MedEdPORTAL Module Guides Evaluation of Faculty Fellowship Background Professional development of faculty is critical to the future of health sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

CRITICAL THINKING The Discipline The Skill The Art.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
1. 2  Identify recruitment and retention challenges  Discuss current trends and challenges  Define the clinical question  Discuss the perceived benefits.
COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.
NEW COMPETENCY QUESTIONS IN PROGRAM INFORMATION FORM Lois L. Bready, M.D. Associate Dean for GME and DIO UTHSCSA.
. FORMATION OF AN EDUCATION DISCOVERY INSTITUTE (EDI) WITHIN AN ACADEMIC HEALTH CENTER: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES. Presented at the Southern Group on.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
Knowing What We Learn and Demonstrating Our Success: Assessment and Evaluation of FLCs Andrea L. Beach, Ph.D. Western Michigan University Presented at.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
Questions to Consider What are the components of a comprehensive instructional design plan? What premises underline the instructional design process?
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
ASCA 3.0 vs. ASCA 2.0 What are the changes between the 2nd and 3rd editions of the ASCA National Model? A Brief Synopsis Gregg Curtis, PhD School Counseling.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Deborah S. Richardson, Christie L. Palladino, and Andria M. Thomas Education Discovery Institute Medical College of Georgia at GHSU, Augusta, GA. Evaluating.
CADRE I. DRK-12 Science Project Portfolio Descriptive Summary.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
ME Assessment Process Presented to the College Advisory Council, Sept. 18, 2003 Overview Overview ME Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) Revision Process.
A Performance Management and Evaluation System.  Compliance with BHECM Guidance  Identification of “Best Practice Standards”  A Job Description Review.
1 “So who wants to lead a mathematics department?” Developing Future Secondary Subject Leaders for Mathematics – Collaborative Action Research Project.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Teacher
A Practitioner’s Tips for Balancing Teaching, Service and Scholarship Kelly M. Smith, PharmD, FASHP Associate Professor, Pharmacy Practice and Science.
Education Portfolio Sean Elliott Chairman, AMES.  The 3- (or 4-) legged stool RESEARCH RESEARCH Clinical care Clinical care Service Service Teaching.
PEGGY MAKI, PH.D. EDUCATION CONSULTANT IN ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING PRESENTED AT CCRI SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 Assessment at Three Levels: Institution, Program,
Reasons for Campus Preference among Medical Student Matriculants: A Qualitative Study at the Georgia Health Sciences University (GHSU) Medical College.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
Looking at Teaching through the Lens of Standards Irv Richardson A Presentation to the 600s Sub-Committee July 22,2010 9:00 – 11:00.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Module 4 Evaluating Services to Binational Migrant Students Designing an Implementation and Outcome Evaluation of State and Local Binational Services 1.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Cultural Competency in an Osteopathic Curriculum Presented by: Mary Pat Wohlford-Wessels, Ph.D. Vice President for Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Meaningful Evaluation: Framework, Process, Impact Inis Jane Bardella, M.D., FAAFP Associate Dean for Faculty Development and Global Health Initiatives.
Cross-cultural Medical Education at Stanford University Clarence H. Braddock III, MD, MPH Ronald D. Garcia, PhD.
Becoming a Skilled Mentor: Tools, Tips, and Training Vignettes Rebecca Pauly, M.D. Cecilia Lansang, M.D. Gwen Lombard, PhD. Gwen Lombard, PhD. *Luanne.
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Teaching Philosophy and Teaching Portfolio
ESRC Doctoral Recognition: Preparing a submission Jackie Powell University of Southampton
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Student Learning Outcomes (Pharmacy) Susan S. S. Ho School of Pharmacy Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 September 2007.
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
What is the difference between milestones and evaluations? Why do so many struggle with this?
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Standards-Based Online Professional Development to Mentor and Retain Special Education Personnel Presented to Teacher Education Division of Council for.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Curriculum Development: an Overview of 6 Steps MAJ Heather O’Mara, DO, FAAFP Faculty Development Fellow.
CBME in MESAU Institutions, Uganda Sarah Kiguli MakCHS 7 th August 2013.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
CHW Montana Training Program Curriculum Feedback Retreat
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
MUHC Innovation Model.
Translating Evidence-based Assessment into Educational Practice:
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Mentoring 2.0: Exploring Challenges in the Mentor-Mentee Relationship
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Writing a Strong Intellectual Statement
Advising Doctoral Students
Education Portfolio Sean Elliott, MD.
Writing a Strong Intellectual Statement
SLO Assessment and Program Review
Presentation transcript:

MedEdPORTAL Module Guides Evaluation of Faculty Fellowship Background Professional development of faculty is critical to the future of health sciences education. The Education Discovery Institute (EDI) at Georgia Health Sciences University (GHSU) developed a year-long Educational Research Fellowship designed to nurture faculty career progression by providing training in health sciences education research and fostering career development. As we developed the program, we realized the need for a careful evaluation plan. Publication Description Presented at the Association of American Medical Colleges Annual Meeting November 5, 2011 Methods The six-step approach outlined in the OMERAD Evaluation Planning Tool provided guidance for clarifying the goals and objectives of the EDI Educational Research Fellowship (ERF) and directed the development of our assessment plan. Following their guidelines, we identified a set of program goals (Step 1), developed program objectives (and outcomes) associated with each goal (Step 2), specified sources of evaluation data (Step 5), and selected or developed methods of data collection (Step 6). Deborah Richardson, PhD; Margo Villarosa, MS; Christie Palladino, MD, MSc; Andria Thomas, PhD Education Discovery Institute Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA Results Goals & Objectives Instructional Strategies Learner Activities Learner Assessment Program Evaluation Program Revision Needs Assessment/ Problem Definition The module further identifies 6 steps for developing an effective program evaluation plan: Step 1: state the program goal Step 2: state the program objectives Step 3: write the program description Step 4: list the program evaluation questions Step 5: list the sources of evaluation data Step 6: describe the methods of data collection. The first three steps in the plan focus on program development, including defining content and preparing for dissemination. The last three steps identify the most appropriate methods of evaluating the content and the process of the program. GoalsObjectivesOutcomesAssessment Development of educational research skills Fellows understand and perform steps in the research process Fellows recognize ethical issues in health science education research Fellows develop a health science education research project Fellows prepare IRB protocol Self-assessment Mentor Evaluation Research Portfolio Career developmentFellows develop self concept as a health science education researcher Fellows develop plans for continued health science research Post-fellowship Interview Annual Fellows Alumni Report Development of local and national collaborative relationships Fellows affiliate with regional and national medical education organizations Fellows hold offices or serve on committees of regional or national organizations Annual Fellows Alumni Report Improvement of health science education research and practice Develop cadre of health sciences education researchers EDI will show an Increase in number of products (e.g., grants, publications, presentations) research Count of products EDI Educational Research Fellowship Program Evaluation Plan (excerpts) Publication Description (Cont.) Figure 1 presents the program evaluation cycle proposed in MedEdPORTAL Publication # 749 by researchers in the Office of Medical Education Research and Development (OMERAD) at Michigan State University (Sleight, 2007). This cycle demonstrates how the process of evaluation ultimately serves both formative and summative functions, by providing data that inform program improvement. Figure 1. Program Evaluation Cycle Although we did not incorporate all of the steps identified in the OMERAD Program Evaluation Tool, we were able to adapt their carefully articulated tool to our needs. We added a step of associating objectives with specific outcomes, which were then the focus of our assessment plan. We expect to further articulate assessment steps in line with the steps proposed in the MedEdPORTAL module and to “close the loop” in the evaluation cycle by using the data to improve the fellowship program. We will use our goals, objectives, and associated outcomes to prioritize the program evaluation questions which we would most like to address first. The OMERAD Evaluation Planning Tool described in a MedEdPORTAL module guided the development of the program evaluation plan for the EDI Educational Research Fellowship. We used their basic model and guidelines with modifications for our context. Summary Points Results (Cont.) Sleight D. Evaluating Educational Programs: A Planning Tool. MedEdPORTAL; Available from: