SPRING 2014 QLP TA Training Workshop. AGENDA 2:00 – 2:05 Introduction QLP Team 2:05 – 2:30 QLP SLO’s and Collecting Assessment Data Kim Massaro 2:30 –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Standards (What this means in computer class)
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
Daniel Peck January 28, SLOs versus Course Objectives Student Learning Outcomes for the classroom describe the knowledge, skills, abilities.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Carol Ann Gittens, Gail Gradowski & Christa Bailey Santa Clara University WASC Academic Resource Conference Session D1 April 25, 2014.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
SPRING 2015 QLP TA Training Workshop. AGENDA TimeTopic 1:00 – 1:15Introduction to QLP 1:15 – 1:20Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) 1:20 – 1:25Data Collection.
Rubric Workshop Los Angeles Valley College Fall 2008.
Overarching Goal: Understand that computer models require the merging of mathematics and science. 1.Understand how computational reasoning can be infused.
A Quantitative Literacy Assessment Rubric Development & Lessons Learned - Stuart Boersma, Central Washington Univ. - Caren Diefenderfer, Hollins University.
Scoring Rubrics Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
CS 498 Senior Seminar Students will research a current topic in computer science, write a paper on that topic, and make an oral presentation.
Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Engineering Sciences 96 Engineering Design Seminar Spring 2009 Instructors: Warren Seering and Rob Howe.
A Quantitative Literacy Assessment Rubric Development & Lessons Learned - Stuart Boersma, Central Washington Univ. - Caren Diefenderfer, Hollins University.
English Word Origins Grade 3 Middle School (US 9 th Grade) Advanced English Pablo Sherman The etymology of language.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Language Understanding to Improve Student Achievement Project LUISA Session 7. Mar 1, Welcome: Focusing on Assessment 2. Standardized Proficiency.
Boot Camp Spring  Choose a class and complete a Context for Learning for this class. (It can be the same class as the literacy tasks, but YOU MUST.
CSE 1111 Week 1 CSE 1111 Introduction to Computer Science and Engineering.
GV Middle School Mathematics Mrs. Susan Iocco December 10, 2014.
-SLO Development Progress -SLO Activity -Assessment Progress -Support Needs.
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
Exploring the Normal Distribution Rick Luttrell James Price South Iredell High School.
1 Commissioned by PAMSA and German Technical Co-Operation National Certificate in Paper & Pulp Manufacturing NQF Level 2 Apply basic knowledge of statistics.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
HU113: Technical Report Writing
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
CETL Class of 1969 Teaching Scholars Project Presentation Dr. Mirjana M. Brockett.
The Developmental Reading & English Placement Test
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Keys to success on the Gateway: A checklist  Demonstrate that you understand the writing task  Address and develop all parts of the writing task  Organize.
NEW ASSESSMENT. NEW RESULTS SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT What do families need to know? (Insert School Name) (Insert Date) INSERT LOGO.
FALL 2015 QLP TA Training Workshop. AGENDA (Morning) 9:00 – 9:10Introduction to QLPTeam 9:10 – 9:20Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)Kim Massaro 9:20 –
9.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 17 SEPT 2014 TAKING CHANCES (IN CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY)
Scientific Research in Biotechnology 5.03 – Demonstrate the use of the scientific method in the planning and development of an experimental SAE.
111 MakingConnections Focus on Science and Literacy.
ATL’s in the Personal Project
Everything You Need to Know for Spring 2010 S. Kashima.
TRIAL MakingConnections Science and literacy.
Scientific Communication
ABOUT YOUR PAPER!. JUST FOR CLARITY... Write a paper about the article you sent to Dr. Cotter for approval.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS MATHEMATICAL PRACTICES OBJECTIVE: APPLY BEST MATH PRACTICES TO SOLVE PROBLEMS TO BECOME A MATHEMATICALLY PROFICIENT STUDENT.
Richard Beinecke, Professor and Chair Suffolk University Institute for Public Service.
Welcome to Fifth Grade Mrs. DeMaso Mrs. Walsh. Agenda Math Curriculum Math in Focus and IXL resources ELA Curriculum Think Central and AR resources.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
THE ACT ASSESSMENT This test is used by colleges to predict students’ success in college courses.
QUANTITATIVE LITERACY PROGRAM RAJ BOPPANA MARY DIXSON KIM MASSARO GAIL PIZZOLA KIMBERLY WARD 2015 QLP Workshop.
Developing Meaningful, Measurable Student Learning Outcomes Tulsa Community College January 2013 Susan Hatfield Professor, Winona State University
Quantitative Writing: Communicating Data Presenter: Kim Massaro The University of Texas at San Antonio Quantitative Literacy Program Co-Author: Gail Pizzola.
Using edTPA Data for Program Design and Curriculum Mapping Mary Ariail, Georgia State University Kristy Brown, Shorter University Judith Emerson, Georgia.
Quick Write Reflection How will you implement the Engineering Design Process with your students in your classes?
Quick Week 4 Review * Being an English detective.
General Education Assessment Workshop: Spring 2016 Attributes General Education Assessment Committee (GEAC) SUNY Oneonta November 17 & 20, 2015.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Introduction My class is a 7 th grade Science class which consist of 20 students total, 11 females-9 males, 4students are special needs and.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
University of East London Elizabeth Attree Research methods 1 Practicals Research Methods 1.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
Quantitative Literacy at WOU. LEAP In November, Faculty Senate recommended that WOU adopt LEAP's (Liberal Education & America's Promise) learning outcomes.
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
General Education Assessment
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
AP U.S. History Exam Details
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

SPRING 2014 QLP TA Training Workshop

AGENDA 2:00 – 2:05 Introduction QLP Team 2:05 – 2:30 QLP SLO’s and Collecting Assessment Data Kim Massaro 2:30 – 2:40 Q-grading Tips Kimberly Ward 2:40 – 2:50 Grading Writing Gail Pizzola 2:50 – 3:00 Q&A QLP Team

What is the QLP? The Quantitative Literacy Program is part of UTSA’s Quality Enhancement Plan to address the critical need for quantitative skills in students by enhancing core curriculum of select courses. The goal is to teach students to think critically when solving problems that involve observing and interpreting data.

In regular (non-Q) courses, information and data are presented to students in a lecture format and discussed. In a Q-course, students generate and analyze real-world data sets appropriate for the subject. Example: For example, students in Intro to Archeology investigated the findings of a small Prehistoric cemetery and tabulated the findings. How are Q-courses different from regular courses?

LEARNING TO EVALUATE QLP Student Learning Outcomes

EXPLORE Students will demonstrate the ability to explore data to define problems and identify solutions in a variety of real-world contexts.

VISUALIZE Students will demonstrate the ability to visualize data through converting information into different graphical and tabular forms.

ASSIMILATE & ASSESS Students will demonstrate the ability to assimilate and assess information from different sources, multiple representations of data, different methodologies, and different studies.

LOGIC Students will demonstrate the ability to use logic in computing and interpreting probabilities, evaluating risks, and understanding the idea of uncertainty.

UNDERSTAND Students will demonstrate the ability to understand units of measurement and scale, and the limitations of the quantitative analysis of data.

ANALYZE Students will demonstrate the ability to analyze data using different quantitative methods and draw appropriate conclusions.

TRANSLATE Students will demonstrate the ability to translate quantitative language into verbal assumptions and vice versa.

EXPRESS Students will demonstrate the ability to express quantitative evidence effectively in oral or written communication.

COLLECTING ASSESSMENT DATA

Q-GRADING TIPS

Grading Tips Each section of the course needs its own Excel file. All assignments for the assignment are to be put on one excel sheet. Student Rosters provided through Blackboard Learn* Zero vs. Blank student scores Make notations and comments on each question while grading Total Columns Be careful copy and pasting from Blackboard to Excel

Collecting Data Tips Multiple TA’s  Example: One of you could be a “Lead TA” who is in charge of collecting and compiling the grades for that class’s assignments. Don’t use to transfer student info/grades. When submitting data to QLP, only Q questions need to be sent. Due Date for All Q-Data: Study Days

TA/Grader Resources If you have any questions: Your Faculty Program Coordinator QLP Team Other Resources to use QLP Website Blackboard Learn Tutorials

GRADING WRITING

Clarity of Expression  5 = text clearly, completely, and accurately explains points of graph/chart.  3 = text needs more than one reading to understand the points of the graph/chart or is missing some information  1 = text does not clearly or adequately explain points

Editing 5 = text has no/few distracting editing problems (spelling, punctuation, grammar) 3 = text has some editing problems that are somewhat distracting 1 = text has excessive editing problems which shift the focus from the message to the editing problems.

Practice 1: What score would you give? Prompt: State the comparisons represented on the graph between the average lean body mass for males and females. 1. Males are heavier. _________ 2. Males have an average lean body mass of 53.2 kg, which is approximately 10 kg. higher than that of females, who have an average lean body mass of 43.0 kg. _________ 3. Males have an average body mass of 53.1 and females 43.0 _________

Practice 2: What score would you give? Prompt: The two variables collected for the study were lean body mass (in kilograms) and metabolic rate (in kilocalories). Using complete sentences, identify at least 2 variables that could have contributed to this study. 1. We need to study how old they are and how often they work out.________ 2. The study should consider the number of calories individuals consume per day, the age of the individuals in the study, and the hours per week the individuals exercise.________ 3. Other variables are food and exercising.________

Any Questions?