1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
Advertisements

BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Introduction to Brownfields New Partners for Community Revitalization, Inc. June 29, 2009.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Reuse / Revitalization. What is Reuse / Revitalization? Restoring contaminated and potentially contaminated sites to productive use.
Center City Development Office Brownfields Program.
SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Sustainable Management Approaches and Revitalization Tools – electronic (SMARTe) Leipzig Baldwinsville, NY.
1 Brave New World Emerging Tools for NAPL Remediation Jim Cummings Technology Innovation Office/USEPA Chicago, Illinois Dec 2002.
Redevelopment of Former Industrial Lands in the Australian Capital Territory Toby Hobbs Coffey Geosciences, Australia NATO/CCMS Pilot Study June
Created by WV Legislature in 2005 Assist communities in identifying brownfields redevelopment opportunities Work with state agencies, communities, and.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) WG III AR4 Outline Ogunlade Davidson Co-chair Working Group III PRE-SBTA Session, Milan, Italy November.
1 LAND USE CONTROLS THE ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Presented by MGP Partners LLC December 7, 2000.
“Real Estate Principles for the New Economy”: Norman G. Miller and David M. Geltner Chapter 10 Land Use Controls and Property Taxes.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
EPA’s Brownfields Program Megan Quinn U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization January 25, 2008.
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
* Old gas stations * Old dry cleaners * Oil/chemical spills from past commercial/ industrial operations * Industrial wastes left on property * Old.
© 2009 Capaccio Environmental Engineering, Inc. “Helping Industry and the Environment Prosper” Pollution Prevention Saves Money By Reducing Operational.
Prioritize Contaminated Sites With a Known Release and a Pathway That Poses the Greatest Threat of Exposure  Pathways to surface water Freshwater wetlands,
2011 ITRC Spring Membership Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota April 6, 2011.
Update on the Superfund Program: U.S. Tour de Table NATO SPS Pilot Study Prevention and Remediation in Selected Industrial Sectors June 17-23, 2006 Ljubljana,
Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.
Triad Approach / Best Management Practices. Triad Approach and BMPs Systematic Planning – Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Dynamic Work Strategies Real-Time.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance State of California Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth Preliminary Project Goals.
1 Sustainable Real Property Presentation to the National Executive Forum on Public Property by Bruce Lorimer Director General Professional and Technical.
Bilateral Working Group SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Name Title Date Meeting Title.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
THE GEORGIA BROWNFIELD PROGRAM MAY 22, BROWNFIELD: FEDERAL DEFINITION Real property, the expansion, development or reuse of which may be complicated.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSESSING LIABILITY Helping Communities Pursue Reuse Opportunities at Contaminated Properties March 25, 2015.
Site Completion Preliminary Assessment Site Inspection Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study Remedial Design Remedial Action LTRA O&M Site Identified.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Brownfields: Real Property, the expansion or redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of contamination.
SERDP- ESTCP- ITRC A PARTNERSHIP Dr. Jeffrey Marqusee ESTCP, Director SERDP, Technical Director.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
1 RCRA Project Manager’s Forum Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization & Cleanup Tom Rinehart Branch.
BROWNFIELDS: “Financial and Technical Support for Redevelopment” HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS COALITION Presented to: TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE.
EPA’s Enforcement Perspective on Superfund Site Reuse Hollis Luzecky Office of Site Remediation Enforcement, U.S. EPA.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
Tools and Technologies for Mining Site Remediation Michele Mahoney US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
Division of Waste Management Dexter R. Matthews, Director Mission: to prevent harmful releases of waste to the environment and clean up existing contamination.
1 The Brownfields Grant Program and Opportunities for Revitalization of RCRA Sites Linda Garczynski, Director Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Presented by Deborah Lange, Executive Director Steinbrenner Institute for Environmental Education and Research.
RCRA 2020 Vision… A View from a Facility Owner Lloyd E. Dunlap Atlantic Richfield Company, BP.
FDIC Perspective on Environmental Risk Presented by: Gordon Stoner Legal Division Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation May 6, 2008.
Green Remediation through Optimization Douglas Sutton, PhD, PE Tetra Tech GEO April 4, 2011.
Vapor Study Informational Meeting General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Van Cleve Recreation Center November 12, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health.
EPA Staying Flexible: Adaptive Management Approaches for Superfund Redevelopment An Enforcement Perspective Helena Healy Branch Chief Office of Site Remediation.
DRAFT The RCRA Cleanup Vision for 2020 “Where are We Going? Matt Hale Director, Office of Solid Waste U.S.EPA.
EDA & Brownfields Redevelopment US Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration Brownfields 2006 November 14, 2006.
Former Spellman Engineering Site Project Update Meeting March 18, 2008 William C. Denman, P.E. Remedial Project Manager (404)
Putting It All Together: A Petroleum Brownfields Revitalization Action Plan Carolyn Hoskinson, OUST Paul Connor, NALGEP.
Performance-Based Management for Brownfields - Best Practices and Approaches November 2006 Eliana Makhlouf, Ph.D., P.E. Marsh Environmental Practice.
111 Area-Wide Planning, Superfund Sites, Environmental Justice and Green Infrastructure: Tying it All Together in the Freeport Community Planning Project.
Long-Term Stewardship: Ensuring the Safe Use of Contaminated Sites Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Remediation and Redevelopment at the Former Fort Devens, Massachusetts.
Environmental Acquisition Strategy Performance-Based Contracting
1st Avenue Revitalization Project Brownfield Pilot Study Public Outreach Property Owner Stakeholder Meeting June 1999.
Mark L. Brusseau University of Arizona
The Prepared Process: The Next Generation
Introduction of Pilot Study
How to Bring about Ecological Revitalization on Contaminated Lands
Objectives Provide an overview of the triad approach and its application Describe the elements of the triad approach for practical application Describe.
Forum on the strategies for the management and development of contaminated sites in Taiwan Shian-chee Wu October 25, 2007.
Presentation transcript:

1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate Director Technology Innovation Program Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation US Environmental Protection Agency

07/22/03 2 The Land Revitalization Initiative Emphasizes that cleanup and reuse are mutually supportive Reflects EPA belief that that property reuse should be an integral part of the way EPA does business Applies regardless of whether a property is a Superfund site, an operating waste disposal site, a petroleum facility, a former gas station, or an abandoned industrial facility Under this new initiative, revitalization and reuse will be a formal part of our planning at every single site we clean up under every single program we manage– it's not discretionary, and it's not a pilot program." - Marianne Lamont Horinko, April 2003

07/22/03 3 Tier 1: + $3 to $5 mln. Tier 2: $0 to + $3 mln. Tier 3: Value unknown Tier 4: “Off the radar screen” Neutral to negative value No market: - Size - Location Fair Market Value of Real Estate vs. Risk Management Costs

07/22/03 4 Site Redevelopment: The Role of Cleanup Technology Technologies can support successful redevelopment at Brownfields: –By changing standard assumptions of what is possible: Cost Time Site conditions, issues, etc. –By affecting decisions: Purchase price + site prep < “clean” value Site prep includes investigation and clean-up (risk management) Lower costs can significantly affect equations –More “positively positioned” properties –More “public” redevelopment

07/22/03 5 Development Potential (“clean” value vs. acquisition plus clean-up/prep costs) Theoretical Distribution of “Brownfields” Sites 100 % Sites 0 High (+) Low (-) “Hmmmm !?!” 0

07/22/03 6 Development Potential (“clean” value vs. acquisition plus clean-up/prep costs) Potential with innovative approaches? Theoretical Distribution of “Brownfields” Sites 100 % Sites 0 High (+) Low (-) “Hmmmm !?!” 0

07/22/03 7 Understanding the Context of Cleanup Reuse Plans, Goals Decisions: Cleanup goals Data (type, quality) Tolerable uncertainty Approaches to: Assessment Investigation Cleanup Design, Implementation Closeout, Long-Term Operations and Maintenance Tools for: Sampling and Analysis Cleanup/Remediation  Containment  Cleanup  Controls Monitoring, maintenance Drive Determine

07/22/03 8 Technology Opportunities Investigation, characterization, monitoring (If only we could quickly but reliably determine if the site is (still) contaminated) –Field analytics –Innovative sampling –Long-term monitoring/compliance –Dynamic decision making, expedited characterization Treatment technologies (Standard options just won’t work with the proposed reuse) –In-situ treatment –Volume reduction –Contaminant destruction –Groundwater (?)

9 What Are Innovative Technologies? Innovative technologies, or innovative applications, are those for which performance or cost information is inadequate. Innovative = Unproven, unused, unreliable

07/22/03 10 Systematic Project Planning Dynamic Work Strategy Real Time Measurement Technologies The Triad Approach Synthesizes practitioner experience, successes, and lessons-learned into an institutional framework Managing Uncertainty

07/22/03 11 Innovative Analytical and Sampling: Opportunities for Cost Savings, TODAY An excellent target for innovative approaches –New but not unproven (approaches and technologies) –Technology allows improvement Increase sampling density…AFFORDABLY Support rapid decisionmaking –Not all sites are candidates for treatment, but all sites require monitoring and measurement activities Impacts total project costs –Accurate characterization results in “remedy” savings (e.g. removal, treatment) by reducing uncertainty about cleanup goals and which remedy is most appropriate and cost effective –Monitoring and measurement activities occur from site assessment through site closeout, reuse

07/22/03 12 Control PlanePre-Remediation: Partial Mass Removal: Partial Mass Removal + Enhanced Natural Attenuation: Dissolved Plume Control PlaneCompliance Plane Dissolved Plume DNAPL Source Zone Compliance Plane Dissolved Plume DNAPL Source Zone Control PlaneCompliance Plane DNAPL Source Zone Groundwater Plume Response

07/22/03 13 NAPL Site Characterization Essential component of the remedial package Currently tool-limited for more complex scenarios –Large facilities/chlorinated solvents/heavier PAHs Subject of future technical information transfer efforts EPA/Army COE/DOE--Argonne actively investing in the rollout of the “Triad” approach to site monitoring

07/22/03 14 Rethinking Source Term vs. Plume Management Potential source term control solutions –Steam/Heat –Chemical oxidation –Surfactant-cosolvent flushing Outstanding issues –Science –Policy –Other (Economic – Public and Private sector)

07/22/03 15 Resources - Brownfields/Reuse Brownfields Technology Support Center  Events  Training  Workshops  Reports on past projects  Request site specific support (Local, State, Regional staff)  Publications

07/22/03 16 Brownfields TSC- Direct Support Who? Government users –Local –State –EPA Regions –No consultants, NGOs (can work through localities) Normal support services –Technology scoping –Technology review, literature, descriptions –Procurement issues –Education/training –Plan review - technology focus –Help identify “non-technology” support, expertise