Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report from the GDE director Barry Barish Snowmass 14-Aug-05.
Advertisements

Plan ahead for the GDE Barry Barish ILC Consultations URA, Washington DC 12-May-05.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Personal Perspectives on the ITRP Recommendation and on the Next Steps Toward the International Linear Collider Barry Barish PAC Annual Meeting Knoxville,
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
Strategies for Future Acclerators Barry Barish Elba 23-May-06.
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Industrial Forum Japan 28-June-05.
GDE expectations from the SRF community Barry Barish Cornell SRF Mtg 15-July-05.
5 May 06 SLAC SPC 1 ILC Global Activities GDE, FALC Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
1-Dec-06 HEPAP Univ. Subpanel Global Design Effort 1 ILC Report Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 1-Dec-06 RDR Design Freeze.
Status of International Linear Collider Global Design Effort Barry Barish (by telecon) HEPAP Washington DC 18-May-05.
The Path Toward a Linear Collider Barry Barish HEP 2005 Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish EPP2010 Cornell University 2-Aug-05.
January 17, 2008Mike Hildreth – Aspen 2008 International Linear Collider Project Status Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame Representing the Global.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish iThemba Cape Town 21-Oct-05.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
Technology Breakthroughs and International Linear Collider Barry Barish AAAS Annual Meeting Washington DC 19-Feb-05.
Is there synergy between ILC and SuperB? Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
January 17, 2008Mike Hildreth – Aspen 2008 International Linear Collider Project Status Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame Representing the Global.
20-Jan-09 Madrid, Spain Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Madrid, Spain 20-Jan-09 Designing the ILC ATF-2 Final Doublet System.
Towards an International Linear Collider Barry Barish GDE 6-June-07.
Towards an International Linear Collider Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 25-July-07.
1. Civil Engineering works for Linear Colliders* : -Brief introduction on the overall machine layout (just for CLIC at this stage) -Experimental Area.
Sendai, March 3, 2008 TILC08 · GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 TILC08 · GDE Meeting on International Linear Collider · Tohoku University Sendai · Japan.
LCWS14 - Belgrade October 6-10, 2014 Conventional Facilities & Siting Working Group Summary V Kuchler, M Miyahara, J Osborne.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
7-March-07 ILC-fest Fermilab Global Design Effort 1 International Linear Collider Barry Barish 7-March-07.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
30-May-07 LCWS DESY Meeting Global Design Effort 1 A Vision of the Future RDR to ILC Barry Barish LCWS DESY 30-May-07.
The International Linear Collider and the Future of Accelerator-based Particle Physics Barry Barish Caltech Lomonosov Conference 20-Aug-2015 ILC.
November 17, st XFEL / ILC Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL Design Effort The Current ILC Twin Tunnel Design Wilhelm Bialowons and Nicholas Walker · MPY.
1-Feb-08 P5 Global Design Effort 1 GDE - ILC Barry Barish P5 Meeting - Fermilab 1-Feb-08.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
ILC – Recent progress & Path to Technical Design Report Brian Foster (Hamburg/DESY/Oxford & GDE) Plenary ECFA CERN 25/11/11.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
27 Nov 07 VM Workshop Global Design Effort 1 ILC – Superconducting Linear Collider Marc Ross, Project Manager GDE Fermilab.
6-10 Nov. 06 ILCWS Valencia Global Design Effort 1 RDR Management Board Overview K. Yokoya KEK.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
11 June 07 Fermilab Steering Group 1 ILC Baseline Schedule, Milestones, and Decision points Tom Himel.
Brian Foster - Cosener's Forum May 06 1 The ILC - Status & Plans Introduction & latest developments The GDE The baseline design and R&D efforts The path.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa ILCSC Chair LCWS06 at IISc Bangalore March 9, 2006.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
CLIC Workshop, CERN 1 CLIC/ILC Collaboration Report: Marc Ross (Fermilab); for Nick Walker, Akira Yamamoto Project Managers International Linear.
GDE Status / Plans & ILC Timeline Barry Barish FALC 11-July-07.
25-Sept-07 P5 Fermilab Global Design Effort 1 Report from GDE Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 25-Sept-07.
04-Feb-07 GDE/ACFA Intro Beijing Global Design Effort 1 GDE Status Barry Barish 4-Feb-07.
Global Design Effort - CFS AD & I Meeting - DESY AD & I Meeting - DESY 1 AD&I Meeting CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP Main Linac Tunnel.
International Linear Collider Technology: Status and Challenges Steve Holmes Fermilab Wine & Cheese Seminar September 24, 2004.
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
23-April-13 ECFA LC2013 Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish ECFA LC2013 DESY Hamburg, Germany 27-May-13 GDE The path to a TDR.
Linear Collider Forum of America ILC Technology Applications Workshop Ken Olsen LCFOA President May 15,
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto th ATF2 Project Meeting Accelerator Design and Integration – New Baseline Proposal for ILC – ‘Strawman Baseline.
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
1 May 06 LCFOA - SLAC Global Design Effort 1 ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
Global Design Effort1 September 20-22, 2006 MAC Review Response to 1 st MAC Mtg Barry Barish GDE.
1-2 May 2006 LCFOA Mtg Global Design Effort 1 The Baseline Configuration and the Reference Design Report Tor Raubenheimer SLAC.
The ILC Outlook Barry Barish HEP 2005 Joint ECFA-EPS Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
January 9, 2006 Margaret Votava 1 ILC – NI/FNAL/ANL Brief overview of Global Design Effort (GDE) plans, dates, and organization: –Changes since Industrial.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
Nan Phinney SLAC ILC Worldwide Event, Fermilab, June 12, 2013 (Many slides courtesy of Marc Ross, Akira Yamamoto, Barry Barish) ILC Accelerator A 25-year.
ILC Global Design Effort
Barry Barish GDE Caltech
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
Presentation transcript:

Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07

The GDE Plan and Schedule Global Design EffortProject Baseline configuration Reference Design ILC R&D Program Engineering Design Expression of Interest to Host International Mgmt LHC Physics

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 3 Parameters for the ILC E cm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV Luminosity  ∫ Ldt = 500 fb -1 in 4 years Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV Energy stability and precision below 0.1% Electron polarization of at least 80% The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 4 Designing a Linear Collider Superconducting RF Main Linac

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 5 –11km SC linacs operating at 31.5 MV/m for 500 GeV –Centralized injector Circular damping rings for electrons and positrons Undulator-based positron source –Single IR with 14 mrad crossing angle –Dual tunnel configuration for safety and availability RDR ILC Schematic

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 6 Reference Design and Plan Producing Cavities Cavity Shape Obtaining Gradient single cells

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 7 4 th generation prototype ILC cryomodule Cryomodules TESLA cryomodule

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 8 The Main Linac Costs have been estimated regionally and can be compared. –Understanding differences require detail comparisons – industrial experience, differences in design or technical specifications, labor rates, assumptions regarding quantity discounts, etc.

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 9 –Three RF/cable penetrations every rf unit –Safety crossovers every 500 m –34 kV power distribution Main Linac Double Tunnel

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 10 Conventional Facilities 72.5 km tunnels ~ meters underground 13 major shafts > 9 meter diameter 443 K cu. m. underground excavation: caverns, alcoves, halls 92 surface “buildings”, 52.7 K sq. meters = 567 K sq-ft total

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 11 Reference Design and Plan Making Positrons 6km Damping Ring 10MW Klystrons Beam Delivery and Interaction Point

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 12 Technically Driven Timeline August BCD Construction  Startup RDREDR Begin Const End Const Engineer Design

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 13 Civil Construction Timeline

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 14 CMS assembly approach: Assembled on the surface in parallel with underground work Allows pre-commissioning before lowering Lowering using dedicated heavy lifting equipment Potential for big time saving Reduces size of required underground hall On-surface Detector Assembly CMS approach

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 15 Technically Driven Timeline August BCD All regions require ~ 5 yrs Construction  Startup Siting Plan being Developed RDREDR Begin Const End Const Engineer Design Site Prep Site Select

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 16 ~ 5.5 km Central Area fits inside the Fermilab boundary Site Characterization of the Central Area can be done ~ Boundary of Fermilab Preconstruction Plan: Fermilab

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 17 Technically Driven Timeline August BCD All regions ~ 5 yrs Construction  Startup Siting Plan being Developed RDREDR Begin Const End Const Engineer Design Site Prep Site Select R & D -- Industrialization

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 18 Module Test – Results DESY

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 19 E Cloud – Results SLAC

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 20 Schedule in Graphical Form Construction Schedule Cryomodule Production RF System Tests

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 21 Technically Driven Timeline August BCD All regions ~ 5 yrs Construction  Startup Siting Plan being Developed RDREDR Begin Const End Const Engineer Design Site Prep Site Select R & D -- Industrialization Gradient e-Cloud Cryomodule Full Production System Tests & XFEL Detector Install Detector Construct

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 22 Detector Concepts

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 23 Detector Performance Goals ILC detector performance requirements and comparison to the LHC detectors: ○ Inner vertex layer ~ 3-6 times closer to IP ○ Vertex pixel size ~ 30 times smaller ○ Vertex detector layer ~ 30 times thinner Impact param resolution Δd = 5 [μm] + 10 [μm] / (p[GeV] sin 3/2θ) ○ Material in the tracker ~ 30 times less ○ Track momentum resolution ~ 10 times better Momentum resolution Δp / p 2 = 5 x [GeV -1 ] central region Δp / p 2 = 3 x [GeV -1 ] forward region ○ Granularity of EM calorimeter ~ 200 times better Jet energy resolution ΔE jet / E jet = 0.3 /√E jet Forward Hermeticity down to θ = 5-10 [mrad]

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 24 detector B may be accessible during run accessible during run Platform for electronic and services (~10*8*8m). Shielded (~0.5m of concrete) from five sides. Moves with detector. Also provide vibration isolation. Concept: one IR - two detectors The concept is evolving and details being worked out detector A

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 25 Technically Driven Timeline August BCD All regions ~ 5 yrs Construction  Startup Siting Plan being Developed RDREDR Begin Const End Const Engineer Design Site Prep Site Select R & D -- Industrialization Gradient e-Cloud Cryomodule Full Production System Tests & XFEL Detector Install Detector Construct Pre-Operations

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 26 Conclusions - Technical The ILC design is proceeding toward an engineering design by (Goal: Ready to propose construction when LHC results justify). R&D program is being globally coordinated to determine gradient, electron cloud, industrialization, mass production. (Resources are regional, by country and laboratory). Detector R&D also very important to be able to fully exploit the ILC (e.g. spatial & energy resolution) (Needs improved coordination, better regional balance).

17-Aug-07 LP07 Daegu, Korea Global Design Effort 27 Achieving our ILC Timeline “The other issues” We need to begin a campaign to prepare the way for submitting a winning proposal in about –Science Motivation is very strong, but we need LHC results for validation (~2010) –Must convince broader HEP and science communities on the ILC –Must engage the global governments to take ownership and develop international governance –Must develop a siting strategy The key to maintaining our timeline will be working these issues in parallel with developing an engineering design and completing the R&D