CA’s Practice Model Washington DSHS Children’s Administration (CA) Created by the Practice Model Team in conjunction with Dr. Dana Christensen Foundations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Clinical Supervision: Based on Solution Based Casework
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Getting Started With Intake & CPS Process. Developmental Competencies SW Understands the roles and tasks of the intake process SW Understands.
S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Foster Care Service Planning & Structured Decision Making FOM
Common Ground One Approach, Many Adaptations Juanita Blount-Clark August, 2011.
A New Practice Model for Child Welfare
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
Preventing and Intervening in Delinquency through Integration and Coordination of Services.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
Introduction to Outcomes Based Service Delivery in Southern Alberta David O’Brien MSW, RSW Southern Alberta Child and Family Services Authority.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
By: Andrew Ball. What do school psychologists do? School psychologists work to find the best solution for each child and situation. They use many different.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
Program Evaluation: Entre Familia. Entre Familia: Program Description  Gender- and culture-specific residential treatment program (6 to 12 months duration,
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models Steven Preister, Associate Director National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
It’s All About Attitude Presenters: Darleen Shope and Richard Tvaroch The most important thing that changed is what we believe about families… Dave Thompson.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Background Materials Useful in Developing a California Integrative Theoretical Framework January 9, 2014 Webinar Led by the members of the Practice Model.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
“Sometimes the simple things are the most radical.” Dana N. Christensen, PhD Becky Antle, PhD Family Therapy Program Kent School of Social Work University.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Integrating Substance Abuse Competency Within A Child Welfare System Kim Bishop-Stevens LICSW Loretta Butehorn PhD Jan-Feb 2007.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.
Washington State Practice Model Experiences. Snapshot of Implementation from Adopted SBC as our practice model Introduction to SBC Presentations.
Early Intervention Program & Early Family Support Services: Analyzing Program Outcomes with the Omaha System of Documentation Presented to: Minnesota Omaha.
Educating Youth in Foster Care Shanna McBride and Angela Griffin, M.Ed.
Using the CANS – F to Support In-Home Child Welfare Services Tim Kelly, MS, Department of Social and Health Services Children’s Administration 11th Annual.
Getting to Outcomes: How to do strategic planning with your CRP Theresa Costello National Resource Center for Child Protective Services May 25, 2007.
102: Supporting Families in Using Critical Thinking Skills.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
PRACTICE MODEL Milestone 1. Curricular Competencies Awareness of the importance organize assessment information into family individual levels Understand.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
The MDFT Model And Some Notes on Germany Andreas Gantner.
Signs of Safety Webinar Series UC Davis Extension Center for Human Services Northern Training Academy Overview of Signs of Safety Implementation.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
1 Child and Family Teaming Module 2 The Child and Family Team Meeting: Preparation, Facilitation, and Follow-up.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ken Berrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seneca Center for Children and Families
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
NYU Child Study Center: Bridges Program Caring Across Communities: Annual Grantee Meeting April
California Child Welfare Core Practice Model: Development of Theoretical Framework and Alignment with Values and Principles Anita P. Barbee, MSSW, Ph.D.
The Children’s Administration Practice Model Child Safety in Practice.
North East Lincolnshire Council Practice Briefing
CASE PLANNING AND SERVICE ARRAY
What is the role of a school psychologist?
Presentation transcript:

CA’s Practice Model Washington DSHS Children’s Administration (CA) Created by the Practice Model Team in conjunction with Dr. Dana Christensen Foundations of Practice

Developmental Competency SW Ability to identify core principles and goals of the agency practice model such as building partnerships, focusing on pragmatic everyday life events, and targeting measurable prevention skills

By the End of This Session You will be able to: Describe the reasons for having a practice model State the four milestones that make the SBC practice model Explain the three basic tenets of the SBC practice model List the three foundational theories of SBC Navigate the research that shows the effectiveness of the practice model Explain how the practice model addresses disproportionality

Theoretical and values based Operationalizes specific casework skills/practices Provides a conceptual map to optimize the safety, permanency, and well-being of children who enter the child welfare system What is a Practice Model ?

Solution-Based Casework (SBC) is an evidence- informed practice model for Casework Management in Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice. The model provides a conceptual map for a family-centered practice from assessment through case closure. The SBC practice model is best thought of as the architecture that holds our practice to a consistent focus on our outcomes. What is our practice model? Solution-Based Casework

Three Main Tenets of SBC We Prioritize the Family Partnership We Focus on Pragmatic Solutions to Everyday Life Problems 33 We Help Families Document and Celebrate Success

Integrated Framework from:  Relapse Prevention (Cognitive Behavioral Theory) (Marlatt & Gordon, 1985, Pithers, 1990, Beck, 1993) Cognitive Behavior Therapy  Solution-Focused Therapy (Berg, 1994, DeShazer, 1988) All three models have their own well-documented evidence base. Solution Focused Interviewing  Family Life Cycle Theory (Carter and McGoldrick, 1999) Family Life Cycle Theory

Research on SBC in Child Welfare? SUMMARY of OUTCOMES 30% reduction in removal of children Over a 100% increase in goal attainment 27% more workers contacted referral sources directly 64% increase in identified client strengths Families with chronic CPS involvement more likely to be successful Clients with Co-morbidity also achieved more goals. 35% reduction in recidivism referrals over 6 months Full implementation of SBC met all 23 CFSR review items and the 7 outcomes of safety, permanency, and well-being (4500 cases) (Antle et al, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2012) More information on other studies at

What is the SBC Evidence Base ? (Antle et al, 2005, 2007)

Achievement of Goals Families achieved significantly more case goals/outcomes when SBC was used Chronic CPS families were even more likely to experience success with SBC Families with all types of maltreatment and co-morbid factors achieved more goals with the use of SBC

Worker Effort (Antle et al, 2005, 2007)

Worker Attitude

Overview of Study Research: What is the relationship between implementation of SBC and performance on federal review items and outcomes What are the most critical points in the child welfare casework process to use SBC in order to promote positive outcomes? Sample: 4,559 cases over four-year time period ( ) Procedure CQI Review Process Merged data across four years Extracted SBC items from review tool Federal review items and outcomes mapped onto CQI tool by CFSR/PIP team in KY (Antle et al, Child Abuse and Neglect, 2012)

Summary of Study 5 Solution-Based Casework is associated with significantly better scores on all 23 CFSR review items and the 7 outcomes of safety, permanency, and well-being (Antle et al, Child Abuse and Neglect, 2012) Well-being 1, 2, & 3Permanency 1 & 2Safety 1 & 2

Family Centered wasn’t operationized: no systemic support Investigations led to a list of problems, not solutions Assessments were too interrogative, no consensus built Assessments weren’t located in the details of family life Case planning focused on service completion, i.e. compliance (versus skill acquisition) Case planning was more worker-driven and “owned” Caseworkers and Providers didn’t share a common map Why was Solution-Based Casework Developed ? Problem - Based

DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM Family Support Mental Health In-home therapy Drug Counseling Health In-home worker Residential Staff Foster Care Anger Management Family MembersCPS Natural Supports Courts School Counselor

Mom is NeglectfulMom needs MoneyMom uses DrugsSon is TruantSon is HyperactiveGirl needs SA CounselingBaby has Med. Needs Assessment of Problems Case Plan Assessment & Referral to: Referral & Assessment Family Support Action Plan Drug Counselor Treatment Plan School Attendance Plan Impact Plus Service Plan FPP’s Treatment Plan Comp Care Treatment Plan First Step Treatment Plan The Family ? ? ? ? The All-Too-Familiar Approach

A Family-Friendly Interface that Helps to Organize Complex Issues and Multiple Partners Mental Health: MH Clinic Work Issues: Family & Child Support School Attendance: School Substance Use: AA Counselor Supervision: Family Members Home & Child Cleanliness: FPP Protection issues: Courts and P & P

How is Solution-Based Casework Different ? Problem definition located in the difficult situations of everyday life (Family Life Cycle) Challenging situations are normalized, tracked, and contextualized Consensus building sought and guided from the very first interview Case planning targets NEW ways of handling those situations at both the Family and Individual level Outcome is measured by skill development in areas of concerns (Versus service compliance) Skill development is documented and celebrated. Ahh…that’s better

Organization Of Practice Organization Of Practice Milestone 2 : Getting Organized on Objectives Moving from Consensus to FLO & ILO Building the Family and Community Team for Change Co-Developing a “Case Plan” Milestone 1 : Building a Consensus Family engagement Gathering assessment information (IA, FAR FA, CFE) What has happened in the past? What do we need to create change? Milestone 3 : Specific ACTION Plans Specific Plans of Action for Families and Youth Documenting behavioral change Using the Team to help Milestone 4: Documenting and Celebrating Documenting Progress and Change Celebrating Small Steps of Success Adjusting plans for progress 20

Making the practice real CHILD SAFETY FRAMEWORK SAFETY ASSESSMENTS FAR FAMILY ASSESSMENT FAMILY TEAM DECISION MAKING MEETINGS SHARED PLANNING MEETINGS COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY EVALUATION

Summary What are some reasons for having a practice model? Shout out the four milestones of our practice model What are the three basic tenets of the SBC practice model? What are the three theories that make up SBC? How do you think our practice model can address disproportionality?