Economic Aspects of OER Peter Baumgartner This Work is licensed under a Creative Commons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-Learning E-learning means all teaching and learning forms supported by modern ICT. The e-content can be organized interactively and in a multimedia.
Advertisements

Eurosoil Freiburg 2004 – Education in Pedology E-Learning in Soil Science – What are the Perspectives? Ludger Herrmann University of Hohenheim.
Some impressions from the school visits and the conference -No systematic report 1 st Some general wisdom 2 nd Key analysis questions of the project Conference.
Better universities with free content: the future of open educational resources Jan Hylén.
IT Portfolio Shell – Add a title, your name, date, links and examples
C U L. OER definitions “... digitised materials offered freely and openly for educators, students and self-learners to use and.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Courtney Anstett, M.S. Service-Learning Coordinator Norwalk Community College Bringing Service and Learning Together.
Masters Level Assessment of Teaching and Learning C r e a t i v i t y without  What should we do?
Design of Reusable Multimedia Resources to Deepen Information Literacy North Carolina State University Libraries Kim Duckett Principal Librarian for Digital.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
MoHealthWINs MoHealthWINs Open Learning Initiative Co-Development Project October 31, 2013.
Open Educational Resources / production workshop / february 2009 Except where otherwise noted, this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution.
Knowledge Experts – Knowledge Management and E-Learning Skills for Digital Librarians Aban Budin & Gerhard Budin University of Vienna.
Chapter 3 Teaching with Instructional Software M. D. Roblyer Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 4/E Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education,
Distance learning: issues and trends MOOC and OER Anna Maria Tammaro University of Parma.
Meaningful Learning in an Information Age
Learning Object Fundamentals © Wawasan Open University 2010 OER Capacity Building Workshop by Wawasan Open University is licensed under a Creative Commons.
Week 7 Managing eLearning. “...an approach to teaching and learning that is used within a classroom or educational institution... It is designed to.
MoHealthWINs MoHealthWINs Open Learning Initiative Co-Development Project October 31, 2013.
Click to edit Master title style  Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level  Click to edit Master text.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
UNIVIRTUAL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Versione 00 del 29/07/2009.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Critical Events Legacy Learning Program Schema. Learning Program Learning Modules Classroom Management Special Needs Education Child Development Literature.
Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School of Education Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
A Model to Facilitate Effective Blended E-learning within Universities in Developing Countries B. Aguti, R. J. Walters, G. B. Wills Electronics and Computer.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
Analyze Design Develop AssessmentImplement Evaluate.
E-Learning. Three central questions: What is e-learning?  Why should we use it?  How should we go about doing it?
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Theme: how can the Next Generation Digital Learning Environment contribute to the curriculum design of African Universities? Blended Learning at the Utrecht.
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
A Portfolio by: Mary S. Weinaug Enter.  As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of teacher standards  ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
A portfolio by Jamie Andrews Created in ELD 325 Instructional Technology Spring 2010.
Making educational practices more open with OER Professor Andy Lane, Senior Fellow, Support Centre for Open Resources in Education.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
How to Apply it in the Classroom Elicit ideas Elaboration & Reconstruc- tion Frequent problem based activities Variety of info. & resources Collaboration.
Teaching Roles for Instructional Software Eric Sharp EDMS 6474.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Affordable Teaching and Learning Redefining What's Possible Erin Walker Learning Technology Consultant.
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Intel ® Teach Program Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative and Intel Teach Program.
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
IT Portfolio Shell – Add a title, your name, date, links and examples
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Module 2: Introduction to Using OER for Math Instruction
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Teaching Roles for Instructional Software
NJCU College of Education
WHAT IS LIFE LONG LEARNING IMPORTANCE OF LIFE LONG LEARNING
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
The Second Elearning Workshop
Selecting & Developing Cases and Clinical Problems
Professional Teaching Portfolio
New technologies have made it possible to:
Presentation transcript:

Economic Aspects of OER Peter Baumgartner This Work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License

The Myth of Learning Objects OER Definition (revisited) Open Courses and Open Content Business & Exchange Models Conclusions and Discussion

Definition of OER (by OECD, Jan Hylén) Open courseware and content Open software tools Open material for e-learning capacity building of faculty staff Repositories of learning objects Free educational courses _1_1_1_1,00.html Essential in my definition: no financial transaction involved

Open Educational Resources (EOR) Different Concepts: LOR and EOR Learning Object Repository (LOR) LO’s freely available Free educational Resources + Tools for Creating, Changing, Evaluating LO‘s not freely available Store, Find, + Other Services (Interoperability)

Regrouping of the Definition Open courseware and open content Open software tools Open material for e- learning capacity building of faculty staff Repositories of learning objects Free educational courses Open courseware Open content; LO = Open source Open courseware or open content (LO) Learning object (LO) Open courseware Summary: 2 main types: Open Courses and Open Content

Two Motives for OER 1.Production Re-usable content should decrease the productions cost of content (Learning Object, Content Sharing) 2.Education Educational Resources should be open for everybody (free access to knowledge)

Re-usable Learning Objects (RLO‘s) Learning Object Lecture, Chapter Course, Certification

Die LEGO - Metapher

Die LEGO - Metapher (2)

Die LEGO - Metapher (3)

Re-usable Learning Objects Independent of context Dependent of context Pedagogy Educational Scenario „ROI-Paradox“ Reusability of Objects and Instruction Paradox

Learning Object Media Objects (Assets): Text, Sound, Graphic, Image, Animation, Movie etc. Sound Movie Text Image Information Objects: Concepts. Facts, Principles, Processes, Procedures etc.. Media Objects are packaged to information (e.g. Functionality of a pump). Multiple Representations Learning objects: Closed collection of information objects with exactly one learning objective. 7 +/-2 information overload rule of the short term memory Addresses exactly one learning objective: How does a motor work? -> Assessment and Evaluation! Reusable in other learning contexts????

Learning Object (revised) IO ES EO LO IO = Information Object EO = Educational Objective ES = Educational Scenario LO = Learning Object IO = Information Object RLA= Re-usable Learning Asset

Teaching Method: Group Presentation

Teaching Method: „Ball Bearing“ (“Station Learning”)

IMS LD - Conceptual Model ?

Interaction between IO and DS IO DS Information- objects (IO’s) Didactical Settings (DS’s) R e p o s i t o r y Export IO DS LCMS Runtime DS IO DS IO DS IO DS IO DS IO DS IO Educational Scenarios Integration IO DS

Levels of Granularity Subject Module (Course) Learning Time: Hours - Weeks Discipline Unit Educational Scenarios Learning Time: Min. - Hours Pedagogical Unit Didactical Interaction Learning Time: Sec. - Min. Action Unit

Two Assumptions 1.The quality of educational settings is a mix of content AND learning environment (educational scenarios) 2.Different types of educational resources support different kinds of learning environment and vice versa.

Transfer Tutor Coach factual knowledge, “know-that” Transfer of propositional knowledge to know, to remember Production of correct answers Verbal knowledge, Memorisation to teach, to explain procedural knowledge, "know-how" Presentation of pre- determined problems to do, to practice Selection of correct method and its use Skill, Ability to observe, to help, to demonstrate social Practice, "knowing-in-action" Action in real (complex and social) situations to cope, to master Realisation of adequate action strategies Social Responsibilty to cooperate, to support Teaching I Teaching II Teaching III

Transfer Tutor Coach Teaching I Teaching II Teaching III Content ?

Conclusions so far Keep the Pedagogy out of the Learning Object. (Robert McCormick) Separate Didactical Model and Information Object. (CampusContent) Concentrate on the combination of Information Objects AND Educational Scenarios (Peter Baumgartner) Questions: –How to integrate the Information Objects into an appropriate Learning Environment? –How to design the Learning Environment for using the Information Objects most effectively

Principles of Learning Learning is fundamentally social. Knowledge is integrated in the life of communities. Learning is an act of participation. Knowing depends on engagement in practice. (Institute for Research on Learning - now defunct -, Menlo Park, California, 1999.)

Interacting with Self & Society Perceive & Do (Debug) Teaching & Facilitating Knowing-in-action Produce & Deposit Tutoring & Managing Interacting with Object Reflecting-in-action Artefact (user driven content) Practice & Discuss Coaching & Orchestrating Interacting with Subject (Human) Reflecting-in-practice Environment

“Canned” versus Open Content (I) Prefabricated content Packaged and delivered Static, seldom updated Produced by few specialists Quality control by experts “all rights reserved” User generated content Processing, interacting Dynamic, evolving Produced by many people Quality control by community “some rights reserved”

“Canned” versus Open Content (II) Access restricted Database, Downloads Teacher as instructor Facts, Rules, Principles Transfer of knowledge Curriculum, Courseware Open Access Web 2.0, P2P, Community Teacher as mentor/coach Competencies, Skills Construction of knowledge Informal learning

Open Courses & Business Models private institution public institution self learning material (autonomous learner) blended learning material (educational support) Cross-promotion Brand extension Lock-in policy Limited Access (Version, Amount, Time, Log-Ins) Show Window - attracting students Altruism Academic traditions Reputation Taxpayer Sharing Public Relations

Open Content & Exchange Models (I) 1.General Principle = (not monetary) exchange with mutual advantage (win-win situation) 2.Building up a new Ecology for Learning and Teaching (eg. Metadata Ecology for Learning and Teaching = MELT )

Open Content & Exchange Models (II) Content for “a better world”: altruistic motive Content for Reputation: publicity, honours, quotation index –Development of professional career models Content for Content: –How to start up? (How to get a critical mass?) –How to compare Content? (evaluation problem) Content for other Services: Providing Metadata, Experiences –Benefit for the original Content(provider)

Some Barriers (Fears) to overcome copyright infringement material has to be improved for general use print publication is better than web publication lack of knowledge (of OER, of CC License) giving away business opportunities

Medida-Prix

Conclusions I = Principles of (e)Learning The production of special (e)learning content (“canned content”) loses importance. (e)Content is created in collaborative learning situations (“user generated content”) Good Content is everywhere. It has to be integrated in social learning situations (situated learning). What matters is the social (learning) arrangement, content is just a part of it. For better content sharing separate content from educational modelling/integration. Provide educational scenarios as own content type.

Conclusions II = Principles of OER There are different Strategies to apply for Open Content and Open Courses. Open Courses of private institutions serve often just as appetiser or as Pre-Promotions in their business models Public institutions may offer more Open Courses under a national license model for taxpayers. Open Content needs the development of exchange models to foster the individual participation. Close the link between individual motives and institutional interests through institutional career models.

Some Questions for Discussion Does the distinction between Open Courses and Open Content make sense? If so: What are the consequences for OER? What kind of exchange models are necessary? How to overcome the mentioned barriers? What strategy should we choose/create for a change of culture in content sharing?