One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Plan Stage Develop Improvement Plan.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © DE-PBS Key Features Evaluation: Matching Philosophy & Measurement Sarah K. Hearn, M.Ed., Delaware Positive.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Developing a literacy implementation strategy
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
“Every Child a Graduate” Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction SPECIAL EDCATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Life-long learning and continuous.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Gather Stage Get Ready.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Calhoun ISD Facilitated School Improvement Planning October 1, 2012 Beth Brophy and Mitch Fowler DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Ranada Smith Lamar University Conroe ISD Technology Plan
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Evaluate the Plan.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Service Quality
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Our School’s Inclusive Action Plan
Presentation transcript:

One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan

Introduction Do Implement Monitor Evaluate

Activity: School Improvement on the Fly gTime/PlanningTime.html

Implementation Fidelity Impact Do Vocabulary

Implement Do Implement Monitor Evaluate

The Big Picture

Nothing to it but to do it? Implementation Process

Readiness to Implement  Have a shared vision?  Understand the need?  Concerns have been addressed?  Staff and administrators are able to integrate this new work with existing work?

Implementation Guide Implementation Guide Essential to implementation Non-negotiableNon-negotiable Highest level of fidelity May vary from gold standard Still true to the research Not consistent with research Will not lead to desired results Key Feature

Sample Strategy Implementation Guide

Strategy: What teachers do in the classroom with the students in the presence of content – Teachers will…. – Math teachers will…. – ELA teachers will… MDE Definition of Strategy

Activity: What needs to be done so that staff or teams – are ready to implement the strategy – have a plan for implementation of the strategy – have a plan to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the strategy and the impact on student achievement MDE Definition of Activity

Matrix 1 Tool

How will we ensure readiness for implementation? How will we ensure that staff and administrators have the knowledge and skills to implement? Professional development around strategy Purchase materials -Planning for implementation – Identify schedule for strategy use, personnel, mechanism for monitoring, rollout, etc. -Communication vehicles Activities: Getting Ready to Implement

How will we ensure successful opportunity for implementation of the strategy? Communication – to whom? How? Ongoing coaching? Observations? Instructional technology utilized?* Activities to support at-risk students (For Title One students)* Parent Involvement has been planned Activities: Implement

How will we ensure the strategy is implemented with fidelity? How will you monitor the program’s impact on student achievement? Walkthroughs PLC/CASL meetings Documentation of effective implementation Documentation of impact (Gather achievement data) Demonstration classrooms or lesson study, videos, self assessments Activities: Monitor Fidelity of Implementation

Monitoring of Activity Implementation

Monitor Do Implement Monitor Evaluate

The Big Picture

Monitoring Adults are implementing the strategy with fidelity Impact implementation is having on students

Leadership and Learning Center 2010 Implementation and Impact

Monitoring Implementation Demographics Student Outcomes Perceptions School Processes Meeting schedules Meeting minutes Ongoing Student Data Walkthrough data

Collected on adult actions or behaviors Based on teacher actions related to set standards – Implementation Guide to define – What does the strategy look like and sound like if implemented fully? Quantifiable Implementation Data

How will we know the strategy is implemented as intended? Have we clearly defined expected adult actions? How well have we communicate these expectations? What data will we collect? – Self-collection – Peer collection – Leader collection Adult Actions

Collected on student learning related to a specific outcome or target A proficiency level should be set based on pre-determined criteria – Examples: 70% is considered proficient 4 out of 6 on rubric Quantifiable Impact Data

How will we know the strategy is impacting what students learn? Have we clearly defined learning expectations? What data will we collect? – Formative – Interim – Summative Student Learning

1.Implementation Guide Sample: Close and Critical Reading 2.Monitoring of Activity Implementation 3.Matrix 1Tool 4.Monitoring of Classroom Strategy Implementation Tools to support Successful Implementation

Monitoring of Classroom Strategy Implementation

What mechanism will we use to determine the interaction between the data collected on adult actions (Implementation data) and student learning (Impact data)? – Format – Frequency – Adjustments Relationship between implementation and impact data

Hey, why did we do that Flipped Activity?

Type of Data: Implementation (Adult Data) versus Impact (Student Data) Fidelity Rate: The percentage of adults implementing the strategy the way it was defined. Data Narrative: A non-judgemental, factual statement about the data. Causal Factors: Factors that led to the fidelity or proficiency rate. Action: The steps that will be taken to improve the fidelity or proficiency rate. Flipped Activity

Strategy Fidelity Rate Percent Proficient Share out

Close and Critical Reading Fidelity Rate 50% Percent Proficient 38% Example Shared:

Fidelity Rate compared to Percent Proficient 50% Fidelity Rate 38% Proficient Fidelity Rate < 80%

Fidelity Rate compared to Percent Proficient 50% Fidelity Rate Two staff members did not received adequate training Three staff members indicated that they forgot to record their strategies. 38% Proficient Fidelity Rate < 80%

We will have a follow up training after school on the 28th from 2:30 - 4:00. All are invited. All staff members have received the link to the walkthrough tool again and deadlines have been reiterated. FOCUS ON Implementation Actions Fidelity Rate < 80%

Close and Critical Reading Fidelity Rate 91% Percent Proficient 73% Another Example :

Fidelity Rate compared to Percent Proficient 91% Fidelity Rate 73% Proficient Fidelity Rate > 80%

Fidelity Rate compared to Percent Proficient 91% Fidelity Rate Teacher who did not implement had a misunderstanding of how to model and scaffold learning for all students. 72% Proficient 20% of students in this grade are not reading at or above grade level. Fidelity Rate > 80%

FOCUS ON actions for both Implementation and Impact Observe Peers Embed Coaching Support with focus on modeling for two weeks. Pull intervention group to support students below grade level. Re-test students using appropriate grade level text. Fidelity Rate < 80%

You decide: SI Plan is a compliance document or SI Plan is a blueprint for increasing student learning in the classroom A SI blueprint will include active participation by staff, ongoing data collection and analysis and discussions around causal factors and deliberate actions to increase fidelity and student learning. So, Where do we go from here?

Conclusion Do Implement Monitor Evaluate