0 0 Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations in the Context of a Korea-EU FTA 3 May 2007 Heungchong KIM Head, European Studies Korea Institute for International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 n European Commission 4th Global Congress: Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Dubai – 3 February 2008 An Urgent Need to Better Respond to the Global.
Advertisements

Asian Drivers and Poor Countries: The Research Agenda Jörg Mayer UNCTAD China and India: Whats in it for Africa? Paris, March 2006.
Coping with multiple uncertainties: Latin America in the TPP negotiations Sebastián Herreros Geneva, 24 September 2012.
Creation of WTO investment rules in the new round We strongly urge that investment rule negotiations be launched at the Fifth Ministerial in September.
British Columbia and International Trade Agreement Negotiations October 30, 2013 Janel Quiring, Director International Trade Policy Unit Ministry of International.
The Trans -Pacific Partnership Agreement: an Opportunity for Viet Nam to reduce its Economic Dependence of China Good morning everyone The Annual summer.
EU-Canada Trade and Economic Relations – towards a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) 5 May 2014.
Economic Research Department. Hong Kong Branch. 1 Carlos III 27 de marzo 2008 EU & Asia (China) Alicia Garcia Herrero.
Regional Economic Integration in East Asia and Japan’s FTA Policy March, 2010 Shujiro URATA Waseda University.
1 The EU Trade Policy. 2 Contents 1.General background of the EU’s trade policy: how is the EU trading bloc structured?  The institutional setting 
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK TURKEY EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY Office of the Commercial Counsellor.
Progress Report on “Nurturing an Integrated Logistics and Transportation System for the APEC Economies”
Thailand Focus Royal Thai Embassy Buenos Aires. Basic Data.
Trends and Evolution of Trade Patterns in East Asia Mona Haddad Regional Trade Coordinator East Asia Region, World Bank.
Khemaphan Hoontrakul Phanomkwan Devahastin European Free Trade Association (EFTA)
How can trade contribute to growth and jobs? The role of EU trade policy Signe Ratso Director Directorate General of Trade European Commission.
Free Trade Agreements: Helping U.S. Businesses Export.
U.S. - China Statistics Some Observations Dr. Andrew L. H. Parkes “Business Economics II” 卜安吉.
1 Korea’s FTA strategies & Effects of Korea-EU FTA.
General orientation of international economic integration
October 11, 2007 From NAFTA to an Integrated North American Steel Market Rafael Rubio NASPD Fall Conference Cancun, Mexico October 11, 2007.
Country Report on Presented by: Mr. Thol Nara
ECIPE PRESENTATION » Natalia Macyra Trade Policy Analyst, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) Implications of the Transatlantic.
ECO-PIDE Study on Regional Trading Patterns Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
Korea’s FTA Policy & Economic Relations with Latin America July 19, 2005 Korea Institute for International Economic Policy Won-Ho Kim,
Japan’s FTAs/EPAs with APEC Economies Nobuhiko Sasaki Deputy Director-General APEC Senior Official METI Japan March 2006.
0 0 Korea ’ s FTA Policy and its Perspectives 27 September 2006 Heungchong Kim Head, European Studies Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
Explaining China's Evolving Trade Structure Group2 Ho Hsia, Wen-Yun Tu, Chih-Mei Shen.
ECONOMIC RELATIONS By: Nana Yuliana Head of Economic Affairs The Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia in Bangkok.
Economic Impacts of the KORUS-FTA Progressive Caucus Briefing Robert E. Scott, Ph.D. Economic Policy Institute February 23, 2011.
SIFA Ambassador’s Talk : 14:00-16:00, 19 June 2009 The Overview of ASEAN-Republic of Korea Partnership and Future Relations Partnership for Real, Friendship.
Japan-EU EPA Negotiation: Lessons from EU-South Korea FTA EU Institute in Japan, Kansai Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University Dr. Prof. YOSHII.
1 European Union – Korea Free Trade Agreement Sustainability Impact Assessment: Phase One Public Presentation November 30,
New Global Economic Powers and the Environment Dr. Peter Bosshard Policy Director, International Rivers Beijing, April 18, 2011.
1 The European Union Trade Policy The European Union Trade Policy May 2009.
CHILEAN SCENARIO ON FREE TRADE OR ASSOCIATION AGREEMENTS 1.FTA CURRENTLY IN EFFECT: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (negotiations began in The FTA became.
The Setting: Economic. Mythbusters Trivia China’s currency is the…? a) Yen b) Renminbi c) Yuan d) Both b and c.
Özgür ERKER Assistant General Manager Treasury and Financial Institutions Division 30 June 2012.
South Africa’s Trade Relations: EU, IBSA and BRICS Presented to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry By Xavier Carim, DDG International.
Canada India Trade ASHNEET, ANEL, MONA, SAAD & SAAD.
Canada-United States Transportation Border Working Group, October 28, 2010 The Canada-US Trade and Investment Relationship.
“ECONOMIC REVIEW AND TURKEY’S TRADE WITH FINLAND” Embassy of Turkey, Office of the Commercial Counsellor
Mega FTA in East Asia for Regional Economic Integration: RCEP and TPP
Trade, Growth and Development 1 February 2012 Tailoring trade and investment policy for those countries most in need.
The Effect of FTAs on Korean Trade Remedy System and Its Future Direction The Effect of FTAs on Korean Trade Remedy System and Its Future Direction
U.S. - China Statistics Some Observations Dr. Andrew L. H. Parkes “Business Economics II” 卜安吉.
International Trade Dr. David J. Molina Economics 4850/5850.
The Changing Landscape of Trade Negotiations Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan For presentation at 2015 Seoul Conference.
United Nations University - Comparative Regional Integration Studies UNU/CRIS 1The United Nations University on Comparative Regional Integration Studies.
GLOBAL SCENARIO AND ECONOMIC OUTLOOK FOR INDIA Dr. SK LAROIYA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS HANSRAJ COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI.
COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE CORPORATE COMPETITIVENESS IN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (FTA) ERA. AJBM 31 st MEETING BANGKOK, THAILAND, NOVEMBER 24, 2005.
Canada India Trade ASHNEET, ANEL, MONA, SAAD & SAAD.
Ing. Petr Kulovaný Head of the Unit of Africa, Asia and Australia Trade and Economic Relations Between the Czech Republic and the Republic of Korea 11.
EU-Indonesia Trade Cooperation Facility Module 2: EU as a negotiating partner Trends of EC trade negotiations 29 September
Economic Cooperation between Taiwan and the Philippines – State of Play and Prospects The 22nd Joint Meeting of Chinese-Philippine & Philippine-Chinese.
ECONOMIC AND TRADE RELATIONS BULGARIA - KOREA Korea - Bulgaria forum 26 November 2008 Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Oleksandr V. Kubatko Sumy State University Chisinau, Moldova December 2015 DCFTA implementation in Ukraine: main opportunities and challenges.
The South African Institute of International Affairs “South Africa’s window on the world” SOUTH AFRICA’s FREE TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AGENDA Development Through.
Korea-EU FTA - Implications for Global Businesses - - Implications for Global Businesses Korea-EU FTA - Implications for Global Businesses - -
Two Ways forward – a crossroad in the global economy -
AN INSTITUTION DEDICATED TO TURKEY’S DEVELOPMENT … THE ISTANBUL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE THE ISTANBUL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
China Trade Lei Jia.
Research Center For China-EU Economic Cooperation (CCEEC), UIBE
European Union - China Relation & Coorporation
Impacts of Oil Price Changes Korea Development Institute
ALMA Business Plan Overview
Bilateral FTA between Korea and Australia: from Korean Perspective
Cross-National Cooperation and Agreements
Cross-National Cooperation and Agreements
Undersecretariat for Foreign Trade April 1st, 2019
Presentation transcript:

0 0 Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations in the Context of a Korea-EU FTA 3 May 2007 Heungchong KIM Head, European Studies Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

1 1 Table of Contents I. Korea in the First-round FTA Partner of EU II. Korea’s FTA Policy III. Current Status of Korea-EU Economic Relations IV. Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations V. Korea-EU FTA: a feasibility VI. Korea-EU FTA: current situation and prospects VII. Future Prospects of Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations

2 2 I. Korea in the First-round FTA Partner of EU  Key Economic Criteria of new FTA partners 1.Market potentials in terms of economic size and growth 2.The level of protection against EU export interests 3.The progress of their negotiations with EU competitors 4.The types of FTAs that the potential partners pursued : high-level and comprehensive. Based on these criteria, ASEAN, Korea and Mercosur are chosen in the first round of the FTA negotiations, India, Russia and GCC emerged to be in the second wave.

3 3 II. Korea ’ s FTA Policy  Why does Korea pursue FTAs now?  Korea: strongly supported multilateral trade negotiations as it is one of the greatest beneficiaries of the GATT/WTO – heavily dependent on foreign markets, but just ignored FTAs  Regionalism revived and making fortress in foreign markets, so urgent need to change its trade policy to take new markets and not to lose existing ones.  Emerging China and Korea’s choice  A sense of urgency = “Already late, but don’t be too late.”  Basic Strategy of Korea’s FTAs  Should take a multi-track pursuit with a high-level and comprehensive  Forming FTA networks with giant economies and emerging markets  FTAs supporting MTN

4 4 II. Korea ’ s FTA Policy  Why does a high-level and comprehensive FTA?  To create an FTA harmonizing worldwide trade and investment liberalization, why?  FTA as a domestic negotiation – only high-level and comprehensive FTA induce domestic reform and active remedy support for the groups - contribution to a worldwide liberalization in WTO

5 5 I. Korea ’ s FTA Policy Entry into force ChileProved successful through mutual benefits SingaporeEntered into force on 2 nd March 2006 EFTAEntered into force on 1 st September 2006 Under Negotiation U.S. Negotiations completed in 1 April 2007 Canada Negotiations since July 2005 Mexico Negotiations since February 2006 – stalled, but expected to begin soon India Negotiations since March 2006 ASEAN Finished commodities sector, and negotiations on services Japan Stalled (differences over agricultural products) Joint StudyMERCOSURUnder way Joint StudyChina At the academic, industry and governmental level (until the end of 2007)

6 6 II. Korea ’ s FTA Policy  Korea’s FTA Networks in the Future  FTA Networks with more than 50 countries in the World including….. - Small but strong countries such as Chile, Singapore, EFTA and Canada - Giant economies of ASEAN, US, EU, Japan and China - Emerging Markets of India, Mexico, MERCOSUR and Russia

7 7 III. Current Status of Korea-EU Economic Relations  Achievements in Trade  Official diplomatic relations in 1963 => 43 year “ celebration ” of diplomatic relations; great achievements in trade and investment  Korea ’ s exports to the EU increased by 566 times in 1971 to 2005; Korea ’ s imports from the EU also increased 117 times over the same period.  In 2006, Korea's exports to the EU amounted to $49.2 billion, while its imports totaled $30.2 billion, making the total volume of its trade $79.4 billion. This is composed of nearly 12.5% of Korea ’ s total trade volume in 2006.

8 8 III. Current Status of Korea-EU Economic Relations  Achievements in Trade  As of 2006, the EU was Korea ’ s second biggest exporting partner next to China and ahead of the U.S. It is also the second biggest trading partner next to China, and ahead of Japan and the U.S.  Korea is the 8 th trading country for the EU. -U.S., China, Switzerland, Russia, Japan, Norway, and Turkey stood ahead of Korea -Korea is the biggest country of MFN status except giant economies of the US, China and Japan

9 9 III. Current Status of Korea-EU Economic Relations  Achievements in Investment  Before 1990: Japan was the largest investor to Korea – almost half of total investment record since 1962, much ahead of the U.S.(28.5%) and EU(12.5%)  Since 1991, the EU and US spurred up to the biggest investors in Korea  As of 2006, the EU stood as the largest investor in Korea with a registered investment stock of US$40.5bn in 2006; 31.9% of foreign capital in Korea  Korea ’ s ODI to the EU totalled US$9.4bn or 13.6% of Korea ’ s total ODI – not so conspicuous (compared with some 24% to the US or China), but much developed mainly to the CEECs -more than 60% of Korea ’ s ODI to the EU goes to new member states recently

10 III. Current Status of Korea-EU Economic Relations  Recent Developments in the Relations  EU ’ s strategic paper on Korea in 1993 and the Asia Strategy initiative in 1994  The Korea-EU Framework Agreement for Trade and Cooperation established in 1996 between the two  The Joint Committee Meeting has been taken place since , 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006  Big trade issues including shipbuilding, trade remedy and others have settled down, but cosmetics, SPS, IPRs and other issues including NTB… still remaining

11 III. Current Status of Korea-EU Economic Relations  Korea-EU Relations Revisited  Trade imbalance – more than $19 billion trade surplus of Korea  Trade potentiality fully developed? - trade in goods and services  Problems in market access and investment issues  Strategic importance of the EU among the world vs. strategic importance of Korea among Asian countries  Asked a critical moment in economic relations

12 IV. Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations

13 IV. Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations To BulgariaTo the World Rank HS Code No. Description Amounts HS Code No. 187 Vehicles other than railway or tramway rolling-stock 109, Electrical Machinery and Equipment30, Nuclear reactors, boilers, machinery and mechanical appliances 18, Plastics and articles thereof 9,24089** 554* Man-made filaments3,363 27** 690 Optical, photographic, measuring, checking, cinematographic, surgical, medical instruments and apparatus 1, * Rubber and articles thereof1, * Man-made Staple Fibers759 72** 973 Articles of Iron or Steel706 29** 1030* Pharmaceutical Products Korea’s Main Exports to Bulgaria by HS description (2006) (Unit: thousand US$)

14 IV. Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations Korea’s Main Exports to Bulgaria by HS description (2006) (Unit: thousand US$) Note: ** denotes the commodities that turn up on the list of Korea’s ten main exports to the world but is excluded in the list of Korea’s top ten exports to Bulgaria. No. 89, 27, 72 and 29 indicate (Ships, boats and floating structures), (Mineral fuels and oils, and products of their distillation), (iron and steel), and (Organic chemicals), respectively. Source: KOTIS

15 IV. Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations Korea’s Main Imports from Bulgaria by HS description (2006) (Unit: thousand US$) From BulgariaFrom the World RankHS Code No.Description AmountsHS Code No. 174 Copper and articles thereof 13,14127** 289* Ships, boats and floating structures 12, Electrical machinery and equipment 5, * Aluminium and articles thereof 4,82672** 516* Preparations of meat, of fish, of crustaceans. Other aquatic invertebrates 4, * Cereals 3,48429** 790 Optical, photographic, measuring, checking, cinematographic, surgical, medical instruments and apparatus 2,68526** 884 Nuclear reactors, boilers, machinery and mechanical appliances 2, * Articles of Apparel and clothing accessories, not knitted or crocheted 1, * Inorganic chemicals, compounds of precious metals 97787**

16 IV. Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations Korea’s Main Imports from Bulgaria by HS description (2006) (Unit: thousand US$) Note: ** denotes the commodities included in the list of Korea’s ten main imports from the world but excluded from the list of Korea’s top ten imports from Bulgaria. These are 27 (mineral fuels and oils, and products of their distillation) 72 (Iron and steel), 29 (Organic chemicals), 26 (Ores, slag and ash), and 87 (Vehicles other than railway or tramway rolling-stock, and parts thereof). Source: KOTIS

17 V. Korea-EU FTA: a feasibility  Strategic Complementarities  Placed multilateralism first on the table but changing the mood from both sides -EU: a) growing concern about trade diversion in the Korean market caused by its active engagement in RTA (e.g. KORUS FTA) b) searching for momentum to improve market access and to solve problems arising from trade deficit c) active engagement of the EU in dynamic East Asia -Korea: a) why not the EU? from its FTA policy b) good chance to expand trade with a giant economy and create additional wealth c) good chance to make a stepping stone in accelerating the ongoing economic reform and upgrading the economic and social systems once again

18 V. Korea-EU FTA: a feasibility  Mutual Benefits Maximized*  Korea would benefit. - GDP increase by 2.02% and 3.08% GDP per capita increase by 2.16% and 2.96% - imports and exports increase by US$ 8.2 billion and 11 billion : in the improvement of Korea’s trade balance with the EU (for manufacturing goods) by US$2.9 billion - Domestic employment rises by 597,000 - FDI increase from 42 to 70% compared to the pre-FTA levels * KIEP(2005 and 2006)

19  EU would benefit, too. -In the agricultural sector, exports may increase (mainly in processed foods, e.g. dairy products and wine). -In the service sector, the EU shares estimated to substantially increase in telecommunication & broadcasting, legal, finance & insurance, and transportation & storage - The EU may benefit from a growing transparency in the Korean economy with the full adoption of a global standard V. Korea-EU FTA: a feasibility

20 VI. Korea-EU FTA: current situation and prospects  Preliminary Talks finished and official announcement made  Feasibility studies of a Korea-EU FTA finished by both sides - no need for further joint studies on the feasibility of a Korea-EU FTA  The Joint Committee meeting in June 2006 finished  Preliminary talks on a Korea-EU FTA taken place in July and September in 2006  Public hearing from the Korean side in November, 2006  Council of the EU approved the start of negotiation in April, 2007  The Korean Ministers’ meeting decided to start the negotiation in April, 2007.

21 VI. Korea-EU FTA: current situation and prospects  Factors to be Considered  Existence of strong will to evolve preliminary talks to a higher level  Development of negotiations in DDA  Further Development of the KORUS FTA  Political sensitivity in both economies  Interest groups on both sides  Time schedule  Negotiation will start next week in Seoul  4 or 6 times negotiations by the end of this year  Hope to finish by the first half of next year

22 VII. Future prospects of Korea-Bulgaria Economic Relations  Korea-Bulgaria Relations will be Strengthened through a Comprehensive Korea-EU FTA  Korea-EU FTA will provide critical momentum in the bilateral relations of Korea and Bulgaria - Growing Bulgaria and Korea’s presence on the other side - Bulgaria: the first FTA with East Asian countries - Korea: market access  Can provide more active roles in a inter-regional and multilateral arena - In the ASEM member states, Korea can be a channel for dialogue between the two regions. - In the WTO/DDA and UN, Bulgaria and Korea can harmonize a mutually interested agenda.

23 Thank you