematical practices in connection with the content of the lesson. When the Shifts in Mathematics are effectively integrated into instructional practice, evidence of the following can typically be observed: EVIDENT IN EACH LESSON EVIDENT OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR 1.The lessons and tasks students encounter reinforce focus and coherence across and within grades. 2.There is evidence of student mastery of the grade level Standards for Mathematical Content and student progress on the Standards for Mathematical Practice. 3.The teacher regularly and productively collaborates with other teachers to improve practice.

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13 Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching and Lesson Planning Tools The Instructional Practice Guide includes the Coaching Tool and the Lesson Planning Tool Lesson Planning Tool developed as a companion tool for teachers to use to prepare -The Shifts are the basis of both tools -The same Core Actions and Indicators facilitate meaningful discussion between teachers and coaches

PAGE 14 Lesson Planning Tool Much more than lesson planning – professional learning opportunity Modular. Start with – ELA: Planning a standards-aligned close reading lesson – Math: Planning a standards-aligned lesson

PAGE 15

PAGE 16

PAGE 17 Closing Activity: Planning to Use the Coaching Tool Task: Pair up with someone at your table and choose to discuss ways you might use the Coaching Tool at the school, district or state level. Consider specific activities you might do with relevant audiences. Discuss the following: 1.What existing activities or initiatives relate to the use of the Coaching Tool? How would you adapt or replace these activities? 2.What supports or trainings might you need to facilitate your use of the Coaching Tool? 3.What other individuals or groups might be most relevant to your work with the Coaching Tool?

PAGE 18 Intended for professional learning communities at the school level and is available for K- HS in math and ELA/literacy. An instructional coach or school leader invites educators to take the survey which is designed to take about 30 minutes. The results are automatically compiled into a report which includes discussion questions and professional development resources. Participants can see their own results, whereas coaches can only see results in aggregate in order to maintain the anonymity of the teachers. n-core-knowledge-and-practice-survey-detail- pg

Thank You! Sandra Alberti