ICCS 2009 4 th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid 1 Sample Participation and Sampling Weights.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Students” t-test.
Advertisements

Chapter 6 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
9. Weighting and Weighted Standard Errors. 1 Prerequisites Recommended modules to complete before viewing this module  1. Introduction to the NLTS2 Training.
3rd NRC Meeting, 9-12 June 2008, Windsor 1 ICCS 2009 Main Survey Sampling Consultations.
Sampling: Final and Initial Sample Size Determination
POINT ESTIMATION AND INTERVAL ESTIMATION
ICCS 2009 IDB Workshop, 18 th February 2010, Madrid Using the IEA IDB Analyzer to merge and analyze data.
Overview of Main Survey Data Analysis and Scaling National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Chapter 7 Introduction to Sampling Distributions
QBM117 Business Statistics Statistical Inference Sampling 1.
Suppose we are interested in the digits in people’s phone numbers. There is some population mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) Now suppose we take a sample.
Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 6-1 Introduction to Statistics Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions.
SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS. SAMPLING VARIABILITY
How confident are we that our sample means make sense? Confidence intervals.
Chapter 7 Probability and Samples: The Distribution of Sample Means
Hypothesis Testing and T-Tests. Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Tests of Differences One.
Joint Canada/U.S. Health Survey Catherine Simile, National Center for Health Statistics Patrice Mathieu, Statistics Canada Ed Rama, Statistics Canada NCHS.
Chapter 6: Sampling Distributions
AM Recitation 2/10/11.
Hypothesis Testing.
Jeopardy Hypothesis Testing T-test Basics T for Indep. Samples Z-scores Probability $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400 $500 $400.
Introduction to plausible values National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
1st NRC Meeting, October 2006, Amsterdam 1 Sampling: Next Steps.
1st NRC Meeting, October 2006, Amsterdam 1 ICCS Sampling Design.
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions.
Chapter 11: Estimation Estimation Defined Confidence Levels
STA Lecture 161 STA 291 Lecture 16 Normal distributions: ( mean and SD ) use table or web page. The sampling distribution of and are both (approximately)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Sampling Distributions.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 17 Inferential Statistics.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 22 Using Inferential Statistics to Test Hypotheses.
Chap 6-1 A Course In Business Statistics, 4th © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. A Course In Business Statistics 4 th Edition Chapter 6 Introduction to Sampling.
Statistical Decision Making. Almost all problems in statistics can be formulated as a problem of making a decision. That is given some data observed from.
Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 6-1 Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach 6 th Edition Chapter.
Copyright (C) 2002 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Understandable Statistics S eventh Edition By Brase and Brase Prepared by: Lynn Smith.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions.
3rd NRC Meeting, 9-12 June 2008, Windsor 1 ICCS 2009 Main Survey Sampling Quality Standards.
Chapter 7 Probability and Samples: The Distribution of Sample Means
ICCS 2009 IDB Workshop, 18 th February 2010, Madrid Using the IEA IDB Analyzer Percentages & Means.
6 - 1 © 1998 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 6 Sampling Distributions.
1 Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions. 2 Chapter Outline  Selecting A Sample  Point Estimation  Introduction to Sampling Distributions  Sampling Distribution.
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions Statistics for Business (Env) 1.
ICCS Main Survey Overview National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Losing Weight (a) If we were to repeat the sampling procedure many times, on average, the sample proportion would be within 3 percentage points of the.
Analyzing Statistical Inferences How to Not Know Null.
ICCS 2009 IDB Workshop, 18 th February 2010, Madrid 1 Training Workshop on the ICCS 2009 database Weighting and Variance Estimation picture.
Confidence Intervals (Dr. Monticino). Assignment Sheet  Read Chapter 21  Assignment # 14 (Due Monday May 2 nd )  Chapter 21 Exercise Set A: 1,2,3,7.
S-005 Sampling. Some basic terminology Population –Larger group (the research population) –Sometimes can be quite small Sample –A subset of the population.
Figure 13.1 Relationship to the Previous Chapters & The Marketing Research Process Figure 13.1 Relationship of Sample Size Determination to the Previous.
Statistical Inference Statistical inference is concerned with the use of sample data to make inferences about unknown population parameters. For example,
Review of Statistical Terms Population Sample Parameter Statistic.
Sampling Theory and Some Important Sampling Distributions.
ICCS 2009 IDB Seminar – Nov 24-26, 2010 – IEA DPC, Hamburg, Germany Training Workshop on the ICCS 2009 database Weights and Variance Estimation picture.
Lecture 5 Introduction to Sampling Distributions.
Ch 8 Estimating with Confidence 8.1: Confidence Intervals.
COURSE: JUST 3900 INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Test Review: Ch. 4-6 Peer Tutor Slides Instructor: Mr. Ethan W. Cooper, Lead Tutor © 2013.
Chapter 7 Introduction to Sampling Distributions Business Statistics: QMIS 220, by Dr. M. Zainal.
Hypothesis Testing  Test for one and two means  Test for one and two proportions.
6 - 1 © 2000 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Statistics for Business and Economics Sampling Distributions Chapter 6.
Lecture 22 Dustin Lueker.  Similar to testing one proportion  Hypotheses are set up like two sample mean test ◦ H 0 :p 1 -p 2 =0  Same as H 0 : p 1.
Statistical Decision Making. Almost all problems in statistics can be formulated as a problem of making a decision. That is given some data observed from.
Chapter 6: Sampling Distributions
Chapter 6 Inferences Based on a Single Sample: Estimation with Confidence Intervals Slides for Optional Sections Section 7.5 Finite Population Correction.
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200 - Lecture Section 001, Fall 2016 Room 150 Harvill Building 10: :50 Mondays, Wednesdays.
Behavioral Statistics
ESTIMATION
LESSON 18: CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ESTIMATION
The estimate of the proportion (“p-hat”) based on the sample can be a variety of values, and we don’t expect to get the same value every time, but the.
Sampling Distributions
Presentation transcript:

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid 1 Sample Participation and Sampling Weights

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Overview Progress report Participation in ICCS Weights –What are weights? –Why use weights? –What weights are there in ICCS? –How were ICCS weights calculated?

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Progress report 38 educational systems participated in ICCS Sampling weights were calculated for all of them –For the student study and the teacher study –For six additional grades Variables for variance estimation were prepared Participation rates were calculated

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Participation categories Three categories for sampling participation were defined in ICCS for students and for teachers –Category 1: acceptable participation rate without the use of replacement schools –Category 2: acceptable participation rate when replacement schools are included –Category 3: participation rate not acceptable even when replacement schools are included Each country was grouped into a category during sampling adjudication Each country was informed about the decision

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Participation categories - students Category 1: 28 countries Category 2: 8 countries Category 3: 2 countries

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Participation categories - teachers Category 1: 22 countries Category 2: 5 countries Category 3: 9 countries Two countries could not be reported

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Weights. They are everywhere. Weights are in your data Weights are in the tables of the reports –All means and percentages in the reports will be calculated with weighted data

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid What are weights? Weights are values that are assigned to every sampling unit The weight of a sampled unit indicates the population that is represented by this sampled unit 2 200

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Why do we need weights? Weights allow drawing conclusions about the population based on information from the sample Weights allow unbiased estimates of population parameters Un-weighted data only allow conclusions about the sampled units

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Population  sample Example: in the population, 20% of the students are in private schools, 80% are in public schools The NRC decides to over-sample students from private schools In the sample, 50% of the students are from private schools, 50% are from public schools

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Sample  estimate To estimate the correct proportion of students in the population, we must assign different weights to the students in the sample

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid What weights are there in ICCS? Student weights –TOTWGTS Teacher weights –TOTWGTT School weights –TOTWGTC

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Why do ICCS weights differ? ICCS student weights differ, because the following five elements differ: Selection probabilities –1)... of the sampled schools –2)... of the classes within the schools Non-participation –3)... of sampled schools –4)... of sampled classes within the schools –5)... of students within the classes Each element corresponds to a weight factor

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid 1) School Base Weight WGTFAC1 The school base weight is the inverse of the selection probability of the school –Low selection probability  large weight –High selection probability  small weight 5 1

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid 1) School Base Weight: PPS Schools were sampled with probability proportional to size (PPS) Large schools had larger selection probabilities Therefore, they now have smaller school base weights Example: the large school is three times larger The small school has a three times larger school base weight ww x 3

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid 2) Class Base Weight WGTFAC2S The class base weight is the inverse of the selection probability of the class Different selection probabilities because of the different number of classes in a school 6 2

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid 3) School Weight Adjustment WGTADJ1 Adjusts for schools that did not participate Example: Schools from two different explicit strata – one blue school does not participate 5/4

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid 4) Class Weight Adjustment WGTADJ2S Adjusts for classes that did not participate In most countries, only one class was selected per school Almost always, this factor equals 1

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid 5) Student Weight Adjustment WGTADJ3S Adjusts for students that did not participate Example: Students from two different classes – one blue student does not participate 5/4

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid The final student weight We now can compute the TOTAL STUDENT WEIGHT TOTWGTS = x School Base Weight x Class Base Weight x School Adjustment Factor x Class Adjustment Factor x Student Adjustment Factor

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Teacher weights The TOTAL TEACHER WEIGHT is computed similarly TOTWGTT = x School Base Weight x Teacher Base Weight x School Adjustment Factor x Teacher Adjustment Factor x Teacher Multiplicity Factor –adjusts for the fact that some teachers teach in more than one school

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid More about weights: IDB Training on Thursday –how weights are used for data analysis –some examples of what can go wrong if weights are not used for data analysis Please join!

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Country sessions If you have any questions about participation rates or weights... Please sign up!

ICCS th NRC Meeting, February 15 th - 18 th 2010, Madrid Thank you for your attention!