Patrizia Rossi for the RICH Collaboration Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati- INFN (Italy) Physics motivations Status of the project Future Plans CLAS12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
Advertisements

1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
Barrel PID upgrade K. Inami (Nagoya-u) and PID group - R&D status - TOP counter - iTOP - Focusing DIRC - To do, cost estimation.
1 A DIRC for GlueX Paul Mueller Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee, Knoxville BaBar DIRC Collaboration for the GlueX.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute The HERA-B RICH counter.
CLAS12 – RICH PARAMETERDESIGN VALUE Momentum range3-8 GeV/c  /K rejection factor Not less than 500  /p rejection factor Not less than 100 Angular coverage5.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a workable solution 4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon.
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana March 17, 2006 Super B Workshop, Frascati Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Aerogel RICH and TOP: summary.
Position Sensitive SiPMs for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters C.Woody BNL January 17, 2012.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
May 31, 2008 SuperB PID sessionMarko Starič, Ljubljana Marko Starič J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Report on hardware tests and MC studies in Ljubljana.
Performance of the PANDA Barrel DIRC Prototype 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt 2 Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Marko Zühlsdorf.
Contalbrigo Marco INFN Ferrara Rich Project Review, 5 th September 2013.
Status of Aerogel detector for high pT upgrade at PHENIX Budget from US-J project for next two years : (1) 400 liters of Aerogel (2) 600 photomultiplier.
EIC Detector – JLab – 04/June/2010 Cisbani / HERMES RICH 1 HERMES: Forward RICH Detector Evaristo Cisbani / INFN-Rome Sanità Group Most of the slides from.
CLAS12 – RICH PARAMETERDESIGN VALUE Momentum range3-8 GeV/c  /K rejection factor Not less than 500  /p rejection factor Not less than 100 Angular coverage5.
A RICH with Aerogel for a hadron machine On behalf of the LHCb RICH group Some results and considerations on: Cerenkov angle resolution from aerogel Index.
Cherenkov Counters for SoLID Z.-E. Meziani on behalf of Simona Malace & Haiyan Gao (Duke University) Eric Fuchey (Temple University) SoLID Dry Run Review,
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
A RICH detector for CLAS12 CLAS12 European Workshop February 25-28, Genova, Italy Evaristo Cisbani INFN Rome and ISS Patrizia Rossi INFN- Laboratori.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
The RICH prototype V. Lucherini, M. Mirazita, S. Pereira, D. Orecchini, A. Orlandi, A. Viticchie’ - INFN Frascati L. Barion, M. Contalbrigo, R. Malaguti,
CLAS12 Rich Imaging Cherenkov Counter
Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany general overview focus on ring radius/ Cherenkov angle.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
Simulations of Light Collection Efficiency (JLab Hall C 12 GeV Kaon Aerogel Detector) Laura Rothgeb Nuclear Physics Group Catholic University of America.
RICH detector for CLAS12 CLAS12 Technical Workshop P. Rossi Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - INFN.
RICH simulation for CLAS12 Contalbrigo Marco INFN Ferrara Luciano Pappalardo INFN Ferrara Hall B Central Detector Forward Detector M. Contalbrigo1 JLAB12.
RICH Simulation in LHCb LHC Detector Simulation Workshop S.Easo, RAL, On behalf of LHCb–RICH group.
TMD flavor decomposition at CLAS12 Patrizia Rossi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN  Introduction  Spin-orbit correlations in kaon production.
Aerogel Cherenkov Counters for the ALICE Detector G. Paić Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM For the ALICE VHMPID group.
Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.
RICH simulation for CLAS12 Contalbrigo Marco INFN Ferrara Luciano Pappalardo INFN Ferrara Hall B Central Detector Forward Detector M. Contalbrigo1JLAB12.
Contalbrigo Marco INFN Ferrara 14 th ICATPP Conference, 25 th September 2013.
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
Tests of a proximity focusing RICH with aerogel as radiator and flat panel PMT (Hamamatsu H8500) as photon detector Rok Pestotnik Jožef Stefan Institute,
TORCH IOP meeting Manchester March 31, 2015 TORCH Maarten van Dijk On behalf of the TORCH collaboration (CERN, University of Oxford,
Aerogel RICH & TOP counter for super KEKB Y.Mazuka Nagoya University June 14-16, 2006 The 3 rd SuperB workshop at SLAC.
TORCH – a Cherenkov based Time-of- Flight Detector Euan N. Cowie on behalf of the TORCH collaboration E N Cowie - TORCH - TIPP June 2014.
RICH studies for CLAS12 L. Pappalardo1 Contalbrigo Marco Luciano Pappalardo INFN Ferrara CLAS12 RICH Meeting – JLab 21/6/2011.
Matthias Hoek Institut für Kernphysik Next Generation Cherenkov Counters* *For Accelerator Experiments 52. International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics.
Study of Cherenkov detectors for high momentum charged particle identification in ALICE experiment at LHC Guy Paic Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM.
Struttura del nucleone: TMD Il RICH e HD-Ice per CLAS12 Marco Mirazita (LNF)
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors for LHCb Antonis Papanestis CCLRC – RAL On behalf of the LHCb RICH group.
PhD thesis: Simulation & Reconstruction for the PANDA Barrel DIRC Official name: Open charm analysis tools Supervisor: Prof. Klaus Peters Maria Patsyuk.
Focusing Aerogel RICH Optimization A.Yu.Barnyakov, M.Yu.Barnyakov, V.S.Bobrovnikov, A.R.Buzykaev, V.V.Gulevich, S.A.Kononov, E.A.Kravchenko, A.P.Onuchin.
CLAS12 – RICH RICH - TECHNICAL PARAMETERS PARAMETER DESIGN VALUE
Status of the PandaRoot simulation of the Forward RICH
The focusing mirror system
E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia
  at Super tau-charm
Next-DIS Program Innovative PID solutions based on Cherenkov detectors
Contalbrigo Marco INFN Ferrara RICH 2016, September 9th 2016, Bled
Particle Identification in LHCb
RICH detector for CLASS12
RICH simulation for CLAS12
Upgrade magnets and power supplies
Multianode Photo Multipliers for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors
Software Development for the PANDA Barrel DIRC
The focusing mirror system
Upgrade magnets and power supplies
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
RICH simulation for CLAS12
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
Presentation transcript:

Patrizia Rossi for the RICH Collaboration Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati- INFN (Italy) Physics motivations Status of the project Future Plans CLAS12 2nd European Workshop - March 7-11, Paris, France

CLAS12 Physics Program Hadron PID to achieve flavor tagging Hadron PID to strongly constrain the models Hadron PID to access rare processes Study of the internal nucleon dynamics: TMD distribution and fragmentation functions & GPDs Quark hadronization in the nuclear medium Spectroscopy This program requires good identification of  and K over the full kinematical range accessible with CLAS12 Particle identification is an essential part of any experiment, and has contributed substantially to our present understanding of elementary particles and their interaction

The power of a good PID Need to distinguish B d   from other similar topology 2-body decays and to distinguish B from anti-B using K tag. LHCb ( MC prediction) NO RICH With RICH

CLAS12 PID RICH SIDIS kinematics full pion / kaon / proton separation over whole accessible momentum range of 2 – 8 GeV for SIDIS exp.  /K separation of GeV/c for a rejection factor ~1000 GeV/c  /K  /p K/p e/  HTCC TOF HTCC EC/PCAL RICH LTCC RICH LTCC RICH LTCC RICH

Concept of a RICH for CLAS12 Projective geometry:  6 radial sectors  1.2 m gap  ~ 3 m radius 25 o FTOF wall DC3 TORUS 538 cm 124 cm B ~ 40 G

RADIATOR RIC 8 mrad 2 mrad Aerogel mandatory to separate hadrons in the 2-8 GeV/c momentum range  collection of visible Cherenkov light  use of PMTs Freon+UV-light detection does not provide enough discrimination power in the 2- 8 GeV/c momentum range RICH RICH for CLAS12

RIC  Large Detector area (several m 2 )  Operation in magnetic field & with high intensity e - beam Challenging project: Innovative new technologies  Radiator Material  Photo-detectors  Electronics RIC ~ 6 m 2 entrance window 1 m depth From a proximity focusing to an “hybrid” RICH

CC CKCK   RICH for CLAS12: status and plans MC Simulation for basic parameters studies ✔ (stand-alone GEANT-3 based code) - Aerogel refractive index and thickness - Photon detector pixel size - Gap dimension Fix the pixel size of PMTs < 1cm

RICH for CLAS12: status and plans MC Simulation with RICH geometry included into the CLAS12 GEMC package (Geant4/C++ based code) - focussing mirrors option studies in progress - Development of the reconstruction tracking algorithm of charged particles in progress Front-end & Readout Electonics - Available readout system to be customized for CLAS12 - Test of the modified system in CLAS12 conditions - Production of the needed boards - Quality checks/characterization Preparation of a Conceptual Design Report by this summer MC Simulation for basic parameters studies ✔ (stand-alone GEANT-3 based code) - Aerogel refractive index and thickness - Photon detector pixel size - Gap dimension Validation of simulations and check performances: RICH prototype construction - Procurements of parts done ✔ - Tests of the radiators and the photo-detectors at Frascati – setup installation started - Prototype beam tests Committed by UTFSM (Chile)

Transparent Silica Aerogel with High n New production technique invented for high refractive index greater than 1.05 –Optical quality degraded if sample with n>1.05 is produced in a conventional method –“Pinhole drying (PD)” method artificially shrinks alcogel to obtain high index –Transparency doubled for n>1.05 aerogel with this new method Makoto Tabata, Ichiro Adachi et al. for Belle II aerogel RICH group Some new developments also in Novosibirsk First use of high refractive index aerogel (n=1.13) in particle physics experiment [A.Yu.Barnyakov et.al., Nucl.Instr. and Meth. A 598 (2009) 163]

GEMC Simulations GEANT4 toolkit: Toward a complete simulation: realistic geometry / detailed optic effects track multiplicity / background full Cherenkov ring simulation chain Ongoing activities: Improve simulation Reduce costs  mirrors

The focusing Mirror System Goals: instrument only forward region reduce active area (~1 m 2 /sect) minimize interference with TOF system allow larger aerogel thickness (focalization) Low material budget Direct & reflected photons

The focusing Mirror System Preliminary studies with mirrors (to reduce instrumented area): - focalization capabilities shown - ring patterns for positive and negative mesons at different angles and momenta reconstructed spherical (elliptical) mirror within gap volume for backward refl. plane mirror just beyond radiator for forward reflections Different scenarios (refractive index, radiator thickness, mirror geometry) are being explored TOF Reflecting inside direct & reflected Low material budget Minimize detector area (~1 m 2 /sector) interference with FTOF

The reconstruction algorithm: Direct Ray Tracing (DRT) For each track, t, and particle hypothesis, h, use direct ray tracing for a large number of generated photons to determine the hit probability for each PMT The measured hit pattern is compared to the hit probability densities for the different hypotheses by a likelihood function. Hypothesis that maximizes is assumed to be true is the probability of a hit given the kinematics of track t and hypothesis h is the hit pattern from data = 1 if the ith PMT is hit = 0 if the ith PMT is not hit is the probability of no hit is the total number of expected PMT hits is a background term ANL+INFN/FE

Direct ring example Hit prob > trials per event Aerogel: - n= thickness increasing with radius: 2 cm up to 13 deg 4 cm deg 6 cm deg 8 cm deg 10 cm > 20 deg Mirror: 14 o -25 o PMTs: UBA M. Contalbrigo INFN/FE P PMT (i)

Average N p.e. N p.e. > 5 for reflected rings N p.e.> 12 for direct rings ++ -- 5°

LH  -LH K,p ++ -- Contamination as expected from the GEANT3 simulation! Very promising results also for the reflected events Contamination as expected from the GEANT3 simulation! Very promising results also for the reflected events 5°

Average N p.e. Mirror 14 o -25 o Mirror o Better for negative hadrons ++ -- ++ --

LH  -LH K,p Mirror o Mirror o Better for negative hadrons ++ -- ++ --

Average N p.e. Mirror up to 35 o : Viable configuration Mirror up to 35 o : Viable configuration ++ -- Mirror 14°-25°

Average N p.e. - Mirror 14 o -25 o n=1.06 Aer. thick cm n=1.03 Aer. thick cm n=1.03 gives less photons regardless the increase thickness due to same assumed transmission length n=1.03 gives less photons regardless the increase thickness due to same assumed transmission length ++ -- ++ --

LH p -LH K,p - Mirror 14 o -25 o n=1.03 in principle good due to the larger Cherenkov angle separation n=1.06 Aer. thick cm n=1.03 Aer. thick cm ++ -- ++ --

n=1.06 better for patter recognition in the presence of backgrouns n=1.06 better for patter recognition in the presence of backgrouns Average N p.e. o ++ -- n=1.06

Average N p.e. o ++ --

Photo-detectors  Multi-anode PMTs  SiPM visible lightcompactsingle photon Small pad size REQUESTS: MA-PMTDimentional outline (mm 3 ) Effective area (mm 2 )Pixel size (mm 2 ) Comment R760026x26x2818x184.5x4.5 (4x4)Optimized for single photon Recommended by Hamam Low packing factor H8500-C52x52x2849x495.8x5.8 (8x8)Excellent packing factor Not optimized for single photon Not recommended by H. H8500-C-03UV glass window R M1625x25x2820x204.8x4.8 (4x4)Optimized for single photon High packing factor Sensitive to B R M16Super bialkali R x232.8x2.8 (8x8)Optimized for single photon High packing factor Insensitive to B Available only 8x8 - Preliminary tests results with H8500 and R7600 at Glasgow U. - R8900 will be tested soon

Front-end & Readout Electronics Independent channels (unique!) with selectable gain for non-uniformity compensation Smart (reconfigurable) self- triggering by active FPGA (trigger topology scheme) Up to 4096 channels in compact form factor Fast Readout Compact (high density of the front end) Front-end & readout board developed by INFN-Genova group (front- end chip MAROC from IN2P3-Orsay) A.G. Argentieri et al. NIM A 617 (2010) 348–350

Players in the Game INSTITUTIONSResearchers ARGONNE NL3 INFN Bari, Ferrara, Genova, Frascati, Roma/ISS 13 GLASGOW U.2 JLAB2 U. CONN3 UTFSM (Chile)3 NEW COLLABORATORS, CONTRIBUTIONS ($, €..), MANPOWER, ARE VERY WELCOME TO JOIN THIS EXCTING PROJECT

Conclusions Good hadron identification is required for studies of the internal nucleon dynamics RICH technique is the clear choice when hadron identification is required at high momenta Preliminary studies show that aerogel plus visible light detection with MA-PMT can match the requirements for a RICH for CLAS12. Work is in progress to: - Improve simulation and reconstruction algorithm - Define a CDR by this summer - validate simulations and check performances by testing components and building a prototype Initial R&D funding available from INFN and ANL

Error on  Error on the particle velocity  measured with a RICH Depends on :  Number of detected photons  Error on the Cherenkov angle of the emitted photons  Emission point uncertainty Chromatic error Dispersion : 1  = n( ) cos  Photon impact point resolution (~photon detector granularity)

RICH Simulations Main output parameter:  k  = mean error on Cherenkov angle reconstruction of k and   K-  = (  K +   )/2 CC CKCK    contamination 1 ‰  Detection efficiency = 80% 4  97% 5  ~100% 6 

Hybrid ring example Hit prob Hit prob > trials per point Aerogel: - n= thick. increasing with radius: cm Mirror: o PMTs: UBA

Wrong ID example Hit prob Hit prob > trials per point Aerogel: - n= thickness increasing with radius: cm Mirror: 14 o -25 o PMTs: UBA

MA-PMTsAdvantages: Uses known photomultiplier technology High quantum efficiency photocathodesare now available – Super-bialkali (typ. QE ~35%) – Ultra-bialkali (typ. QE ~43%) Good effective area -- ~80-85% Good packing density -- square geometry Good high current operationDisadvantages: Cost per channel – $ per pixel – significantly more expensive per area than single anode tube Quite Large Pixel-to-Pixel Gain Variation Pixel-to-Pixel Crosstalk (~2-5%)