3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 1 MEG Software MEG Software Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Advertisements

MEG-Review Feb MEG Software Group MEG Software Status Framework for MC, Schedule, DC reconstruction update and Discussion on a ROOT-based offline.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
A. Baldini PSI July 04 General Introduction Work done in the past 4 months presented in the individual sub-detectors talks: highlights Construction is.
VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.
Report from the Lecce’s Offline Group Rome 6-Feb-2006 The Achievements The People Future Plans.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Malte HildebrandtMEG Review Meeting, 14th February 2007 Report of Run Coordinator Run 2006 Summary Malte Hildebrandt MEG Review Meeting, 14th February.
19 July 2005Fabrizio Cei1 Status and Perspectives of MEG software Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa On behalf of the MC/Offline group MEG Review Meeting.
Shuei MEG review meeting, 2 July MEG Software Status MEG Software Group Framework Large Prototype software updates Database ROME Monte Carlo.
Satoshi Mihara ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo Feb MEG Review Meeting 1 CEX beam test at piE1 Satoshi Mihara.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Analysis of PSI beam test R.Sawada 09/Feb/2004 MEG collaboration R.Sawada 09/Feb/2004 MEG collaboration
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
MiniBooNE Computing Description: Support MiniBooNE online and offline computing by coordinating the use of, and occasionally managing, CD resources. Participants:
MEG positron spectrometer Oleg Kiselev, PSI on behalf of MEG collaboration.
As of 28 Juni 2005Getting Starged with GEM - Shuei Yamada 1 Getting Started with GEM Shuei YAMADA ICEPP, University of Tokyo What is GEM? Before you start.
26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
14 February 2007Fabrizio Cei1 INFN and University of Pisa PSI Review Meeting PSI, 14 February 2007 Status of MEG Software.
BESIII MC Release notes & planned development Dengzy, Hem, Liuhm, Youzy, Yuany Nov. 23, 2005.
5 May 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch Computing Planning for ATLAS ATLAS Software Week 5 May 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Prediction W. Buchmueller (DESY) arXiv:hep-ph/ (1999)
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
Julien Bettane, Giulia Hull, Silvia Niccolai, Daria Sokhan 31/1/2012 Status and commissioning plan for the Central Neutron Detector.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
06 February 2007Fabrizio Cei1 INFN and University of Pisa INFN Scientific Commission I Rome, 06 February 2007 Status of MEG Software.
Liquid Xenon Calorimeter Analysis R.Sawada on behalf of the MEG LXe analysis group 17/Feb/2009.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
20 September 2005Fabrizio Cei1 Status and Perspectives of MEG Software Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa INFN Scientific Committee I Napoli, 20 September.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
1 NaI calibrationneutron observation NaI calibration and neutron observation during the charge exchange experiment 1.Improving the NaI energy resolution.
27 June 2006 Shuei YAMADA, MEG PSI 1 MEG Software Status and Prospects MEG Software group.
Overview of the experiment Collaboration (about 30 physicists at this meeting) Budget Realistic schedule and general status (few words) of each sub-detector.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna CHEP 2000Abstract B 029 Object Oriented simulation of the Level 1 Trigger system of a CMS muon chamber Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna.
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
A. Baldini PSI July 05 Overview of the experiment MEG is being built (Beam line, Magnet, LXe, DC, TC, Elect., Software) Delays in some items: O(months)
MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究セン ター 第 65 回年次大会 岡山大学.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
Photon Transport Monte Carlo September 27, 2004 Matthew Jones/Riei IshizikiPurdue University Overview Physical processes PMT and electronics response Some.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
SIMULATION OF BACKGROUND REDUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR Ge DBD DETECTORS Héctor Gómez Maluenda. University of Zaragoza. GERDA/Majorana MC Meeting.
Pattern recognition with the triplet method Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa MEG Meeting, Hakata October /10/20131 Fabrizio Cei.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
9 Feb, MEG Software Status -for the coming review committee- Question from A.Blondel Our answer Schedule and Man power MEG Software Group.
Alex Howard, Imperial College Slide 1 July 2 nd 2001 Underground Project UNDERGROUND PROJECT – Overview and Goals Alex Howard Imperial College, London.
DCH missing turn analysis
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
TC status & remaining tasks
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
MEG Summary T. Mori for MEG Collaboration February 9, 2005.
西村美紀(東大) 他 MEGIIコラボレーション 日本物理学会 第73回年次大会(2018年) 東京理科大学(野田キャンパス)
New Results from the MEG Experiment
Presentation transcript:

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 1 MEG Software MEG Software Group

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 2 Contents Summary of Software Meeting (3-4 Nov. 2005) Standard Operating System Transition to Subversion ROME based analysis tools Status of Software Software Organization Status of Monte Carlo Status of Offline Software Ongoing Studies Using MC Resources and Needs CPU DISK Network Schedule and Manpower

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 3 Summary of Software Meeting (3-4 Nov. 2005) Standard Operating System Scientific Linux (SL) Mostly used in the HEP community Derived from RedHat Enterprise Linux, Freely available Transition to Subversion A concurrent versioning system, similar to, but better than CVS Truly atomic commit (CVS: file-by-file) Moving/renaming files and directories (CVS: loses history) Free/Open source version control system Runs on all modern flavor of Unix, Mac & Win2k/XP Binary package available for SL3/4

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 4 ROME based analysis tool MegRoot was rejected Analysis tools based on ROME was approved megbartender : event cocktail & digitization meganalyzer : reconstruction & event display Both for online & offline New software coordination Repository: Fabrizio Cei, Shuei Yamada MC: Fabrizio Cei, Shuei Yamada Offline: Matthias Scheebeli, Ryu Sawada Online: Stefan Ritt

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 5 Status of Software Software Organization Monte Carlo Status Offline Software Status Ongoing Studies Using MC

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 6 Software Organization Simulation DCH. Nishiguchi TCP. Cattaneo XEF. Cei + S. Yamada Beam/TargetW. Ootani + K. Ozone + V. Tumakov CalibrationF. Cei DC digitizationP. Huwe TC digitizationP. Huwe XE digitizationY. Uchiyama Trigger simulationD. Nicolo’ + Y. Hisamatsu Analysis FrameworkM. Schneebeli DatabaseR. Sawada DCH. Nishiguchi + M. Schneebeli TCD. Zanello XEG. Signorelli + R. Sawada

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 7 Procedure of Analysis GEM ZEBRA bartender analyzer ROOT MC simulation event generation detector simulation Electronics simulation event cocktail waveform simulation digitization trigger simulation DAQ MIDAS ROOT simulationexperiment Reconstruction Event display

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 8 Monte Carlo Status GEANT3 based simulation program : GEM Program built around the framework REM Organization in modules, as an OO class; structured like: xxx (prefix of specific device) = dch, ticp, ticz, xec … yyy (suffix defining the functionality) = ini, set, end, draw, … Documentation under SVN in meg/rem/doc Interactive GEM Call GEANT3 functions interactively to Draw geometry, track and hit Change the running conditions To be done: Learn how to use it Implement user interface (kumac and/or GUI)

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 9 Drift Chamber Progress Improved integration of time to distance profile from GARFIELD GEANT simulation of Vernier electrode patterns Improved hit structure More adequate description w/ low-E  -rays Simple and small hit data structure (220 → 8 words/hit) Efficient (80 →100%) and simple hit cell# calculation To be done Effect on signal of Vernier patterns Improve detail of material : electronic cards, cables, …

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 10 Timing Counters Progress: Implementation of many geometries : cables, jacket, bars w/ slanted ends, square fibers, PMTs, APDs, … Preliminary support structure Generation and propagation of scintillation photons : based on analytical calculation & Poisson fluctuations To be done: Improve details of materials and support structure Improve photon propagation model Cross check w/ beam test data (for  counter)

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 11 Liquid Xenon Calorimeter Progress: Geometry almost finalized Inner&Outer vessel, PMT holders, PMT position, Honeycomb,… Faster GEANT based optical photon tracking : (~10s/event on 3GHz Pentium4, ~ 7.5s/event on 2.4GHz Athlon64) To be done: Implement final geometry : Dense PMT layout for backside, hollow spacer for L&R side Fast optical photon tracking

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 12 Beam and Target Progress: Muon beam simulation based on phase space into event generator Elliptical tube option for target Implemented end cap and Rohacell insertion tube To be done: Implement Beam Transport Solenoid Complete the beam transport within the detector Implement final target with support 3D Field map + interpolation

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 13 Calibration Extensive work in the past Partially implemented in MC Progress: Geometry and tracking media almost completed Event generation under testing To be done: Test and commit event generator Complete implementation of geometry Ni plates outside LXe calorimeter (neutron calibration)

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 14 MC General Conclusion Simulation status satisfactory : good level of sophistication in geometry and physical process simulation. Further refinements in geometry under way. Simulation of calibration procedures started. Some people (5 - 6) actively working. It ’ s a good time for testing the mass production (possible problems with disk space, memory management…)

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 15 Offline Software Status Single Event Display Preliminary mu -> e+gamma trigger simulation Waveform simulation & digitization XE & DC : ready TC : preliminary Analysis Extensive works by individuals Partially implemented in meganalyzer : XE : Fast reconstruction (Qsum, position,…), Position reconstruction DC : preliminary track fit (for online display)

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 16 Single Event Display ROME and ARGUS are merged Both for online & offline ROME runs in 3 modes ROME stand alone Argus stand alone ROME with Argus display (new mode) Configuration in the ROME configuration file No special user code needed

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 17 QT movie…

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 18 Ongoing Studies Using MC BG Source Study Optimize end cap,target system and Rohacell tube design AIF events in LXe Source of AIF gammas AIF gammas’ spectrum & yield AIF Rejection LXe Waveform Waveform simulation Pile-up rejection

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 19 BG Source Study New features Optimize end-caps Upstream End-cap Rohacell Insertion Tube Optimize target system Purpose beam DC cable duct Michel decay

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 20 BG from End Cap 39 photons / 50,000 Michel e + Designed end-cap (Aluminum part) + SUS Beam Pipe beam Michel decay Aluminum SUS Bremsstrahlung photon

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 21 BG from Rohacell Tube 3 photons / 50,000 Michel e + Bremsstrahlung photon Rohacell X 0 = 820cm density = g/cm 3 C 9 H 13 O 2 N

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 22 BG from DC cable duct 427 photons / 50,000 Michel e + beam Michel decay Carbon fiber Aluminum Cu cable Bremsstrahlung photon

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 23 BG Source Study(1) Summary BG Sources Effect of cable ducts was improved down to 1/2 Bremsstrahlung & Annihilation at rest Effect of end-cap is relatively small Low E ( ~ 1MeV), but pile-up study is needed AIF study target & Rohacell tube Cable duct Target study Slant angle of the target Complete target support structure & calibration system Energy deposit in LXe [MeV]

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 24 AIF study using MC 1. Generate Michel e+ in target, emit them for 4π 2.At the each GEANT tracking step, calculate annihilation probability by material information and Michel e+ momentum information 3. Generate 2 γ at each step weighted by this probability 4. Trace 2γ, if it enters Xe cryostat

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 25 AIF probability map X-Y View Z-Y View Z-X View No Cut Xe events Egam> 45MeV

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 26 AIF Spectrum & Photon Yield AIF spectrum and their origin Egam MeV/52.8MeV Photon yield per muon decay

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 27 AIF Event Rejection in LXe Different arrival times of 2 gammas Different Impinging points TODO : Pattern recognition δT 2gamma [sec] δX 2gamma [cm]

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 28 LXe Waveform Waveform Simulation Pile-up rejection Take sum of PMT outputs Larger pulse Microstructure in pulse shape disappear Optimization for # of PMTs to be summed Summing up all the PMTs not good from S/N viewpoint

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 29 Xe Waveform Simulation 1.Sum up Gaussians over all photo electrons Mean = arrival time of each photon Width = TTS (1 p.e. response) 2. Shaping (Low Pass Filter) Low Pass filter Time constant RC = 5nsec Fits very well with real pulse !

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 30 Pulse Shape Fluctuation Pulse shapes are not constant especially for small pulses 0.6V data simulation 1.2V data deviation Fluctuation reproduced

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 31 Pile-up finding  T=50ns.  T=15ns 11MeV + 42MeV Peak search Count # of peaks in Moving average Simple but powerful for large  T Differential Count # of peaks in Differentiation Powerful for small  T

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 32 Rejection Efficiency (E 1 + E 2 )/52.8MeV Optimal Value : 60 ~ 70% of Qsum Function of Energy

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 33 Rejection Efficiency  T 8ns  T 10ns  T 15ns  T 50ns  T 100ns As functions of Energy of each  and  T Summed up to 60% Qsum Misidentification probability: <0.05% Weak points:  T < 10nsec Small pulse after a large one

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 34 Resources & Needs Data storage CPU Power Data Access

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 35 Data Storage Resource & Needs PSI TapesPSI DisksMEG Needs TBytes (free) + 40 TBytes occupied by back up (to be freed) 4TBytes (backuped) + 6TBytes(not backuped) ~ 10TBytes/yr (read data) ~ 40-50TBytes/yr (MC Production) ~ 10TB/yr (overheads, DSTs) total70-80 TBytes10TBytes60-70TBytes/yr MEG Needs ~ 5 TBytes/year of Disk Space for DATA Assuming 1/2 of the data collected in one year reside on disk for monitoring, calibrations, faster analysis, etc…

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 36 CPU Resource & Needs PSI NodesMEG Needs (CPUs/yr)  64 ~ 3 CPUs (real data, w/o Waveform fitting) < 1 CPU (selected data w/ Waveform fitting) ~ 20 CPUs (MC production & bartender) ~ 10 CPUs (MC reconstruction = 3x data, w/o WF fitting) < 1 CPU (MC selected sample w/ WF fitting) Total64 CPUs ~ 33 (+20 per 10 repr.) CPU/yr 128 CPUs

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 37 Data Access Resource & Needs PSI Link SpeedMEG Needs 25MBytes/s to tapes via FTP 1Gbits/s to disks from CPUs ~ 1MBytes/s (w/ Waveform compression) ~ 10MBytes/s (w/o Waveform compression) OK !

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 38 Schedules and Manpower Milestones Manpower

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 39 Milestones Within 2-3 weeks New PSI cluster partly ready : 128 Opterons MC mass production (at least signal events and Michel positrons) Start development of reconstruction & Pattern recognition algorithms Start pre-selection study By end of September Finish MC mass production Signal, Michel positrons, backgrounds…

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 40 Schedule for LXe analysis Other sub-detectors can emulate LXe schedule

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 41 Man Power 2006Q1 Y. Hisamatsu 0.5 H. Nishiguchi 0.2 W. Ootani 0.1 K. Ozone 0.5 R. Sawada 0.5 Y. Uchiyama 0.7 S. Ritt 0.1 M. Schneebeli 0.4 F. Cei 1.0 G. Gallucci 1.0 D. Nicolo’0.2 A. Papa 0.3 R. Pazzi 1.0 G. Signorelli 0.5 P. W. Cattaneo 0.5 D. Zanello 0.5 A. Barchiesi 1.0 W. Molzon 0.2 V. Tumakov 1.0 S. Yamada 1.0 P. Huwe 1.0 F. Xiao 0.7 Total Q2 Y. Hisamatsu 0.5 H. Nishiguchi 0.3 W. Ootani 0.1 K. Ozone 0.5 R. Sawada 0.5 Y. Uchiyama 0.7 M. Schneebeli 0.8 F. Cei 1.0 G. Gallucci 1.0 D. Nicolo’0.2 A. Papa 0.3 R. Pazzi 1.0 G. Signorelli 0.5 P. W. Cattaneo 0.5 D. Zanello 0.5 A. Barchiesi 1.0 W. Molzon 0.2 V. Tumakov 1.0 S. Yamada 1.0 P. Huwe 1.0 J. Perry 0.7 D. Stute 0.4 F. Xiao 0.5 Total 14.2

3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 42 End of Slides