1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation – NLA Feb. 28, 2009 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSLI Fall 2013 Survey Almost 7:30 Democratic Club Nov. 1, 2013 Presentation by Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues www2.aacc.edu/csli.
Advertisements

Local Government Services and revenue.
The Center for the Study of Local Issues: Overview Review CSLI History/Mission Opportunities for Student Learning and Civic Awareness Your Help Dan Nataf,
POS #12068 Key Findings from a Telephone Survey of 800 Registered Voters in Johnson County and an Online Survey of 693 Johnson County Business Representatives.
Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
Presentation of the 20 th Idaho Public Policy Survey - Statewide Results 1 Boise State University College of Social Sciences & Public Affairs Public Policy.
1 Public Perceptions of Terrorism and Government Preparedness National and Local Trends and Findings November 16, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director,
Presentation of the 20 th Idaho Public Policy Survey - Statewide Results 1 Boise State University College of Social Sciences & Public Affairs Public Policy.
1 Public ne Arundel County: Greater Severna Park Council – Presentation of CSLI Survey Findings for Spring 2009 April 14, 2009 Dan Nataf, PhD Director,
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation January 20, 2011 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: A Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation November 15, 2006 by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the.
Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
Burnet County Comprehensive Plan. What Is the Comprehensive Plan? This is a county strategic plan that will focus on the areas where the county government.
FY13 Budget Priorities 8/9/ The mission of the University of Alaska Southeast is student learning enhanced by faculty scholarship, undergraduate.
What is the proposed ballot issue? Referred measure 3B: Increased funding for education in School District 51 only Shall taxes on peoples’ property (house,
Summary of Survey Results Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Summer 2015 Ann S. Bisconti, PhD Bisconti Research, Inc.
The Public’s Perceptions and Experiences with the Economy in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation January 7, 2010 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study.
Based on Recent Surveys of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
Executive Summary July SURVEY OVERVIEW Methodology Penn Schoen Berland conducted 1,650 telephone interviews between March 27, 2015 and May 4, 2015.
March 2010 Telephone Survey EMC Research, Inc. 811 First Avenue – Suite 451 Seattle, WA (206)
GREATER SEVERNA PARK COUNCIL PRESENTATION Results of Oct , 2012 Survey of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study.
Learning with the Center for the Study of Local Issues Dan Nataf, PhD, Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Careers 132 Anne Arundel Community.
Presentation of CSLI Fall 2009 Survey Findings + Annapolis Election Musings Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: CSLI Campus Presentation November 7, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings February 21, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
#MDNPLP Legislative Preview Sponsored by: Presenting Sponsor Media Sponsor.
The Public’s Perceptions and Experiences with the Economy in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
Service Learning at the Center for the Study of Local Issues Review CSLI History/Mission The Semi-Annual Survey: An Opportunity for Student Learning and.
Southern Apache County Community Health Survey Spring 2003.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings November 18, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
CSLI Advisory Board Feb. 11, 2010 Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2009 survey Review/discuss proposed.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
CSLI Advisory Board Sept Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Spring 2009 survey Review/discuss.
1 CSLI Advisory Board – Fall 2006 Presentation Review of Spring 2006 Survey Findings September 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for.
1 Overview of the Center for the Study of Local Issues March 30, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
CSLI Service Learning – Final Meeting, Fall 2012 Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
CSLI Advisory Board Sept 13, 2012 Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2012 survey Review/discuss proposed.
1 Public ne Arundel County: Coordinators of Volunteers of Anne Arundel County– Reflections about Trends affecting Nonprofits in AA County June 5, 2009.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings March 29, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
Survey conducted: November 6th, 8th – 10th,
Results of March 4-7, 2013 Survey of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community.
Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College.
CSLI Advisory Board Feb. 13, 2014 Agenda Call to order Survey Committee report Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2013 survey Review/discuss.
Recap of Recent CSLI Survey Findings from Fall 2008 Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Part of the Sarbanes Center for Public.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings June 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings December 13, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings March 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
CSLI Semi-annual Survey for Fall 2007 The Center for the Study of Local Issues is part of the Paul S. Sarbanes Center for Community and Public Service.
Learning with the Center for the Study of Local Issues: Introductory Meeting Dan Nataf, PhD, Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Careers 132.
By Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College August 4, 2010.
CSLI Service Learning – Final Meeting, Fall 2012 Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: A Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation May 12, 2006 by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study.
Greater Severna Park Council Presentation of Fall 2015 Survey Findings – Anne Arundel County Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
District 32 Republican Club Presentation of Fall 2015 Survey Findings – Anne Arundel County Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues.
Poverty in Johnson County Primary Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 1-year estimates, 2014 Prepared January 2015.
Elephants Club Presentation By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli March.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
Local Government Services and Revenue Chapter 12 Section 2.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings November 2, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
Presentation transcript:

1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation – NLA Feb. 28, 2009 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD (410) (410) fax

2 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 The Center for the Study of Local Issues: Overview CSLI – Part of Sarbanes Center for Public and Community Service – 30 th Anniversary Mission: Provide students opportunities for engaged learning, community outreach Main activity: Public interest and client surveys/research each semester

3 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 The Center for the Study of Local Issues: Overview Surveys: Respondents randomly chosen from universe of listed telephone numbers combined with computer generated numbers Typical sample size: respondents; students used as interviewers Topics: Each survey includes demographic and attitude/behavior questions, including such themes as: –Economic conditions –Growth/Development –Transportation –Economic conditions –Education –Tax and spending preferences –Policy preferences Visit CSLI’s web site for previous surveys (

4 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Main Issues for Today –County - Right/Wrong direction –Economic conditions –Confidence in government –Housing –Growth –Crime –Education –Immigration –Tax and spending preferences

5 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 County – Right/Wrong Direction

6 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economic Concerns – Most Important Problem

7 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economic Concerns: Perceptions of the Local and National Economies National County “ Thinking about our county's economy, how would you rate economic conditions in Anne Arundel County today -- excellent, good, only fair, or poor?” (Total percentage saying excellent and good)

8 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economic Concerns: Perceptions of the Local Economy Fall 2008 by Income Groups “ Thinking about our county's economy, how would you rate economic conditions in Anne Arundel County today -- excellent, good, only fair, or poor?”

9 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economic Concerns: Applicability of Specific Conditions Spring/Fall 2008

10 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economic Concerns: Applicability of Specific Conditions Fall 2008 by Income Groupings and Gap (Poor-Rich) ConditionOverall0-$50,000$50-100,000Over $100,000 Significant losses in stocks or retirement accounts Hard to afford cost of utilities such as electricity or gas Wages or salaries are not rising as fast as the cost of living Hard to afford cost of taxes Hard to afford cost of transportation Health care insurance is unavailable, too expensive or inadequate Unable to find affordable housing Facing the possibility of unemployment Facing the possibility of house foreclosure or loss41132

LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economic Concerns: Applicability of Specific Conditions Fall 2008 by Age Group

12 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economic Concerns: Applicability of Specific Conditions Fall 2008 by Race and Gender

13 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economic Concerns: What will the Future bring looking to 2010 and 2008 looking at 2018

14 Preparedness/ Confidence Econ crisis/ Feds Fall 2008 Econ.Environ.TerrorDisaster Very58711 Somewhat Not very No answer27634

15 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 How Prepared are Local Authorities in Event of Terrorist Strike – Katrina

16 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Housing - What is “Affordable Housing?” (asked Fall 2002) Attribute cited% Purchase price Median: $ ,000 39% A type that is lacking in AA County20% Housing type – apartments, townhouses, section 819% User type – low income, poor9% Other12% Total100% Is the lack of affordable housing in Anne Arundel County a problem? Yes 54% No 34% Don’t know 12%

17 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Main Economic Challenge for the Next Decade (Fall 2005) Transition to Managing Growth Challenge% Citing Managing growth/development31 Providing affordable housing19 Providing proper skills/education for workers 19 Infrastructure, roads10 Providing enough jobs9 Govt. budget problems/services3 Gas prices2 Taxes2 Other5

18 How effective have County policies been regarding growth and planning? LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economy and Growth: Effectiveness of County Growth Policies (Fall 2004 )

19 LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Economy and Growth: County Growth Choices – New Roads or Mass Transit (Spring 2001 ) To solve the transportation congestion issues that affect you the most, is it more important to fund new mass transit projects or build new roads and improve existing ones?

Approach to growth and transportationYesNo Build or upgrade highly congested roads and intersections in the county 7713 Create a local jitney bus service7121 Increase bus availability to major cities (Balt/DC)6922 Make it easier to get o MARC trains6720 Make it easier to find other people with whom to carpool6326 Severely limit new residential development – higher impact fees5433 Put moratorium on new residential development in your area5335 Reduce fares on public transportation5228 Allow more intense development of areas well served by public transportation LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 Approaches for Managing Growth/Transportation (Fall 1998)

Issue Gotten better Stayed about the same Gotten worse Better- Worse Improving the local economy Improving the overall quality of life in our County Controlling crime Improving the environment Reducing poverty and homelessness Improving ethics in government Improving the efficiency of local government Keeping taxes low Improving the academic performance of our children Planning growth and development Reducing traffic congestion I am going to read you a list of problems facing the County. Please tell me how well you think the County has dealt with these problems over the last year. Has the problem gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? LAA Presentation – Feb. 28, 2009 How well has County Performed? (Fall 1999) Transition to Crime

22

23

24

25

26 One Thing to Most Improve Safety

ServiceMore % Same % Less % Don’t% know Public schools Police Fire Community college Seniors’ services Roads Average percentage Environmental programs Social services Health department Libraries Parks and recreation Planning and zoning LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Education – Perceived Value to Taxpayers? Spend More, Same or Less on Public Services? (Spring 2004)

HelpHurtNo effect HelpHurtNo effect Add Teaching Aides in Classrooms 9117 Increase Local Community Control over Schools Reduce Class Size8929 Provide More Elective Courses in Higher Grades Give Teachers More Power when Dealing with Disruptive Students 8687 Allow more variety in the curriculum Emphasize a "Return to Basics" Approach to Education 8659Change the School Board selection process Provide More Assistance to Special Education 85410Provide More Financial Assistance to Schools doing Poorly on Standardized Tests Encourage Flexibility in Teaching Methods 8398Add some Specialized Programs Increase Teacher Salaries82315Introduce School Prayers Start some Countywide "Magnet" Schools 79714Place Some Schools on a Year Round Schedule Create a Special High School for Disruptive Students Redistrict schools more frequently LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Would Proposals Help, Hurt or have no Effect on the Quality of Public Schools (Spring 1996)

29 LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Immigration Questions – Various (Spring 2008)

30 LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Legal and Illegal Immigrants (Spring 2008)

31 Do you think that you personally have benefited from the services of illegal immigrants for example in landscaping, construction, restaurants or janitorial services? LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Personally Benefitting from Illegal Immigrants(Spring 2008)

32 LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Personally Benefitting from Illegal Immigrants(Spring 2008) By Political Party

33 SupportOpposeUnsure No answer Total Environmental measures meant to restrict development in critical areas? Efforts by police to identify illegal immigrants and refer them to federal immigration services? Increasing impact fees on new construction in our county? Creating or increasing fees to sports leagues that use public parks to cover the maintenance of those parks? Increasing the tax on hotel stays from 7 percent to 10 percent Decreasing the drinking age to A $500 ambulance fee to help pay for county services?

ProposalSpring 2003Fall 2003Spring 2007 Cut programs Increase taxes Other--188 (Combo – cut spending/ raise taxes)-- 54 Don’t know24147 Total LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Funding Government – cut programs or cut spending? (Spring 2003, Fall 2003, Spring 2007)

35 LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Funding Government – Various Approaches (Fall 2003)

36 LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Funding Government – % Favoring Raising Income Tax? (Fall 2003)

37 LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Funding Government – % Favoring Sales Tax? (Fall 2003)

Approach (N=85)FavorCases Reduce government salaries1513 Reduce politicians salaries1210 Reduce government perks76 Cut waste, administration119 Cut back on specific programs3933 Other miscellaneous1614 Total LAA Presentation: Feb. 28, 2009 Expenditure reduction – Identify ways to cut govt. spending (open-ended) (Spring 2003)