Consultation on panel criteria and working methods.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

GSOE Impact Workshop Impact and the REF 19 th May 2010 Lesley Dinsdale.

Advertisements

Working with the Research Excellence Framework Dr Ian Carter Director of Research and Enterprise Sussex Research Hive Seminars 10 March 2011.

Research Excellence Framework Jane Boggan Planning Division Research Staff Forum - January 2010.

Main Panel A: Subpanels and Chairs A1: Clinical Medicine - Christopher Day, Newcastle University A2: Public Health, Health services and Primary Care -

The REF – panels and UOAs British Academy, 27 Oct 2009 Graeme Rosenberg REF Manager.

Impact workshop Phil Hannaford VP Research and Knowledge Exchange.

Use of resources 2008/09 Briefing. Response to UoR consultation 203 responses from all types of organisation, auditors, stakeholders 61% agreed with overall.

The REF impact pilot findings Chris Taylor, Deputy REF manager.

Research Excellence Framework and equalities Belfast 29 November 2011 Ellen Pugh Senior Policy Adviser, ECU.

REF2014 HODOMS Birmingham 8 th April Ann Dowling: Chairman of REF Main Panel B John Toland: Chairman of REF Sub-Panel B10: Mathematical Sciences.

Assessment Consultation Karen Mahony Development Officer.

Supporting & promoting Equality & Diversity through REF Dianne Berry, Chair REF E&D Advisory Panel Ellen Pugh, Senior Policy Officer ECU.

The Research Excellence Framework Assessment framework, guidance on submissions and panel criteria.

Guidance on submissions Chris Taylor, Deputy REF Manager Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.

Creating Better Health and Care Services An overview of a Better Health and Care Review process.

These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 3 September 2011 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.

The Research Assessment Exercise in the United Kingdom Paul Hubbard International colloquium “Ranking and Research Assessment in Higher Education” 13 December.

Purpose of the Standards

Research Excellence Framework : Equality and Diversity Working Methods and Code of Practice University of Wales, Trinity Saint David Matt Briggs Eleri.

The Research Excellence Framework Panel criteria [Main Panel Chair] Graeme Rosenberg.

Professor Simonetta Manfredi and Professor Lucy Vickers Centre for Diversity Policy Research and Practice Oxford Brookes University

Demonstrating research impact in the REF Graeme Rosenberg REF Manager

The Research Excellence Framework. Purpose of REF The REF replaces the RAE as the UK-wide framework for assessing research in all disciplines. Its purpose.

The Research Excellence Framework. Presentation outline The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions: - Overview - Staff - Outputs - Impact.

REF Information Session August Research Excellence Framework (REF)

The Research Excellence Framework Data and Audit May 2012.

A month in the life of a university bibliometrician Dr Ian Rowlands University of Leicester, UK.

The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions Linda Tiller, HEFCW 16 September 2011.

Introduction to the Research Excellence Framework.

The Research Excellence Framework Briefing event for REF institutional contacts Graeme Rosenberg REF Manager.

The Research Excellence Framework Briefing events for HEI contacts 21 May: Glasgow 23 May: Manchester 24 May: London 28 May: Cardiff 31 May: London.

Page 1 RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK : RESEARCH IMPACT ASESSMENT LESSONS FROM THE PILOT EXERCISE Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.

Chair: Professor Dame Ann Dowling Sub-panel Chairs: Panel Advisers: SP07: Professor David Price Dr Karen Ness SP08: Professor Richard Catlow Ms Lesley.

Main Panel D Criteria and Working Methods Main Panel D covers: Area Studies Modern Languages and Linguistics English Language and Literature History Classics.

The Research Excellence Framework Impact: the need for evidence Professor Caroline Strange 22 June 2011.

12/9/10 Pilot assessment impact- paperwork Findings of the expert panels- report + appendix Lessons learned- feedback from pilot institutions Examples.

The REF assessment framework (updated 23 May 2011)

Research Excellence Framework 2014 and Open Access 23 rd October 2012.

Main Panel A Criteria and Working Methods Cardiff School of Biosciences Ole H Petersen Chair.

Research Excellence Framework 2014 Michelle Double Hyacinth Gale Sita Popat Edward Spiers Research and Innovation Support Conference.

Impact and the REF Consortium of Institutes of Advanced Study 19 October 2009 David Sweeney Director (Research, Innovation and Skills)

Research Publications Service & Research Excellence Framework 2014 John Nicholas.

The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades The primary purpose of assessment and evaluation is to improve student learning.

The Research Excellence Framework Assessment framework and guidance on submissions Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.

Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.

The future of the REF: view from HEFCE

Colin McInnes, Ryan Owens, Hannah Payne

Impact and the REF Tweet #rfringe17

WP2. Excellent university for the researchers

Consultation on draft panel criteria and working methods

RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK 2021

Safeguarding Objective Decision making

REF 2021 Briefing 25 January 2018.

REF 2021 What we know and thought we knew, in preparation for the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS.

Law Sub-panel Generic Feedback - Impact

These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 30 January 2012 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.

REF 2021 Briefing Consultation on the draft guidance

These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 30 January 2012 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.

One year on: developments since Duxford 2016

Institutional capacities for introduction of the NQF strengthened

Consultation on draft panel criteria and working methods

Research Update GERI May 2010.

Consultation on the REF 2021 guidance and criteria

Research Excellence Framework: Past and Future

Consultation on draft panel criteria and working methods

Webinar on Staff circumstances in REF 2021 Follow us on Twitter

us: REF 2021 – an update Follow us on us:

UCML, London 18 January 2019 REF 2021 Susan Hodgett (D25)

REF2021: Code of Practice Consultation

REF 2021 EQUALITY TRAINING Professors Simonetta Manfredi Lucy Vickers.

Presentation transcript:

Consultation on panel criteria and working methods

Consultation process The REF panels and REF team are consulting on the criteria and working methods that panels will employ when assessing submissions: Part 1: A generic statement of criteria that will be applied by all panels Part 2: A statement of the criteria and working methods developed by each of the four Main Panels Responses must be made online at Consultation closes on 5 Oct 2011 Final criteria and working methods to be published in Jan 2012

Generic statement of criteria Part 1 sets out: How all panels will operate within the common framework and generic criteria for assessment General procedures to be followed by all panels (for example, regarding collective decision making, confidentiality and managing conflicts of interest) Proposed generic ‘tariffs’ to determine the number of outputs that may be reduced for staff with clearly defined circumstances; and options for taking account of maternity leave

Main panel statements of criteria Part 2 sets out: The criteria and guidance of each main panel and its sub-panels, relating to: Submissions and UOAs Outputs Impact Environment The working methods of each main panel and its sub- panels

Consultation questions: generic Consistency between the four main panels Individual staff circumstances (to be discussed in the Equality and Diversity session)

Consultation questions: main panel Consistency between the group of sub-panels UOA descriptors Expectations about multiple submissions

Consultation questions: main panel The clarity and appropriateness of criteria relating to outputs, including: - Criteria and level definitions - Output types - Co-authorship - Double-weighted outputs - Additional information - Use of citation data

Consultation questions: main panel The appropriateness and helpfulness of the criteria and guidance relating to impact including: - The range of impacts - Evidence of impacts - Assuring the quality threshold for underpinning research - The impact template - The criteria of ‘reach and significance’

Consultation questions: main panel The clarity and appropriateness of criteria relating to Environment including: - Information requested in the environment template - Use of data - The criteria of ‘vitality and sustainability’ The clarity and appropriateness of the working methods

Consultation responses Responses will help us refine the criteria and working methods A separate response should be made for each main panel criteria statement Must be made online by midday, 5 October 2011www.ref.ac.uk Enquiries: