High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The No Child Left Behind Act and Title 1 Schools What Parents Should Know and Do.
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Lisa Marvel EDD: 7100 December, 2009.
Chapter Fifteen Understanding and Using Standardized Tests.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Chapter 14 Understanding and Using Standardized Tests Viewing recommendations for Windows: Use the Arial TrueType font and set your screen area to at least.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Understanding and Using Standardized Tests
Power and Control at State and National Levels: Political Party Platforms and High- Stakes Testing Chapter 9 ©2012 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Jackson Elementary School Title I Information
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
Chapter 15 Understanding Standardized Assessment.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting W.H. Rhodes Elementary School School Year.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
What you need to know About Title I Parent Meeting Presentation.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.
American Institutes for Research
What you need to know About Title I
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Adequate Progress Gina LaPlaca Grand Canyon University
How Do We Identify Standards and Write Objectives?
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
Understanding and Using Standardized Tests
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Presentation transcript:

High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing High stakes testing is… Using standardized test scores, either by themselves or in conjunction with other data, to determine whether students get promoted to the next grade or graduate from high school, whether teachers and administrators receive financial rewards or demotions, and whether school districts receive additional state funds or lose their accreditation.

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing The Federal Initiative: No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  Requirements of NCLB – Standards: States must have challenging content and achievement standards in math, reading/language arts, science – Testing: Annual testing of students in grades 3-12 in math, reading/language arts, science – Adequate yearly progress (AYP): States must demonstrate each year that an additional percentage of all students have reached the proficient level – Reporting: States and school districts must report how every group of students has performed on the annual assessment – Accountability: Rewards or punishments given to successful or failing schools

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Problems Implementing NCLB  States may weaken standards to meet AYP  States may lower the score that determines proficiency for same reason  Law ignores long-standing validity issues and standardized testing (minorities, ELL students, and students with disabilities)  Few students receive free tutoring mandated by the law  State departments of education lack the resources to carry out their responsibilities

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Arguments in Support of High-Stakes Testing Programs  Goal Clarity  Improved Quality Control  Beneficial Effects for Teaching  Beneficial Effects for Students

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Arguments Critical of High-Stakes Testing Programs  Structural Limitations  Misinterpretation and Misuse of Test Results  A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Motivation  A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Standards ã Undesirable Side Effects

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Research on the Effects of High-Stakes Testing Programs  Effect on Achievement  Effect on Motivation  Effect on Teachers and Teaching  Effect on the Curriculum ã Effect on the Dropout Rate  Use of School Choice and Supplemental Instructional Services

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Recommendation for Improving High-Stakes Testing  Each state should adopt only those content standards that represent the most important knowledge and skills that students need to learn  A state’s content standards should clearly describe exactly what is being assessed so teachers can create lessons that directly address those standards  Scores on a state assessment should be reported on a standard-by- standard basis for each student, school, and district  States should provide school districts with additional assessment procedures to assess those standards that the required assessment does not cover  States should monitor the curricula of school districts to ensure that instruction addresses all content standards and subjects, not just those assessed by the required state test

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Recommendation for Improving High-Stakes Testing ã States should provide school districts with additional assessment procedures to assess those standards that the required assessment does not cover ã States should monitor the curricula of school districts to ensure that instruction addresses all content standards and subjects, not just those assessed by the required state test ã State assessments should be designed so that all students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate which of the state’s standards they have mastered ã All tests should satisfy the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing of the American Educational Research Association and similar test quality guidelines ã Teachers and principals should receive professional development training that helps them use test results to optimize children’s learning