ACRIN Protocol 6666 ACRIN Protocol 6666 Screening Breast Ultrasound in High-Risk Women Made possible by grants from the Avon Foundation and National Cancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Helical CT Screening for Lung Cancer at Advanced Radiology Consultants
Advertisements

TOP2A IS AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR OF SURVIVAL IN UNSELECTED BREAST CANCER Amit Pancholi Molecular Profiling of Breast Cancer: Predictive Markers of Long.
How will you approach the 35 year old, with a 2 x 2 x 2cm, firm, mobile, well circumscribed non tender mass on the right breast?
Breast Cancer. Introduction Most common female cancer Accounts for 32% of all female cancer 211,300 new cases yearly and rising 40,000 deaths yearly.
Which of the following increases a women’s risk for Breast Cancer? A.Starting her menses at age 14 or older B.Breastfeeding C.Extremely dense breast tissue.
†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department.
Breast Cancer Screening What’s New to Know? The Issue of Breast Density Catherine Babcook MD Partner, Mountain Medical Physician Specialists Medical Director.
Breast MR Imaging Workshop th September 2014 High-Risk Screening Evidence-based Clinical Indications for Breast MRI Dr. Muhamad Zabidi Ahmad, AMDI.
Breast Density A patient guide.
BREAST CANCER UPDATE DETECTION TO DIAGNOSIS
SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY PROGRAM Screening Mammography in 2014: Still Controversial? Dr. Christine Wilson MEDICAL DIRECTOR, SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY.
A program of the UAMS College of Pharmacy
Breast Cancer 101 Barbara Lee Bass, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery
Breast Imaging Made Brief and Simple
299. Breast Cancer Screening Paul Jones, PGY2 Resident Rounds 25 July 2012.
Volumetric Breast Density understandbreastdensity.or g.
Breast Cancer Risk Factors
ACRIN 6657/CALGB Consent for Research Study Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI and MRS: A Correlative Science Studies to Characterize Tumor Response in.
Elshami M.Elamin, MD Medical Oncologist Central Care Cancer Center Wichita, KS, USA
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL Title: Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer (PABC); Prospective Data Registry in Saudi Arabia Sponsor: Oncology Department, King.
Breast cancer screening Mammography is the most widely used screening modality, with solid evidence of benefit for women aged 40 to 74 years Clinical breast.
MAMOGRAPHY. Mammography is the process of using low- energy X-rays (usually around 30 kVp) to examine the human breast, which is used as a diagnostic.
Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening in Family Care Clinic and their Outcomes Presented by Liana Poghosyan, MD Ne Moe, MD May 19, 2008.
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)
 Determining the Nature of a Breast Abnormality  It is a procedure that may be used to determine whether a lump is a cyst (sac containing fluid) or a.
Finding N.E.M.O. Marvin R. Balaan, MD, FCCP System Division Director, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh.
Atoosa Adibi MD. Department of Radiology Isfahan University Of Medical Sciences.
EPIB-591 Screening Jean-François Boivin 29 September
Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Weighing the Risks and Benefits Kathy J. Helzlsouer, M.D., M.H.S. Prevention and Research Center, Women’s.
Clinical Utility of BRCA Testing Mark Robson, MD September 7,
Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care:
ACRIN Breast Committee Fall Meeting : Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Image Acquisition in Relation.
 Self-Examination  Clinical Examination  Mammography  Biopsy  Does prevailing ‘Standard of Care’ save lives? ©2012 Philip Hoekstra, PhD.
ACRIN 6685 Overview ACRIN 6685 A Multi-center Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head.
Breast Complaints You gotta know when to screen em, know when to street em, know when to reassure, know when to refer.
Breast Cancer Breast Cancer DR/FATMA AL-THOUBAITY ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR SURGICAL CONSULTANT.
Shiva Sharma SHO to Professor Redmond.  Introduction  Increased risk groups  Consideration of genetic testing  Management of patients with mutation.
Breast Cancer Screening Steven Stanten MD Rupert Horoupian MD AltaBates Summit Medical Center Oakland, California.
In The Name of God BREAST IMAGING N. Ahmadinejad Medical Imaging Center TUMS.
Breast Cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin For the WHI Investigators Rowan T Chlebowski, MD., Ph.D.
Implications of lung cancer screening in the new millenia Andrew R. Haas, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Medicine Section of Interventional Pulmonary and.
American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 ACRIN 6664 – Protocol Review The National CT Colonography Trial Name(s) of presenters.
Tolerability of Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnostic and Biopsy Procedures: An ACRIN 6666 Substudy Mark D. Schleinitz, MD, MS Dina DePalo Jeffrey Blume,
ACRIN 6666 Follow-Up 0 month “12 month” = months –If patient has been contacted, plans follow-up, please hold IA, IS, and F1 until she returns (even.
Breast Cancer. Breast cancer is a disease in which malignant cells form in the tissues of the breast – “National Breast Cancer Foundation” The American.
Senior Statistician Per-Henrik Zahl, MA MD PhD
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC): A Research Infrastructure sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Risk Models William Barlow,
Breast Density: Black, White and Shades of Gray Jen Rusiecki, MD VA Pittsburgh Health System Women’s Health Fellow AMWA Hot Topic 2016.
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
Breast Cancer 1. Leukemia & Lymphoma New diagnoses each year in the US: 112, 610 Adults 5,720 Children 43,340 died of leukemia or lymphoma in
Date of download: 5/31/2016 From: Tipping the Balance of Benefits and Harms to Favor Screening Mammography Starting at Age 40 Years: A Comparative Modeling.
Linking Electronic Health Records Across Institutions to Understand Why Women Seek Care at Multiple Sites for Breast Cancer Caroline A. Thompson, PhD,
Iraj Khalkhali M.D., F.A.C.R., F.A.C.N.M.
Dr. Julia Flukinger Breast Radiologist, Director Breast MRI, Advanced Radiology May 21, 2106.
The Elliott Breast Center * Baton Rouge, LA *
Case D Karmi Margaret G. Marcial. How will you approach the 35-year old, with a 2 x 2 x 2cm, firm, mobile, well-circumscribed non-tender mass on her R.
Presented by Liana Poghosyan, MD Ne Moe, MD May 19, 2008
TMIST A Breast Cancer Screening Trial
Indications for Breast MR Imaging
Mammograms and Breast Exams: When to start /stop mammograms
Breast Cancer Screening/Imaging
Breast Screening and Risk Assessment
Breast Health Katherine B. Lee, MD, FACP April 26, 2018.
Roni Talukdar, MD.
Breast Imaging Ravi Adhikary, MD.
Stamatia Destounis, MD, FACR, FSBI, FAIUM
Breast Cancer Guideline Update – Sharp Focus on Who is at Risk
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL
Diagnosis of breast cancer in women age 40 and younger: Delays in diagnosis result from underuse of genetic testing and breast imaging 95% of patients.
imaging modalities for Breast screening
Presentation transcript:

ACRIN Protocol 6666 ACRIN Protocol 6666 Screening Breast Ultrasound in High-Risk Women Made possible by grants from the Avon Foundation and National Cancer Institute (CA80098)

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Contacts  Site Contacts Principal Investigator: Research Associate:  Trial Personnel: Principal Investigator: Wendie Berg, MD, PhD – American Radiology Services. Johns Hopkins at Greenspring Co-Investigator: Ellen Mendelson, MD – Northwestern University Statistician: Jeffery Blume, PhD – Brown Unversity

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Objectives  Background Review principles of screening What we have learned from mammography Review results from single center trials of screening US  Protocol 6666 Overview Aims Eligibility Participant Enrollment

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Screening  Early detection and resulting treatment will alter the course of the disease  Healthy women will not be harmed  Early detection will allow breast conservation more often and less harmful treatments

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Mammography  Mammography is the only screening test to date which has been shown to reduce deaths due to breast cancer  Screen-detected cancers have better prognosis than clinically-detected cancers GoodIntermedPoor Screen-detect 50% 32% 18% Clinically found Tabar, Rad Clin N Amer 2000;38:

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Survival by Prognostic Category Tabar Rad Clin NA 2000;38:

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Prognostic Categories Good Intermed.Poor DCIS Node -Node + Gr 1 < 20 mm N-20+; N+<15N+, ≥15 Gr II < 15 mm mm≥ 30 mm Gr III < 10 mm N-10+, N+<15N+, ≥15 Lobular < 10 mm mm≥ 30 mm Medullary N-, < 20 N-, ≥ 20 N+_____ Mucinous N-, <10 N-10+, N+<20 N+,≥20_ Tubular N-, <20 N-, 20+ or N+ none___

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound DCIS  Left untreated, majority of DCIS will progress to invasive carcinoma, but time course may be 20 years or more  First prevalent screen, estimated 37% of DCIS non-progressive  Only 4% of new DCIS detected at annual screens non-progressive  Over treatment may occur at first screen, but is uncommon if test performed annually Yen et al Eur J Cancer 2003;39:

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound DCIS  Analysis of Swedish two-county trial  Majority of mortality reduction was due to stage shifting from stage II invasive or worse to stage I invasive cancer  Detection of DCIS might account for 5-12% of deaths averted Duffy et al Eur J Cancer 2003;39: Duffy et al Eur J Cancer 2003;39:

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound What can we infer?  Poor prognosis cancers are node positive and larger in size, but fundamentally the same histology as those of good prognosis  Left undetected, good prognosis cancers will progress to those with poor prognosis  Detection of small (< 1 cm) invasive cancers is critical to achieving mortality reduction from screening

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Prognosis and Treatment  Prognosis and treatment of a given cancer will depend primarily on size and nodal status  Should be independent of the method of detection

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Mortality Reduction: Mammography  22% reduction in breast cancer mortality ≥ 50  15% reduction in breast cancer mortality yrs of age US Preventive Services Task Force summary report Ann Intern Med 2002;137:

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Mammographic Sensitivity  98% in women ≥ 50 with fatty breasts  30-69% sensitivity in women with dense breasts, particularly low if < 50 or at increased risk Kerlikowske et al JAMA 1996;276:33-38 Kolb et al Radiology 2002;225: Mandelson et al JNCI 2000;92:

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Summary of US Screening Studies Investigator, Yr Prevalence Gordon, Goldenberg /12,706 (0.35) 44/12,706 (0.35) Buchberger et al / 8,103 (0.39) 32/ 8,103 (0.39) 8/ 867 (0.9) 8/ 867 (0.9) Kaplan et al / 1,862 (0.3) 6/ 1,862 (0.3) Kolb et al /13,547 (0.27) 37/13,547 (0.27) Crystal et al / 1,517 (0.46) 7/ 1,517 (0.46) LeConte et al / 4,236 (0.38) 16/ 4,236 (0.38) Total 150/42,838 (0.35)

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Screening Ultrasound  150 US-detected cancers in 126 women  114 (90.5%) heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts  High-risk women are 2-3 times more likely to have US-only detected cancer 55/110 (50%) were at high-risk

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Invasive Cancer vs. DCIS  Of 150 cancers seen only on sonography 141 (94%) invasive – 99 (70%) were < 1 cm – 30/33 (91%) were stage 0 or stage I – Mean size 9-11 mm across series, range 4-25 mm  In 25,753 exams, mammo reported Another 56 cancers seen only on mammo – 42 (75%) DCIS and 14 (25%) invasive

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Cancers Seen Only on US  Early invasive cancers with good prognosis  Additional detection virtually all in dense and heterogeneously dense breasts  Half of the cancers seen only on US were in women at high risk (7-9 per 1000)

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Why do a multicenter trial?  In all but Kolb’s series, only a single prevalent screen performed No estimate of the role of annual sonography  Single center studies, may not be generalizable  Prior studies not blinded to mammographic results, artificially inflates US performance  Screening: need for rational basis to subject healthy women to testing

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Specific Aims  Primary Aim: Diagnostic yield of screening mammography + US compared to mammography alone Independent read, blinded to the other study  Secondary Aim: Diagnostic yield of US and mammography independently Effect of breast density and heterogeneity of echotexture

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Protocol 6666  Approximately 2800 women at high risk of breast cancer breast cancer  Annual mammogram and whole breast bilateral screening US, physician performed, independently read  Screenings at 0, 12, 24 months

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Eligibility Criteria  Women ≥ 25 yrs  Breast tissue at least moderately dense as viewed on mammogram  AND at least ONE of the following applies: Known mutation in BRCA-1 or -2 gene Personal hx breast cancer at least one year ago Stong family hx of breast cancer (25% lifetime risk as determined by the Gail or Claus models) Prior LCIS Radiation treatment to the chest (before age 30 and at least 8 years ago) Prior ADH, ALH, atypical papilloma

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Ineligibility Criteria  Fail to meet eligibility requirements  Male  Implants  Clinically abnormal or indication other than routine  < 1 yr following dx breast cancer or with known distant mets  Pregnant or plan to be within 2 years

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Ineligibility Criteria  Contrast-enhanced breast MRI within 1 yr prior (or plan within 2 yrs of entry)  Bilateral whole breast US within 1 yr prior  Injection of sonographic or mammographic contrast or tomosynthesis or plan to undergo within 2 yrs of study entry  Mammograms cannot be double read or undergo CAD  Breast procedure (other than cyst asp) within 1 yr prior

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Imaging  Pt randomized to initial US or mammogram  Study US and mammogram at same site within 2 weeks of each other  Independent interpretation of US and mammogram, each radiologist qualified in study protocol and each must read some US and some mammo

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6666: Screening Breast Ultrasound Participant Education  Participant Brochures Available from Research Associate  Letter to potential participants Electronic file available for practice customization from Research Associate  Clinical Trial Websites NCI: cancer.gov CenterWatch: centerwatch.org ACRIN: acrin.org (full protocol available)