Welcome to Unit 8 Administrative Law

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Advertisements

Constitutional Law Part 4: The Federal Judicial Power
Constitutional Law Part 4: The Federal Judicial Power Lecture 6: Justiciability – Mootness.
Judicial Review Getting Into Court Standards of Review Remedies.
The Appeals Process by Gina chandler
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative, Judicial, and E-Dispute Resolution
1 Judicial Review Under NEPA Bob Malmsheimer April 1, 2006.
American Government and Politics Today
The Court System.  Judge: decide all legal issues in a lawsuit. If no jury, the judge’s job also includes determining the facts of the case.  Plaintiff.
Judicial Review. Basic Requirements Court must have jurisdiction Plaintiff must state a recognized cause of action and seek a recognized remedy This is.
1 After Wooley The Bonvillian Cases. 2 Bonvillian v. Dep't of Insurance, 906 So.2d 596 (La.App. Cir ) What is the underlying dispute? Insurance.
Chapter 3 The Trial Process. Vocabulary Rule of Law: Principle that decisions should be made by the application of established laws without the intervention.
Introduction to Law II Appellate Process and Standards of Review.
Review Injury in fact Zone of injury Redressiblity.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Introduction to Administrative Law and Process The Administrative Procedure Act Getting Into Court Standards of Judicial Review.
Introduction to Civil Procedure in the United States Wake Forest LLM Introduction to American Law Alan R. Palmiter – Sep
P A R T P A R T Regulation of Business Administrative Agencies The Federal Trade Commission Act and Consumer Protection Laws Antitrust: The Sherman Act.
 Administrative law is created by administrative agencies which regulate many areas of our government, community, and businesses.  A significant cost.
Diversity of citizenship action: A civil lawsuit in which the parties are residents of two or more different states. Can be heard by a federal court even.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
All four doctrines were developed by courts in the context of judicial cases. The doctrines, however, are important to administrative law as well.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Legal Framework.
Access to Judicial Review Part III. Ripeness Is Abbott "Ripe"? Ripeness deals with whether the case and controversy is sufficiently far along that the.
Administrative Dispute Term, Subject, Types, Competent Bodies, Parties, Procedure.
4-1 Chapter 4— Litigation REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
The American Court System Chapter 3. Why Study Law And Court System? Manager Needs Understanding Managers Involved In Court Cases As Party As Witness.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Kaplan University - Adjunct Professor Brian Tippens, J.D. - June 04, Chapter 9 Accountability through Reviewability.
Fri., Oct. 17. amendment 15(a) Amendments Before Trial. (1) Amending as a Matter of Course. A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course.
Finality What are the requirements for a final order under sec. 704 of the APA? 1) the action must mark the consummation of the agency's decisionmaking.
1 Bonvillian v. Dep't of Insurance, 906 So.2d 596 (La.App. Cir ) What is the underlying dispute? Insurance Commission refused to renew a bail bond.
The Judiciary Vocabulary Review. activist approach.
Section 1.2 The Court System and Trial Procedures.
Law and Society CJUS/POLS 102 Chapter 5: Limitations.
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.
American Government and Politics Today
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch. “The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
Access to Judicial Review Part III. Ripeness "The problem is best seen in a twofold aspect, requiring us to evaluate both the fitness of the issues for.
1 Bonvillian v. Dep't of Insurance, 906 So.2d 596 (La.App. Cir ) What is the underlying dispute? Insurance Commission refused to renew a bail bond.
The Courts – Federal Court System Objective: Identify the source of power of the federal courts Name the various levels of federal courts and describe.
“The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
Chapter 6 Administrative Agencies Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Judicial Branch – Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Unit IV – Part 2.
American Government and Politics Today Chapter 15 The Courts.
Intro to the Appellate Process When a party loses at trial they have the right to appeal the decision. An appeal is always about whether the law was correctly.
The Courts AP US Government. Some Basic Legal Terms Litigant – Someone involved in a lawsuit. This includes both plaintiff (one bringing the charge) and.
Types of Courts Unit A Objective Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court System.
A day in court. The case that they gave me Courts deal with different types of cases Criminal Cases : decides if an accused person is guilty or not guilty.
Judicial Review Under NEPA
Introduction to Environmental Law
U.S. Legal System Chapter 1.
THE "GOLDBERG INGREDIENTS"
State Court System: Structure & Overview
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Chapter 1 Legal Framework Affecting Public Schools
Regulatory Enforcement & Citizen Suits in the New Administration
Legal Basics.
The Courts AP US Government.
Chapter 6 Powers and Functions of Administrative Agencies.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
§ 10.1 Judicial Remedies Part I.
Judicial Branch Vocabulary
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to Unit 8 Administrative Law Ann Sanok

Impact can vary: When an agency makes a decision, sometimes one person is affected, sometimes several, and sometimes hundreds or thousands.

Who can overrule an agency? That depends. A court’s right to overrule or evaluate a decision made by an administrative agency is called “Judicial Review”

Sources of Authority Judicial authority to review agency actions comes from a variety of sources. Most judicial authority to review agency actions comes from statutes. Constitutional and common law sources may also provide for judicial review. Quiz Alert!

Here comes the judge?... The availability of judicial review is limited by a number of doctrines. Congress can exempt some, but not all agency discretionary actions from review. Congress may establish when the review must be sought and where it must be sought, and may set limits on the judiciary’s authority in reviewing agency action.

Discretionary decisions usually not reviewable Decisions that have been “committed to agency discretion” are not subject to judicial review. If a lawsuit is filed stemming from an action committed to an agency’s discretion, it must be dismissed, because the reviewing court lacks authority to hear the case. This prevents review of procedural, as well as substantive, issues. However, not all discretionary agency decisions are exempt from review.

One example… An example of a decision committed to agency decision at law can be found in the Supreme Court case Webster v. Doe. This is part of this week’s DB and involves a man who was fired from the CIA because he was gay.

Congress can regulate aspects of review… Although time limitations are permissible, Congress may not explicitly preclude judicial review of constitutional issues by statute.

Who can challenge a decision? Any person or entity with “standing”. The standing doctrine requires that the person bringing a lawsuit have a personal interest in the case . They must be impacted or could be impacted by the decision. Quiz Alert!

Who is impacted? The actual litigant or subject of the order or dispute Anyone directly affected by the decision. Other interested persons can also seek judicial review: A qui tam action is an action brought by a private individual on behalf of the government. Quiz alert!

More on standing… Usually someone impacted financially by an agency decision will have standing to challenge it.

However, standing is not limited to those with financial interests: Both environmental and aesthetic injury have been recognized by the courts as sufficient to confer standing Quiz Alert!

For example… A physician could challenge a regulation regarding abortions if he can show that he is financially impacted by it. A dairy farmer can challenge a decision regarding milk prices or health regulations pertaining to dairy operations.

Neighbors… In Duke Power Co. v.Carolina Environmental Study Group, the Court held that the residents of a community where a nuclear power plant was planned to be constructed could possibly show sufficient environmental injury to confer standing to challenge the law authorizing the construction.

What about taxpayers in general? A person’s status as a citizen does not confer a right to challenge a law or agency action. That is, disagreement with a law or governmental behavior, without any accompanying harm, is not sufficient to confer standing.

FINAL AGENCY ACTION At common law and under the APA, only final agency actions are judicially reviewable. The doctrines of primary jurisdiction, exhaustion of administrative remedies, and ripeness are used to test the timing of an appeal for finality.

The exhaustion doctrine The exhaustion doctrine provides that all administrative remedies must be pursued and exhausted (completed) before judicial review is available. The administrative process must be given a full and complete opportunity to correct its own errors before judicial intervention occurs

Make sure you know that… Four common law doctrines—res judicata, collateral estoppel, equitable estoppel, and laches—may be applied by a reviewing court or administrative agency.

The doctrine of res judicata The doctrine of res judicata prevents the same claim from being raised more than once. This means if the issue was already litigated and decided by the court, it cannot be litigated again by the same party. Quiz alert!!!

Example of res judicata For example, Glen has an automobile collision with Nell, in which Glen’s neck and leg are injured. He sues Nell for his personal injuries resulting from the accident. At trial, Glen introduces evidence of his leg injury, but fails to introduce evidence of his neck injury. He prevails and is awarded damages for his leg injury by a jury. He later files a new complaint to recover damages resulting from his neck injury. The second claim is res judicata, as there was a previous action that arose out of the same set of facts involving the same parties and resulted in a final decision on the merits.

You Snooze You Lose Doctrine: Laches The doctrine of laches is a common law concept that prohibits a party from raising a claim when the party's delay in raising the claim has prejudiced an adverse party. For instance, if someone wants to sue for wrongful termination 10 years after being dismissed from employment, this puts the employer at a disadvantage as the relevant witnesses and records may be difficult to obtain.

Standards of Review De Novo Review: under the de novo standard, courts review agency decisions anew; that is, no deference is given to the agency’s factual findings. The reviewing court may substitute its opinion for that of the agency. Record de novo permits a court to substitute its opinion for that of the agency, although the court is limited to reviewing the record from the agency. No new hearing is conducted nor evidence received. The court is limited to the record as it exists when the agency completes its work. If a court determines that evidence was improperly denied admission by the agency, the case must be remanded with an instruction to admit the evidence and reconsider the decision in light of the new evidence. The court will not admit the evidence and reconsider the decision itself.

This week…. DB Quiz Rough Draft of Final Paper. If you want me to grade your draft as a final paper –let me know when you submit. This means that the rough draft and final paper will have the same grade.

Any Questions?? Have a great week!