Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care John Elliott Hilary Shager April 25 th, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana IV-E Waiver Original Demonstration 1998 – 2002 Informal Extension 2002 – 2005 Current Extension
Advertisements

Promoting school connections for youth in child welfare Ensuring Educational Stability, Continuity, & Success of Children in Foster Care A COLLABORATIVE.
Expanding & Sustaining Systems of Care: New Challenges and Opportunities Presentation Beaver County (PA) System of Care: Optimizing Resources, Education.
Broward’s Infrastructure Design to Guide and Sustain Permanency for Young Foster Children (BRIDGES)
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
An Introduction to Project NO REST February 11, 2015
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Child Welfare Practice Model
Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative Update Meeting September 23, 2004 Bridgeport Holiday Inn.
Engaging Community Stakeholders and Building Community Partnerships
Colorado Educational Stability Grant April David T. Menefee, Ph.D. Associate Director for Quality and Performance Improvement Division of Child.
PROJECT SCHOOL SUCCESS— PHASE II NYC ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN’S SERVICES OFFICE OF EDUCATION SUPPORT AND POLICY PLANNING (OESPP) & DIVISION OF POLICY,
Wisconsin’s Read to Lead Initiative NGA Building State Systems.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
EDUCATION STABILITY MATTERS OREGON. 2 PRESENTED BY: Catherine Stelzer, MSW Oregon Team: A.J. Goins (Project Manager), Julie York, Sarah Walker, Annie.
Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.
OUR KIDS OF MIAMI-DADE/MONROE, INC. EDUCATION COLLABORATION PROJECT Presented by: Additional Key Project Team: Claudia Kitchens Robin Molan Director of.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
The Future of Continuous Quality Improvement in Wisconsin’s Child Welfare System.
Future Research Agenda for MCH: Children with Special Health Care Needs November 10, 2004 Washington, DC Deborah Allen, ScD Boston University School of.
New Jersey Department of Education Division of Early Childhood Education March 3, 2009.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Collaboration and data in a County Initiative : Cuyahoga County – Invest in Children Claudia Coulton & Rob Fischer, Ph.D. Center on Urban Poverty & Community.
2004 National Oral Health Conference Strategic Planning for Oral Health Programs B.J. Tatro, MSSW, PhD B.J. Tatro Consulting Scottsdale, Arizona.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
“Positive Beginnings” Michael White A/Executive Director, Office for Children Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Presentation to Best.
Department of Children and Families - Fiscal Update WHSFMA Conference May 7, 2014 John Tuohy, DCF Regional Operations David Harkins, Title IV-E Coordinator.
1 Issues in Preparing and Supporting the Workforce to Implement the Part C Referral Requirements of CAPTA Cordelia C. Robinson, Ph.D., RN Departments of.
February 7, STATE EARLY CHILDHOOD COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMS GRANTS AND PARTNERSHIPS WITH PART C AND SECTION 619 Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB)
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Promoting school connections for youth in child welfare Joan Rock, Implementation Coordinator Kristen Hayden-West, Implementation Coordinator Jessica Strolin-Goltzman,
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
State Advisory Council Birth to Age 8 Alignment through the Rural Opportunities Initiative Summary Presentation for the Board of Early Education and Care.
COUNTY PARTNERSHIP TO MEET SKILL NEEDS & ENHANCE TRANSFER CLIMATE The Ohio Child Welfare Training Program.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Overview of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI).
Pathways to Safety (DR) In Monterey County A Community-Based Early Intervention Initiative.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
November 2015 Common weaknesses in local authorities judged inadequate under the single inspection framework – a summary.
Implementing CDC’s School Guidelines: Challenges And Opportunities Joy Larson Utah Department of Health Tobacco Prevention & Control Program.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
Mission Possible: Improving Academic and Behavioral Results for Children with Disabilities through Sustained Research Based Professional Development Deborah.
Autism Five -Year Plan Phase II Christie Reinhardt Governor’s Council on Disabilities & Special Education.
From Preschool to Post-School Outcomes Preparing Florida’s Youngest Students to Become College and Career Ready Monica Verra-Tirado, Chief Florida Department.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES AKA: PROGRAM MONITORING.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Division of Student Support Services
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
Presentation transcript:

Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care John Elliott Hilary Shager April 25 th, 2013

Wisconsin Program Lead Agency: Wisconsin Department of Children and Families, Division of Safety and Permanence The Division of Safety and Permanence (DSP) is the division of the state agency responsible for oversight of child protective services and foster care. Wisconsin is a county administered state supervised child welfare system except DSP directly operates child welfare services in Milwaukee County through the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare (BMCW). Partners: The Department of Public Instruction is the Wisconsin state agency responsible for K-12 education. Madison Public Schools is the school district in the second largest urban center in Wisconsin. Dane County Human Services administers the CPS system for Madison, WI. 2

Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care Project/Program Overview The purpose of this project is to use data to improve educational outcomes for children. The short term goal of this effort is to build an infrastructure that will lay the groundwork to track trends in child-, school-, district-, and state-level outcomes. The long term goal for this effort is to specifically target educational needs of children in out-of-home care, ultimately leading to improved educational outcomes for youth in out-of-home care. Target Population for the data analysis and interventions proposed in this grant will be children in out-of-home care who are enrolled in Madison public middle and high schools, with an emphasis on children moving from middle to high school, a critical transitional period, especially for children in out-of- home care. 3

Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care Project/Program Overview The Wisconsin Project will focus on the following key aspects: 1.Data Sharing: Build model data sharing agreements between DCF and DPI and in localities. 2.Communication: Increase local strategic coordination and communication between county child welfare workers and schools by developing a local- level data sharing portal and developing an early warning system for children facing educational challenges. 3.Policy and Intervention: Increase identification, enrollment, and attendance of targeted youths in care into comprehensive, high-quality education services and multi-disciplinary interventions that increase protective factors and decrease risk factors to improve outcomes for youths in foster care. 4.Research and Reporting: Develop state-wide research agenda and reports to evaluate and improve upon the educational outcomes of children in out- of-home care.

Evaluation Approach: Process Evaluation 5 Key research questions 1)Did the project increase strategic coordination and communication between DCF and DPI by building on initial state-level data sharing agreements? 2)Did the project increase strategic coordination and communication between county child welfare workers and schools by developing a local-level data sharing portal? 3)Did the project support the development of policies, procedures, and practices to increase the identification, enrollment, and attendance of targeted youths in care into comprehensive, high-quality education services and multi-disciplinary interventions that increase protective factors and decrease risk factors to improve outcomes for youth in foster care?

Evaluation Approach, Continued Key Data Sources Implementation data Tracking of inputs and outputs Whether project goals were met in a timely fashion Successes, challenges, and lessons learned Administrative data Child welfare data from eWiSACWIS Educational data from the DPI’s longitudinal data system Survey data Survey of school staff and county child welfare workers Pre-/post- for participating pilot county; broader sample for informing portal build Qualitative data Focus groups with school staff and county child welfare workers Interviews with project staff

Expected Opportunities and Challenges Key Opportunities Collaboration is currently inconsistent. This project will provide uniform access to education records and allow for a more consistent, collaborative approach. Increased communication between schools, social workers, foster and birth parents to help foster children achieve educational success. Development of statewide models for data sharing to make it simple for local school districts and county child-welfare agencies to share education data. Opportunity for local schools districts to gain a better understanding of the challenges and potential trauma foster kids may have experienced through the Casey Family Program Endless Dreams program. Development of ongoing research agenda and tracking of educational outcomes for children in foster care to inform better policy and practice. Key Challenges Availability and time of teachers and school administrators Utilize grant funds and other resources to “buy-out” teacher time Developing practical practices and procedures for social workers and teachers Involve teachers and social workers in the development of a simple and practical guide Involving foster and birth parents in the process Solicit feedback from foster and birth parents Concentration of students for a pilot in an individual school Identify a few schools with the ability to participate 7

Sustainability & Dissemination Plans Key Sustainability Efforts Development of model data sharing agreements that will be distributed to local schools districts and county child welfare agencies Development of practical desk guides for teachers/schools and social workers Implementation of the education data portal state- wide with long-term plans to integrate with our SACWIS system Development of state-wide quarterly reports on key educational indicators for youths in foster care and incorporation of key educational outcomes into the department’s KidStat (performance management) program Key Dissemination Efforts Communicate progress and success through various child welfare and education conferences, meetings, seminars, etc. Disseminate data sharing models, practice guides and other key information to child welfare agencies and local school districts Develop statewide online toolkit 8

Questions for fellow CWED Grantees? How are you engaging teachers and schools in your programs? How are you involving foster parents and birth parents? How are other grantees involving youths in foster care in their projects? Are there any examples of guidelines or manuals about using educational data developed for child welfare workers? 9