Follow-up to Fall Statewide Coaches’ Observation System Training for Veteran Cohort A Coaches Cohort A Fall 2005 Regional Coaches’ Meeting: © 2005 by the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Student Centers in the Classroom Eight elements can assist in developing and implementing an effective classroom management system.
Advertisements

Literacy Coach’s Kick-off: Goals for the Year
Connecting Classrooms to Systems of School-wide PBS
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Playing board for the game Crooked rules
The Open Ended Response
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Concrete-Representational-Abstract Instruction 2010 Region 3 Education Service Center / Texas A&M University.
Hank Fien, Carrie Thomas Beck, Nicole Sherman-Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Leadership Session: Fidelity of Implementation Observation.
Oregon Reading First IBR V - Cohort B Coaches and Teachers Working Together to Improve Student Outcomes.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Statewide Coaches’ Session September 14, 2006.
Strategies.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
RTI & Classwide Instruction
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Session 5 – Small Group Instruction   Guided Reading – purpose  Preparing for the small group  Book Orientations  Reading and conferencing  Book.
Literacy Work Stations
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Using Empowering Teachers Instructional Routines with Student Center Activities to Differentiate Instruction Elissa Arndt Connie Weinstein Michelle Wahl.
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
Guidelines for Developing Lesson Plans EX
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
SIOP Overview Shelter Instruction Observation Protocol
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 3-5 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521 Information.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
 Desks in pairs or groups of 3-4  Students engaged in learning, minimal whole group instruction, students in collaborative pairs, small groups, etc.
© TNTP 2013 ACE Observer Training Stoudt For observers new to TNTP and the ACE Instructional Framework.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Response to Intervention How Do We Define a Tier I (Classroom-Based) Intervention? Jim Wright
Chapter 10 – Improving your teaching effectiveness Staying current Staying current –Graduate courses? –Conferences? –Professional journal? –Professional.
Leap Into Literacy Centers By Leigh Ann Roderick And Buffalo Jones Staff.
McCool Junction Elementary April 21st, Purpose/Objectives  Educate ourselves about the program options that are out there.  Take time to analyze.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
Identifying Assessments
Academic Seminar – Week 6
Differentiation and Small Group Instruction. Data-Based Decision Making Planning the content of daily instruction based on frequent, ongoing assessment.
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
Implementing a Writer’s Workshop
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
Overview of Video Presentations: Unveiling Critical Features of Instruction Enhancement Training © 2007 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
ODE Javits Project: I-GET-GTEd Differentiation Strategy Explained: Centers/Stations.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
1 Putting it All Together: Building an Effective 90 Minute Reading Block 22.
Establishing and teaching expectations. Establishing expectations Each classroom should have three to five positively expectations for students to follow.
Academic Seminar – Week 6 Lesson Plans & Formative Assessment Graphs.
Portfolio By: Fatima Henriquez. Balanced Literacy  Identify and explain the components of a balanced literacy program. Balanced Literacy is a framework.
Coach Observation Strategies: A Follow-Up
Writing Workshop facilitated by Kristen Giuliano Professional Development Specialist Monroe-2-BOCES.
Assist with implementation of curricular MODIFICATIONS, ACCOMMODATIONS, and INSTRUCTIONAL PLANS according to student’s IEP. (Includes BEHAVIOR PLANS, if.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2016.
Managing Student Centers in the Classroom
Independent Reading 2:00-3:15 September 8, 2011 PDC.
Managing Student Centers in the Classroom
Sitton Spelling Refresher
Observing Behavior: Formal Observational Systems
Guided Math.
Taking a closer look at DACL… Using and Creating a Walkthrough Tool
Presentation transcript:

Follow-up to Fall Statewide Coaches’ Observation System Training for Veteran Cohort A Coaches Cohort A Fall 2005 Regional Coaches’ Meeting: © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning

Observation Summary: Fall 2005 One round of Five-Minute Observations of K-3 classroom teachers (+ follow up). One round of Five-Minute Observations of K-3 classroom teachers (+ follow up). Formal Fidelity Observations (+ follow up). Formal Fidelity Observations (+ follow up). One round of Five-Minute Observations of certified and classified specialists (+ follow up). One round of Five-Minute Observations of certified and classified specialists (+ follow up).

Formal Fidelity Observation Parameters Who to Observe: ALL K-3 Classroom Teachers Who to Observe: ALL K-3 Classroom Teachers Length of Observation: The ENTIRE reading block Length of Observation: The ENTIRE reading block

Organizing Principles for Observations 1. Observations will have a student focus as determined by grade level data. The observations will begin with all classroom teachers as a hub and then follow students to other groups.

Organizing Principles for Observations 2. The entire reading block will be observed. 3. Observations will document reading instruction across multiple programs and/or instructors.

Organizing Principles for Observations 4. If teachers are using only parts of a program (as might be the case with program specific templates) coaches will indicate the skipped activities on one line of the program fidelity checklist.

Organizing Principles for Observations 5. For items that are embedded in the reading block (a block longer than 90 minutes), such as language arts or writing, coaches will discuss with their regional coordinator how to document such activities.

Gathering of Information to Determine Coaching Support Survey of Teacher Needs Survey of Teacher Needs Summary of Teacher Needs Summary of Teacher Needs 5 Minute Observations 5 Minute Observations 5 Minute Observation Summary 5 Minute Observation Summary Fidelity Observations Fidelity Observations

Five-Minute Observations Feedback from Coaches

Fidelity Observations Fill out ALL parts of a lesson on the Observation Form Fill out ALL parts of a lesson on the Observation Form Rating System Changes: Rating System Changes: N, P, F and E N, P, F and E Merged P/P+ to ONLY be “P” (partial) Merged P/P+ to ONLY be “P” (partial) Added “E” for Enhanced Added “E” for Enhanced

Fidelity Observation: Enhancements Use an “E” when a teacher has made a worthwhile modification or has replaced an activity with one more valuable for their students (describe briefly in the comment box). Use an “E” when a teacher has made a worthwhile modification or has replaced an activity with one more valuable for their students (describe briefly in the comment box). Use an “E” to rate an activity that the teacher added. This activity would be included at the end of the observation (describe briefly in the comment box). Use an “E” to rate an activity that the teacher added. This activity would be included at the end of the observation (describe briefly in the comment box). If a teacher modifies the lesson with an activity that isn’t particularly strong, they would be expected to give that activity a “P” and make a note in the comments that the enhancement didn’t better the lesson (describe briefly in the comment box). If a teacher modifies the lesson with an activity that isn’t particularly strong, they would be expected to give that activity a “P” and make a note in the comments that the enhancement didn’t better the lesson (describe briefly in the comment box).

Fidelity Observation: Enhancement Examples “additional, time-efficient practice opportunities” “additional, time-efficient practice opportunities” “HM lesson weak in _______, but teacher enhanced by adding _____________” “HM lesson weak in _______, but teacher enhanced by adding _____________” “Lesson included two modeling opportunities... teacher provided this intensive group with additional modeling.” “Lesson included two modeling opportunities... teacher provided this intensive group with additional modeling.” “Teacher added _____________ (e.g., white board work, manipulatives, vocab) to strengthen the lesson.” “Teacher added _____________ (e.g., white board work, manipulatives, vocab) to strengthen the lesson.”

evidence of using non-RF-approved programs during the 90-minute block evidence of using non-RF-approved programs during the 90-minute block evidence of using programs for which there was no corresponding S-I application evidence of using programs for which there was no corresponding S-I application completing only the narrative/comments section and not the last two pages completing only the narrative/comments section and not the last two pages providing no comments in the actual observation section providing no comments in the actual observation section giving almost all F’s for Full completion across teachers without supporting comments giving almost all F’s for Full completion across teachers without supporting comments Previous Concerns with Fidelity Observations

comments throughout fidelity observation, general features, and observation feedback pages are similar across teachers... no indication of individualization comments throughout fidelity observation, general features, and observation feedback pages are similar across teachers... no indication of individualization Identified Areas for Student Support sometimes indicated how the teacher was supporting the students, rather than how the teacher could improve that support, even though scores on the observation were low Identified Areas for Student Support sometimes indicated how the teacher was supporting the students, rather than how the teacher could improve that support, even though scores on the observation were low Previous Concerns with Fidelity Observations (Cont.)

in some schools, teachers received F’s for full completion based only on finishing the lesson and P’s were used to note an unfinished lesson in some schools, teachers received F’s for full completion based only on finishing the lesson and P’s were used to note an unfinished lesson vague action plans vague action plans general features comments don’t match information on observation page (e.g., complimented a general feature of instruction and then listed it as an area for student support) general features comments don’t match information on observation page (e.g., complimented a general feature of instruction and then listed it as an area for student support) Previous Concerns with Fidelity Observations (Cont.)

Narrative/Comments Section: Tips Brief and specific comments Brief and specific comments Details that shows individualization of feedback Details that shows individualization of feedback Give explanation in comments section for P’s (what was omitted) and E’s (what was added and how it enhanced the lesson) Give explanation in comments section for P’s (what was omitted) and E’s (what was added and how it enhanced the lesson)

Tips: Be brief and specific. Use the new five-minute observation draft form for comment ideas. Feature 1. Instructor modeled instructional tasks when appropriate. Examples: Examples: “T. followed HM lesson models of activities that were included.” “ T. modeled when prompted by lesson script, but students in low intensive grouped seemed to need more modeling.” “T. modeled all tasks before expecting students to do them.” Non-examples Non-examples “Good job!” “Jason was off task.” General Features Page

Feature 2. Instructor provided explicit instruction. Examples: Examples: “T. provided a kid-friendly definition and examples for main idea” Non-examples Non-examples “You are a wonderful teacher!” “Teacher provided explicit instruction.” General Features Page

Feature 3. Instructor engaged students in meaningful interactions with language during lesson. Examples: Examples: “T. explained and interacted with words encountered during read aloud. Used demonstrations and related the words to the students.” “T. demonstrated what yodeling was!” “T. used prior knowledge to relate vocabulary words to students’ lives.” Non-examples Non-examples “ vocab words” “Students did vocab workbook page.” General Features Page

Feature 4. Instructor provided multiple opportunities for students to practice instructional tasks. Examples: Examples: “ T. had all students use thumbs-up, thumbs-down for all practice words.” “Use more choral and partner responses so that all students have multiple opportunities.” Non-examples Non-examples “Yes.” “I liked your bulletin board.” General Features Page

Feature 5. Instructor provided corrective feedback after initial student responses. Examples: Examples: “T. immediately gave correction and had students repeat during whole group chanting.” “Used DI error correction procedure: ‘That word is gentle. What word? Let’s start over.’” Non-examples Non-examples “Johnny never got it, did he?” “You tolerate those tough kids.” General Features Page

Feature 6. Students were engaged in the lesson during teacher-led instruction. Examples: Examples: “Approximately 90% of students were engaged. T. monitored and redirected as needed.” “All small groups were engaged except students at the phonics center.” Non-examples Non-examples “I liked your behavior chart.” “What’s wrong with Mary?” General Features Page

Feature 7. Students were engaged in the lesson during independent work. Examples: Examples: “ During workbook time, approx. 90% of students were engaged in individual work.” “No independent work observed during this time.” “Students at back four desks were consistently off task.” “Students had the skills necessary to be engaged and successful at their independent work.” Non-examples Non-examples “I didn’t like that workbook page.” General Features Page

Feature 8. Students were successful completing activities at a high criterion level of performance. Examples: Examples: “During choral response of CVC words, I heard no incorrect answers.” “Students doing workbook pages were successful on all pages.” “Small group with paraprofessional were responding incorrectly approx. 50% of the time.” Non-examples Non-examples “No.” “Good job.” General Features Page

Feature 9. Instructor encouraged student effort. Examples: Examples: “T. used positive comments after each individual response.” “ T said: ‘Well said,’ and ‘Good answer,’ and ‘I like that answer’ to encourage student effort.” Non-examples Non-examples “You are a great teacher.” “Keep it up.” General Features Page

If pre-conference targeted a specific area for observation, provide feedback here. If pre-conference targeted a specific area for observation, provide feedback here. Comments should be brief and specific. Comments should be brief and specific. Feedback should be aligned with comments in other parts of fidelity observation. Feedback should be aligned with comments in other parts of fidelity observation. The observation feedback page should provide a verbal snapshot to reinforce critical teacher behaviors/ strategies. The observation feedback page should provide a verbal snapshot to reinforce critical teacher behaviors/ strategies. The “Identified Areas for Student Support” should be followed by a related “Action Plan”. The “Identified Areas for Student Support” should be followed by a related “Action Plan”. Observation Feedback Page: The Big Ideas!

Examples: Examples: “Transition routines and activities were effective. Students consistently received explicit instruction. T. provided enhanced modeling for this intensive group. Students had multiple opportunities to respond. T. encouraged student efforts.” Non-examples Non-examples “Great job teaching reading!” “Those kids are really learning!” Observation Feedback Page: Areas Implemented Well

Examples: Examples: “The low intensive students need more modeling.” “Students need consistent transition routine.” “Students need more opportunities to respond during the lesson.” “Students need more immediate feedback and more effective correction procedures.” Non-examples Non-examples “You are doing a great job.” “I think you need a bigger bulletin board.” “You have a hard class this year.” Observation Feedback Page: Identified Areas for Support

Examples: Examples: Coach will shadow teach HM lesson with teacher during whole group instruction.” “T. will arrange classroom so that independent station is closer to teacher desk.” “T will work with coach to add more effective correction procedures.” “T. will incorporate Touchphonics into small group phonics instruction during differentiated instruction time.” “T. will work with coach to improve pacing of lessons.” Non-examples Non-examples “Teacher will continue what she is doing.” “Coach will observe again later.” “ Students will cooperate with teacher.” Observation Feedback Page: Action Plan

Ask coaches to review sample fidelity observations and discuss. Each region will have six observation samples to review. Activity