Facility Status and Plans M.G. Bell 5-Year Plan Review June 30 – July 2, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XP 1157 Increasing the CHI start-up current magnitude in NSTX B.A. Nelson et al. 1.
Advertisements

ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
APS-DPP October Denver, Colorado CDX-U Final results from the CDX-U lithium program R. Majeski, R. Kaita, H. Kugel, T. Gray, D. Mansfield, J. Spaleta,
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
The Reversed Field Pinch: on the path to fusion energy S.C. Prager September, 2006 FPA Symposium.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
Introduction to Spherical Tokamak
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
PFC meeting 9-11 May 2005 PPPL CDX-U E-beam experiments on CDX-U Presented by Dick Majeski R. Kaita, T. Gray, H. Kugel, J. Spaleta, J. Timberlake, L. Zakharov.
C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory For the NSTX National Team DOE Review of NSTX Five-Year Research Program Proposal June 30 – July 2, 2003.
9/20/04NSTX RESULTS REVIEW NSTX rtEFIT implementation progress results NSTX 2004 RESULTS REVIEW September 20&21, 2004 REAL-TIME EQUILIBRIUM RECONSTRUCTION.
Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
pkm- NCSX CDR, 5/21-23/ Power and Particle Handling in NCSX Peter Mioduszewski 1 for the NCSX Boundary Group: for the NCSX Boundary Group: M. Fenstermacher.
ASIPP EAST Overview Of The EAST In Vessel Components Upgraded Presented by Damao Yao.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgements: M. G. Bell 2, R. Kaita 2, H. W. Kugel 2, R. Raman 3, A. L. Roquemore 2 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Initial Exploration of HHFW Current Drive on NSTX J. Hosea, M. Bell, S. Bernabei, S. Kaye, B. LeBlanc, J. Menard, M. Ono C.K. Phillips, A. Rosenberg, J.R.
1 CHI Summary Transient CHI (XP606) –All systems operated reliably without any faults Edge Current drive (XP533)
Status of the ASDEX Upgrade Tokamak Programme Hartmut Zohm MPI für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Joint Executive Committee session of IEA-IAs on Pol.
Mid-Run Assessment - ISD S. Kaye, D. Gates 10 May 2006.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
1Physics Operators Course, PCS Navigation, D.J. Battaglia, September 15, 2015 Devon Battaglia, Keith Erickson, Dennis Mueller, Stefan Gerhardt, Roger Raman,
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Demonstration of 200 kA CHI Startup Current Coupling to Transformer Drive on NSTX B.A. Nelson, R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe, University of Washington D. Mueller,
H. W. Kugel 45 th APS DPP Meeting Oct 27-31, 2003, Albuquerque, NM 1 Lithium Experiments in the NSTX Boundary Physics Program H.W.Kugel, M.Bell, R.Kaita,
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
PF1A upgrade physics review Presented by D. A. Gates With input from J.E. Menard and C.E. Kessel 10/27/04.
EAST Data processing of divertor probes on EAST Jun Wang, Jiafeng Chang, Guosheng Xu, Wei Zhang, Tingfeng Ming, Siye Ding Institute of Plasma Physics,
NSTX-U cryo/particle control discussion #8 December 19, 2012 What have we done, or plan to do to be responsive to PAC questions, and in prep for 5 year.
Advances In High Harmonic Fast Wave Heating of NSTX H-mode Plasmas P. M. Ryan, J-W Ahn, G. Chen, D. L. Green, E. F. Jaeger, R. Maingi, J. B. Wilgen - Oak.
Integration and Plasma Control D.A. Gates, M.G. Bell NSTX 5-Year Plan June 30-July 2, 2003.
CHI Run Summary for March 10-12, 31 & April 9, 2008 Flux savings from inductive drive of a Transient CHI started plasma (XP817) R. Raman, B.A. Nelson,
XP817: Transient CHI – Solenoid free Plasma Startup and Coupling to Induction Office of Science R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
Session I-B – Overview Talks Lithium in Magnetic Confinement Experiments S. MirnovLi collection experiments on T-11M and T-10 in framework of Li closed.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
Rajesh Maingi Oak Ridge National Laboratory M. Bell b, T. Biewer b, C.S. Chang g, R. Maqueda c, R. Bell b, C. Bush a, D. Gates b, S. Kaye b, H. Kugel b,
Work with TSC Yong Guo. Introduction Non-inductive current for NSTX TSC model for EAST Simulation for EAST experiment Voltage second consumption for different.
NCSX NCSX CDR May 21-23, 2002 H.W. Kugel Slide 1 Conceptual Design for NCSX Auxiliary Systems Heating, Fueling,Wall Conditioning and Vacuum Systems.
Low-density Start-up D. Mueller, M. Bell, S. Gerhardt, J. Menard, R. Raman, S. Sabbagh NSTX FY12 low density discussion: May 12, 2011.
1 Progress in Spherical Torus Research Roger Raman University of Washington, Seattle and the NSTX National Research Team ICC Workshop May 2003, Seattle,
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
ASIPP Magnetic Diagnostics of HT-7U Tokamak Shen Biao Wan Baonian Institute of Plasma Physics, CAS P.O.Box 1126, Hefei, Anhui , P.R.China (e_mail:
MHD Issues and Control in FIRE C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop on Active Control of MHD Stability Austin, TX 11/3-5/2003.
Solenoid Free Plasma Start-up Mid-Run Summary (FY 2008) R. Raman and D. Mueller Univ. of Wash. / PPPL 16 April 2008, PPPL 1 Supported by Office of Science.
MCZ MCZ NCSX Mission Acquire the physics data needed to assess the attractiveness of compact stellarators; advance understanding.
NSTX-U Run Planning Guidance for 2015 NSTX-U Research Forum 1 FY2015 (and 2016) research milestones will guide prioritization of eXperimental Proposal.
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
M. Ono NSTX FWP 2014 Budget Planning Meeting Apr. 15, 2012 Chapter 10. NSTX-U Facility Status and Proposed Upgrades Text, figures – mostly there except.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
Gary Taylor presented on behalf of the NSTX Research Team Non-Inductive Operation 5-Year Research Plan NSTX Program Advisory Committee Meeting (PAC-14)
FY WEP TSG Goals & WEP-Relevant Diagnostic Upgrades NSTX Supported by WEP TSG Meeting September 14,
1 NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-712 Title: HHFW Power Balance Optimization at High B Field J. Hosea, R. Bell, S. Bernabei, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
Simulation of Non-Solenoidal Current Rampup in NSTX C. E. Kessel and NSTX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory APS-DPP Annual Meeting, Savannah, Georgia,
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
NSTX SAS – GMS Mtg. 12/1/04 S. A. Sabbagh and J. E. Menard NSTX RWM Active Feedback System Implementation Plan Discussion NSTX Global Mode Stabilization.
LRTSG Milestone Review 12/16/10 Lithium Research Topical Science Group FY11-FY12 Milestone Review II Charles Skinner for LRTSG 1/7 Follow up to 11/29/10.
NSTX APS-DPP: SD/SMKNov Abstract The transport properties of NSTX plasmas obtained during the 2008 experimental campaign have been studied and.
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
For the NSTX Five-Year Research Program 2009 – 2013 M.G. Bell Facility and Diagnostic Plans.
Construction and Status of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus at SNU
Presentation transcript:

Facility Status and Plans M.G. Bell 5-Year Plan Review June 30 – July 2, 2003

MGB / 5-Year Review / Designed to Study High-Temperature Toroidal Plasmas at Low Aspect-Ratio Achieved Parameters Aspect ratio A1.27 Elongation  2.2 Triangularity  0.8 Major radius R m Plasma Current I p 1.5MA Toroidal Field B T0 0.6T Solenoid flux0.7Vs Auxiliary heating & current drive: NBI (100kV)7 MW RF (30MHz)6 MW CHI0.4MA Pulse Length1.1s Experiments started in Sep. 99

MGB / 5-Year Review / Facility Has Progressed Rapidly for Physics Studies Advances in physics performance and research have followed improvements in facility capabilities Operational periods have been highly productive

MGB / 5-Year Review / Neutral Beam Injection System Has Been Workhorse of High-  Research  T = 35% for P NB = 6.2MW (V NB ≈ 90kV) Maximum P NB = 6.9MW (V NB ≈ 100kV)  W tot = 390kJ (B T = 0.55T) 0 R [m] Z [m] , 0.282s

MGB / 5-Year Review / Feedback Control of NB Power Upgrade NB control system for pulse-width modulation of sources (FY’04) Data links to/from Plasma Control System computer –Source status to PCS –Source permissive signal from PCS Provide NB “notching” for diagnostics, e.g. CHERS Feedback control of  –  obtained from rt-EFIT analysis

MGB / 5-Year Review / HHFW System Provides Flexible Auxiliary Power for Heating and Current Drive 12-element antenna for 6MW coupled power at 30MHz Real-time phase control of straps demonstrated –k tor = ±(4 –14) m -1 Observed effective electron heating in FY’00 and first indications of current drive in FY’ Antenna Straps  P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 P4P4 P5P5 P6P6 RF Sources 5 Port Cubes Decoupler Elements I1I1 I7I7  V21 

MGB / 5-Year Review / Technical Aspects and Upgrades of HHFW Phase feedback system works well –Phases set to arbitrary waveforms between shots –Now developing algorithms for real-time feedback Power limited to < 3MW through FY’02 run –Found evidence of arcing in feedthroughs –Modified center conductors to reduce electrical stress Better performance in brief FY’03 experiments Upgrade to symmetric end-fed design in FY’05, if needed –Increase power by factor 4 at constant voltage

MGB / 5-Year Review / CHI Has Generated Significant Toroidal Current Without Transformer Induction I inj B T J pol XB tor Toroidal Insulators DC Power Supply + - Absorber Injector Goal to control discharge evolution to promote reconnection of toroidal current onto closed flux surfaces

MGB / 5-Year Review / CHI Experiments Have Encountered Some Technical Problems Arcs across absorber insulator limited pulse length –Installed new absorber insulator and coils after FY’02 run Flashovers in external circuit due to large dI CHI /dt –Moved transient suppressors closer to injector gap Noise pick-up in magnetic diagnostics –Prevented attempts to add CHI to inductive plasmas –Have now improved shielding, grounding and signal processing for magnetic sensors Ground current in CHI circuit prevented NBI –caused by unneutralized beam current

MGB / 5-Year Review / New CHI Absorber Insulator Designed to Resist Arcing Installed in FY’02 Insulator on high-field side –Plasma entering absorber flows towards lower field Arc path longer and more tortuous Indications from FY’03 that arcs are suppressed Added coils to null poloidal field across absorber gap –UW developing a power supply for these –Install in FY’04 if needed

MGB / 5-Year Review / Additional Power Supplies Will Provide Alternative Non-Solenoid Startup Use PF5, PF4, PF3, PF2 to get poloidal field null and poloidal flux –~0.15Wb available Possibility for > 100kA –Meets requirements for breakdown with adequate preionization Provide power supply for PF4 coils (FY’04) Reverse present unipolar PF5 power supply for initial tests If successful, provide bipolar capability for PF5

MGB / 5-Year Review / MW EBW System Proposed for Localized Current Drive EBW can drive localized current in “overdense” plasmas –Supplement bootstrap current and stabilize NTMs Requires mode-conversion of coupled EM wave to EBW –Characteristics of edge plasma are critical –Valuable input from CDX-U and MAST programs Require ~3MW (delivered) EBW power at ~15 GHz for f ce and Doppler-shifted 2f ce absorption Develop ~1MW gyrotron sources (FY’04 – 05) –Adaptation of existing technologies Use steerable mirror launcher and low-loss waveguide Install 1MW in FY’06, 3MW in FY’07

MGB / 5-Year Review / Active Control of Resistive Wall Modes RWM identified in plasmas above the wall-stabilized  -limit –Amplifies non-axisymmetric field perturbations Field errors greatly reduced by PF5 realignment in FY’02 Install 6 external “picture frame” correction coils in FY’04 –Operate as 3 opposing pairs with Switching Power Amplifiers Experiments to correct “average” perturbations in FY’04 –Possible in 21-week run Active RWM feedback in FY’05 Assess need for installing internal control coils in FY’06

MGB / 5-Year Review / Modifying PF1A Coils Can Produce Higher Triangularity Plasmas Higher triangularity  ~ 0.8 desirable for advanced ST goals –Benefit mainly through higher toroidal current for fixed q Moving PF1A coils further from midplane or splitting coils gives greater shaping capability –Moving coils simpler but range of shapes limited –Split coils give more flexibility Assess trade-offs and design in FY’04 Install in FY’ 05 opening 0 R (m) Z (m) Using lower half of PF1A lower

MGB / 5-Year Review / Repositioning Passive Stabilizer Plates Will Benefit High-Triangularity Plasmas Secondary passive stabilizer plates originally positioned to benefit a range of shapes with  ≤ 0.5 Reposition upper, lower secondary plates in FY’05 opening Repositioned Secondary Passive Stabilizer Original location Possible cryo-pump Provides space for cryo- pump behind plate –Assessed to have enough conductance to pump outboard divertor region

MGB / 5-Year Review / High-Field-Side Gas Injection Improved Both Reproducibility and Longevity of H-mode HFS injector gives large initial flow then continuing lower flow – contributes to density rise LFS fueling with rate similar to HFS produces –Delayed transition, but –Similar confinement Can also get H-mode by loading walls with D 2 gas puffing New, more controllable HFS injector installed for FY’03 New fueling methods may provide means to advance physics

MGB / 5-Year Review / Solid Pellets and Supersonic Gas Injection Will Enhance Fueling Capabilities Injector for room-temperature solids now in development for installation this year –Lithium, boron, carbon as single pellets or “dust balls” –20 – 400 m/s with up to 8 pellets/shot Supersonic gas injector being developed with CDX-U and M&AE Dept. for installation this year –Up to 6  D in 300ms at ~1.8km/s Deuterium pellet injector proposed for installation in FY’05 in collaboration with ORNL –Multiple pellets/shot capability –Initially outside mid-plane launch through pump duct –Upgrade to guided inside launch in FY’06

MGB / 5-Year Review / Investigate Both Fueling and Momentum Effects with Compact Toroid Injector Injector used on Tokamak de Varennes available to NSTX –Collaboration with University of Washington High field gradient of ST well suited to CT injection –Variable fuel mass and deposition location Provide momentum injection (  t ~50ms of 1MW NBI) – Induce H-modes (STOR-M, TdeV) or ITBs –Transport studies by isotopic impurity tailoring –Prompt density injection to avoid locked modes Conduct off-line testing (FY’05–6) –Also investigate development of multi-shot capability Install on NSTX in FY’07

MGB / 5-Year Review / Improved Treatment of Plasma Facing Components Benefited Physics Studies Boronizaton routinely applied since Sep. ‘00 –Glow discharge (~2 hr) in mixture of deuterated trimethyl boron (CD 3 ) 3 B (“TMB”) [5g], He [90% by vol.] –After bakeout & every 2 weeks of operation (19 times) Full bakeout capability introduced in Mar. ‘02 –Center column to 350C –Outer PFCs to 320C (heated by high-pressure helium) Immediate benefits in terms of poloidal flux consumptionimproved H-mode access lower impuritiesreduced MHD activity Continue to pursue new methods for PFC treatment

MGB / 5-Year Review / Propose Two Methods for Coating Plasma Facing Components with Lithium Demonstrated benefit of coating carbon limiter in TFTR –Strong edge pumping (reduction of recycling) –Improvement of energy confinement (  2) 1. Pellet injector (FY’04) –Use multiple pellet capability and “painting” technique –Could also investigate other materials (e.g. B) 2. Lithium evaporator (FY’05) –CDX-U developing e-beam evaporator –Use several evaporators to cover surfaces in NSTX –Beneficiary of CDX-U research to optimize material Possible change from carbon PFCs in FY’07

MGB / 5-Year Review / Divertor Cryo-Pump Can Provide Needed Density Control Proven technique Requires adequate conductance from neutralization region Two schemes being evaluated for FY’05 installation 2. Shield on inner divertor Suitable for  ~ 0.8 Installation on center stack Repositioned Secondary Passive Stabilizer Cryo-pump 1. Behind secondary plates Suitable for  ≤ 0.5 Requires plate relocation

MGB / 5-Year Review / Upgrade of Divertor Tiles Required for Long-Pulse Operation at High Power Present divertor tiles of ATJ graphite Limit surface to 1200C to avoid radiation-enhanced sublimation  “carbon blooms” Measurements indicate tiles adequate for 3s at full NB + HHFW power Investigate heat-flux mitigation techniques in FY’04-5 –Strike-point sweeping –Enhanced divertor radiation Assess need for material upgrade to be installed FY’07 –Decision to benefit from additional material research and experience

MGB / 5-Year Review / Liquid Lithium Surface Module Will Address Important Reactor Issues Development under aegis of ALIST group of VLT A potential solution for both power and particle handling –Tantalizing possibilities for advanced regimes –Liquid Li tray in CDX-U dramatically reduced recycling Modules of ~1m 2 close to plasma Flow liquid Li at 7 – 12 m/s to avoid evaporation at full power Design in FY’06–7 with installation in FY’08

MGB / 5-Year Review / Proposed Upgrades Build Steadily on Solid Research to Create a Vibrant Program