New and old regions for Barcoding Teun Boekhout CBS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Annotation: Mating type A locus
Advertisements

Brandi Cantarel, Bernard Henrissat, Pedro M. Coutinho Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (UMR 6098) CNRS / Aix-Marseille Université,
GBrowse at TAIR Philippe Lamesch TAIR curator. Seqviewer.
Part I: Tips and Techniques from curators GBrowse at TAIR David Swarbreck.
Conserved gene order in Basidiomycetes An investigation of synteny within and between: Laccaria bicolor Coprinopsis cinerea Phanerochaete chrysosporium.
Periodic clusters. Non periodic clusters That was only the beginning…
Réarrangements chromosomiques Evolution des génomes de levures 2ème réunion GTGC Nantes 12 et 13 octobre 2006 Gilles Fischer.
Phylogenetics workshop: Protein sequence phylogeny week 2 Darren Soanes.
The genome sequence of Melampsora larici-populina the causal agent of the poplar rust disease Inventory and annotation of Mlp Signaling genes Mlp Summer.
April 2006 Kim Hammond-Kosack Wheat Pathogenesis Programme Jacob Koehler Bioinformatics and Biomaths Division PHI-base.
Genome Evolution. Amos Tanay 2009 Genome evolution Lecture 12: epistasis and the evolution of gene regulation.
Genome evolution: a sequence-centric approach Lecture 13: epistasis: RNA, enhancers, networks.
Lichens and Ascomycota broadly Alternative markers to COI ITS.
Chapter 5: History of Life on Earth. Dates of origins 1. Everything (Universe):14 Bya 2. Solar System (Earth):4.6 Bya Conservative estimates 3. Prokaryotic.
Medical Mycology.
Comparative genomics of fungal cytochrome P450s David R. Nelson University of Tennessee, Memphis Nectria haematococca Aspergillus fumigatus Aspergillus.
FOG: High-Resolution Fungal Orthologous Groups René van der Heijden Project 5.10: Comparative genomics for the prediction of protein function and pathways.
A Look Back at the Past Year Genomics in Nature Patience Tenney.
Genome projects and model organisms Level 3 Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Jim Provan.
DNA barcoding of fungi: a feasibility analysis Donal Hickey, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Eukaryotic Genomes: Fungi Monday, November 24, 2011 Genomics J. Pevsner
8. Lecture WS 2003/04Bioinformatics III1 Phylogenetic Prediction (of single genes) Material of this lecture taken from - chapter 6, DW Mount „Bioinformatics“
Eukaryotic Genomes: Fungi Wednesday, October 22, 2003 Introduction to Bioinformatics ME: J. Pevsner
The Graph of Life Dennis Shasha Joint work with Kenneth Birnbaum Treester system by: Matt Olim.
Which drugs?. Mode of action of antifungals ergosterol polyenes e.g. amphotericin B polyenes azoles e.g. fluconazole azoles nucleosides e.g. 5-flucytosine.
Yeast genome sequencing: the power of comparative genomics MEDG 505, 03/02/04, Han Hao Molecular Microbiology (2004)53(2), 381 – 389.
DNA barcoding: bane or boon (or both) for taxonomy? Donal A. Hickey, Concordia University, Montreal. Collaborators: Mehrdad Hajibabaei and Gregory Singer.
Anatomy of a Genome Project A.Sequencing 1. De novo vs. ‘resequencing’ 2.Sanger WGS versus ‘next generation’ sequencing 3.High versus low sequence coverage.
Melampsora Genome Annotation and Genome Structure Analysis First Annotation Workshop of the Melampsora Genome Consortium Yao-Cheng Lin Bioinformatics &
whole-genome duplications and large segmental duplications… …seem to be a common feature in eukaryotic genome evolution …play a crucial role in the evolution.
Outline Group Reading Quiz #2 on Thursday (covers week 5 & 6 readings Chromosome Territories Chromatin Organization –Histone H1 Mechanism of Transcription.
Oryza Arjan van Zeijl Claire Lessa Alvim Kamei Robert van Loo Ruud Heshof BIF
Comparative genomics Haixu Tang School of Informatics.
Kex2 from saccharomycetales  a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z A B C F G H D E Saccharomyces cerevisiae NDLFKR-LPVP D D D D Y H R I.
ANTIFUNGAL DRUGS Modes of Action Mechanisms of Resistance
Phylogenetic prediction of gene function Daniel Barker Centre for Evolution, Genes and Genomics, School of Biology, University of St Andrews
CHARACTERS USED IN RECONSTRUCTING PHYLOGENETIC TREES 1. Morphological “ Tiktaalik is the sister group of Acanthostega + Ichthyostega in one of the two.
The Tree of Life How do we select a gene sequence for comparison?
ADDENDUM. MS/MS Fragmentation of SPTVTAKK Found in H1_YEAST, Histone H1 OS=Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC / S288c) GN=HHO1 PE=1 SV=1 Match.
Genomes & The Tree of Life
Aspergillus DNA barcoding – progress so far János Varga, Jos Houbraken, Martin Meijer, Pedro W. Crous & Robert A. Samson.
The Contribution of Ploidy to Functional Genomic Comparisons in Yeasts Eric Delgado Regev Group Summer Research Program in Genomics.
Gene models and proteomes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Oryza sativa (Os), Drosophila melanogaster.
Comparative genomics. Comparing the DNA sequences from several species makes it possible to eliminate spurious gene predictions, sometimes find new ones,
Comparative Genome Analysis and Genome Evolution of Members of the Magnaporthaceae Family of Fungi.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Pipeline for culture-independent studies of a microbiota. (A)
Last time … * Constraint on transcription factor binding sites Sites with the most ‘information content’ generally evolve slowest * Stabilizing selection.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Pipeline for culture-independent studies of a microbiota. (A) DNA.
S1 Fig Supplementary Image 1 |Phylogenetic analysis of fungal MAPKs. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by comparing amino acid sequences using the neighbor-joining.
B. subtilis as query species
A genomic code for nucleosome positioning
Eukaryotic Comparative Genomics
Cis-regulatory evolution of duplicate genes in yeasts
A Squalene Epoxidase Is Involved in Biosynthesis of Both the Antitumor Compound Clavaric Acid and Sterols in the Basidiomycete H. sublateritium  Ramiro.
Part I: Tips and Techniques from curators
Eukaryotic Genomes: Fungi
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages (July 2005)
GATA binding transcription factor families in fungi.
The microsporidian sex-related locus.
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Phylogenetic tree of 170 Lactobacillus species.
Iwr1 Directs RNA Polymerase II Nuclear Import
Homologs in 38 fully sequenced eukaryotic genomes to 534 assigned S
Modelling heterogeneity in multi-gene data sets
Rooted neighbor-joining tree inferred from the concatenated MLST typing scheme sequences (CAP59, GPD1, LAC1, SOD1, URA5, and PLB1 genes and IGS) of 10.
Sequence comparisons of fungal HOG1 orthologues.
Rtt101 and Mms1 in budding yeast form a CUL4DDB1‐like ubiquitin ligase that promotes replication through damaged DNA Mms1 belongs to the DDB1 family of.
C. neoformans encodes a single family 2 DHODH required for wild-type growth. C. neoformans encodes a single family 2 DHODH required for wild-type growth.
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Presentation transcript:

New and old regions for Barcoding Teun Boekhout CBS

Problems with Mitochondrial Genomes Taphrinomycotina versus Saccharomycotina versus Pezizomycotina Cryptococcus gattii

Three published scenario’s on fission yeasts Most nuclear genes No support Mitochondrial support Saccharomycotina Taphrinamycotina Saccharomycotina Pezizomycotina Saccharomycotina Pezizomycotina Taphrinamycotina Pezizomycotina Taphrinamycotina (1)(2) (3)

Cryptococcus gattii 4 monophyletic lineages (phylogenetic species) 6 nuclear concordant nuclear gene phylogenies Mitochondrial versus nuclear genes incongruent [ATP 6 & MtLrRNA] vs [CNLAC, TEF1α, RPB1, RPB2, ITS, IGS1] Mitochondrial loci incongruent Mitochondrial recombination

10 CBS6998 CBS1622/CBS6992 CBS A/56A CBS8273/RV20186 T CBS6289 WM830 WM276 WM176 CBS883 T CBS7748 E566 CBS7229 T /RV54130 CBS919 T WM179 R Mitochondrion Nucleus blue = AFLP4 green = AFLP6 purple = AFLP4 like yellow = AFLP6 like red = chimera AFLP4/AFLP6 ATP6 MtLrRNA M1 M3 M2 M5 M4 ATP6 haplotype 3 MtLrRNA haplotype 2 ATP6 haplotype 4 MtLrRNA haplotype 2 ATP6 haplotype 1 MtLrRNA haplotype 2 ATP6 haplotype 2 MtLrRNA haplotype 1 ATP6 haplotype 2 MtLrRNA haplotype 4 Nuclear AFLP/MLST 4 with varying mitochondria

100 1 WM714 H CBS6886 JEC20 CBS7229 RV54130 WM WM276 WM830 RAM2 ICB184 A1MR265 A1MR406 A1M368 CBS1930 CBS6956 CBS8684 WM178 A1MR409 HEC11102 A1MF2866 A1MF2932 A1MR269 A1MR271 CBS7750 WM179 E566 CBS883 CBS7748 CBS919 CBS1622 CBS6992 CBS A CBS A CBS6289 CBS6998 RV20186 CBS6993 WM161 WM728 CBS5758 CBS8755 WM C CBS6955 CN043 CBS C B5748 B5742 M27055 WM Cryptococcus neoformans AFLP6 VGII MLST 6 AFLP7 VGIV MLST7 AFLP5 VGIII MLST5 AFLP4 VGI MLST4 AFLP4 VGI MLST4 0.1 ICB184 HEC11102 CBS1930 CBS6956 CBS7750 CBS8684 A1MR269 A1MR368 WM178 A1MR406 A1MR409 A1MF2932 A1MR265 A1MR271 A1MF2866 RAM2 WM179 E566 CBS1622 CBS6992 CBS7229 RV54130 WM WM276 WM830 CBS6998 RV20186 CBS A CBS8273 CBS A WM779 M27055 B5748 B5742 CBS919 CBS883 CBS7748 CBS C CBS6955 CBS C WM161 CBS5758 WM726 CBS8755 CN043 WM728 CBS6886 JEC20 WM714 H ATP6MtLrRNA (M2) (M3) (M4) (M5) (M1) (M2) (M3) (M4) (M5) a b

The ‘old’ alternative rDNA universally present ITS + D1/D2 LSU rDNA (Kurtzman > 20years) Basidio + Asco yeasts Yeast book chapters: both needed Clinical yeasts (C. glabrata / C. nivariensis / C. bracarensis) Large datasets available Proven useful for ID (Kurtzman, Fell, CBS, et al.) Luminex technology (ID, M. Diaz, Miami) Cryptococcus, Trichosporon, Candida, Malassezia

Alternatives 2 ‘Unique’ fungal pathways E.g. Ergosterol pathway (membranes) Concatenated ERG genes resolve TOL ERG7 (lanosterol synthase) fungi/animals ERG1 (squalene epoxidase) fungi/animals/plants ERG11 (lanosterol C14 demethylase) fungi/animals

Alternatives 3 Comparative Genomics 33 Fungal Genomes 4852 KOGs 70 single protein Kogs (paralogs!) 32 gene KOs not viable (S. cerevisae) > essential genes Reference tree based on 531 KOGs KOG2671 showed highest correlation (0.97) with 531 KOG tree Cophenetic correlation between individual protein NJ trees > 0.5 > 64 KOGs remaining Development phylogenetic signal

64 concatenated proteins 0.1 Sac. cerevisiae RM11-1a Sac. cerevisiae S288c Sac. paradoxus Sac. mikatae Sac. kudriavzevii Sac. bayanus Sac. castellii Can. glabrata Ash. gossypii Kluyveromyces lactis Sac. kluyveri Can. guilliermondii Debaromyces hansenii Can. albicans Can. lusitaniae Yarrowia lipolytica Chaetomium globosum Neurospora crassa Magnaporthe grisea Fusarium graminearum Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Botritys cinerea Asp. fumigatus Asp. nidulans Coccidioides immitis Stagonospora nodorum Schizosaccharomyces pombe Coprinopsis cinereus Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cry. neoformans var. neoformans JEC21 Cry. neoformans var. grubii H99 Ustilago maydis Rhizopus oryzae Caenorhabditis elegans I II III IA IB IC IIA IIB IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IIIA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > 80%

Development of phylogenetic signal Mainly Information storage and Processing & Cellular processes and signaling

Potential Barcoding candidates KOG2671 Putative RNA methylase KOG0340 ATP-dependent RNA helicase KOG4089 Predicted mitochondrial ribosomal protein L23 KOG S proteasome KOG2728 Uncharacterized conserved protein Etc. Top 5 orthologues with high discriminatory potential

My suggestions There may be alternative genes D1/D2 + ITS 1+2! Panfungal / Paneukaryotic / Single copy / PCRable Need to be investigated further for Barcoding (and TOL) potential Option: Multilocus Barcoding ? Webtool: Different loci per (higher) taxon Selection depends on taxonomic resolution