STORAGE OVERVIEW 2010 Steve Isser, JD, PhD Vice President & General Counsel Good Company Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

PG&Es 2009 Participating Load Pilot. 2 Overview Regulatory Context Pilot Characteristics Lessons Next Steps.
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
© New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. New Challenges Facing System Operators Stephen G. Whitley President & Chief.
Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
11 Presentation for ERCOT ETWG FERC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Frequency Regulation Compensation in the Organized Wholesale Power Markets (RM )
Discussion of Inter-RTO Seams Issues Presented by: Midwest ISO and NYISO Independent Market Monitor David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics October 7,
PJM©2014www.pjm.com Winter 2014 Overview & Recent and Upcoming Market Rule Changes Adam Keech Director, Market Operations.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
Challenge of Large Scale Wind Power Integration - Introduction to the Workshop Pradeep Perera Principal Energy Specialist Asian Development Bank.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
1 Presentation to the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (WIEG) T. Graham Edwards President & CEO August 9, 2007.
©2012 | Commercial in Confidence | Proprietary to Ventyx, An ABB Company NYISO Real-time Market Presentation to ERCOT METF – April 26, 2012 Confidential.
ANCILLARY SERVICES THE NEXT STEP IN MARKET GRANULARISATION.
The Continuing Evolution of U.S. Electricity Markets
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
Vehicle-to-Grid: Integrating Electric Drive Vehicles with the Power Grid Power Systems 2002 Conference March 13, 2002 Alec Brooks Chief Technology Officer.
Energy and Economy Transition California’s energy system to a highly efficient, renewables-based system and electrify transportation.
The Policy Voice for Energy Storage Bulk Energy Storage for the Nation’s Electricity Grid Jason Makansi, Executive Director President, Pearl Street Inc.
Vanus J. Priestley Philip R. O’Connor. Ph.D.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
Aaron Townsend National Renewable Energy Laboratory October 28, 2013 Colorado Rural Electric Association Energy Innovations Summit Energy Storage in the.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Moving Toward Hybrid Power Systems Creating value with utility scale energy storage ERCOT Renewable Technology Working Group April 2009.
Power Plant BI POWER GENERATION Evolution of Plant Ownership From Regulated Era Regulated Utility Monopolies To “Partially” Deregulated Era Independent.
1 Capacity Markets Investment in Generation Capacity Payments October 31, 2005 J. W. Charlton.
PJM©2009www.pjm.com Implications of Electric Transportation for the National Grid Ken Huber PJM Interconnection February 19, 2010.
1 The Costs of Participating in Restructured Wholesale Markets American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 William M. Bateman Robert C. Smith.
PJM© Welcome to PJM. PJM© Today’s Agenda 1.Introductions 2.PJM Overview 3.State and Federal Regulation Steve Boyle.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
Barriers to Energy Storage providing Ancillary Services in ERCOT
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Regulation Energy Management Overview CPUC Energy Storage Workshop March 9, 2011.
Montana Energy Summit April 22, 2008 Ancillary Service – Regulating Reserves.
1 1 Beacon Power Corporation Energy Storage – Regulation Issues Prepared for: Emerging Technologies Working Group January 5, 2011.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
Hawaii Energy Storage Seminar: Utility Regulation Service
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
PJM©2011 From Pilot to Production: Integrating New Storage Products in PJM Scott Baker PJM Interconnection ERCOT ETWG Storage Workshop December 2, 2011.
Conference on Standard Market Design Issues Alice Fernandez, FERC Staff January 22-23, 2002.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
Changes in U.S. Regulatory Framework that Supports Energy Storage Deployment Jim Hart Vice President – South America.
Multi-Use Application Use Case #3: Optimized Pricing and Resource Allocation (OPRA) Project. May 3, 2016.
CAISO Market Design Initiatives Update Donald Tretheway Senior Market Design and Policy Specialist CPUC Storage Proceeding January 14, 2013.
Black Start Service in New England System Operator’s Perspective Robert B. Burke ISO New England Inc. July 23, 2002 IEEE - Chicago, Illinois.
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
The Future of Demand Response in New England
31st USAEE/IAEE North American Conference
Hot Topics in PJM: Price Formation and Public Policy
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Alternative ICAP Proposal
Transforming the Electric Grid with Storage
Status of Energy Storage Policy in the U.S.
Presentation transcript:

STORAGE OVERVIEW 2010 Steve Isser, JD, PhD Vice President & General Counsel Good Company Associates

Storage Is Here – Grid-Ready ARRA Funding - Batteries –8 battery companies received $1.14 billion, –primarily automotive, but spillover possible ARRA Funding – Storage –Flywheels, Amber Kinetics, Beacon Power –CAES, NYSEG, PG&E, SustainX “mini-CAES” –Li Batteries, Seeo Inc., SCE project, DTE/A123 –Lead Batteries, East Penn Ultrabattery –Si Batteries, 44 Tech Inc. –Zi/Br, PSNM –Redox, Ktech Corp

Short-Term Energy Storage in A/S Markets California ISO Demonstrated: -100 kW Beacon Flywheel Interconnected: - 2 MW AES A123 batteries New York ISO: 5/12/09 Demonstrated: -100 kW Beacon flywheels Planned: -(2) 20 MW Beacon flywheel plants (Stephentown, Glenville) -(3) 20 MW AES battery plant PJM: Spring 2009 Operating: -1 MW AES Altairnano batteries at PJM HQ Planned: -20 MW Beacon flywheel plant (Chicago) -20 MW Battery plant (PA) ISO New England Operating: 3 MW Beacon Flywheels Midwest ISO: 1/1/10 Demonstrated: -2 MW AES Altairnano batteries Operating: - 15 MW Alcoa Reynolds DR ISOs that have market rules in place to allow energy storage to provide regulation are attracting investment

Initial Driving Force – FERC Order 890 FERC modified the Regulation and Frequency Response Services tariff to allow provision of those services by generating and non-generation resources. See Order No. 890 at P 888. “ We therefore modify Schedules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 of the pro forma OATT to indicate that Reactive Supply and Voltage Control, Regulation and Frequency Response, Energy Imbalance, Spinning Reserves, Supplemental Reserves and Generator Imbalance Services, respectively, may be provided by generating units as well as other nongeneration resources such as demand resources where appropriate.”

Energy Storage in Other ISOs Status of Storage in Regulation markets: –NYISO: FERC approved new market rules for Limited Energy Storage Resources (LESRs) to provide Regulation on May 15, 2009 –Midwest ISO: FERC approved new tariff for Stored Energy Resources (SERs) based on NYISO proposal on December 31, 2009 –PJM: Implemented a frequency-based signal for energy storage resources in March 2009; allow resources to self-manage energy and capacity –CAISO: Non-generators proposing an energy management method similar to NYISO, is in stakeholder discussions –ISO-NE: Currently operating a pilot program for alternative technologies, such as energy storage, to provide Regulation and developing permanent market rules

Barriers to Alternative Technologies Challenge/BarrierWhy?Recommendation Regulation resources required to be dispatched in energy market Storage resources not designed for continuous energy injection Allow “regulation only” providers Energy bias in Regulation signal Storage fills up or emptiesAllow resources to manage their energy level (i.e. NYISO/MISO method) Reg. High/Low Limit rules don’t work for storage Generator/Load rules work for resources that either only inject or only withdraw, not both Create storage asset category for resources that both inject and withdraw Inability to settle net energy at wholesale Storage provides regulation by injecting and withdrawing energy (recycles energy) Allow net energy settlement at LMP

Pilot Data: Generation Dispatch Method is Not Effective When Energy Storage does not have the ability to modify its energy base- point, it results in high fade time and under utilization of the resource Originally energy base-point was fixed at zero When hit extreme state-of-charge LESR faded until signal moved in opposite direction No ability to adjust energy base-point No ability to utilize LESR’s available regulation capacity Fade time

NYISO/MISO: Energy Storage Tariff Created New Resource Category: Limited Energy Storage Resource (LESR) or Stored Energy Resource (SER) Allowed to supply Regulation only –Eliminated requirement to bid into the energy market LESR/SER energy level managed by ISO to maintain regulation capability Resources dispatched based on speed of response Hourly Energy Settlement = Net Injections/Withdrawals *LMP

PJM Frequency Based Signal PJM developed a new ‘frequency-based’ AGC for storage devices; Could be similar to ERCOT’s current AGC due to the fact that ERCOT is an ‘island’ PJM allows storage to self manage its energy base point and capacity in real time under existing market rules Energy Storage AGC based off the Frequency Error More volatile – fast changing Utilizes storage’s fast response speed Less energy bias Generator AGC based off of the ACE value Contains longer term energy trends The combination of signal and energy management enables LESR/SERs to continuously provide regulation (no fade)

ISO-NE Pilot: “Mileage” Component 2008 Status ISO-NEPJMNYISOCAISO Fast First Dispatch NNN Pay-for-Performance NNN Maximum Allowable Response time 5 minutes 10 minutes Regulation Procurement (as % of Avg. Load) 0.80%1.11%1.13%1.35% Regulation Procurement vs. NE 100% (baseline) 139%141%169% “Regarding compensation, some storage technologies appear able to provide a nearly instantaneous response to regulation signals, in a manner that is also more accurate than conventional resources. These two characteristics can reduce the size, and hence overall expense, of the regulation market. Most existing tariffs or markets do not compensate resources for superior speed or accuracy of regulation response, but such payment may be appropriate in the future...” - FERC Chairman Wellinghoff Testimony, Senate Hearing on Energy Storage, Dec. 10, 2009

TEXAS Activities Presidio Battery – AEP Renewable Technologies Working Group –Storage; TRIPS Report, MDO5 -Whitepaper on Storage Issues - es/manager/StoragePaper pdfhttp:// es/manager/StoragePaper pdf -Storage key element of 2010 RTWG Agenda Project – Storage Investigation