Tom Fairfield STAMPEDE Trial Manager

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Charlene Green STAMPEDE Clinical Trial Manager
STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08): Arm J Pharmacy Training
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
A pooled analysis of the final results of the two randomized phase II studies comparing Gemcitabine (G) vs Gemcitabine + Docetaxel (G+D) in patients (pts)
Survival with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the “docetaxel era”: Data from >600 patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial (MRC.
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
1 NDA / S012 CASODEX (bicalutamide) 150 mg FDA Review Division of Reproductive and Urologic Drug Products (DRUDP)
Controversies in the management of PSA-only recurrent disease Stephen J. Freedland, MD Associate Professor of Urology and Pathology Durham VA Medical Center.
STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08): Arm J overview
Sponsor number:. MRC PR08 ISRCTN number:
Drug Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
Implementation of MAMS 1 Mahesh Parmar, Feb-2010 Practical Implementation of Multi-Arm Multi-Stage Trials Mahesh Parmar Director MRC Clinical Trials Unit.
1Stopeck A et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Renal Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Patients With Breast Cancer.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
Howard M. Sandler, MD University of Michigan Medical School
ODAC SCHERING-PLOUGH RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 Temozolomide Oncology Drug Advisory Committee March 13, 2003 Craig L. Tendler, M.D. Vice President, Oncology.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Surrogate End point for Prostate Cancer- Specific Mortality After RP or EBRT A D’Amico J Nat Ca Inst 95,
Low dose chemotherapy with insulin (Insulin Potentiation Therapy) in combination with hormone therapy for treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer.
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer A Regulatory Perspective of End Points to Measure Safety and Efficacy of Drugs Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Bhupinder.
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
Design of Clinical Trials for Select Patients With a Rising PSA following Primary Therapy Anthony V. D’Amico, MD, PhD Professor of Radiation Oncology Harvard.
RECIST Overview.
Involved Field Radiotherapy versus No Further Treatment in Patients with Clinical Stages IA/IIA Hodgkin Lymphoma and a “Negative” PET Scan After 3 Cycles.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit STAMPEDE Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy Sponsor number:MRC PR08 ISRCTN.
Immune Related Response Criteria (irRC) Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors Training Presentation v3.0.
Phase II in Second Line NSCLC DefinitionPhase II: BI 6727 vs. BI 6727+pemetrexed vs. pemetrexed in second line advanced NSCLC Early stopping.
CASE 1 65-year-old man No other diseases or previous surgeries July 2005: PSA 11.5 ng/ml; F/T: 9% After prostate biopsy revealing adenocarcinoma: RETROPUBIC.
Phase Ⅱ Trial of Docetaxel and Cisplatin Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Cisplatin in Locally Advanced.
Protocols for Advanced Prostate Cancer and/or Local Failure After Radical Prostatectomy Isaac Powell, MD.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Two Year Estimate of Overall Survival in COMBI-v, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib With Vemurafenib.
A prospective randomized trial
ProtecT study Lead Nurse meeting October ProtecT study Recruitment and case-finding.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
A phase III trial comparing R-CHOP 14 and R-CHOP 21 for the treatment of newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma Results from a UK NCRI Lymphoma.
Bortezomib (VELCADE), Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone (VRCD) combination therapy in front-line low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LG-NHL) is active.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
CB-1 Background of Pancreatic Cancer & NCIC CTG PA.3 Study Design Malcolm Moore, MD Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology Princess Margaret Hospital Chair,
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Gemcitabine and capecitabine with or without telomerase peptide vaccine GV1001 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (TeloVac)
Matthew Raymond Smith, MD, PhD Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Program Director, Genitourinary Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA- Summarised
SABR Update Breast SSG June 2017.
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
STAMPEDE: Docetaxel Significantly Improves Survival in Men With Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
Biomarker Screening Pilot
until tumour progression until tumour progression
SYSTEMIC THERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER
ACT II: The Second UK Phase III Anal Cancer Trial
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
- Phase 1 Signalling Study
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant Therapy in Melanoma
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS)
Management of Prostate Cancer: Global Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Tom Fairfield STAMPEDE Trial Manager STAMPEDE Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy Tom Fairfield STAMPEDE Trial Manager Sponsor number: MRC PR08 ISRCTN number: ISRCTN78818544 EUDRACT number: 2004-000193-31 CTA number: 00316/0026/001-0001

TRIAL DESIGN

Design rationale STAMPEDE is 6-arm, 5-stage randomised controlled trial 3 investigational drugs Using Multi-Arm Multi-Stage methodology MAMS design MAMS design permits rapid comparison and concurrent testing of treatments

Trial Design

Trial Design Stages Stage Outcome Measures Primary Secondary Pilot Safety Feasibility Activity I-III Failure-free survival Overall survival Toxicity Skeletal-related events Efficacy IV Overall survival Failure-free survival Quality of life

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Main Inclusion Criteria Newly diagnosed high risk patients with one of Any 2 out of the following 3 Stage T3/4 N0 M0 PSA  40ng/ml Gleason sum score 8-10 Stage Tany N+ M0 or Tany Nany M+ Multiple sclerotic bone metastases with a PSA  100ng/ml Previously treated relapsing patients with either PSA  4ng/ml and rising with doubling time less than 6 months PSA  20ng/ml N+ M+

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Intention to treat with long term HT WHO PS 0,1 or 2 Adequate cardiovascular history No major dental extractions planned within next 2 years

Hormone Therapy Before Randomisation It is preferable that patients are not started on hormones prior to randomisation No more than 12 weeks before PSA measurement taken before HT treatment

Screening Procedures Patients identifed CT or MRI of pelvis and abdomen Bone Scan Chest X-ray and ECG PSA Test Within 8 Weeks of Randomisation Blood Tests

TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION

Hormone Therapy Three acceptable approaches: Bilateral orchidectomy Total or subcapsular LHRH analogues Used according to local practice Prophylactic anti-androgens recommended Anti-Androgens M0 patients only Monotherapy according to local practice

Zoledronic acid Zoledronic acid 4mg 15min IV infusion Every 3 weeks for 6 treatments Then every 4 weeks Patients should also receive 500mg calcium oral supplement 400IU vitamin D oral supplement Available as a combination tablet Continues until the soonest of: Maximum of 2 years disease (including PSA) progression

Docetaxel Docetaxel 75mg/m2 Patients should also receive Continues: Day 1 as 1hr IV infusion Max 160mg Patients should also receive Prednisolone 5mg bid daily for 21 days Continues: Cycle repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles

Celecoxib Celecoxib 400mg Continues until the soonest of: bid Maximum of 1 year Disease (including PSA) progression

Radiotherapy Radiotherapy permitted for suitable patients Intention to use RT stated at randomisation ensure no bias towards particular combinations of systemic therapy with radiotherapy RT given 6 to 9 months after randomisation and after any docetaxel toxicity settled

ASSESSMENTS & FOLLOW-UP

Follow-up schedule 6 weekly 0 to 24 weeks 12 weekly up to 2 years 6 monthly up to 5 years Annually thereafter

Assessment of Treatment Failure New lesions CT scan Increase in baseline lesions Biochemical Rate of fall of PSA and the level of the PSA nadir PSA nadir will be sent to responsible clinician confirming the PSA level which would be taken as progression. Death from prostate cancer

Defining PSA Nadir & PSA Failure Lowest reported PSA level Between randomisation and 24 weeks PSA Failure Depends on baseline PSA measurement and PSA nadir 3 possible PSA failure categories, A, B and C

PSA Failure Categories

Defining PSA Relapse For patients in group A – Failed at time zero For Patients in group B – Relapse occurs when PSA increases by 50% above nadir For Patients in group C – Relapse occurs when PSA increases by 50% above nadir or goes above 4ng/ml, whichever is greatest

DRUG SUPPLY

Drug Supply & Support Novartis Pfizer Sanofi-Aventis Supplying free Zoledronic Acid Providing an educational grant to support some central work Pfizer Supplying free Celecoxib Providing funds to distribute drug to centres Sanofi-Aventis Providing an educational grant Supplying Docetaxel at a discounted price of buy 1 get 2 free

Drug Supply & Support Department of Health Central subvention provided £1,787 per patient randomised to arms C and E of the trial and prescribed docetaxel. Payable in respect of a hospital trust randomising more than 3 patients

Drug Ordering and Labelled Celecoxib and Zoledronic Acid Ordered by MRC CTU at accreditation and on subsequent request from centres Docetaxel Ordered by centre pharmacist All drugs To be labelled by the pharmacist using labels provided

CURRENT ACCRUAL

Current Recruitment Status First patient 17th October 2005 Accrual targets Pilot Phase target was 210 patients Pilot Phase target achieved in March 2007 Overall target approximately 3300 patients (440 OS events on control arm) Observed accrual 2114 patients have been randomised 28th February 2011

Accrual

Patient Characteristics Age (years) at randomisation median (quartiles) 65 (60-70) PSA (ng/ml) at randomisation median (quartiles) 66 (23-183) WHO performance status (0 Vs 1 Vs 2+) 1628 vs 460 vs 25 Bone mets at randomisation n (%) 1080 (51%) RT planned n (%) 521 (25%) Type of HT: (LHRH vs bicalutamide vs orchidectomy) 2069 vs 35 vs 10 High risk newly diagnosed pts n (%) 1975 (93%) Previously treated/relapsing pts n (%) 139 (7%) Data from 28th Feb 2011

TRIAL COMMITTEES AND CONTACTS

Trial Management Group Nick James Oncologist; CI, Chair, Birmingham, UK Noel Clarke Urologist; Vice-Chair Manchester, UK Malcolm Mason Oncologist; Vice-Chair Cardiff, UK John Anderson Urologist Sheffield, UK David Dearnaley Oncologist Sutton, UK John Dwyer Patient representative Stockport, UK John Masters Pathologist London, UK Martin Russell Oncologist Glasgow, UK Marc Schulper Health Economist York, UK Andrew Stanley Pharmacist Birmingham, UK George Thalmann Oncologist Bern, CH Charlene Green Data Manager MRC CTU, UK Gordana Jovic Statistician MRC CTU, UK Erika Kuettel Trial Coordinator SAKK, CH Max Parmar Statistician MRC CTU, UK Tom Fairfield Trial Manager MRC CTU, UK Matthew Sydes CTU Lead/Trial Statistician MRC CTU, UK

Contact us Tom Fairfield Trial Manager MRC Clinical Trials Unit E: stampede@ctu.mrc.ac.uk Charlene Green Data Manager T: 0207 670 4882