Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, 2003-08. All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
School Leadership that Works:
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan Stakeholders Meeting February 26, 2014.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0-
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
EES Student v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Student Edition.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
EES Staff v10.0 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Staff Survey 3-Way.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT v2.2.
Questions to Consider  Why are students leaving our district?  Are we meeting the individual needs of our students?  How can we best serve our students.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. STAFF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1. Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Office of Service Quality
BY: STACEY CLARK, JENNA MORRIS, BRIAN OGBIN, JENNIFER TUPPENY SEA Project.
Learning Resource Team: Aligning Systems To Support All Learners What does this look like in our school? 3/9/20161.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
SACS Governance & Leadership Committee September 26, 2012.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
COLlaboration time survey
Beyond The Bake Sale Basic Ingredients
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEYTM
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 2 The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. The Center for Educational Effectiveness (CEE) is a service, consulting, and research organization dedicated to the mission of partnering with K-12 schools to improve student learning. NOTICE The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. (CEE) makes substantial effort to ensure the accurate scoring, analysis, and reporting of the results of the Educational Effectiveness Survey. However, CEE makes no warranty of any kind with regard to this material, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. CEE shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. Reproduction rights granted for non-commercial use-- including all school and district improvement activities. Published by: The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc nd Ave. NE. Redmond WA Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc Printed in the U.S.A. Contact Information: Phone: Fax:

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 3 Getting the Most from Your EES Student 1.Who took the survey? Familiarize yourself with the demographics. These charts set the stage by explaining who took the survey and their characteristics or contexts – length of service in this building, gender, position, etc. 2.Characteristics of High Performing Schools: This section presents the details on each characteristic that research has determined is present in high performing schools. The details provide both attitudinal and tactical data on specific elements. 3.References: Includes the references used in the development of the survey instrument as well as the resources used to support the application and use of perceptual data in the process of school and district improvement. Finally, don’t forget to start planning for the future - today! Using formative data from the EES only works when you have an intentional, focused process you are following. Longitudinal data, over time, is essential to keep improvement conversations alive and to measure progress toward stated goals. Some questions to keep in mind might include: - What is our plan for sharing this data with leadership, the school improvement team, staff, students and parent community? - What is our plan for interpreting, and creating an action plan based on this data? - What is our 5 year plan for looking at longitudinal progress with perceptual and/or organizational data?

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 4 While most schools focus on the outcomes they are reaching for, truly successful schools focus on organizational effectiveness and the programs and systems that drive and sustain improvement in the outcomes. The Educational Effectiveness Survey (EES), was developed to assist schools in continuous, sustainable improvement by helping schools understand their strengths and challenges in the areas known to impact the effectiveness of a school. While there is no single solution for all schools, research on effective schools has identified common characteristics of high performing schools (Marzano, 2003). Successful schools and schools engaged in improvement focus on these characteristics to create and improve the system(s) that drive the outcomes. To help schools identify and leverage these drivers and focus on what makes a school successful, the EES quantifies these characteristics. This results report contains a summary of the information your student community provided on the EES survey form. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH PERFORMING SCHOOLS: Clear and Shared Focus High Standards and Expectations Effective School Leadership Supportive Learning Environment High Levels of Community and Parent Involvement High Levels of Collaboration and Communication Frequent Monitoring of Teaching and Learning Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Aligned with Standards (Note: Focused Professional Development is one of the Nine Characteristics of High Performing Schools not measured in the EES Student Survey) Using Data to Focus and Accelerate Your School Improvement Planning The school improvement planning and transformation process is supported and driven by both quantitative and qualitative data. Data should be used to inform decisions, set goals, create school improvement plans and measure progress toward stated goals. We are accustomed to looking at the outcomes-- particularly the outcomes that are published in the local newspapers (e.g. “high-stakes” test scores). Truly effective schools realize that these outcomes are influenced and driven by the Mission/Vision, Leadership, and Processes/Programs/Culture in place in their buildings and districts. The relationship between the mission/vision, leadership, and the other characteristics of high performing schools is well discussed in Marzano (2003), Wagner (2002), and Schlechty (2001).

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 5 Characteristics of High Performing Schools For More Information see: Shannon, G.S. & Bylsma, P. (2003). Nine Characteristics of High Performing Schools. A research-based resource foir school leadership teams to assist with the School Improvement Process. Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Olympia, WA. i = implied

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 6 Demographic Charts – Who Took the Survey?

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 7 On the Overall Summary Chart Consider: This is the 10,000 foot view Look at the overall relationship between the characteristics and their bar charts Remember – green is good! The 2 greens (“Almost Always True” and “Often True” are the positive perceptions Ivory (“sometimes true”) is the “land of opportunity” – these people represent the easiest persons to bring to the positive side – give them more information and bring them into the process. If you ignore the ivory – they usually become disconnected and move to the negative Orange and red are the two negative perceptions – often times they reflect “history” – something that happened years ago, or something in a person’s personal life. Don’t spend a lot of time and energy here, it may be out of your ability to influence. Do pay attention to significant amounts of negative! Grey – “No Opinion or N/A”. Ask why? In response to “where should we be?” Ask “where do we want to be?”

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 8 Clear and Shared Focus Are you all on the same train, headed to the same place? Do your decisions and conversations all echo the same vision/mission? You have to have a destination if you are ever going to get there! Clear & Shared Mission/Vision: Everybody knows where they are going and why. The vision is shared, everybody is involved and all understand their roles in achieving the vision. The vision is developed from common beliefs and values, creating a consistent focus.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 9 High Standards and Expectations Evidenced in our behavior – what we say and do conveys our expectations and standards Always apply the building or district context to the question “there are a large number of qualified applicants per opening here.” High Standards and Expectations: Teachers and staff believe all students can learn and that they can teach all students. There is a recognition of barriers for some students to overcome, but the barriers are not insurmountable. Students become engaged in an ambitious and rigorous course of study.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 10 Effective Leadership Leadership keeps you on track Leadership has vision around the corner – they know what is coming and what you need to be prepared for it Leadership sets an example Your school improvement plan must be able to survive leaders coming and leaving your school Effective School Leadership: Effective leadership is required to implement change processes within the school. This leadership takes many forms. Principals often play this role, but so do teachers and other staff, including those in the district office. Effective leaders advocate, nurture, and sustain a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 11 High Levels of Collaboration & Communication Communication is the essential vehicle for effective, sustained change Collaboration is the only way you will get everything done that is being asked and required of you today High Levels of Collaboration and Communication: There is constant collaboration and communication between and among teachers of all grades. Everybody is involved and connected, including parents and members of the community, to solve problems and create solutions.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 12 Parent and Community Involvement Both parent and student involvement and perspective are essential in the improvement process. Both groups need clarity of vision and expectations and to be asked for their support. How will you involve students in the process of accessing and involving their parents? High Levels of Parent and Community Involvement: There is a sense that all educational stakeholders have a responsibility to educate students, not just the teachers and staff in schools. Parents, as well as businesses, social service agencies, and community colleges/universities all play a vital role in this effort. It is essential that parents be informed and involved in decision- making to support their student’s educational experience.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 13 Supportive Learning Environment Do we support our colleagues? Do we encourage one another to continue to grow professionally? Do we have professional conversations with one another? Are we encouraging of parents and students? Is the environment in this school one of learning and high expectations? Supportive Learning Environment: The school has a safe, civil, healthy and intellectually stimulating learning environment. Staff feel supported, respected and valued and students feel respected and connected with the staff, and are engaged in learning. Instruction is personalized and small learning environments increase student contact with teachers.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 14 Frequent Monitoring of Teaching and Learning Monitoring of Teaching and Learning: Teaching and learning are continually adjusted based on frequent monitoring of student progress and needs. A variety of assessment procedures are used. The results of the assessment are used to improve student performances and also improve the instructional program.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 15 EES Student v2.1 Research and Development History Bringing the Conceptual Model to Reality The journey to the current Educational Effectiveness Survey (v8.0) demonstrates that the EES is a dynamic research instrument -- one that has been, and will continue to be evolving over time. The vision of the Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. is to develop, maintain and enhance tools and services that are catalysts to improvement in the organizational effectiveness of schools. In 2001, CEE integrated organizational effectiveness and school effectiveness research into the development of 3 instruments (EES Staff/Parent and Student Surveys) designed to provide a school quantifiable data on its culture and effectiveness as a learning institution to assist in the school improvement process. Over the last 5 years CEE has continued to research, evaluate, and respond to recent developments in school effectiveness research. Additionally, client feedback has also been consistently factored into each new version. Through strong relationships with leading educators, professional associations, and OSPI, the Educational Effectiveness Parent and Student Surveys have undergone 2 revisions, each bringing the latest in research- based understandings into the instrument. Major enhancements to the instrument include: This process has yielded the most widely used school effectiveness instruments in the state-- focused on quantifying perceptions of the Nine Characteristics of High Performing Schools. As of April 2008, CEE’s data repository contains responses from over 41,000 staff, 110,500 students, and 38,500 parents (30% students and parents from homes where English is not the primary language).