Introducing IANA Root Management A presentation to APTLD-ccTLD workshop in the Pacific Save Vocea ICANN’s regional rep. – Australasia/Pacific Noumea, April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICANN Report Presented by: Dr Paul Twomey CEO and President LACNIC, Montevideo 31 March 2004.
Advertisements

Operational Policies for NIRs in the APNIC Region NIR Meeting APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 Sept 2002.
CcTLD Management, ICANN, and the Public Interest July 26, 2001.
The ICANN Experiment ISOC-Israel 13-March-2000 Andrew McLaughlin.
CcTLD Agreement Update ICANN Public Forum Melbourne, Australia 12 March, 2001 Andrew McLaughlin ICANN Policy Guy.
IANA TLD Zone Inspection Shanghai, China Louis Touton 29 October 2002.
ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee ICANN Meetings Shanghai October 30, 2002.
GNSO goals Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council Sao Paulo, 4 Dec 2006.
STAFF Implement Proposed action STAFF – Assess (initial AND revisions based on feedback) Implementation change? Policy guidance needed? Admin/error update?
The ICANN Experiment CainetCainet Andrew McLaughlin.
ICANN Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency.
Support and Transparent Process for ENUM Designated Zone implementations for the USA Before the Dept of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee SG-A AdHoc Meeting.
Managing the Health and Safety of Contractors
Kuala Lumpur 24 July 2004 ICANN/ITU workshop Framing ccTLD relations Linking global and national responsibilities.
Update on ccTLD Agreements Montevideo 9 September, 2001 Andrew McLaughlin.
ICANN/ccTLD Agreements: Why and How Andrew McLaughlin Monday, January 21, 2002 TWNIC.
ICANN/IANA ccTLD Workgroup Herbert Vitzthum, ICANN ccTLD Liaison,
Glen de Saint Géry ICANN GNSO Secretariat for Theresa Swinehart Counsel for International Legal Affairs Domain Day Milan.
The Domain Name System Overview Introduction DNS overview How DNS helps us? Summary.
ICANN and the Internet Ecosystem. 2  A network of interactions among organisms, and between organisms and their environment.  The Internet is an ecosystem.
CcTLD-ICANN Agreement GCC Regional Meeting Dubai, UAE 17 June, 2001 Andrew McLaughlin ICANN.
Revised Draft Strategic Plan 4 December 2010.
Transition of U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Stewardship of the IANA Functions to the Global.
Establishing ccTLDs in Africa - Overcoming The Challenges Michuki Mwangi President AfTLD AfTLD Meeting 7th, April 2008 Johannesburg, South-Africa.
SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.
UAEnic مركز الإمارات لمعلومات شبكة الإنترنت Presented By: Sultan Al Shamsi GCC ccTLD Working Group Meeting 7 th March 2004 Riyadh, KSA.
Policy Proposal 109 Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements ARIN XXV 18 April, 2010 – Toronto, Ontario Chris Grundemann.
Review, Redress, Empowerment CCWG-ACCT. Mission In accordance with Bylaws, coordinate the global Internet’s systems of unique identifiers by: – Coordinating.
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
CcNSO Finance Working Group: Survey on ICANN Contributions and Services Byron Holland March 11,
CcTLD/ICANN Contract for Services (Draft Agreements) A Comparison.
Introducing IANA Root Management ccTLD workshop, Guyana 2007 John Crain Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
1 ICANN & Global Partnerships Baher Esmat Manager, Regional Relations Middle East ccTLD Training, Amman Nov, 2007.
JIG (Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Group) Update APTLD | New Delhi Feb 23, 2012.
ICANN Costa Rica March 2012 FOIWG. Presentation outline Scope of Framework Of Interpretation Process Topics for interpretation Activities since ICANN.
Dedicated to preserving the central coordinating functions of the global Internet for the public good. John L. Crain, Chief Technical Officer, ICANN
Training Role Module 8 – User Admin Ver. 10 Oct 2009.
ccTLD IDN Report ccTLD Meeting, Montreol June 24, 2003 Young-Eum
CcTLD Best Practices & Considerations ccTLD workshop, Guyana 2007 John Crain and Jacob Malthouse Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
Adrian Kinderis – AusRegistry International Best Practices of a ccTLD Registry BEST PRACTICES OF A ccTLD REGISTRY ADRIAN KINDERIS AUSREGISTRY INTERNATIONAL.
1 1 The GNSO Role in Internet Governance Presented by: Chuck Gomes Date: 13 May 2010.
CcTLDs and ICANN/IANA ccTLD Workshop Nairobi, Kenya September 2005.
Japan Registry Service Copyright © 2002 Japan Registry Service Co., Ltd. ccTLD Sponsorship Agreement (.JP) March 2002 Hiro Hotta JPRS (Japan Registry Service.
IDN UPDATE Tina Dam ICANN Chief gTLD Registry Liaison Public Forum, Wellington 30 March 2006.
IP Addressing and ICT Development in the Pacific Islands Anne Lord and Save Vocea, APNIC ICT Workshop, Fiji, November, 2002.
Securing Future Growth: Getting Ready for IPv6 NOW! ccTLD Workshop, 8 th April 2011 Noumea, New Caledonia Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist, APNIC.
ICANN Regional Outreach Meeting, Dubai 1–3 April Toward a Global Internet Paul Twomey President and CEO 1 April 2008 ICANN Regional Meeting 1–3.
Internet Protocol Addresses What are they like and how are the managed? Paul Wilson APNIC.
Review of CCWG-Acct 3 rd Proposal and ALAC Issues Alan Greenberg 04 December 2015.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.
Review of CENTR’s dialogue with the GAC Emily Taylor, Solicitor Company Secretary, Nominet UK.
CcTLD Constituency Ghana Recommendations for the IANA Function IANA WG CENTR Chair: Elisabeth Porteneuve Marianne Wolfsgruber, CENTR, 11 March 2002.
An Overview THE AUDIT PROCESS. MAJOR PHASES IN AN AUDIT Client acceptance and retention Establish terms of the engagement Plan the audit Consider internal.
Domain Name System INTRODUCTION to Eng. Yasser Al-eimad
Zone Transfers Summary of CENTR Position Kim Davies ICANN Shanghai 27 October 2002.
B101 Presentation on DNS By Thomas Shaw. What is the function of the DNS? Otherwise known as the Domain Name System It is one of the most important systems.
1 27Apr08 Some thoughts on Internet Governance and expansion of the Domain Name space Paul Twomey President and CEO 9 August 2008 Panel on Internet Governance.
National Standardization Secretariat ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Africa and SG5RG-ARF and SG5RG-AFR Meetings Livingstone, Zambia March.
APTLD MEETING Manila 23 – 24 February ccTLD Role in Its Community RFC 1591 Introduction  Foresaw a few TLDs (edu, com, net, org, gov, etc.) and.
CcTLD Issues AFNOG Accra, Ghana May, 2001 Andrew McLaughlin.
Pick Ups & Job Management
ICANN’s Policy Development Activities
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
ICANN62 GAC Capacity Building
One Size Does Not Fit All
Christopher Wilkinson Head, GAC Secretariat
ccNSO PDP Review Mechanism & Retirement
Updates about Work Track 5 Geographic Names at the Top-Level
Erosion of Senate Authority Over Curriculum?
Defining the scope of the ccNSO
Presentation transcript:

Introducing IANA Root Management A presentation to APTLD-ccTLD workshop in the Pacific Save Vocea ICANN’s regional rep. – Australasia/Pacific Noumea, April 2011

IANA. What is it? The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority “Dedicated to preserving the central coordinating functions of the global Internet for the public good.” 2

What does that mean? The Internet is not 100% anarchy There does need to be some technical coordination, otherwise there would be no interoperability IANA was designed to be that definitive central coordinating body – maintains the identifiers used on the Internet that need to be unique. 3

More specifically… 4

A quick history lesson… 5

IANA: Early history The central repository for Internet standards and registries First references to “IANA” appear in 1972 Operated by Jon Postel (and later with supporting staff) under US Government contracts 6

IANA: The 90’s The Internet becomes popular Process to create a steering body for the Internet created, the “New IANA Project”. The result is ICANN IANA transferred from University of Southern California to ICANN in 1998 “RFC Editor” function split out 7

The DNS Tree As we know, the DNS relies on delegating sub-domain responsibility down 8

The DNS Tree Each zone has a party responsible for it, and for making delegations under it 9

The DNS Tree As operator of the root, IANA is responsible for assigning operators of top-level domains 10

TLD census March

ISO3166 list referenced by IANA 12

Pacific Islands ccTLDs 13

How IANA manages the root Maintain data for the DNS root – Technical data (NS records, “glue”) – Social data (admin and tech contacts, support organisations, WHOIS, Registration URL) Two types of changes 1. Routine changes (easy!) – Confirm authenticity, check for technical problems, implement. 2.Reassignments (hard!) – Perform evaluation, submit to ICANN board, implement as appropriate. 14

15

Documents that guide us Domain Name Structure and Delegation (1994) – Domain Name Structure and Delegation (1999) – The Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) Principles for Delegation and Administration of ccTLDs 16

What IANA doesn’t do Don’t set policy – We follow precedent where possible, encourage review of our operations by community Don’t unilaterally decide what the two letter codes should be – ISO 3166 standard provides these, ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency makes revisions – Additions may be applied for by appropriate parties, deletions should be replaced – ICANN is one of ten members of the ISO 3166 MA Don’t decide who runs a ccTLD – local Internet community decision – IANA performs due diligence 17

Keeping IANA records up to date IANA keeps records on who runs each TLD – If it is out of date, we don’t know who is responsible any more – Causes problems if changes need to be made later – Also causes problems if someone needs to contact you for operational reasons. Check your IANA records and update if necessary! – Go to in your web browser and enter your TLDhttp://whois.iana.org 18

Whois records 19

I need to make changes! What now? 20

Lodge a change template There is a simple text template for you to complete and to IANA Downloadable from – 21

22

Instructions on changing details Download the template file Fill in your updated details – For sections that don’t change, you can simply write “No Change” rather than filling in all the current details again. Make sure everyone at your end is aware of the upcoming change! – Admin and Tech contact need to approve it! to 23

IANA Processing Steps 1.For all changes: – Check template is filled out correctly – Check the current contacts agree to the change 2.For supporting organization (SO) changes: – Perform a redelegation evaluation 3.For contact (AC and/or TC) changes – Check the new contacts respond and agree 4.For nameservers (NS) changes: – Check nameservers work 5.For all changes: – Seek US Government approval – Implement in the DNS root with VeriSign – Update IANA database 24

About redelegations 25

Redelegations Most changes to IANA database are routine updates – e.g. operator has updated their nameserver list, changed addresses, or added a new staff member Some changes involve changing the ccTLD management to a new party – IANA will do a thorough investigation this operator will operate the domain in the interests of the country We call this a “redelegation” 26

Some quotes on redelegation “selecting a designated manager for a domain that was able to do an equitable, just, honest and competent job” “These designated authorities are trustees for the delegated domain, and have a duty to serve the community. The designated manager is the trustee of the top-level domain for both the nation and the global Internet community” 27

Redelegation Agreement Generally, to redelegate a domain, the change needs to be approved by: – the current/old operator – the relevant government – substantial parties in the local Internet community In cases where the current operator is doing a bad job, and everyone else agrees, the IANA will conduct a “hostile redelegation” Government’s view is important - but is not the only view. If government asks for a change, but significant parties disagree, it can’t be assumed IANA will redelegate. 28

Redelegation challenges Some local disagreements: – Between old and new managers – Between government and old manager – Between local Internet community and government – Between old manager and local Internet community – Between different government departments The IANA always has to be careful of fraud – many parties want to try and take over something 29

Redelegation challenges (2) Misunderstandings – Requests by unauthorised staff – Requests without understanding of procedures Technical problems – Technical ability of new manager and/or his staff – Problems with technical systems – Absence of any local policies – Absence of a business/commercial model – Problems with hosting arrangements or physical premises Disagreement with the ISO alpha-2 designation 30

Redelegation challenges (3) Political challenges – Governments lacking a legal/policy basis for closing down an organization – Governments seeking political control over the ccTLD / seeking change for political reasons – Disagreements between operator and government, or between government departments Legacy challenges – ccTLD operations out of country – Compensation claims of old managers – Governments suddenly claiming back a “national asset” 31

Complex situations and issues Out-of-country ccTLD operation under a contested redelegation request Verification of identity and authority of involved persons Contested redelegation requests (no local agreement), particular in cases where there is no legislation/regulation, relies on good will of parties 32

Redelegations: Evaluation Process IANA performs a thorough evaluation in redelegations – Speaks to many affected parties – Evaluates the change on a number of criteria – Writes a detailed report recommending a course of action ICANN Board votes on the report – If they approve to redelegate, is processed like a regular change. – If they don’t, we reject the change. Applicant may reapply if they change the circumstances. 33

Criteria for Redelegation 1. Operational and technical skills a. The prospective manager has the requisite skills to operate the TLD appropriately. (ICP-1 §a, RFC 1591 §3.5) b. There must be reliable, full-time IP connectivity to the nameservers and electronic mail connectivity to the operators; (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1) c. The manager must perform its duties in assigning domains and operating nameservers with technical competence (ICP-1 §d; RFC 1591 §3.5) 2. Operator in country a. The prospective manager supervises and operates the domain name from within the country represented by the TLD; (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1) b. The prospective administrative contact must reside in the country represented by the TLD. (ICP-1 §a; RFC 1591 §3.1) 3. Equitable treatment a. The prospective manager must be equitable and fair to all groups encompassed by the TLD that may request domain names (ICP-1 §c; RFC 1591 §3.3) 4. Community/Governmental support a. The prospective manager has the requisite authority to operate the TLD appropriately, with the desire of the government taken very seriously. (ICP-1 §a, GAC Principles) b. Significantly interested parties in the domain should agree that the prospective manager is the appropriate party to receive the delegation (ICP-1 §a; RFC

Summary IANA manages the root, and therefore the delegations that allow TLDs to do their work TLDs should ensure their data (contact details, nameserves) are accurate with IANA. If in doubt, talk with us! IANA’s procedures to verify changes are thorough, to ensure stability of the DNS root Full changes to the operator involve an investigation to ensure the changes are in the IANA whois database 35

Some references IANA reports on the assignment and re- assignment of Top-Level Domains – ccNSO Announcements – read Working Group on Delegation, Redelegation report 36

Thank you! 37 Sourced from Kim Davies, Manager, Root Zone Services