LTSC and SC36 Collaboration1 Proposal for JTC1/SC36 Collaboration Frank Farance, Edutool.Com

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration2 OLD: Related Standards/Specification Development Orgs In Education & Learning Technology LTSC (P1484) Specs submitted by Consortia/Fora IEEE, ANSI, ISO: Accredited Standards GEM PROMETEUS GESTALT Stds/ Specs Sampling of Organizations

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration3 NEW: Related Standards/Specification Development Orgs In Education & Learning Technology LTSC (P1484) LTSC & JTC1/SC36: Close Collaboration ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36 GEM PROMETEUS GESTALT Current, existing Future possibilities Sampling of Organizations

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration4 JTC1 (Joint Technical Committee 1) — Information Technology TC1 Screw Threads TC2 Fasteners SC02 Coded Character Sets SC35 User Interfaces SC22 Programming Languages & Environments SC22/WG20 Internationalization SC31 Automatic Identification and Data Capture SC17 Cards and Personal Identification SC32 Data Management and Interchange SC34 Document Description/Processing Languages SC11 Flexible Magnetic Media for Digital Data SC23 Optical Disk Cartridges SC29 Coding of Audio/Picture/Multimedia/Hypermedia SC24 Computer Graphics and Image Processing SC28 Office Equipment SC27 IT Security Techniques SC07 Software Engineering SC36 Learning Technology CAI-RG Conformity Assessment and Interoperability IIT-RG Implementing Information Technology JTC1 (Joint Technical Committee 1) Information Technology TCnnn... ISO International Organization for Standardization IEC International Electrotechnical Commission

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration5 General Information [1/5] What is SC36? –SC36 is a new Subcommittee (SC) formed within ISO/IEC JTC1 with the following scope: [Excerpt from "Seoul Resolution #6"]: JTC 1 establishes a new Subcommittee on Learning Technology (SC36) with the following title and program of work: –Title: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC Learning Technology –Scope: Standardization in the area of information technologies that support automation for learners, learning institutions, and learning resources.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration6 General Information [2/5] –Excluded: The SC shall not create standards or technical reports that define educational standards, cultural conventions, learning objectives, or specific learning content. In the area of work of this new SC, standards and technical reports would not duplicate work done by other ISO or IEC TCs, SCs, or WGs with respect to their component, specialty, or domain. Instead, when appropriate, normative or informative references to other standards shall be included. Examples include documents on specialty topics such as multimedia, web content, cultural adaptation, and security.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration7 General Information [3/5] Why do we need an SC for Learning Technology? –A subcommittee responsible for learning technology would have the following advantages: Getting an ISO standard (and all the benefits of the "ISO" label), while leveraging the existing work in LTSC. National input within an international forum. Currently, we (LTSC) have no mechanism for getting national position on technical positions.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration8 General Information [4/5] Ballot resolution for fast-track standards. If we (LTSC) choose to fast-track standards, or if an NB proposes a fast-track standard, we have an existing forum for resolving ballot comments. –There are many other benefits, too. The short list above is non-exhaustive.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration9 General Information [5/5] Will the new SC mean more meetings? –No. It is expected that the SC and its WGs would meet at the same place and time with IEEE LTSC. It is intended that no additional travel would be required. IMPORTANT: This requirement of "no more meetings (travel) and no more splinter organizations" is very important to the success of standards in learning technology.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration10 LTSC-SC36 Relationship [1/4] What is the official relation between SC36 and LTSC? –LTSC and SC36 will probably have a liaison relationship. Need to assign a liaison from LTSC to SC36

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration11 LTSC-SC36 Relationship [2/4] Will LTSC be "in charge" of SC36? –No. SC36 will operate according to JTC1 Directives which include representation by NBs. Will SC36 be "in charge" of LTSC? –No. LTSC will operate according to its existing procedures which include IEEE, IEEE Computer Society, and IEEE LTSC SEC processes and procedures.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration12 LTSC-SC36 Relationship [3/4] Is there value in continuing/new participation in IEEE LTSC? –Yes. The LTSC organization has fewer formalities, supports individual representation (helpful for the education researchers and the learning technology industry), and LTSC might be the only method for participating for nations with no NB representative. Effectively, the IEEE LTSC work will continue relatively unchanged except, of course, for NB input via SC36.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration13 LTSC-SC36 Relationship [4/4] Will there be separate reflectors? –This coordination between reflectors is a good topic for the first SC36 meeting. There is certain to be SC36-only activity, so these concerns must be worked. Will there be a separate SC36 web site? –Probably. There will be a need to distinguish between LTSC and SC36 activities. However, the web sites will be cross-linked.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration14 JTC1/SC36 and LTSC Will Collaborate Closely — Co-Located Meetings Will Help Significantly LTSC (P1484) LTSC & JTC1/SC36: Close Collaboration ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36 GEM PROMETEUS GESTALT Current, existing Future possibilities Sampling of Organizations

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration15 Coordinating the Work [1/6] Will SC36 and LTSC issue the same document or will there be separate ISO and IEEE standards? –The documents should be the same. Other committees have both ISO and IEEE numbers, yet the identical document.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration16 Coordinating the Work [2/6] Will SC36 have a WG structure like LTSC? –Probably not. LTSC has roughly 20 WGs and SGs. SC36 would form several WGs, but because the JTC1 WGs require more administration (including a secretariat) the same work scope would probably be consolidated into fewer WGs.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration17 Coordinating the Work [3/6] Will SC36 have a WG structure like LTSC? [continued...] –Currently, there are five main areas of work in LTSC: (1) General Activities, (2) Learner- Related Activities, (3) Content-Related Activities, (4) Data and Metadata, and (5) Management Systems and Applications. In might be reasonable to have an SC36 WG for each LTSC main area of work, but it is up to SC36 to determine its own best structure. Q: How might the current LTSC activities map into SC36? A: There will probably be an SC36 project for each LTSC WG. An SC36 WG can have more than one project. Again, the exact SC36 structure is determined by SC36. LTSC will probably provide significant input to make sure the projects and deliverables of SC36 and LTSC remain harmonized and their working relationship remains efficient. Q: Is there a possibility that SC36 and LTSC will go off in separate directions? A: Yes, there is a possibility, but No it is unlikely. Currently, LTSC has a significant number of international participants. While the LTSC participants and SC36 NBs (see below) might not have exactly similar opinions, the two committees are likely to be very similar. Given the different methods of representation in LTSC and SC36 (i.e., individual vs. NB), it is *possible* to be different, but there are a good number of external forces (e.g., market forces) that steer the committees to common, efficient, timely, and market- relevant outcomes.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration18 Coordinating the Work [4/6] How might the current LTSC activities map into SC36? –There will probably be an SC36 project for each LTSC WG. An SC36 WG can have more than one project. Again, the exact SC36 structure is determined by SC36. LTSC will probably provide significant input to make sure the projects and deliverables of SC36 and LTSC remain harmonized and their working relationship remains efficient.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration19 Coordinating the Work [5/6] Is there a possibility that SC36 and LTSC will go off in separate directions? –Yes, there is a possibility, but No it is unlikely. Currently, LTSC has a significant number of international participants. While the LTSC participants and SC36 NBs (see below) might not have exactly similar opinions, the two committees are likely to be very similar.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration20 Coordinating the Work [6/6] Is there a possibility that SC36 and LTSC will go off in separate directions? [continued...] –However.... Given the different methods of representation in LTSC and SC36 (i.e., individual vs. NB), it is *possible* to be different, but there are a good number of external forces (e.g., market forces) that steer the committees to common, efficient, timely, and market-relevant outcomes.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration21 Co-Located Meetings [1/3] What is a "co-located" meeting? –Two or more organizations meeting at the same place and same time. Officially, each organization has "its own" meeting. The organizations are able to collaborate more efficiently through co-located meetings.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration22 Co-Located Meetings [2/3] Is a "co-located" meeting the same as a "joint" meeting"? –No. Joint meeting have formal liaisons between the organizations and have special "joint" procedures for running meetings. Joint meetings require much more administration than co-located meetings.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration23 Co-Located Meetings [3/3] Are there other examples of co-located meetings and/or close collaboration with ISO committees? –The following are some well-known committees that have similar closeness: SC6 and IEEE 802 (Ethernet, etc., standards) SC22/WG15 and IEEE 1003 (POSIX) SC24 and VRML Consortium SC29 and MPEG

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration24 JTC1/SC36 and LTSC Relationship To Other Orgs LTSC (P1484) LTSC & JTC1/SC36: Close Collaboration ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36 GEM PROMETEUS GESTALT Current, existing Future possibilities Sampling of Organizations

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration25 Collaboration With Orgs [1/3] How will other learning technology orgs (ADL, AICC, ARIADNE, CEN/ISSS/LT, IMS, GEM, GESTALT, PROMETEUS) participate in SC36? –It is up to each organization to determine its participation. For example, an organization may choose to have a liaison relationship with SC36. Additionally, members of these organizations may participate in the NB TAGs (in LTSC, the members of these organizations participate directly within LTSC). Q: Must each organization have the same scope and work program as LTSC? A: Definitely No! Organizations will continue to choose to work in areas of interest to their organization and the organization's constituents. Q: Must each organization have the same scope and work program as SC36? A: No. As mentioned above, organizations will have their own direction and priorities. Organizations will choose to liaise/contribute to SC36 and LTSC based on areas of common interest.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration26 Collaboration With Orgs [2/3] Must each organization have the same scope and work program as LTSC? –Definitely No! Organizations will continue to choose to work in areas of interest to their organization and the organization's constituents.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration27 Collaboration With Orgs [3/3] Must each organization have the same scope and work program as SC36? –No. As mentioned above, organizations will have their own direction and priorities. Organizations will choose to liaise/contribute to SC36 and LTSC based on areas of common interest.

LTSC and SC36 Collaboration28 Actions LTSC liaison to SC36 –Jim Schoening will represent LTSC Contact National Bodies for awareness of SC36 meeting –Actions in each country SEC drafts a proposal for “co-location” operating practices –Start with existing IEEE 1003 work