Seismometer Trigger mechanism: brittle failure at conduit walls QiQi R (reflection coefficient) T (transmission coefficient) Q r -1 Total amplitude decay.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics
Advertisements

Lecture 3 Governing equations for multiphase flows. Continuum hypothesis. Fragmentation mechanisms. Models of conduit flows during explosive eruptions.
Review on Modern Volcanology
Patrick Smith Academic History PhD Project Title: Combining magma flow modelling and seismicity on Montserrat Supervisor: Prof. Jürgen Neuberg (aka Locko)
The Asymptotic Ray Theory
(Introduction to) Earthquake Energy Balance
Magma fracture and lava dome collapse Hugh Tuffen Dome collapse at Colima, Mexico in 1991.
Scaling of viscous shear zones with depth dependent viscosity and power law stress strain-rate dependence James Moore and Barry Parsons.
Unit 4 Jeopardy Fracturing Faults Fierce Folding & Uppity Uplift
Earthquake swarms Ge 277, 2012 Thomas Ader. Outline Presentation of swarms Analysis of the 2000 swarm in Vogtland/NW Bohemia: Indications for a successively.
Tidal triggering of earthquakes: Response to fault compliance? Elizabeth S. Cochran IGPP, Scripps.
Theoretical aspects of seismic waves and sources Massimo Cocco INGV Earthquakes produce effects to the environment & the society Damages are produced by.
Measureable seismic properties
Mathematical models of conduit flows during explosive eruptions (Kamchatka steady, transient, phreatomagmatic) Oleg Melnik †‡, Alexander Starostin †, Alexey.
Sealing the deal? A seismic source model for strombolian explosions at Fuego volcano, Guatemala John Lyons Greg Waite Tricia Nadeau 17.
BGA 2007 Different aspects of seismic amplitude decay in viscous magma Patrick Smith Supervisor: Jürgen Neuberg School of Earth and Environment, The University.
Conduit length Conduit top Tilt: 17 µrad due to pressure 50 MPa 100 MPa P Tilt  Pressure Conduit length Conduit top τ Tilt  Traction  Strain rate.
Modern seismometer If you speeded up any earthquake signal and listened to it with a hi fi, it would sound like thunder. east-west north-south up-down.
Analytical and Numerical Modelling of Surface Displacements due to Volcanism Olivia Lewis Supervised by Prof. Jurgen Neuberg School of Earth and Environment.
Low frequency coda decay: separating the different components of amplitude loss. Patrick Smith Supervisor: Jürgen Neuberg School of Earth and Environment,
Low frequency coda decay: separating the different components of amplitude loss. Patrick Smith Supervisor: Jürgen Neuberg School of Earth and Environment,
8: EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS
WAVEFORM MODELING, MOMENT TENSORS, & SOURCE PARAMETERS
Unraveling shallow conduit processes Integrating multiple data sets to evaluate volcanic hazards in Guatemala.
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Quality Factor Inversion from Prestack CMP data using EPIF Matching Jing Zhao, Jinghuai Gao Institute of Wave and Information,
Vulcanian fountain collapse mechanisms revealed by multiphase numerical simulations: Influence of volatile leakage on eruptive style and particle-size.
Cyclic behaviour in lava dome building eruptions. Oleg Melnik, Alexei Barmin, Antonio Costa, Stephen Sparks.
Modern seismometer If you speeded up any earthquake signal and listened to it with a hi fi, it would sound like thunder. east-west north-south up-down.
Widening of Conduit The results provide further evidence and validation for the increase in the width of the conduit which may mark a significant change.
IUGG 2007 An amplitude battle: attenuation in bubbly magma versus conduit resonance Patrick Smith and Jürgen Neuberg School of Earth and Environment, The.
5: EARTHQUAKES WAVEFORM MODELING S&W SOMETIMES FIRST MOTIONS DON’T CONSTRAIN FOCAL MECHANISM Especially likely when - Few nearby stations, as.
Focal Mechanism Solutions
Earthquake Focal Mechanisms
Scattering and Attenuation Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior Scattering and Attenuation Propagating seismic waves loose energy due to geometrical.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Analysis of complex seismicity pattern generated by fluid diffusion and aftershock triggering Sebastian Hainzl Toni Kraft System Statsei4.
Role of Geodynamic Models in Interpreting Upper Mantle Images Magali Billen University of California, Davis MARGINS Workshop, May 2006.
Earth’s Creators and Destroyers
Kinematic Representation Theorem KINEMATIC TRACTIONS Time domain representation Frequency domain representation Green Function.
Earthquake – A sudden release of stored energy. This energy has built up over long periods of time as a result of tectonic forces within the earth.
Numerical Investigations of Seismic Resonance Phenomena in Fluid-Filled Layers Hans F. Schwaiger and David F. Aldridge Geophysics Department Sandia National.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
Surface waves Earthquakes generate both body waves (P, S) and surface waves Surface waves are generated along any free surface in the medium In the Earth,
Point Source in 2D Jet: Radiation and refraction of sound waves through a 2D shear layer Model Gallery #16685 © 2014 COMSOL. All rights reserved.
SOES6002: Modelling in Environmental and Earth System Science CSEM Lecture 1 Martin Sinha School of Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Ivan Lokmer Early Stage Researcher Host Institution: UCD Dublin.
1 What is Q? Interpretation 1: Suppose A 0 represents wave amplitudes, then slopeintercept ln(A) t Interpretation 2: Suppose u represents displacement,
Borehole Strainmeters: Instruments for Measuring Aseismic Deformation in Subduction Zones Evelyn Roeloffs U.S. Geological Survey, Vancouver, WA.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 24 Apr 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Amplitude Effects Multipathing describes the focusing and defocusing.
LECTURE 6: SEISMIC MOMENT TENSORS
Lithosphere KQ 2 What natural hazards are derived from plate movement and how are they managed?
Unit 4 The Restless Earth Part II Lessons 4, 5 & 6
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
1 Linear Wave Equation The maximum values of the transverse speed and transverse acceleration are v y, max =  A a y, max =  2 A The transverse speed.
MODELLING OF THE HYDRO- ACOUSITC SIGNAL AS A TSUNAMI PRECURSOR F. Chierici (IRA-INAF) L. Pignagnoli (ISMAR-CNR) D. Embriaco (INGV) Nearest meeting, Berlin.
Attenuation and Anelasticity
EART 118 Seismotectonics MWF D250 9:30-10:40 am; Th D250 2:00-4:00 pm Prof.: Thorne Lay, C382 E&MS, Office Hours 11:00-12:00 MWF TA: Lingling Ye, Office.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 20 Jan 2016
Earthquakes. What’s an Earthquake? Earthquakes are movements of the ground that are caused by a sudden release of energy when along a fault move. Earthquakes.
Seismology Dylan Mikesell April 5, 2011 Boise State University.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 6 Introduction to convection.
Earthquake Jeopardy Ride the Wave Plate Tectonic.
Seismic waves Mathilde B. Sørensen and Jens Havskov.
CHAPTER 12 EARTHQUAKES MOVEMENTS OF THE EARTH THAT ARE CAUSED BY A SUDDEN RELEASE OF ENERGY WHEN ROCKS MOVE ALONG A FAULT.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
Introduction to seismology Mathilde B. Sørensen and Jens Havskov.
Please label the following layers..
Earthquake Seismology Review
A possible mechanism of dynamic earthquake triggering
Combining magma flow models with seismic signals
Presentation transcript:

Seismometer Trigger mechanism: brittle failure at conduit walls QiQi R (reflection coefficient) T (transmission coefficient) Q r -1 Total amplitude decay is a combination of these contributions: ff ff ss ss Aki, K., Magma intrusion during the Mammoth Lakes earthquake. JGR, 89, pp Collier, L. & Neuberg, J., 2006, Incorporating seismic observations into 2D conduit flow modelling. J. Volcanol. Geotherm.,, 152, pp Collier, L., Neuberg, J., Lensky, N. & Lyakhovsky, V., 2006, Attenuation in gas-charged magma. J. Volcanol. Geotherm., 153, pp Jousset, P., Neuberg, J. & Jolly, A., 2004, Modelling low-frequency volcanic earthquakes in a viscoelastic medium with topography. J.GI.., 159, pp Neuberg, J., Tuffen, H., Collier, L., Green, D., Powell T. & Dingwell D., 2006, The trigger mechanism of low-frequency earthquakes on Montserrat. J. Volcanol. Geotherm., 153, pp Patrick Smith's Ph.D. is funded by NERC grant NER/S/A/2006/ The data collection and archiving by staff of the Montserrat Volcano Observatory is fully acknowledged. Using the seismic amplitude decay of low-frequency events to constrain magma properties. AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, December Session & Poster number: V51D-0782 P. J. Smith & J. Neuberg School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds., UK. 1. Background i. Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat. ii. Low-frequency seismicity. iii. Seismic trigger mechanism: brittle fracturing of the magma 5. Wavefield modelling Domain Boundary Solid medium (elastic) Fluid magma (viscoelastic) Variable Q Damped Zone Free surface Seismometers Source Signal: 1Hz Küpper wavelet (explosive source) ρ = 2600 kgm -3 α = 3000 ms -1 β = 1725 ms -1 Characteristics of low-frequency events Similar waveforms Repeatable source mechanism Tight clusters of source locations Swarms precede dome collapse Amplitude spectra of synthetic low-frequency signals for a 30m wide and 50m wide conduit. i.Observations and modelling ii. Implications. Magma velocity profiles for 30m and 50m wide conduits, derived using a 2-D finite-element model of three-phase magma flow in a conduit. (by M. Collombet) 30m conduit 50 m 30m 50m conduit Comparison of a 30m and 50m wide conduit: illustrating the change in frequency content with widening conduit Photographic evidence from an extruded spine suggests a widening of the conduit from 30m to 50m. Seismic observations: frequency shift of low-frequency events over extended period of time. Increased conduit width is an important observation and may mark a significant change in the volcano’s behaviour. Changes overall flow behaviour, particularly velocity profiles, mass flux and ascent rate and therefore also the velocity and shear stresses. This will impact on the occurrence and location of brittle fracturing, and also degassing processes. Suggests flow behaviour and seismicity may be controlled by shallow processes rather than the magma chamber. Results of numerical modelling verify change in frequency of resonance with width. 4. Conduit Widening i.Finite-difference model ii. Calculation of apparent Q iii. Data Analysis 6. Summary Produce synthetic seismograms from which an apparent Q is determined via the gradient of log(Amplitude) against time. We then see to what extent the apparent Q is determined by the intrinsic Q given to the model. 2-D O(Δt 2,Δx 4 ) scheme based on Jousset et al. (2004). Volcanic conduit modelled as a viscoelastic fluid-filled body embedded in homogenous elastic medium. To include anelastic ‘intrinsic’ attenuation, the rheology of the material is parameterized by an array of Standard Linear Solids (SLS). Preliminary apparent Q analysis of the waveforms of low-frequency events from Montserrat. The ‘peaked’ amplitude spectra are used to create a series of narrow band-pass filters for the data. filtered signals is used to determine a set of apparent Q values. Example low-frequency event from April Band-pass filtered traces with apparent Q values Event amplitude spectrum 3. Factors determining the seismic amplitude Apparent (coda) Intrinsic (anelastic) Radiative (parameter contrast) true damping amplitude decay (Aki, 1984) Conduit resonance: energy generated by a seismic source is trapped by the impedance contrast between fluid and solid and travels as interface waves. Swarm of low-frequency events merging into tremor before a dome collapse. Different types of volcanic seismicity. Low frequency events are characterized by their harmonic coda and spectral content. i. Source mechanism Brittle fracturing on ring-fault as seismic source: View of the lava dome of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, from the MVO in April Photograph by P. Smith. Cylindrical shear fracturing at the edge of the conduit as seismic triggering mechanism The island of Montserrat and its location within the Lesser Antilles volcanic island chain. The amplitude decay of the Geometry and parameters chosen to produce monochromatic smoothly decaying synthetic signals ‘Peaked’ amplitude spectrum used to choose frequencies for band-pass filters Soufrière Hills Volcano is an andesitic stratovolcano situated on the island of Montserrat at the northern end of the Lesser Antilles volcanic arc, formed by the subduction of Atlantic oceanic lithosphere beneath the Caribbean plate. The current phase of eruptive activity has been ongoing since 1995, beginning with phreatic activity, and has since been characterized by cycles of lava dome growth followed by subsequent dome collapses. The volcano has been well monitored throughout this period of activity and in particular several types of volcanic seismic signals have been observed including, rockfalls, volcano- tectonic earthquakes and low-frequency events. Link model for source mechanism to cycles of deformation and seismicity. ii. Components of amplitude loss Need to conduct more analysis of the apparent Q of data from Montserrat. Want to examine any azimuthal variation for single events, variation with distance from conduit and changes over time. Further develop magma flow meter idea. Need full moment tensor inversion to get seismic moment and hence determine the amount of slip per event. Effects of including bubble growth by diffusion and mass flux on the seismic attenuation. Collier et al. (2006) 2. Seismic attenuation in bubbly magma ii. Magma viscosities are derived from flow modelling: i. Q and magma properties Q a -1 =Q i -1 +Q r -1 Q a -1 Seismic attenuation is quantified through the quality factor Q, the inverse of the attenuation. This intrinsic Q is highly dependent on the properties of the magma. Q is quantified using the phase-lag between stress and strain for a sinusoidal pressure wave – equivalent to using the material properties (viscosities). The method includes the effects of bubble growth by diffusion. 7. Acknowledgements Gas diffusion No seismicity Pressure increasing 4 ττ No seismicity Magma slowing Gas diffusion 3 ττ Diffusion lags behind Gas loss (Neuberg et al, 2006 ) 1 2 Q a -1 = Q i -1 + Q r -1 M 0 = µAu Unfiltered data Time [cycles] log(Amplitude) Apparent Q value based on synthetic signal envelope Gradient of line = Q value from gradient = Linear Fit Data Amplitude Synthetic trace Time [number of cycles] A = area of fault rupture u = average slip μ = shear modulus or rigidity Gives seismic moment: Generation of interface waves at the conduit walls. ττ Seismicity Pressure decreasing Stress threshold: slip plug flow gas loss parabolic flow Collier & Neuberg, 2006; Neuberg et al., 2006 depth of brittle failure Collier & Neuberg, 2006; ii. Magma viscosities are derived from flow modelling: ηbηb ηmηm Melt viscosity Magma viscosity Both the viscosities and Q are highly dependent on the gas-phase. Particularly the gas-volume fraction, bubble number density and also bubble size and shape. Match/use as input 1.Determine 2-D distribution of intrinsic Q values in a volcanic conduit through magma flow modelling, including the effects of bubble growth by diffusion. 2.Transfer into finite-difference models of the seismic wavefield by fitting an array of Standard Linear Solids (SLS) to model the 2-D intrinsic Q distributions. 3.Synthesise seismic wave propagation in such a conduit and determine apparent Q from amplitude decay of the signals produced. 4.Compare results with analysis of data from Montserrat. 5.By comparison of modelling results with data analysis link the Q values back to the magma properties and gain information about the system. Discussion and further work Want to determine amount of slip, u, from the seismic moment, so we then get Amount of slip × Event rate → Magma ascent rate But requires full moment tensor inversion of a non-couple source mechanism. Need understanding of amplitude losses. (P. Jousset) Most of the energy remains within the conduit Events are recorded by seismometer as surface waves Interface waves