U.S. Department of Homeland Security Chemicals of Interest Anti-terrorism Standard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Homeland Security Site Assistance Visit (SAV)
Advertisements

NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Advisory Group (CIP AG) Electric Industry Initiatives Reducing Vulnerability To Terrorism.
Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Carter Hanson / Patrick Cudahy 2011.
Protected Critical Infrastructure Information (PCII) Program
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Securing the Chemical Sector: An Outline of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Program May 2008.
Presented at the 2007 CUPA Conference by SRM Associates, Inc. PO Box Temecula, CA (951) Chemical Site Security and Chemical.
Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Standards (CFATS) Compliance Plan Overview prepared by The Office of Environmental Health & Safety 1.
Conversation on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) and Critical Infrastructure Protection Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information.
Fiscal Year 2008 Urban Areas Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Federal Advisory Board DHS Challenges & Opportunities Captain Curtis Dubay, P.E. Department.
Chemical Security Anti-Terrorism Standards: Key questions raised by the Department of Homeland Security’s New Regulations Barry M. Hartman K&L Gates Washington,
California Accidental Release Prevention Program California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program.
1 Disclaimer The following information was presented by Matthew Bettridge of the Chemical Security Compliance Division of DHS on June 12, 2007 at the 2007.
Modeling with CAMEO Les Benedict St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Developing a Chemical Risk Management Program
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
GSA Expo 2009 Impact of Secure Flight Program on DoD Travel Mr. George Greiling GSA Expo June 2009.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Interagency Testing Committee (ITC)
HAZWOPER Overview.
PSM Covered Chemical Facilities National Emphasis Program.
EPCRA1 The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
Securing the Chemical Sector: An Overview of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards August 29, 2007 Ronald E. Miller Inspector.
Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model
ISAT 422: Environmental Management Disasters and Right to Know n Unlike OSHA, focus is on non-employees – Neighbors in community – Emergency responders.
Overview of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Southern Plains Area USDA/ARS.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
United States Coast Guard Port Security Assessment Program Evaluability Assessment LaKeshia Allen Alexandra Sommers May 2, 2005.
Department of Homeland Security Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standard (CFATS) Impact on Washington University Bruce Backus Environmental Health & Safety.
The Integrated Pilot Comprehensive Exercise (IPCE) Briefing to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 21st Annual Regulatory Information Conference Marc.
Clean Air Act Section 112(r) Federal Program Update U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region Emergency Prevention and Preparedness February 15, 2007 CUPA Training.
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT Alan Chvotkin Senior Vice President and Counsel Professional Services Council DEFENSE ACQUISITION.
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training ISR Systems Danbury, CT 2011.
BSAF-BIONET Meeting Robert J. Hashimoto, CBSP University of California, Berkeley October 2, 2009.
Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Standards Since 2003, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been working with its private sector partners in the.
DHS Anti-Terrorism Standards for Chemical Facilities Steven Burns A&WMA Southern Section 2007 Annual Meeting and Technical Conference August 9, 2007.
CFATS Aka: Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Standards Clyde D. Miller Director, Corporate Security June 9, 2010.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced or distributed without authorization. ASSET Safety Management.
Securing Critical Chemical Assets: The Responsible Care ® Security Code Protection of Hazardous Installations from Intentional Adversary Acts European.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Introduction to a Safe Workplace
1 Washington State Critical Infrastructure Program “No security, No infrastructure” Infrastructure Protection Office Emergency Management Division Washington.
NotificationNotification. Notification Objectives To understand the need for the Regulatory Authority to identify and locate radiation sources through.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Management System Part II: Inventory of Radiation Sources – Regulatory Authority Information System (RAIS)
June Initially developed in 1983 to give employees a “right to know” Required a comprehensive hazard evaluation and communication process Chemical.
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act Tier II Inventory Form Preparing to Submit Part 1 of 2 October
Fiscal Year 2007 Urban Area Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
National Protection and Programs Directorate Department of Homeland Security The Office of Infrastructure Protection Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards.
Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security RRT Quarterly Meeting July 16, 2015.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
Hazardous materials awareness Chapter 1, intro to hazardous materials.
Lowell Randel Global Cold Chain Alliance/ International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration.
1 Presented by David Thompson, TIA December 14, 2005 NFPA 1600 and Emergency Communications.
CO Chemical Safety Workshops for Regulated Facilities
Joint Force Headquarters-Michigan CCIRs and PIRs
Joint Force Headquarters-Michigan CCIRs and PIRs
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training
Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Standards ((CFATS)
NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Advisory Group (CIP AG)
Securing the Chemical Sector:
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Chemicals of Interest Anti-terrorism Standard

Overview of the Proposed Program as it applies to Fox Chase Cancer Center

What is the Standard? [ as of November 20, 2007] Interim Final Rule that imposes comprehensive federal security regulations for “high risk” “chemical facilities”. Interim Final Rule that imposes comprehensive federal security regulations for “high risk” “chemical facilities”. Requires “covered facilities” to prepare Security Vulnerability Assessments and develop and implement Site Security Plans. Requires “covered facilities” to prepare Security Vulnerability Assessments and develop and implement Site Security Plans.

Authorizing Legislation This regulation is authorized by the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2007 (Public Law , Section 550) [The Act]. This regulation is authorized by the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2007 (Public Law , Section 550) [The Act].

What is the Standard? Final Rule was published in the Federal Register on December 20, 2007 and becomes effective 60 days after, January 17, Final Rule was published in the Federal Register on December 20, 2007 and becomes effective 60 days after, January 17, 2008.

Important Definitions CHEMICAL FACILITY CHEMICAL FACILITY HIGH RISK HIGH RISK COVERED FACILITY COVERED FACILITY TOP-SCREEN PROCESS TOP-SCREEN PROCESS

Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards for any facility that manufactures, uses, stores, or distributes certain chemicals above a specified quantity. The standard may apply to hospitals and research institutions and you may have to file a report to DHS by 1/19/08. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards for any facility that manufactures, uses, stores, or distributes certain chemicals above a specified quantity. The standard may apply to hospitals and research institutions and you may have to file a report to DHS by 1/19/08. Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism StandardsChemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards

Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards On November 20, 2007 DHS published an updated Appendix A to this standard identifying nearly 300 chemicals that present a security risk. If a facility possesses amounts of a chemical at or above the threshold quantities specified in this inventory, they are required to fill out the “Top-Screen” questionnaire within 60 days of the publication date of There are three security issues involved: On November 20, 2007 DHS published an updated Appendix A to this standard identifying nearly 300 chemicals that present a security risk. If a facility possesses amounts of a chemical at or above the threshold quantities specified in this inventory, they are required to fill out the “Top-Screen” questionnaire within 60 days of the publication date of There are three security issues involved:

Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards To assist you in the assessment of your chemical inventory, ASHE has converted the inventory list into an excel spreadsheet that can be used as a tool to determine your facility’s status with regard to this Standard. To assist you in the assessment of your chemical inventory, ASHE has converted the inventory list into an excel spreadsheet that can be used as a tool to determine your facility’s status with regard to this Standard. available at eissues.html. available at eissues.html. eissues.html eissues.html

Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards If there are no chemicals present in a facility at or above the screening threshold, then nothing further is required. The threshold quantities apply to the 60 days prior to the publication date of and anytime thereafter. If there are no chemicals present in a facility at or above the screening threshold, then nothing further is required. The threshold quantities apply to the 60 days prior to the publication date of and anytime thereafter.

Important Definitions CHEMICAL FACILITY: CHEMICAL FACILITY: “…any facility that possesses or plans to possess, at any relevant point in time, a quantity of a chemical substance determined by the Secretary to be potentially dangerous or that meets other risk-related criteria identified by the Department.”

Important Definitions Q: Is FCCC a Chemical Facility? A: Yes. Initial screening phase of the program may demonstrate that FCCC possesses some of the regulated chemicals in quantities greater than the listed threshold values.

HIGH RISK: “…refers to a chemical facility that, in the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, presents a high risk of significant adverse consequences for human life or health, national security and/or critical economic assets if subjected to terrorist attack, compromise, infiltration, or exploitation.” HIGH RISK: “…refers to a chemical facility that, in the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, presents a high risk of significant adverse consequences for human life or health, national security and/or critical economic assets if subjected to terrorist attack, compromise, infiltration, or exploitation.” Important Definitions

Q: Is FCCC a High Risk Facility? Q: Is FCCC a High Risk Facility? A: Unlikely. DHS will designate facilities as High Risk only after the initial screening phase. However, conventional wisdom, along with recent comments by DHS officials, are not clear if university research facilities will not make that list. A: Unlikely. DHS will designate facilities as High Risk only after the initial screening phase. However, conventional wisdom, along with recent comments by DHS officials, are not clear if university research facilities will not make that list. Important Definitions

COVERED FACILITY: “…a chemical facility determined by the Assistant Secretary to present high levels of security risk…” COVERED FACILITY: “…a chemical facility determined by the Assistant Secretary to present high levels of security risk…”

Important Definitions Is FCCC a covered facility? Is FCCC a covered facility? Unlikely but possible. The initial screening phase of the program will probably result in FCCC not being designated a covered facility. The result will be that we will not be required to perform a Security Vulnerability Assessment or develop a Site Security Plan.

TOP-SCREEN PROCESS: TOP-SCREEN PROCESS: “…an initial screening process identified by the Assistant Secretary through which chemical facilities provide information to the department [of Homeland Security]…” Important Definitions

Q: Is FCCC required to participate in the Top-screen process? Q: Is FCCC required to participate in the Top-screen process? A: Possibility. If we have even one regulated chemical in a quantity greater than its listed threshold, we must complete and submit a Top-screen. A: Possibility. If we have even one regulated chemical in a quantity greater than its listed threshold, we must complete and submit a Top-screen. Important Definitions

Authorizing Legislation The Act requires the development and implementation of “risk-based performance standards,” and applies to facilities that “present high levels of security risk.” The Act requires the development and implementation of “risk-based performance standards,” and applies to facilities that “present high levels of security risk.” The Act builds on “pre-existing federal security initiatives and chemical safety programs.” The Act builds on “pre-existing federal security initiatives and chemical safety programs.”

!Developed by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, RAMCAP is a method for evaluating consequences, vulnerability and risk for elements of critical infrastructure. !The initial screening segment of RAMCAP, known as Top- screen, has been incorporated into the Chemical Facility Anti- terrorism Standard. DHS Risk Assessment Methodology (RAMCAP)

!Authorized by the Clean Air Act. !Requires facilities with chemicals in amounts exceeding thresholds to implement an accident prevention program and an emergency response program, and submit a Risk Management Plan. EPA Risk Management Program (RMP)

!Sets requirements for management of hazards associated with processes using highly hazardous chemicals. OSHA Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals Standard (PSM)

!Covers emergency response operations involving the release of hazardous substances. !Currently, only Jeff Henne and I participate in annual HAZWOPER training. OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Standard

!Provides workers with the right to know the hazards associated with the chemicals with which they work, and measures they can take to protect themselves. !Compliance with the HAZCOM Standard is one of the most important, and time-intensive, duties of the Safety Safety Office. OSHA Hazard Communication (HAZCOM) Standard

Phased Implementation of the Standard Chemical facilities will be required to complete and submit a Top-screen within 60 days of the publication of the final rule. Chemical facilities will be required to complete and submit a Top-screen within 60 days of the publication of the final rule. DHS will then determine which facilities will be required to continue in the program, and complete Security Vulnerability Assessments and Site Security Plans. DHS will then determine which facilities will be required to continue in the program, and complete Security Vulnerability Assessments and Site Security Plans. FCCC’s participation in the program will probably end with the submission of the Top-screen. FCCC’s participation in the program will probably end with the submission of the Top-screen.

The Top-screen Process DHS considers terrorism risk to be a function of three variables: DHS considers terrorism risk to be a function of three variables: –Consequence (or criticality) –Vulnerability (or the likelihood that an attack would succeed if launched) –Threat (or the likelihood an attack would be launched in the first place)

The Top-screen Process DHS also believes consequence is the initial qualifying factor. DHS also believes consequence is the initial qualifying factor. So it is requiring the use of “Top-screen”, which is a “consequence-only” assessment tool.

The Top-screen Process Top-screen is a basic questionnaire that chemical facilities will be required to complete. Top-screen is a basic questionnaire that chemical facilities will be required to complete. It is based on the RAMCAP model of the same name. It is based on the RAMCAP model of the same name. It will be used to identify High Risk facilities. It will be used to identify High Risk facilities. It will be completed online, using the DHS Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT). It will be completed online, using the DHS Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT).

The Top-screen Process – Two Categories of Users PROVIDER – “…a qualified individual familiar with the facility in question. This person will submit the screening tool.” PROVIDER – “…a qualified individual familiar with the facility in question. This person will submit the screening tool.”

The Top-screen Process – Two Categories of Users SUBMITTER – “…an officer of the corporation (or equivalent) responsible for the facility in question. The Submitter will send the completed Top-screen to DHS, and in so doing, will attest to the accuracy of the information provided.” SUBMITTER – “…an officer of the corporation (or equivalent) responsible for the facility in question. The Submitter will send the completed Top-screen to DHS, and in so doing, will attest to the accuracy of the information provided.”

The Top-screen Process – Segment One The first segment of the Top-screen will include identifying information for the facility, such as name, address, and geographic coordinates. The first segment of the Top-screen will include identifying information for the facility, such as name, address, and geographic coordinates. This segment will also address issues of criticality by asking questions regarding potential loss of life and loss of capability to execute critical missions as the result of a terrorist incident. This segment will also address issues of criticality by asking questions regarding potential loss of life and loss of capability to execute critical missions as the result of a terrorist incident.

The Top-screen Process – Segment Two The second segment asks a series of exclusionary questions to screen out facilities that are excluded by law from the regulation. The second segment asks a series of exclusionary questions to screen out facilities that are excluded by law from the regulation. Excluded faculties are mainly those that are covered under the Maritime Transportation Security Act, are owned or operated by the Departments of Defense or Energy, or are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Excluded faculties are mainly those that are covered under the Maritime Transportation Security Act, are owned or operated by the Departments of Defense or Energy, or are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The Top-screen Process – Segment Three The third segment addresses risk to human life by identifying which chemicals are present. The third segment addresses risk to human life by identifying which chemicals are present. DHS has developed, and is currently refining, a list of chemicals and a threshold quantity (TQ) for each. DHS has developed, and is currently refining, a list of chemicals and a threshold quantity (TQ) for each. The facility will identify in the Top-screen which of those chemicals are present at the facility in quantities equal to or above the TQ. The facility will identify in the Top-screen which of those chemicals are present at the facility in quantities equal to or above the TQ. This segment addresses security issues associated with specific chemicals and TQs. This segment addresses security issues associated with specific chemicals and TQs.

What We Need to Do Register to access the Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT). Register to access the Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT). Identify a Preparer (Provider), Identify a Preparer (Provider), Submitter, and Submitter, and Authorizer (can be Provider or Submitter). Authorizer (can be Provider or Submitter).

What We Need to Do Pre-plan for work required to complete the Top- screen within 60 days of the rule being published. This will probably involve checking existing chemical inventories against the proposed Appendix A chemicals and scheduling field inspections of buildings that store chemicals. Pre-plan for work required to complete the Top- screen within 60 days of the rule being published. This will probably involve checking existing chemical inventories against the proposed Appendix A chemicals and scheduling field inspections of buildings that store chemicals.

What We Need to Do Schedule A Chemicals of Interest Schedule A Chemicals of Interest –Release –Theft –Sabotage –Security Issues

What We Need to Do Department of Homeland Security Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards: Department of Homeland Security Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards: Final Rule (November 19, 2007) Final Rule (November 19, 2007)