Kuwait Petroleum Corporation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Basel Convention and Basel Protocol: History and Goals Ms. Donata Rugarabamu Senior Legal Officer Secretariat of the Basel Convention Regional.
Advertisements

Overview of the Basel Convention and Basel Protocol: History and Goals Laura Thompson Legal Expert Secretariat of the Basel Convention Regional Workshop.
Port Reception Facilities Curtis A Roach Regional Adviser (Caribbean) International Maritime Organization FIRST HEMISPHERIC CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL.
Singapore’s Actions Against Oil Pollution
EU-MOP FINAL WORKSHOP Madrid, 24 January 2008 Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Navales Miguel Palomares Director, Marine Environment Division International.
CLEAN and CLEAN DESIGN Environmental Class Eivind Haugen, Det Norske Veritas Norske Sivilingeniørers Forening Økonomisk og Miljøvennlig drift av skip.
Introduction to the Sensitive Sea Areas – Legislative Framework
SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT AT SEA “CONVENTIONAL WISDOM” Barcelona 30 October 2003 Peter Swift.
Green Ship Design Design for Environmentally Friend Ship in Shipbuilding ・ Less Hazardous Materials ・ Less CO 2 Demand for Ship Operation ・ Less Engine.
“Are Port Reception Facilities Adequate?” By: Joan M. Bondareff Counsel, Blank Rome LLP NAMEPA Norfolk, VA April 16, 2015.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
16 SEPTEMBER 2014 BRIEFING TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPS.
NAMEPA 2014 World Maritime Day Observance Cozumel, Mexico Canada's Experience with the North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
Leading the way; making a difference North American Panel March 17, 2014 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
MARPOL, Revised Annex IV Prevention of Pollution by sewage
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
MARPOL 73/78 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 thereto. Technical regulations.
Leading the way; making a difference Latin American Panel November 6, 2013 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
MR MAWETHU VILANA ACTING DIRECTOR-GENERAL 29 JULY 2014 MR MAWETHU VILANA ACTING DIRECTOR-GENERAL 29 JULY 2014 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
Shore Reception Facilities
FOCUS AREARS INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS IN SA International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL)
Crime and water pollution Discharges from ships Henk Ruessink ECENA course, Boedapest, December 2008.
GWS SMS INTRODUCTION EMS Manual. 3. PROCEDURES FOR BILGE AND WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT OF MACHINERY SPACES As far as possible, the OWS must not be used.
IMO Organisation.
International Maritime Organization and How it works.
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche Unisalento Room R 27 International legal framework for environmental maritime crime: UNCLOS, IMO and MARPOL.
LATIN AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 16, 2009 MARINE ISSUES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
MARPOL requirements for port reception facilities
Samer Seif El-Yazal - WTO. Bali Ministerial Decision PART II – DOHA DEVELOPMENT AGENDA 1.8 We welcome the progress in the DDA, which is embodied in the.
1 INTERTANKO – Latin American Panel Meeting Miami Beach, Florida 12 March 2008 Tom Kirk ABS Americas Director, Technology & Business Development ABS Class.
Prevention of pollution by harmful substances in packaged form
VIII INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR RUSSIAN MARITIME REGISTER OF SHIPPING MARINE ENVIRONMENT SAFETY MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DIRECTOR REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE.
Ballast Water Management DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR
UNECE PRTR Protocol EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
Maritime Environmental Regulations & the Challenges of Compliance
Leading the way; making a difference GREEN4SEA Athens Forum April 9, 2014 UPDATE ON BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Leading the way; making a difference Lunchtime Seminar October 10, 2012 Ballast Water Management JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Chemical Distribution Institute MARPOL ANNEX II REVISIONS November 12, 2003 Howard Snaith, Director, Marine and Chemical INTERTANKO.
GEF CReW & the LBS Protocol UNEP Caribbean Environment Programme Protecting our Caribbean Sea Sustaining Our Future Christopher Corbin, Programme Officer.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs Hong Kong, 26 November 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Senior Manager - Environment.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs October 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Busan, 21 October.
MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.
Manager Research and Projects Lloyd’s 7th International Product Tanker Conference London 14 September 2005.
Developing Ballast Water Regulations Presentation by Gerard McDonald to the 9th Asia-Pacific Heads Of Maritime Safety Agencies Forum April 2006.
6/12/ ORIGINS, BENEFITS AND THE PATH FORWARD BRS Secretariat December 2015 SYNERGIES UNDER THE BASEL, ROTTERDAM AND STOCKHOLM.
Hazardous Substance Response Plan Regulations Lieutenant Eric A. Bauer, USCG Office of Response Planning & Preparedness Division Industry Preparedness.
Dabney P. Hegg Senior Professional Staff U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
T OPIC 3 International and Domestic Environmental Regulation.
9th Annual Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law – South Africa Nengye LIU, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, Ghent University Prevention.
Agenda item 4: Draft Offshore Action Plan Gabino Gonzalez, Programme Officer 4th Meeting of the EcAp Coordination Group Athens, Greece, 9-10 October 2014.
To Satisfaction of the Administration Seminar on the Implementation of measures to ensure that safety standards are “to the Satisfaction of the Administration.
Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention Getting ready for COP-4.
1 Module 2(1) Noumea Convention and Protocols Investigating Shipping Pollution Violation Workshop Tarawa, Kiribati October 2010.
MARPOL.
process and procedures for assessments
GCC CODE “THE SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR SHIPS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS” THE CABINET RESOLUTION NO.(29) OF 2013.
International Maritime Organization
MARPOL Annex I Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Oil
3rd Asia-Pacific Water Summit
The Polar Code Rear Admiral Steven D. Poulin United States Coast Guard
International Maritime Organization
Vapor Emission Control System
Seminar on Port and Marine Environment Management
Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI Convention
World Health Organization
IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Regulating ship waste from a European perspective
Presentation transcript:

Kuwait Petroleum Corporation History Of (MARPOL 73/78) And Regional Implementations By Capt. Awad Saeed Manager Environment Kuwait Petroleum Corporation

OILPOL 54 In 1954, the United Kingdom organized a conference on oil pollution resulted in; the adoption of the International Convention for the Prevention Pollution of the Sea by Oil (OILPOL), 1954. Following entry into force of the IMO Convention in 1958, the depository and Secretariat functions in relation to the Convention were transferred from the United Kingdom Government to IMO. K P C

OILPOL 54 The 1954 Convention,was amended in 1962, 1969 and 1971, primarily addressed pollution resulting from routine tanker operations and the discharge of oily wastes from machinery spaces. Established "prohibited zones" extending at least 50 miles from the nearest land and allows discharge of oil mixture of 10ppm. Countries take all appropriate steps to promote the provision of facilities for the reception of oily water and residues. K P C

1973 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL 73) None adequacy the 1954 OILPOL Convention, despite the various amendments which had been adopted.  In 1969, the IMO Assembly inspired by the Torrey Canyon disaster in 1967. Decided to convene an international conference to adopt a completely new convention The 1973 conference incorporated much of OILPOL 1954 and its amendments into Annex I, covering oil. K P C

Torrey Canyon K P C

1978 Conference on Tanker Safety and Pollution Prevention (MARPOL 78 Protocol) An international Conference on tanker safety and Pollution Prevention was held in 1998, following 1976-1977 series of tanker incidents. The Conference adopted a protocol to the 1973 MARPOL Convention(was not then in force), absorbing the parent Convention and expanding. The requirements for segregated ballast tanks, crude oil washing system(COW) and clean ballast tanks for existing tankers over 40,000tons. K P C

Annex IV - Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships. International Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78) Annex I - Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Oil Entry into force: 2 October 1983 Annex II - Regulations for the Control of Pollution by Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk. Entry into force: 6 April 1987 Annex III - Prevention of Pollution by Harmful Substances Carried by Sea in Packaged Form. Entry into force: 1 July 1992 Annex IV - Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships. Entry into force: 27 September 2003 Annex V - Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships. Entry into force: 31 December 1988 Annex VI  - Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships (adopted September 1997 - not yet in force. Entry into force: 19 May 2005 K P C

International Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78) To speed-up the implementation the Conference allowed that the Parties "shall not be bound by the provisions of Annex II of the Convention for a period of three years" from the date of entry into force of the Protocol, so that countries could accept Annex I and have three years to implement Annex II. Sufficient States had ratified MARPOL by October 1982, and finally entered into force on 2 October 1983 (for Annexes I and II) K P C

K P C

Regional Implementations Back Ground ROPME States first meeting on reception facilities was convened in Kuwait 1982. High priority was given to reception and treatment of dirty ballast. Feasibility study by Overseas Shipbuilding Cooperation Centre (OSCC) in 1984. The study resulted in huge amount of investment required to establish Ballast reception facilities to cover 23 ports. K P C

New approach ROPME to up-date OSCC study carried out in 1984 to meet the development that have taken place. To meet the requirement to accede MARPOL 73/78, a provision of small number (1-3) of land and/or floating reception facilities jointly funded on regional basis should be considered as an alternative and, Consider load-on-top system for the offshore crude loading terminals as the most cost effective method of satisfying MARPOL 73/78 requirements. K P C

New approach cont. Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) support commenced in 1989, GCC/ROPME ad-hoc meeting recommended to; Prepare a comprehensive study with the concerned international organizations for the accessions to MARPOL 73/78. K P C

New approach cont. Study the possibilities of establishing a central reception facility or to be distributed at a different ports/terminals in the Member States. The seventh meeting of ROPME Council decided that member state to accede to MARPOL 73/78. ROPME secretariat jointly with GCC to prepare a document to be submitted the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC/IMO) Prior to its annual meeting in March 1991. K P C

Established Ad- hoc Task Force ROPME/ IMO Symposium on MARPOL Convention held in Kuwait Feb.1996 recommended the set up of an ad-hoc task force includes experts from IMO,GCC, GAOCMAO (RECSO) and experts from member states to assist ROPME in carrying out a feasibility study in cooperation with Sultanate of Oman in line with 14th ROPME Executive Committee Meeting in Muscat, Jan.1996. ROPME Regional Feasibility Study. K P C

Communications With IMO Document summarizes the out come of the preparatory and 1st Regional Steering Committee meetings was submitted to MEPC/ IMO 45th Meeting. MEPC very much welcomed the RSA countries intention to accede, implement and enforce MARPOL by July 2002. Document on ‘special area’ status has to be submitted in December 2001 Prior to the MEPC 47th meeting in March 2002. K P C

Regional Implementations Obstacles Cost Misinterpretation of the change in Tankers’ design (SBT). Reception Facilities the Regional Approach. Commitments from member states. Size and location for an adequate reception facilities to meet the requirements of MARPOL 73/78. Agreement on the fee structure K P C

Regional Implementations Obstacles Integrate MARPOL rules and regulations into the National Legislations. The need for Competent inspectors /surveyors. Proper Ship movements monitoring and surveillance. MARPOL enforcement requires regional Memorandum of Agreement on Port State Control. K P C

Conclusion All ROPME member States accession to MARPOL was announced in the GCC summit held in Qatar on 2007. At IMO - MEPC 52 (October 2004) ROPME Sea Area was extended to cover Arabian Sea up to the OMAN Yemen Borders. and came into force on 1 January 2007 together with the new revised Annexes I and II. 1st. August 2008 ROPME Sea Area will be declared a special area subject of the establishment of the reception facilities. Over 41,000 different vessels entered Strait of Hormuze in 2006 and 47,000 in 2007 K P C