PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Advertisements

THE DEVELOPMENT BANK OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
+ African Legal Support Facility Negotiations of natural resource contracts : Role of ALSF 2013 African Legal Support Facility Stephen Karangizi Director,
PEIP Project Tariff Policy for Water and Wastewater Services.
The Business Plan.
LET’S MAKE HISTORY PLEASANT TO REMEMBER Follow us 22 Hastings Street, London, SE18 6SY, United Kingdom T: E:
Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova. Session Overview  Purpose of the Feasibility Study  The Feasibility Study process according.
South Carolina Finance Workshop for Small Water Systems June 4, 2013 Water Partnerships: Financial Advantages and Challenges SC Case Study: Lowcountry.
0 Role of Economic Analysis in Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
System Engineering Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao. System Engineering Jerry Gao, Ph.D. Jan System Engineering Hierarchy - System Modeling - Information.
Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation to Climate Change Consultations on the Relationship between Climate and human rightsGeneva 22 October 2008 Festus.
NextEnd. Preparation of Business Plan for Setting up Enterprise Business Plan.. The business plan is a written document prepared by the entrepreneur that.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
23/08/20151 European Investment Bank EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK Urban Development Projects 29 th May 2009 Barbara Lemke Urban Planner Projects Directorate.
Role and Components of Project Evaluation
Project Planning and Capital Budgeting
1.4.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Planning 1 POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROJECT PLANNING UPA Package 1, Module 4.
Why are economic and financial instruments needed? A presentation made by Noma Neseni, IWSD.
Engaging with stakeholders: Adding value to the energy system 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment Porto Pedro.
SOCIAL AND LABOUR PLAN.
Rome Energy Meeting 2008 Rome, November 2008 Investments Opportunities and Project Finance in the Energy Market Luigi Marsullo President Finpublic.
JASPERS in the Environment, Energy and Municipal Sectors Cost – Benefit Analysis Prague, 28 th November 2007.
Project Appraisal: Overview March 28, Country Level Rapid Assessments: Key Areas A. Status of Plans and Activities Current status of AI in the country.
Regional Capacity Building Activities in the Caribbean UNFCCC Expert Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity- building in Developing Countries Carlos.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Theme: Financial risk management Plan: Types of financial risks. Method of managing the risks.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
Regional Learning Session on Sustainable and Inclusive Marketing Arrangements Towards Increasing Farmers’ Market Power 9-11 May 2013 Manila Vedini Harishchandra.
1 Policy Analysis for RISPO II National Workshop XXXXX 2006.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
2008 Electricity Distribution Maintenance Summit Stream 3A: Funding, Investment and Financial issues 10 June 2008 Theo van Vuuren Divisional Executive.
Feasibility Study.
Rookery South Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) Evolving List of Documents being prepared for submission to the Infrastructure Planning Commission Administration.
Assessment of Technology Options 1 Naomi Radke, seecon international GmbH.
Priority Environmental Investment Programme (PEIP) – CARDS Regional Regional Meeting for Senior Officials from SEE and Donors’ Community 26th November,
OECD Water Programme Pillar 1, Output 1 “Pricing Water Resources and Water & Sanitation Services” World Water Week Stockholm, August 2008.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
Investment decision making
Issues from the CDM Institutional Reviews CDM Dialogue, Barbados March 2006 Ian C King Project Manager, UNDP CRMI.
Priority Environmental Investment Programme National Workshop Montenegro Priority Water Projects on the PEIP List Budva, 13 th May 2008 Ruslan Zhechkov,
December Why Program-for-Results (PforR)? Development Effectiveness and Client Demand – PforR responds to client demand that could not be fully.
Version VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES Evaluating the societal impacts of Public research organisations: A (belated) paradigm shift in the making Kaisa.
11 th REReP Task Force Meeting 20th November, Budva, Montenegro Priority Environmental Investment Programme (PEIP). Progress in Environmental Investments.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Lorelyn T. Dumaug IDENTIFICATI ON FORMULATION APPRAISAL AND APPROVAL FUNDING IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Francesco ANGELINI European Commission, DG for Regional Policy Coordination Unit – Major Projects Team.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Budapest Water Summit 2016 Civil Forum, Budapest, November 2016
Financial and Operational Performance Improvement Programe (FOPIP) Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna, May 18 Training session on Local governments’
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna
An Overview on Risk Management
Project Cycle Management
The Feasibility Study: something we already know
Capital Project / Infrastructure Renewal – Making the Business Case
Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova
Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation to Climate Change
Supporting Data for a KfW Financed Investment Project on the Montenegrin Coast 18 May 2017, Wien ●
Engineering Economic Decisions
NEPAL ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF COLLEGE Project Appraisal: Group Works
Progress of the preparations for a White Paper on Adaptation to Climate Change Water Directors’ meeting Slovenia June 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit.
progress of the water reform in bulgaria
Gender mainstreaming in environmental
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Relationship between World Bank and Romanian EA requirements
Presentation transcript:

PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova Project Manager, REC for CEE

Session Overview  The Feasibility Study process according to international standards  The Feasibility Study structure  Discuss the challenges faced by many SEE consultants and local governments in preparing projects

The Feasibility Study: something we already know  Feasibility study as project plan - assumes the project concept is feasible and maps out the course for project implementation  Focus on engineering aspects – low attention to social, institutional, environmental aspects  Economic and/or financial analysis limited to budgeting exercise and some cash flow  Feasibility analysis as part of the process is missing

The Feasibility Study: international standards  Feasibility study is the result of feasibility analysis  Convince the reader (financing entity) that the project is worth funding  Document relevant information and aspects regarding the project  Assess whether the project is relevant, viable and implementable  Enable the project proponent to prepare financing application and present the project to sources of financing

Project as a Solution to a Problem COMMON APPROACH Environmental investment project = Equipment and construction ALTERNATIVE APPROACH Environmental investment project = Solution to a problem

Project Preparation vis-à-vis Project Cycle Strategic and Sectoral Considerations Design Phase Feedback loops Process flow Project Identification Project Preparation Implementation Planning Project Start-up Project Execution Project Sustainability Implementation Phase Feasibility Study, EIA, PSD Pre-feasibility Study, PPD PIP

FS Components Technical Analysis Institutional Analysis Social and Stakeholder Analysis Environmental Analysis Economic Analysis Financial Analysis Project Feasibility

Project Strategic Context  Strategic goals; priority programs at local/regional level  National policies: National, regional or sectoral goals which the project supports  Project environment issues: policy, legal and regulatory, institutional framework, environmental, etc.

Technical Assessment  Technical assessment of existing services, physical system, and treatment, and measures for their optimum use  Demand (wastewater flow) analysis and forecasting  Establish gap between the current level service and future demand  Develop technical alternatives for the project required outputs (design, technology, process, scale)

Financial and Socio-economic rationale of environmental investment project  Purpose of the financial analysis is multiple:  Assessment the project in terms of costs and benefits  A tool for assessment of financial and economic viability of the project  A tool for preparing financing plan  A tool for analyzing, structuring and selecting different project options

Financial cost-benefit analysis of a project  Evaluates and calculates the project’s financial:  Revenues  Costs  Net benefits (of revenues over the costs)  Consultants in the SEE region are knowledgeable in environmental technologies but lack expertise in preparing economic and financial analyses

Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis of a project  Purpose: To assess the project economic worth to the country  Evaluates and calculates the project’s economic benefits and costs to the whole economy in constant economy prices ( adjusted financial prices ) including external benefits:  Environmental benefits  Health effects  Non-technical losses (UFW)

Social and Stakeholder Analysis  Local Government  Consumers  Operator/Utility  Vulnerable groups  Wider community  Ultimately all ventures are about people!  It’s more important to understand the people than the technology: Who gains? Who loses?  Social and distribution analysis of project effects (different beneficiaries)  Poverty Impact Analysis

Environmental Impact Assessment  Assessment of project impacts to physical and also non- physical environmental aspects:  Physical (water, air, land)  Biodiversity  Noise, odors  Safety  Aesthetics, cultural and historical heritage  Two possible levels of assessment:  Preliminary (Initial) Environmental Review  Full Environmental Impact Assessment

Institutional Analysis  Purpose:  Relationship and independence of the water company from the municipality in setting tariffs  Capacity of the project entity to: implement, manage and maintain the project  Financial sustainability of the project entity  Adequate project management processes, including procurement and human resources  Capacity building programs  Many of these aspects are often overlooked in the analysis

Summary of main challenges in project preparation  Analysis and comparison of alternatives  Insufficient expertise of SEE consultants in preparing economic and financial analyses and assessing the human aspects of the projects in terms of stakeholders and institutions  Cooperation of consultants with local governments  Local governments still know little of the market for project financing

Summary  The feasibility analysis is an internationally accepted process used to evaluate various project dimensions important for achieving the desired project results.  An effective tool for appraising the project from standpoints of all project stakeholders  It is not a waste of time. It significantly reduces the risks in project implementation  Capacity building projects need to take account of the major challenges in FS preparation and address them