Beam Instrumentations: Requirements for Proton and Electron Beams C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matching Injector To Linac. Caveats This is all loose and fuzzy – sort of religion We dont have real tight control over and knowledge of the machine –
Advertisements

Summary of the Design Report and Next Steps Edda Gschwendtner for the CERN AWAKE Project Team Edda Gschwendtner, CERN1.
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
MERIT beam spot from optics (update of July 16,2008 talk) I.Efthymiopoulos – CERN, AB Dept. MERIT, VRVS Meeting September 25, 2008.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
WP 13 : Beam Diagnostics Conceptual Specifications Rhodri Jones (BE/BI)
ESS DTL beam commissioning
The AWAKE Project at CERN and its Connections to CTF3 Edda Gschwendtner, CERN.
Few slides from J. Fox’ talk in last November’s LARP meeting LARP CM
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
B.O.S.S. SPS ring and transfer lines Serge Massot for BE-OP-SPS European Organisation for Nuclear Research CERN CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland 27/05/2014CERN.
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon, Matthew Wing 28 th January 2015.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
First AWAKE dump calculations Helmut Vincke. Beam on dump Muon axis inside and outside CERN Distances: Beam impact point to end of West hall: ~300 m Beam.
Integration, Installation & Infrastructure Ans Pardons, with input from the WP4 members September 2014.
Considerations on laser-p+ beam merging for CB, BG, PM.
G5 Beam Instrumentation D. Gassner, E. Pozdeyev 4-09.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
Requirements for the Interlock System of the Phase1 beam line Janet Schmidt on behalf of CP3.
The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
00:15: Stable beams fill 1883, 1.1E33 cm-2s-1.  Seems the 144 bunches beam 1 doe not fit properly on the injection kicker waveform. Systematically the.
Beam Instruments PSB + Transfer Lines B. Mikulec, J-F. Comblin.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
T. Limberg Position of the 3rd Harmonic System. Injector (with first Bunch Compression Stage) 2 European XFEL MAC May 2010 T. Limberg.
CNGS Operation Summary Edda Gschwendtner, CERN. Outline Introduction CNGS Performance Highlights since last NBI 2010 in Japan Issues Summary 2E. Gschwendtner,
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
6 April 2006Malika Meddahi 1 CNGS Project: primary beam 1.Project Overview 2. Proton beam line overview and status 3. Target status 4. Commissioning preparation.
Review on shorter PSB main bending magnets Injection layout with short magnets Advantages & Disadvantages Wim Weterings
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Preliminary Design of Electron Beam line F. Velotti, C. Bracco, B. Goddard and M. Meddahi.
May 31, 2005Mike Hildreth – ATF 2005 Energy Spectrometry and ATF Components of the nano-BPM Test Program and Plans for Future Tests Mike Hildreth University.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
AWAKE: D2E for Alexey beam properties Silvia Cipiccia, Eduard Feldbaumer, Helmut Vincke DGS/RP.
Issues Concerning Different Beam Lines Integration C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements: WP3 and.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Estimates of required MPS reaction time In the merger (at the centers of respective 20deg dipoles and in between 2 lenses) rms R=250 um In the
AWAKE: A Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment at CERN C. Bracco on behalf of the AWAKE collaboration C. Bracco - ICHEP2014.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Beam transfer considerations for LAGUNA Angelina Parfenova, W. Bartmann, L. Ducimetiere, B. Goddard, V.Kain, M.A. Kowalska, M. Meddahi, B. Puccio, F. Velotti.
Feasibility Study of the AWAKE Facility at CERN Edda Gschwendtner, Chiara Bracco, Brennan Goddard, Malika Meddahi, Ans Pardons, Elena Shaposhnikova, Helga.
LAGUNA Primary Beam: Extraction and Transfer B.Goddard TE/ABT 23/01/2013 Reporting on behalf of many colleagues 400 GeV – Extraction from SPS – Upgrade.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
AWAKE p+ beam line HWC C. Bracco, J. Schmidt Acknowledgment: MCS, EPC, MPE, SPS-OP, BI, ABP (survey),STI, EA, ACE, RP.
HiRadMat Summary of Phase-I and plans for Phase-II commissioning J. Blanco, N. Conan, V. Kain, K. Cornelis, B. Goddard, C. Hessler, M. Meddahi, C. Theis,
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
BE-BI Software for LINAC4
AWAKE proposals for BE/BI
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Large Booster and Collider Ring
CNGS Proton Beam: Introduction
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
NuSTORM - μ Storage Ring with Injection
Proton Beam Diagnostics
Electron Source Configuration
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
I-LHC NOMINAL ions beam in 2007
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Transfer Line for EIC.
Presentation transcript:

Beam Instrumentations: Requirements for Proton and Electron Beams C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements: WP3 and WP4 members, P. Muggli and A. Caldwell

Outlines  Introduction  Layout and optics  Electron and proton beam integration (side-injection, on-axis injection)  Electron beam line  Beam characteristics  Lattice  Wish list for diagnostics  Proton beam line  Beam characteristics  Lattice  Wish list for diagnostics  Summary

Reminder Three beams into the game! 7.16 % Phase 1 (2016): protons + laser beam  prove SMI Phase 2 (2017): protons + laser + electron beam  probe acceleration

Proton and Electron Beam  Common beam line last ~4.4 m before plasma cell C. Magnier, F. Galleazzi

Proton and Electron Beam mm 20 mm 10 m 40 mm <0.5 mm p e 10 m 40 mm p e Side injection On axis injection 20 mm 24 mm s=801m Off axis!!

Electron Beam Line Momentum [GeV/c]10-20 (nom. 15) # bunches1 p+ per bunch2.0 × 10 9 Current [nC]0.3 Norm. Emittance [mm mrad]2 e- p+ On-axis inj Quads inside the connection tunnel Final triplet * * tot. envelope: 2x Envelope Hor/Ver beam pipes Ø: mm F. m. Velotti

Electron Beam Line 1. Emittance measurement at beginning of the line  Available space (~50 cm) between elements in the connection tunnel  Vertical dispersion non-zero 2. Beam size at the plasma cell 3. BPMs for correction assuming 1vs1 strategy  14 (1 per quad) + 2 before the plasma cell  6 of them in the common part with p+ 4. Momentum measurements  Spectrometer at the end of RF gun? At one of the h- bends? 5. Bunch length measurements 6. Current measurements F. m. Velotti

Electron Beam Line 1. Emittance measurement at beginning of the line  Available space (~50 cm) between elements in the connection tunnel  Vertical dispersion non-zero 2. Beam size at the plasma cell 3. BPMs for correction assuming 1vs1 strategy  14 (1 per quad) + 2 before the plasma cell  6 of them in the common part with p+ 4. Momentum measurements  Spectrometer at the end of RF gun? At one of the h- bends? 5. Bunch length measurements 6. Current measurements MeasurementsPrecisionPosition Emittance +/- 200  m Connection tunnel Beam size +/- 50  m Before plasma cell Beam position +/- 200  m +/- 50  quads and before plasma cell Momentum+/- 7.5 keVhorizontal bends Current < 1%Before/after plasma cell F. m. Velotti

Proton Beam CNGSAWAKE Nominal Setup Momentum [GeV/c]400 # bunches p+ per bunch1.05 × × × 10 9 Repetition rate [s] Norm. Emittance [mm mrad]~ Specifications (based on LHC TL and HiRadMat requirements) for the unchanged part of the beam line (everything installed upstream of BTVG ) : BPM: 0.2 mm total accuracy Resolution: 0.1 mm (within 20 mm radius) BCT: 1->2% absolute precision BTV: Beam size precision: 0.1 mm BLM: Detect local loss of 5e8 charges Diagnostics for single bunches! ~74 times lower intensity than CNGS

Changes in the Proton Beam Line Instrumentation presently installed: BTVG BPG BLM BPG BPG BTVG BFCT BTVG BLMr /BLMl BPG BTV BPKG Target Area (not possible to reuse) Possible to reuse? (provided required modifications) ~ 90 m

What is Needed in the “New Line”? BPG

What is Needed in the “New Line”? BPG

Proton and Laser Beam Plasma cell Not real bottle neck Lase r Prot on ± 8 mm ± 6 mm ~7 mm (it must be > 5 mm!) BPG new BPG BPG new BPG

What is Needed in the “New Line”? BPG

Required Pointing Accuracy

Beam Envelope at BPMs s** [m] Tot. Env. X [mm] Tot. Env. Y [mm] Beam Pipe [mm] Accuracy [mm] BPG BPG *0.2 BPG *0.2 BPG.412xxx *0.2 BPG.412xxx BPG.412xxx /40***0.05 BPG.412xxx BPG.412xxx ** end position * 50 mm (inner diameter) vacuum chamber for new B190 dipoles, to be checked if still compatible with 60 mm aperture at BPMs (J. Hansen) *** side injection/ on axis injection Downstream of plasma cell Interlocked! Extraction from SPS must be stopped if beyond tolerances: 100  m and 15  rad

What is Needed in the “New Line”? BTV

Proton Beam Line Optics Requirements Round beam with a beam plasma cell entrance 1  = 200 ± 20  m Achieved: 1  = 202  m

Beam Envelope at BTVs S [m] Tot. Env. X [mm] Tot. Env. Y [mm] Beam Pipe [mm] Accuracy [mm] BTV BTV.412xxx /40*<0.05 BTV.412xxx <0.05 Downstream of plasma cell The last two BTVs have to be used also for the proton and laser beam setup (position: two beams coaxial)  a screen has to be added for the laser beam (reduced power during setup, see Mikhail’s talk) The Monitor downstream can be used also for the e-beam Position and beam size measurements * side injection/ on axis injection

What is Needed in the “New Line”? BLM location of vertical bottleneck (5e8 charges) BCT: 1-2% absolute precision BCT

Summary 1/2  Electron beam line:  Completely new diagnostics to measure:  Emittance  Energy  Beam plasma cell  Beam position  Bunch length  Current  Proton beam line:  Adapt existing diagnostics for AWAKE operation (1 bunch) up to BTVG (excluded) + reuse part of remaining diagnostics  Five additional BPM  Two additional monitors for beam size measurements of the p beam and position measurements for p and laser

Summary 1/2  Main challenges:  Coexistence of the e an p beams  Reduced beam pipe diameters (15-24 mm)  Almost no space around the beam pipes in common part of the lines (we’ll try to optimize the lattice):  How to implement pickups for position measurements?  How to perform beam profile measurements?  Required very high accuracy in position measurements for p and laser beam  Low electron energy and current  The option of having a unique design for on axis and side- injection is being evaluated: double diagnostics at the end of the line…..