Who’s Who and What’s What in the University Directory at Georgetown Common Solutions Group Spring Meeting University of Chicago May 9, 2002 Charles F.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Defining the Security Domain Marilu Goodyear John H. Louis University of Kansas.
Advertisements

Use Mobile Guidebook to Evaluate this Session – M1.5 Allowing Students to Update Their Program of Study Online.
Introduction to Campus Community Why should I care about Campus Community data? January 11, 2006 Updated January 25, 2006.
Prepared by Dept. of Information Technology & Telecommunication, May 1, 2015 DoITT Identity Management Security, Provisioning, Authentication.
Directories at the University of Florida Mike Conlon Director of Data Infrastructure University of Florida.
FSU Directory Project The Issue of Identity Management Jeff Bauer Florida State University
Provisioning of Services Authentication Requirements David Henry Office of Information Technology University of Maryland
Technical Issues with Establishing Levels of Assurance Zephyr McLaughlin Lead, Security Middleware Computing & Communications University of Washington.
Manifest – the Service Application Manifest is our new service, with Grouper as its logic engine, to manage populations which are known to us and those.
UCB Enterprise Directory Services. Directory Services – Project History  Requirements defined  Project commission & goals articulated  Project teams.
Technology Steering Group January 31, 2007 Academic Affairs Technology Steering Group February 13, 2008.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS “GETTING CONNECTED” Presented by: Computing and Communications Josee Larochelle September.
June 1, 2001 Enterprise Directory Service at College Park David Henry Office of Information Technology University of Maryland College Park
Middleware & Enterprise Services at College Park David Henry Office of Information Technology November 16, 2001.
Who are you and what can you do? Identity Management Faust Gorham University of California, Merced 12/7/2004.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS “GETTING CONNECTED” Presented by: Josee Larochelle, Phyllis Bruce, Amber Jones, and Terri.
Windows 2000 Arizona State University Windows 2000 Infrastructure Mehran Yahya Information Technology Patricia M. Schneider Information Technology – East.
UCB Enterprise Directory Services. Directory Services – Project History  Requirements defined  Project commission & goals articulated  Project teams.
Peter Deutsch Director, I&IT Systems July 12, 2005
Technology Steering Group January 31, 2007 Academic Affairs Technology Steering Group February 13, 2008.
MCommunity Directory www-sig June 11, What We’ll Cover Today A quick preview of the new directory. Changes in modifying your entry, privacy options,
SIMI: ISO Perspective Al ISO CSU Northridge
Directory Services Project University of Colorado at Boulder.
1 No More Paper, No More Stamps: Targeted myWSU Communications Jack Alilunas, Lavon Frazier October 20, 2004.
Identity Management – Why and How Experiences at CU-Boulder Copyright Linda Drake, Director of Development and Integration, University of Colorado, Boulder,
LDAP Management at Stony Brook Making Active Directory and PeopleSoft Work Together SUNY Technology Conference Rochester, New York Monday June 12, 2006.
David Henry, CSG - May, 2000 University of Maryland LDAP Directory David Henry Office of Information Technology University of Maryland College Park
1 No More Paper, No More Stamps: Targeted myWSU Communications Lavon R. Frazier April 27, 2005 Copyright Lavon R. Frazier, This work is the intellectual.
Learning Information Services Exchanging Data Between Enterprise Systems.
NERCOMP Managing Campus Affiliates Managing Campus Affiliates Faculty? Student? Faculty? Student? Staff? Criss Laidlaw Director of Administrative.
3 Nov 2003 A. Vandenberg © Second NMI Integration Testbed Workshop on Experiences in Middleware Deployment, Anaheim, CA 1 Georgia State University Case.
University of Michigan MCommunity Project Liz Salley Product Manager, Michigan Administrative Information Services Luke Tracy
Unified Student-Centric Authentication and Authorization Nathan Wilder Special Assistant - Technology Office of the CIO.
The UF Directory Project Project Leader: Warren Curry, Information Systems Project Project Web Site:
ID Management in University ID Management in University Kenzi Watanabe Saga University, Japan
Introduction to Grouper Part 1: Access Management & Grouper Tom Barton University of Chicago and Internet2 Manager – Grouper Project.
DATA GOVERNANCE Presentation to CSG September 27, 2007 Mary Weisse Manager, MIT Data & Reporting Services
Office of Information Technology Balancing Technology and Privacy – the Directory Conundrum January 2007 Copyright Barbara Hope and Lori Kasamatsu 2007.
Integrating Applications with the Directory Andrea Beesing CIT/Integration and Delivery June 25, 2002.
Directory Services at UMass  Directory Services Overview  Some common definitions  What can a directory do or not do?  User Needs Assessment  What.
The University of Wisconsin University Directory Service UDS A repository of people information Has been in production for about a year. Serves White pages,
Group Management at Brown James Cramton Brown University April 24, 2007.
Portal Strategies and Issues at Georgetown Common Solutions Group Winter Meeting Duke University January 10, 2001.
Microsoft Active Directory(AD) A presentation by Robert, Jasmine, Val and Scott IMT546 December 11, 2004.
USM Regional PeopleSoft Conference
University of Michigan MCommunity Project Liz Salley Product Manager, Michigan Administrative Information Services Luke Tracy
Information Technologies Jeremy Mortis 1 hi LDAP The Online Directory.
NMI-EDIT CAMP Synopsis, ISCSI Storage Solution, Linux Blade Cluster, And Current State Of NetID By Jonathan Higgins Presentation Template available from.
Outsourcing Student and Other Collaboration Services John Calkins Assistant General Counsel Northwestern University Office of General Counsel (OGC)
USERS Implementers Target Communities NMI Integration Testbed The NMI Integration Testbed NMI Participation Developed and managed by SURA Evaluate NMI.
FSUID & AD Integration Partnering with the College of Human Sciences Jeff Bauer, AIS
Policy Development at Georgetown: Directory Enabled Applications (and not) Charles F. Leonhardt CSG Winter Meeting Sanibel Harbour,
Dartmouth PKI Update Robert Brentrup Internet2 Member Meeting April 21, 2004.
Rapid On-boarding Getting Employees Up To Speed Quickly Through AgLearn.
Afresco Overview Document management and share
ISC-ASTT PennGroups Central Authorization System (Grouper) June 2009.
Portal Services & Credentials at UT Austin CAMP Identity and Access Management Integration Workshop June 27, 2005.
Active Directory. Computers in organizations Computers are linked together for communication and sharing of resources There is always a need to administer.
SPECTO IT TRAING CONTACT US: mail: SAP FSCM ONLINE TRAINING IN BANGALORE.
Ad-hoc Lists / Opt-In Problem Definition Access rules for many applications and services cannot be derived from an authoritative source and must therefore.
Master Data Management Chris Belmont Ochsner Health System 1.
Software sales at U Waterloo Successfully moved software sales online Handle purchases from university accounts Integrated with our Active Directory and.
OpenRegistry MACE-Dir 5/18/09 1 OpenRegistry Initiative Revisiting the Management of Electronic Identity Benjamin Oshrin Rutgers University May 2009.
L’Oreal USA RSA Access Manager and Federated Identity Manager Kick-Off Meeting March 21 st, 2011.
People DATA Request Process
People DATA Request Process
Identity Management at the University of Florida
UF Directory Coordinator Training
Provisioning of Services Authentication Requirements
MIT Case Study Notes Paul B. Hill
Presentation transcript:

Who’s Who and What’s What in the University Directory at Georgetown Common Solutions Group Spring Meeting University of Chicago May 9, 2002 Charles F. Leonhardt

An Opening Limerick For the group that acts like a zoo This May into Chi Town we blew Two guys named Charles and Gavin Planned well the meeting we’re havin’ ‘Twas all for naught as everyone sought To peek at Mark Bruhn’s tattoo Scott Allen, Jim Bruce, Tracy Futhey, Charlie Leonhardt, Larry Levine, Joel Smith Over Crème The Saloon Steakhouse

Outline WHO: is now and is *not yet* in the directory? WHAT: attributes are in the directory for people? other objects are in the directory? WHEN: are records created, updated, suspended? WHY: are we using the directory? HOW: is the directory updated? may users control data access and privacy? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly –Business rules in use today and those that should be

Who is in the directory? All Students: all campuses since 1998 All Faculty & Staff: all campuses since 1998 All affiliated non-employees (vendors, consultants, non-paid researchers, volunteer or sponsored faculty, retired faculty, etc.) who have requested accounts since 1999 All Georgetown Hospital (now owned by MedStar Health) employees since ,000+ Georgetown Alumni: –All campuses since 1998 –25,000+ real time NetID claims

Who is not yet in the directory? Applicants to any of the schools or programs with no other University affiliation (using Apply Yourself for graduate and professional program web-based applications) Alumni prior to 1998 –with no other University affiliation –who have not claimed a NetID online Affiliated individuals with undefined or unapproved requirements –Local community members for portal access –Others –

What attributes in the directory? Faculty, Staff, Affiliates, Hospital Staff –Name, Dept, Job Class/Title, Location, Telephone Students –Name, School, Class, Degree, Major Alumni –Name (non public unless another affiliation) For Everyone –Public/Private IDs: NetID, SSN, University ID – addresses: primary and delivery addresses –Primary and Other Affiliations –Some Application Authorizations –Display Restrictions

What attributes in the directory? Use standard LDAP attributes when possible Use GU* attributes that are specific to Georgetown –High correlation with eduPerson –eduPerson not yet implemented Some application specific attributes –For example, CT* attributes for Corporate Time

What other objects in directory? Secondary Accounts Lists Reserved Words Special Distinguished Names (DNs) Special Groups One Very Ugly Photo (DN=gettes) –many more to come for special uses 105K+ Objects in Directory Only 20% are ‘public’

When are records updated? Daily in batch – Record creation for new ‘traditional’ students, faculty, staff, and affiliates – Record updates and suspension for all Online, real time (near 24 x 7) –Record creation or reactivation for alumni and non-credit or professional development students

Why are we using the directory? Universal database for: Public Web addresses for all and Calendar Address Books Authentication and Authorization –GUMail, GUCalendar, GUNet Remote Access –Hoyasonline Alumni Community (general access for alumni and students; ‘special’ authorization in the application) Authentication –Multiple Access+ Services (Web access to business systems) –Online One Card Services, Data Warehouse –Blackboard courseware; other Web services Future Services –Portal, PeopleSoft, Others

How is the directory updated? Daily Batch –5 “balance line” programs that compare and reconcile the Enterprise Identity Management (EIM) database (aka NetID database) and the Student, HR, Hospital staff, Alumni and ‘beautiful’ Directory databases –1 program to calculate primary affiliation and assign unique identifiers (NetID, University ID) for ‘new’ records –1 “balance line” program to do two way reconciliation of NetID database and LDAP directory

NetID Database Initial Infrastructure Deployment Dir DB HR (2) SIS Alumni LDAP Kerberos RADIUS Terminal Server VPN Server IMAP Directory Search Dial-in Internet Connection Access + Alumni Services Bb Courseware Bb One Card PeopleSoft Service Requests Maintenance Processes Calendar Data Warehouse Bb5 Server Secure Web

How is the directory updated? Real Time –Alumni Claim process allows alumni (with no other affiliation) to enter their name, Alumni ID, School/Class to claim a NetID real time if they need one –Non-Credit and continuing professional education students may claim a NetID, enroll in courses, and pay by credit in real time –Both processes update the EIM or NetID database and the LDAP directory in one integrated process

How may users update data? Students –May invoke FERPA rights (or non-publish rights for ) in Student Access+ or in writing Faculty, Staff, Affiliates, Hospital Staff –May invoke non-publish rights via departmental directory coordinators (who use Access+ to change data) Alumni –May invoke publish / non-publish rights via hoyasonline; “alumni only” are non-public Everyone –May update and calendar attributes (e.g. delivery addresses)

Good Things Almost all constituents in the directory Real time creation via specialized services Basic business rules created by NetID team with minimal ‘buy in’ from process owners Biographic updates fully automated from all data sources Directory is a stable platform and able to adapt quickly to delivery of new services Conceptualized a language to standardize business rule and group processing

Bad Things Update of service delivery attributes (mail, calendar, remote access) defined well at record creation but NOT defined well for changes in status (state changes) Significant work needed to create business rules to automate status change suspension or reactivation of services Bringing the conceptual business rules / group processing language into reality has been challenging

Ugly Things Suspension of records are done by populating a ‘delete’ flag which is respected by some applications (but not integrated into ACLs) Security by obscurity is a reality until true inactivation (and reactivation) processing is in place Inactive processing is dependent upon business rules development Some service affecting attributes are updated manually for individuals with affiliation status changes

Bottom Line The Good Things far outweigh the bad and the ugly A single directory has provided a unified name space, centralized authentication, and specialized authorization services with data supported from core systems The directory is a springboard for new and innovative services including Kerberos and W2K integration (mid-term strategy is to stop using LDAP authentication)