A New Vision Of Permanency April 2006 Jeff Griffin Will Ortiz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERMENANCY Process or placement? Mark A. Spangler, MA, LPC Executive Director Davis-Stuart., Inc.
Advertisements

“Strategic Plan ( ) and Agency Accreditation”
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Indiana Youth Connections Program Department of Child Services Indianapolis, Indiana.
Prince George’s County Human Services Coalition Funders Panel Presenter: Renette Oklewicz Director, Foundation Programs January 11, 2012.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR TRANSITIONAL AGED YOUTH: A FACILITATORS GUIDE FOR SOCIAL WORKERS, FOSTER PARENTS, AND SUPPORTIVE ADULTS Katherine Robinson California.
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth ABA Conference Best Practices to Implement ASFA: Creative Strategies.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
Child Welfare Practice Model
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
National Perspectives on Long-Term Foster Care. MINNESOTA NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON LONG TERM FOSTER CARE AS A PERMANECY OPTION Gerald P. Mallon, DSW National.
1 Every Child Matters National and Local Perspectives Rolle College 29 th June 2007 Geoff Tew Devon CPD Adviser.
6/10/02 Independent Living Resource Center at the Hunter College School of Social Work The Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 Strengthening the System’s.
Siblings and Permanence CPYP 2006 Annual Conference November 2, 2006 Oakland, CA Wendy Piccus, California Children’s Services Archive Center for Social.
Enhancing Mental Health Services for Transitional Age Youth in Orange County A Grant Proposal By Jacquelyn Ruiz California State University Long Beach.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
PCCYFS 2012 Annual Spring Conference Aging Out of Care: Challenges and Opportunities to Support Older Youth Presented By: Emily C. Keller, Esq. Juvenile.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
PARENT, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Educational Champion Training MODULE 12: Mentoring Non-Minor Dependents and/or their Educational Champions © National Center for Youth Law, April 2013.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
What We Are Learning About How to Improve Results: The Evolution of the Initiative’s Theory of Change and Partnerships with Communities and States Leonard.
Organizing Your Work Jeff Griffin Senior Social Services Supervisor County of Orange Children and Family Services February 27, 2008.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Children and learning – the new agenda Children and Lifelong Learning Scrutiny Committee July 05.
Department of Human Services 7 th INTERNATIONAL LAC CONFERENCE, SYDNEY 2006 Looking After Children In Victoria, Australia.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
What is a Family Connections Program? An Overview of a New Service Approach Being Developed by the Bay Area Residentially Based Services Consortium.
Engaging Youth in Permanency New England Youth Permanency Convening Portland, ME November , 2012.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
1 DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING April 23, 2009.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
MOVING FROM DATA TO ACTION ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS THROUGH A RBA FRAMEWORK POINT-IN-TIME COUNTS.
San Francisco Unified School District Student Support Services Department Foster Youth Services Program FYS Liaison Orientation.
PowerPoint Presentation for Family Finding: Evaluation.
In the Current Environment Policy Matters: Initiative Policy Goals Lynn Tiede Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Jorge F. del Valle ( A monitoring system for program evaluation in family foster care CHALLENGES OF FOSTER CARE AT THE BEGINNIG OF THE 21st.
Presented by: Degale Cooper, MSW Director of Family Programs.
Lilliput Family Finding & Relative Support Efforts Karen Alvord, CEO, Beverly Johnson, CPO,
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Commit to Agency Mission and Values
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Butte County Overview December 2016 ~ Cathi Grams, Director Department of Employment and Social.
Child Protective Services Update
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
William Ortiz and Jeff Griffin County of Orange
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Moving to Action: National Trends and Emerging Best Practices to Achieve Greater Permanence and Stability with Older Youth in Foster Care Nebraska Summit.
RISE T4T Child Welfare Curriculum
Presentation transcript:

A New Vision Of Permanency April 2006 Jeff Griffin Will Ortiz

Youth 11-years or Older in PP Service Component by Placement Facility Type as of Dec., 1, 2005 Where Are We Now? Agency-Wide: Group Home Foster Home Relative

Creating Family Connections (Continued) A new process of engagement was also taught regarding how to effectively approach family members to engage (or re-engage) into the youth’s life. The Creating Family Connections pilot project launched in December 2004 and ended in June The 6-month (with one more month of support by CCS) training project involved 27 youth from the Multi-treatment Transition Services (MTS) division. The project had tremendous success in locating and engaging family members for youth that were previously thought to have no family members available to them.

Outcomes For Creating Family Connections Pilot Project:  Percentage of youth for which possible family connections were identified during the CFC project: 92%  Percentage of youth for which new family connections were achieved during the CFC project: 70% Of youth for which connections were made:  Percentage of youth for which the new family connections that were achieved during the CFC project have remained since the project ended: 88%  Percentage of youth for which there is a positive difference in the youth’s functioning now that more family connections have been achieved: 63%  Percentage of youth that have transitioned (or are being considered for a transition) to a lower level of care or family as a result of the CFC project: 63%  Percentage of social workers who participated in the CFC project that think it is valuable and should be continued: 100%

Creating Family Connections: Totals As Of January 2006:

California Permanency for Youth Project Dedicated to assuring that no youth will leave the California child welfare system without a permanent lifelong connection to a caring adult The California Permanency for Youth Project (CPYP), a project of the Public Health Institute, started in January 2003 as a result of a five-year grant awarded by the Stuart Foundation. This grant has since been extended through Other funders include the Walter S. Johnson and Zellerback Family Foundations. Children eleven and older in the foster care system have a poor chance of finding a permanent family. When they do not find permanency before they leave the foster care system at age 18, research shows they often become homeless, unemployed, and disconnected. We believe it is the responsibility of the entire community to make sure that each youth who leaves the foster care system in California has a permanent lifelong connection with a caring adult. Pat Reynolds-Harris, MA, MSPH – Director of California Permanency for Youth Project. -Taken from the California Permanency For Youth Website:

California Permanency for Youth Project (CPYP) (continued)

Definition Permanency is both a process and a result that includes involvement of the youth as a participant or leader in finding a permanent connection with at least one committed adult who provides: A safe, stable and secure parenting relationship Love Unconditional commitment Lifelong support in the context of a legal arrangement when possible The opportunity to maintain family ties and emotional bonds with siblings and important persons who will sustain connections with their culture Simply stated: Permanency is when a child and an adult have a safe, stable, sustainable and committed relationship across time and circumstance.

Orange County CPYP Project CPYP Project Goals 1. Increase connections for youth 2. Increase the number and engagement of supportive family members to enhance service provision 3. Increase the ability of youth to successfully emancipate from dependency 4. Expand the success of family finding and engagement strategies into other areas of CFS and expand the agency’s definition of permanency. 5. Assess models of family finding and engagement to determine their usefulness in CFS.

Orange County CPYP Project What is our target group of youth?  A total of 45 youth will be involved in the County of Orange CPYP project: ♦ CFC will work with 25 youth in MTS, ICS I, ICS II ♦ ICS I Senior Social Worker Tawny Crane and Melanie McCallum will work with 20 selected cases in ICS I and implement family finding and engagement strategies for each case with support of the CPYP committee.

Orange County CPYP Project What is our target group of youth? (continued)

REFERENCES Lighting the Fire of Urgency: Families Lost and Found in America’s Child Welfare System. Kevin Campbell. Catholic Community Services of Western Washington Resource Documents, January The National Resource Center for Family-Centered Practice and Permanency Planning at the Hunter College School of Social Work Who Am I? Why Family Really Matters. Barbara Boisvert, Gina Brimner, Kevin Campbell, Don Koenig, Mary Stone-Smith. Catholic Community Services of Western Washington. F.A.S.T. Family Assessment and Stabilization Team. Catholic Community Services of Western Washington. - California Permanency For Youth Project. Permanence for Young People: Framework. National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency Planning at the Hunter College School of Social Work.