Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
PORTFOLIO.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
1. 6 leadership standards what are they? 3 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
WHAT’s A STATE TO DO? TO BUILD SCHOOL/EDUCATION LEADERSHIP CAPACITY Betty Hale.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.
Looking at Teaching through the Lens of Standards Irv Richardson A Presentation to the 600s Sub-Committee July 22,2010 9:00 – 11:00.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Gene Wilhoit, Executive Director Center for Innovation in Education Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Retreat July 21, 2014.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
8 1Source: ADP Network Science Framework Call Laura Slover, V.P. Content and Policy Stephen Pruitt, Director of Science.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times Secondary Curriculum Leaders Tuesday, April 13.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Janice why don’t you take the first seven slides as an introduction, I will take 8-11 I think in my section. We should make the presentation more interactive.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Five Required Elements
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing needs of their students, hold them to high expectations, and personalize learning to ensure each learner is challenged;  they care about, motivate, and actively engage students in learning; they collect, interpret and use student assessment data to monitor progress and adjust instruction;  they systematically reflect, continuously improve, and collaboratively problem solve; and  they demonstrate leadership and shared responsibility for the learning of all students. On day one of their careers, teachers should be able to model and develop in students the knowledge and skills they need to succeed today including the ability to think critically and creatively, to apply content to solving real world problems, to be literate across the curriculum, to collaborate and work in teams, and to take ownership of their own continuous learning.

School-Ready Principals  With other stakeholders, they craft the school’s vision, mission, and strategic goals to focus on and support high levels of learning for all students and high expectations for all members of the school community.  To help transform schools, they lead others in using performance outcomes and other data to strategically align people, time, funding, and school processes to continually improve student achievement and growth and to nurture and sustain a positive climate and safe school environment for all stakeholders.  They work with others to develop, implement and refine processes to select, induct, support, evaluate, and retain quality personnel to serve in instructional and support roles.  They nurture and support professional growth in others and appropriately share leadership responsibilities.  Recognizing that schools are an integral part of the community, they lead and support outreach to students’ families and the wider community to respond to community needs and interests and to integrate community resources into the school. On day one on the job, principals should be able to blend their energy, knowledge, and professional skills to transform school learning environments in ways that ensure all students will graduate college and career ready.

State Levers for Change Licensure four recommendations Program Approval four recommendations Data Collection, Analysis, and Reporting two recommendations

Licensure  Revise licensure standards to support the teaching and leading of more demanding content aligned to college- and career-readiness (CCR)  Work together to influence the development of innovative licensure performance assessments that are aligned to CCR and include multiple measures of educators’ ability to perform, including evidence of student achievement and growth.  Create multi-tiered licensure systems aligned to a coherent developmental continuum that reflects new performance expectations for educators and their implementation in the learning environment and to assessments that are linked to evidence of student achievement and growth.  Work toward true licensure reciprocity across states

Program Approval  Will hold preparation programs accountable by exercising the state’s authority to determine which programs should operate and establishing a clear and fair performance rating system to guide continuous improvement.  Adopt and implement rigorous program approval standards including around highly selective admissions and exit criteria and high quality clinical practice  Require alignment of content standards to PK-12 student standards for all areas in which candidates seek licensure.  Provide feedback, data, support, and resources to preparation programs to assist them with continuous improvement.

Data Collection, Analysis, and Reporting  Develop and support state-level governance structures to guide confidential and secure data collection, analysis, and reporting of PK- 20 data and how it informs educator preparation programs, including  the need for unique educator identifiers,  the mobility of data across state lines,  links to non-traditional preparation providers, and  the sharing of candidate data among organizations and across states.  Use data collection, analysis and reporting of multiple measures for continuous improvement and accountability of preparation programs.

Maine Virginia 27 States Supporting the Recommendations

Next Steps: Launching a Network of States Ready for Implementation  Applications for states to participate in a pilot to implement the recommendations in the task force were sent to state chiefs on May 8  Completed applications are due on June 28  Selection of pilots will be announced in mid-July  First state convening will be August 27-29, Portland Oregon

How CCSSO will Support the Pilot State Network CCSSO will assist states in  conducting a self-assessment and setting clear expectations for the outcomes of the work that will be agreed upon through a memorandum of agreement  building consensus within and across preparation faculty and PK-12 educators on what a beginning teacher and principal should know and be able to do  developing robust stakeholder involvement strategies

How CCSSO will Support the Pilot State Network CCSSO will work with pilot states collectively and individually to:  redesign program approval policies  redesign licensure systems  create new data systems to support transformation of educator preparation and entry systems.

How CCSSO will Support the Pilot State Network CCSSO will also  provide technical assistance to pilot states on strategies for implementing their state policies (e.g., guidelines, rules, regulations, statutes, etc.) for licensure, program approval, and data collection, analysis, and reporting  advocate for and solicit input from pilot states to inform the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act and the ESEA, along with the Title II regulations for both the Higher Education Act and ESEA to support transformation of educator preparation and entry systems.

Contact Information  Taskforce Report is available online at: Search “Our Responsibility, Our Promise”  Kathleen Paliokas, Director, InTASC, CCSSO