Policy on Data Stewardship, Access, and Retention Establishes University policy to assure that research data are appropriately maintained, archived for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
HOT TOPICS ARCHIVING OR HOW NOT TO DUMP YOUR RUBBISH!
RAP October 3,  What does “Best Practices of Grants Management” mean? ◦ It is the daily oversight of the grant/contract/agreement in accordance.
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
NIH FINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST REGULATIONS – 2012 Office of Sponsored Programs Research & Graduate Studies.
Responsible Conduct of Research & Research Compliance Adam J. Rubenstein, Ph.D. Director of Research Compliance Old Dominion University Office of Research.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
The Responsible Conduct of Research at UTAS Office of Research Services.
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Post Approval Monitoring Program Presented by Carolyn Malinowski Manager, Quality Assurance and Training.
Research Integrity: Collaborative Research Michelle Stickler, DEd Office for Research Protections
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
NIH Proposed Use of a Central IRB (C-IRB) for NIH-funded multi-site studies Committee on Clinical Research January 26,
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
SAFA- IFAC Regional SMP Forum
INTERNAL CONTROLS. Session Objectives Understand why an organization should have internal controls Understand the key components of internal controls.
Volunteer Registration & Protection Paul Brown Associate Director, Ag & Natural Resource Programs Arizona Cooperative Extension Master Gardening Planning.
(Host Club) CLUB QUALIFICATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THE ROTARY FOUNDATION.
Instructions and forms
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Research Office (HSRO) University of Miami and Affiliated Institutions.
Basic Research Administration Principles Presented by Ronald Kiguba Research Coordinator, Makerere Medical School.
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Who’s the Boss? Faculty Advisor or Principal Investigator Supervision versus Student Investigator or Study Coordinator Responsibilities Gwenn Snow, MS,
The University of California Sponsored Project Funding: Pre-Award Nancy R. Lewis Director, Sponsored Projects Administration University of California,
Research Ethics in Undergraduate Research Timothy Sparklin Administrator, Human and Animal Research Protections Office University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying and Minimizing COI from the Perspectives of Sponsors, Faculty and the IRB Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying.
Joan L. Lucas – General Counsel
Segregation of Duties– Sponsored Programs APM
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
Organizing Your Research Project: DATA Claudia Neuhauser University of Minnesota Informatics Institute.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Compliance and Ethics Training Overview
WHO IS WATCHING? WHAT ARE THEY WATCHING? WHY SHOULD I CARE? WHAT SHOULD I DO?
Student Rights and Responsibilities Student Conduct and The University of Wyoming Regulations.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Research Integrity The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research Dr Peter Wigley Manager, Research Ethics and Integrity Flinders University.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Brown Bag Breakfast Briefing: Responsible Persons with/using Suitable Means of Verification for Effort Certification.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Safeguarding Research Data Policy and Implementation Challenges Miguel Soldi February 24, 2006 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM.
Award Review, Negotiation, Etc. Mary E. Schmiedel, JD, CPCM Georgetown University Monique Anderson University of Maryland Tolise Miles Children’s National.
MUSC College of Graduate Studies Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research “Collaborative Research” Ed Krug BE
1 Institutional Responsibilities in Research Management Ann Pollack Assistant Vice Chancellor - Research September 29, 2009.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles: The Principle of Transparency Alaska Chapter of ARMA International Presented by: Tara Carey, ARMA Board Member.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session One: INTRODUCTION.
Kingsley Karunaratne, Department of Accounting, University of Sri Jayewardenepura Colombo – Sri Lanka, Practice Management Quality.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
The Ins and Outs of PI Transfers A departmental administration perspective on faculty moves between institutions Jennifer Cory & Tim Reuter.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
HLC Criterion Two Primer Tuesday Sept. 8, Criterion Two. Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct The institution acts with integrity; its conduct.
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Research Compliance at Dartmouth
Responsible Conduct of Research Training
Research Integrity & RMIT
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Presentation transcript:

Policy on Data Stewardship, Access, and Retention Establishes University policy to assure that research data are appropriately maintained, archived for a reasonable period of time, and available for review and use under the appropriate circumstances. Adopted By: Research Policy Advisory Committee Approved By: Vice Chancellor for Research Dan Uhlrich Associate Vice Chancellor for Research Policy Graduate School

Policy on Data Stewardship, Access, and Retention In most cases, following good academic practice, researchers retain and share data appropriately. When relationships break down and for non-academic reasons…..

The Principal Investigator (PI) is responsible for the stewardship and retention of research Data as well as for determinations concerning access to and appropriate use of Data. Dean or Vice Chancellor for Research hears appeals regarding access to Data UW-Madison must retain research Data in sufficient detail and for an adequate period of time to enable appropriate responses to questions about accuracy, authenticity, primacy and compliance with laws and regulations governing the conduct of the research. Provisions for Transfer of Data to another institution if PI moves Default for retention is 7 years Caveats that this policy does not supersede others Policy (in brief)

Data “Ownership” vs. “Access” "No agreement shall be entered into with any extramural sponsor which allows for the transfer of the ownership of data.“ Per University of Wisconsin System Financial & Administrative Policies on Extramural Support Administration (G2) Section V.B.(9) "Data" “Ownership” Who has access to the data? PI and Other Research Contributors External sponsors or their delegates (per agreements) UW-Madison (to insure access and validate compliance and integrity) Access should not supersede the PI's right to keep Data proprietary until the results of the research have been published and the aims of the research have been fulfilled.

UW-Madison responsibilities Per OMB Circular A-110 (Sec. 53), UW System policy, and “sound management principles” Protect the rights of students, postdoctoral scholars, and staff, to access Data from research in which they have participated Comply with the terms of sponsored project agreements Ensure the appropriate use of animals, human subjects, recombinant DNA, disease-causing agents, radioactive materials, and the like Facilitate the investigation of charges, such as scientific misconduct or conflict of interest Support university personnel in securing and protecting intellectual property rights

Data Retention Minimum of seven years, but superseded by record retention schedules and other considerations: – Data must be kept for as long as may be necessary to protect any intellectual property resulting from the work; – If any charges regarding the research arise, such as allegations of scientific misconduct or conflict of interest, Data must be retained until such charges are fully resolved; and; – If a postdoctoral scholar or other trainee, graduate student, or undergraduate student is a Research Contributor, Data must be retained at least until the degree is awarded, training is completed, or it is clear that the individual has abandoned the work.

Transfer of Data If PI leaves UW-Madison, Data may be transferred with approval of VC for Research and with written agreement from the PI's new institution that guarantees: – 1) its acceptance of custodial responsibilities for the Data, and – 2) UW-Madison access to the Data, should that become necessary. Provides “chain of title” documentation e.g., for IP issues Human subjects data may not be transferred without UW IRB review (and possibly review by the new institution)

Data defined Data means recorded factual material, regardless of the form or media on which it may be recorded, that is commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings. For example, data may include writings, films, sound recordings, pictorial reproductions, drawings, designs, or other graphic representations, procedural manuals, forms, diagrams, work flow charts, equipment descriptions, data files, statistical records, and other research data. Does not include draft manuscripts, preliminary analyses, plans for futures research, peer reviews, communications with colleagues